Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T13:09:05.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

D. J. Allerton, Valency and the English verb. London: Academic Press, 1982. Pp. vi+168.

Review products

D. J. Allerton, Valency and the English verb. London: Academic Press, 1982. Pp. vi+168.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Keith Brown
Keith Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 1984 , pp. 378 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, G. (eds). Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (ed.) (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & Pullum, G. K. (1982). Generalised phrase structure grammar: a theoretical synopsis. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Language structure and language function. In Lyons, J. (ed.) New horizons in linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hays, D. G. (1964). Dependency theory: a formalism and some observations. Lg 40. 511–525.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. D. (1970). Some remarks on case-grammar. LIn 1. 501–511.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1977). X-syntax: a study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1961). Modern English grammar. Vol. 3: Syntax. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jones, L. K. (1980). A synopsis of tagememics. In Moravcsik & Wirth (1980).Google Scholar
Longacre, R. E. (1976). An anatomy of speech notions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1970). Chomsky. London: Collins/Fontana.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics 1 and 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. A. & Wirth, J. R. (1980). Current approaches to syntax. (Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 13.) New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nida, E. (1960). A synopsis of English syntax. Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1980). Relational grammar. In Moravcsik & Wirth (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (ed.) (1983). Studies in relational grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964). Constituent structure: a study of contemporary models of description. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar