Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T13:00:53.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Training Policy and the Property Rights of Labour in Chile (1990–1997): Social Citizenship in the Atomised Market Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1999

LOUISE HAAGH
Affiliation:
St. Antony's College, University of Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article argues that the training and employment policies of Chile's transition governments since 1990 have failed significantly to promote the development of human resources and occupational citizenship, and identifies key structural and political causes. In particular, the weak development of the property rights of labour and of markets in skill are seen as enduring economic and institutional legacies of the period of dictatorship which continue to constrain key areas of economic development as well as social citizenship rights. The article advocates an analysis of citizenship and skill development that identifies the problem of institutional coordination between a range of different services in labour markets. It suggests that the social organisation of skill markets in Chile systematically discriminates against long-term investments in workers. Hence, even in Chile where economic reformers have sought to maximise markets, decisions on skill investments are, to an important degree, conditioned by power relations and organisational inertia inside individual firms and, at the aggregate level, by the selective channelling of information and the (unplanned) institutional structuring of training supply.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

I particularly wish to thank Alan Angell, Gabriel Palma and Samuel Valenzuela for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this text, as well as Ha-Joon Chang and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions. The responsibility for errors and views expressed is entirely mine.