Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:58:34.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tragal cartilage inferior turbinate mucoperiosteal sandwich graft technique for repair of nasal septal perforations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

A. Hussain  and
N. Kay
A. Hussain*
Affiliation:
Albany, New York
N. Kay
Affiliation:
Albany, New York
*
Akhtar Hussain, M.D., F.R.C.S., Division of Otolaryngology A-41, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York 12208
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ten cases of large nasal septal perforation were repaired with a tragal cartilage inferior turbinate mucoperiosteal sandwich graft technique with 70 per cent success rate over a follow-up period of up to 24 months. The technique is described in detail. The results are comparable to other techniques.

Keywords

Nasal septumperforation
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 10 , October 1992 , pp. 893 - 895
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

References

Belmont, J. R. (1985) An approach to large nasoseptal perforations and attendant deformity. Archives of Otolaryngology, 111: 450–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairbanks, D. N. F. (1980) Closure of septal perforations. Archives of Otolaryngology, 106: 509–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, W. S., Strelzow, V. V. (1982) The surgical closure of nasoseptal perforations. Laryngoscope, 92: 121–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlan, M. S., Ossoff, R., Christu, P. (1982) Reconstruction of large septal perforations. Archives of Otolaryngology, 108: 433–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kridel, R. W. H., Appling, D. A., Wright, W. K. (1986) Septal perforation closure utilizing the external septorhinoplasty approach. Archives of Otolaryngology, 112: 168–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed