Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:54:55.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical treatment of glottic cancer: retrospective analysis of 192 cases in a multidisciplinary tertiary care centre in Pune, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2015

D S Kelkar*
Affiliation:
Division of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
S S Gandhi
Affiliation:
Division of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
G A Oka
Affiliation:
Department of Research, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr D S Kelkar, Division of Surgical Oncology, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Erandawane, Pune – 411004, MS, India E-mail: dskelkar@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

A multidisciplinary team approach is required for the preservation of voice and appropriate management of glottic cancer. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of surgically treated glottic cancers of all stages. All aspects of surgical management, such as laser cordectomy, partial laryngectomy, total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis, and salvage laryngectomy, conducted at a single tertiary care institute in India, were reviewed.

Method:

A retrospective analysis of hospital records was performed for 192 glottic cancer patients who were surgically treated between 2003 and 2007.

Results:

Patients with tumour stages 1 or 2 glottic cancer treated with laser cordectomy had a local control rate of 85 per cent and five-year survival rate of 98.6 per cent. The findings suggest that the number of partial laryngectomies performed for stage 3 tumours is declining. Patients with a tumour stage 3 lesion with a fixed hemilarynx or a tumour stage 4 lesion, treated with total laryngectomy, were found to have a five-year survival rate of 61.6 per cent. Nodal status was significantly associated with five-year survival rate.

Conclusion:

Surgery offers a viable five-year survival rate in glottic cancer patients.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Introduction

India has a population of 1.2 billion (according to the 2011 census1). Approximately 68.7 per cent of the population are from rural areas. It is very difficult for such patients to access tertiary healthcare for cancer treatment because of factors such as poor infrastructure and socio-economic conditions.

Indian cancer registries are of 2 types; namely, hospital-based registries covering 6 metropolitan cities and 22 population-based registries covering 7.45 per cent of the population. Although there are some shortcomings of the approach, the same registries are used for projections of cancer incidence and treatment (National Cancer Registry Programme, Indian Council of Medical Research2). In the year 2010, the total number of cancer cases in India was estimated to be 979 786, out of which 28 200 (2.8 per cent) were cases of glottic cancer. To cater to this huge burden of glottic cancer, India needs many more multidisciplinary treatment centres. In India, there are 33 carbon dioxide (CO2) laser centres (as of 2013) (5 in Delhi, 8 in Mumbai, 3 in Pune, 2 in Kolkata, 2 in Bangalore, 2 in Lucknow, 2 in Chandigarh and 9 in other cities; Lumenis Laser Company, unpublished data), 301 linear accelerator radiation centres providing chemoradiation (75 in North India, 116 in South India, 80 in West India and 30 in East India3) and about 1500 surgical centres where laryngeal cancer surgical procedures are performed.

Hence, there are 33 centres in India that offer comprehensive and multidisciplinary care for the management of glottic cancer. The Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre is a 1000-bedded, non-profit, non-government hospital, which provides multidisciplinary services such as: videostroboscopy, a high-speed camera, a Lumenis CO2 laser with UltraPulse® technology, a surgical oncology unit, a linear accelerator radiation unit with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (RT), image-guided RT, speech therapy, and voice rehabilitation.

The present retrospective study focuses on the outcomes of 192 patients with glottic cancers who were surgically treated in the Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre between 2003 and 2007.

Materials and methods

The Division of Oncology at the Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre in India treated 253 glottic cancer patients between 2003 and 2007 using surgery and chemoradiation. Our study presents a retrospective analysis of the hospital records for the 192 patients who underwent surgical treatment, focusing on their post-operative outcomes and 5-year survival rates.

Ethical consideration

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Statistical methods

Data were analysed using SPSS® software version 20. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate cumulative probability of survival. The chi-square test was used to investigate associations between variables.

Results

A total of 253 glottic cancer patients were treated at the institute between 2003 and 2007. There were 233 males and 20 females, with ages ranging from 36 to 76 years. Of the 192 who were surgically treated, 120 (62.5 per cent) were smokers, 172 (89.5 per cent) were tobacco chewers and 65 (33.8 per cent) were drinkers; tobacco and alcohol consumption are known causative agents for glottic cancer.Reference Jayalekshmi, Nandakumar, Akiba, Gangadharan and Koriyama4

The distribution of the 253 glottic cancer patients according to disease stage (determined according to the International Union Against Cancer tumour–node–metastasis classificationReference Sobin and Wittekind5) and treatment received is shown in Table I. All patients underwent stroboscopy, direct laryngoscopy, biopsy, computed tomography (CT) and a pre-surgical fitness evaluation.

Table I Treatment type according to disease stage*

* Total n = 253; n = 192; n = 44; **n = 30; §n = 31. RT = radiation therapy; CRT = chemoradiation therapy; T = tumour stage

Tumour stage 1 or 2

Seventy-four patients (64 males and 10 females) had early glottic cancer (tumour (T) stages 1 or 2 vocal fold lesions). Of these, 63 (85 per cent) had unilateral vocal fold involvement and 11 (15 per cent) had bilateral vocal fold involvement.

Once the diagnosis had been confirmed (on the basis of clinical, stroboscopic and CT scan staging and biopsy findings), all patients were counselled about the pros and cons of laser surgery and RT. There was a clear preference for undergoing laser surgery, which offered equitable results and involved a shorter hospital stay. This can be explained by the fact that 80 per cent of the patients were from outside of Pune city and the cost for both treatments (laser surgery and RT) was comparable.

Surgery was performed by a single surgeon using a Lumenis CO2 UltraPulse laser with a Zeiss microscope. The types of cordectomies performed, categorised based on the European Laryngological Society guidelines (2000),Reference Remacle, Eckel, Antonelli, Brasnu, Chevalier and Friedrich6 are detailed in Table II. Partial excision of the false cord was performed for better exposure in type III and IV cordectomies. The specimens were fixed on a paraffin block and sent for histopathological examination, with margins and bases labelled as per hospital protocol.

Table II Cordectomy type according to disease stage*

* Total n = 74. CIS = carcinoma in situ; T = tumour stage

On histopathological examination, 60 (81 per cent) of the 74 T1 and T2 stage patients were found to have tumour-free margins; margins were positive in 14 patients (19 per cent). Of these 14 patients, 8 underwent further surgery to attain tumour-free margins and 6 were closely monitored having refused re-operation.

All patients were discharged after 48 hours and followed up for a minimum of 5 years. This consisted of visits at three-monthly intervals for the first year and at six-monthly intervals for the next four years. The patients were subjected to microlaryngoscopy and biopsy in the presence of suspicious granulation or suspicious appearance at the operated site during follow up. There were two patients who came from outside of India; these patients did not visit the hospital for follow up, but were alive and well on telephonic follow up.

Thirteen (17.5 per cent) of the patients had local recurrence during the follow-up period (Table III). The time of recurrence ranged from three months to two years. Of these 13 patients, 5 underwent a second laser excision, 1 of whom suffered a second recurrence and underwent total laryngectomy. The remaining eight patients received RT; one of these patients suffered a second inoperable recurrence and died after three years.

Table III Recurrences according to margin involvement, lesion site and tumour grade*

* Total n = 74; n = 13. Chi-square = 1.39; p = 0.23. **Chi-square = 28.22; p < 0.000. §Chi-square = 3.28; p = 0.19

Table III also depicts the recurrences according to lesion site and tumour grade. Most recurrences occurred in those with lesions involving the anterior third of the vocal fold (44 per cent). It is clear from Table III that the tumour site was statistically significantly associated with local recurrence, while other factors, such as resection margins and tumour grade, were not statistically significant.

The overall five-year survival rate for early glottic cancer patients was 98.6 per cent. The local control rate for cases treated with laser excision alone, including the five laser surgical procedures conducted for recurrences, was 85 per cent. The laryngeal preservation rate was 98 per cent.

Tumour stage 3 with mobile arytenoid

All 14 patients with T3 lesions, with no paraglottic space spread and no subglottic extension, who were found to be fit (as per their cardiorespiratory status), were offered a choice between vertical partial laryngectomy and chemoradiation. These patients had been counselled by surgeons and radiotherapists about the risks, pros and cons, and survival statistics of both modalities.

Three (21.4 per cent) of the patients underwent vertical partial laryngectomy and 11 (78.6 per cent) chose chemoradiation. Of the three partial laryngectomy patients, one had positive margins and was given post-operative RT. He subsequently developed regional recurrence and died of disease after two years. The remaining two patients were alive and well after five years.

Tumour stage 3 with fixed hemilarynx, or tumour stage 4

All 127 patients in this group were thoroughly counselled and offered an informed choice between total laryngectomy with voice prosthesis and chemoradiation.

A total of 118 patients (117 males and 1 female) underwent laryngectomy (Table I). Of these, 3 underwent partial laryngectomy and 115 underwent total laryngectomy. The total laryngectomy patients underwent 1 of 3 types of neck dissection, depending on node status: 69 clinically node-negative patients underwent selective lateral, compartmental nodal clearance on both sides (levels II, III and IV); 38 patients with clinically or radiologically involved nodes on 1 side underwent radical neck dissection and type 3 modified neck dissection on the other side; and 8 salvage laryngectomy patients underwent selective lateral, compartmental nodal clearance bilaterally.

All primary (non-irradiated) laryngectomy patients had a Provox2 voice prosthesis fitted intra-operatively. Pharyngeal closure was performed in two layers, in a single vertical line. Operative time for primary laryngectomy ranged from 2 hours to 3 hours and 30 minutes, with an average operative time of 2 hours and 30 minutes. All primary laryngectomy patients were discharged on the 7th post-operative day with a nasogastric feeding tube. Oral feeding was started after two weeks.

Average blood loss in the primary laryngectomy patients was 150 cc. There were no peri-operative (30-day) mortalities. One patient had secondary haemorrhage on the second post-operative day and was managed by exploration and haemostasis. Pharyngocutaneous fistulae occurred in 6 out of 107 patients who underwent total laryngectomy (5.6 per cent). This healed spontaneously within three weeks and none of the affected patients required exploration, resuturing or flap repair. Table IV depicts the morbidities associated with primary laryngectomy and adjuvant RT.

Table IV Morbidities associated with primary laryngectomy, adjuvant RT and salvage laryngectomy

*n = 107; n = 35; n = 8. RT = radiation therapy

Although adjuvant RT is necessary in advanced glottic cancer cases, the combination of radiation with total laryngectomy leads to considerable adverse events, as shown in Table IV.

Salvage laryngectomies were performed on eight patients who were referred to our centre with post-radiation recurrence. Average operating time was 3 hours. Average blood loss was 150 cc. None of these patients underwent primary placement of the voice prosthesis. The prosthesis was fitted after three months as a second-stage procedure. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was used for feeding for all patients; oral feeding was commenced after three weeks. Two out of eight patients (25 per cent) suffered a pharyngocutaneous fistulae: one patient died on the 15th day as a result of sepsis and secondary haemorrhage, and the other experienced spontaneous healing within one month. Morbidities after salvage laryngectomies were as shown in Table IV.

Survival and prognosis

All patients were followed for a minimum of five years after surgery. Follow-up visits took place at three-monthly intervals for the first year, followed by six-monthly intervals for the next four years. Oesophagoscopy and neck ultrasonography were performed every year, and CT scans were conducted in cases of suspected recurrence. After 5 years, 66 primary laryngectomy patients and 4 salvage laryngectomy patients were alive and well. Two patients were lost to follow up.

The curve for cumulative probability of survival for 107 patients who underwent total laryngectomy shows a survival of 61.6 per cent, as seen in Figure 1.

Fig. 1 Cumulative probability of survival (Kaplan–Meier curve) for patients who underwent total laryngectomy.

Prognostic factors

An independent analysis of individual prognostic factors was carried out in relation to the survival of advanced glottic cancer patients. As seen in Table V, nodal status was found to be a highly statistically significant factor for survival at the end of five years. No significant association was found between survival and tumour grade. There was a significant association between survival and tumour stage.

Table V Prognosis by TNM stage, tumour stage, nodal status and tumour grade*

* Total n = 107. Chi-square = 17.52; p < 0.001. Chi-square = 0.72; p = 0.39. **Chi-square = 17.22; p < 0.000. §Chi-square = 2.77; p = 0.25. TNM = tumour–node–metastasis

Discussion

While we believe that laser cordectomy offers better phonological correction (voice quality)Reference Moreau7, Reference Peretti, Nicolai, Redaelli De Zinis, Berlucchi, Bazzana and Bertoni8 than radiotherapy, some studies have shown no advantage of laser over RT.Reference Batalla, Cueva, González, Pendás, Gil and Llames9, Reference Delsupehe, Zink, Lejaegere and Bastian10 The local control rates and laryngeal preservation rates are comparable with those of European studies.Reference Peretti, Nicolai, Redaelli De Zinis, Berlucchi, Bazzana and Bertoni8, Reference Steiner11, Reference Mortuaire, Francois, Wiel and Chevalier12 Higher recurrence rates were noted for lesions of the anterior third of the vocal fold and poorly differentiated tumours. Similar findings were observed by Peretti et al.Reference Peretti, Nicolai, Redaelli De Zinis, Berlucchi, Bazzana and Bertoni8

It is currently unclear whether we can improve local control rates by conducting wider margin resection or if the addition of radiotherapy is necessary; these issues need to be investigated further. Many studies, including ours, have shown that margins of resection have no association with disease-free survival.Reference Peretti, Nicolai, Redaelli De Zinis, Berlucchi, Bazzana and Bertoni8, Reference Mortuaire, Francois, Wiel and Chevalier12, Reference Michel, Fakhry, Duflo, Lagier, Mancini and Dessi13 This is because of the occurrence of photocoagulation at the resection base, which may be responsible for the destruction of the tumour cells. Surgeons may carry out a narrower resection so as to avoid trauma to the anterior commissure, adopting an over-cautious approach.

For T3 lesions with a mobile arytenoid, we have conducted fewer partial laryngectomies in recent years. With improvements in chemoradiation, patients are increasingly choosing this treatment over surgery.14, Reference Lefebvre, Chevalier, Luboinski, Kirkpatrick, Collette and Sahmoud15

For T3 lesions with a fixed hemilarynx and T4 lesions, surgical results with total laryngectomy in terms of five-year survival rates (of 61.6 per cent) are comparable to those reported by other centres in the world.Reference Rao, Shroff, Chattopadhyay and Dinshaw16Reference Hamilton, McMeekin, Dyson and Robson18 Every patient in our study who underwent total laryngectomy had undergone neck dissection. Although some authors have recommended simply observing clinically negative neck nodes,Reference Spiro, Gallo and Shah19Reference Kaplan, Johns, McLean, Fitz-Hugh, Clark and Boyd21 in the present study we found that 27 out of 69 node-negative patients (39 per cent) had occult neck node positivity. We therefore feel it is better to perform bilateral, selective lateral node dissection, which is not associated with significant morbidity.Reference Ferlito, Silver, Rinaldo and Smith22 In India, the patient compliance for follow up is highly irregular. Therefore, elective neck dissection is performed.

Post-operative radiation was administered to all patients who had cartilage invasion, soft tissue invasion or nodal positivity. Although it is known that surgery followed by radiotherapy improves survival,Reference Shi, Xu, Zhang, Jiang, Sun and Yan23, Reference Chen, Schrag, Hao, Flanders, Kepner and Stewart24 there were considerable side effects in patients that underwent radiation. Repeat dilatation was required for 17 per cent of patients who had tight pharyngeal stricture following radiotherapy.

Salvage laryngectomies are associated with a higher incidence of mortality and morbidity. Morbidities can be minimised by delaying oral feeding, avoiding primary prosthesis placement and reducing the use of electrocautery during surgery.

  • Laser cordectomy has shifted choice of treatment in favour of surgery in tumour (T) stages 1 and 2 glottic cancer cases

  • Lesions involving the anterior third of the vocal fold have a higher chance of local recurrence after laser cordectomy

  • The number of partial laryngectomies performed is declining because of higher acceptance of chemoradiation, which preserves the larynx

  • Salvage laryngectomy is associated with a higher incidence of morbidity

  • In this study, five-year survival rates were 98.6 per cent for T1 and T2 lesions, and 61.6 per cent for T3 and T4 lesions treated with total laryngectomy

With regard to recommendations for future studies, comparison of therapeutic outcomes would be useful; specifically, comparison of laser cordectomy versus RT outcomes in T1 and T2 glottic cancer cases,Reference Nunez-Batalla, Oswal and Remacle25 and comparison of chemoradiation versus total laryngectomy outcomes in T3 and T4 glottic cancer cases.

Conclusion

For early glottic cancer, laser cordectomy, which is a safe, one-stage procedure, provides good local control and excellent five-year survival rates. There is increasing acceptance of chemoradiation used in cases of T3 glottic cancer with a mobile arytenoid and, hence, the number of partial laryngectomies performed has declined. For T4 or node-positive advanced glottic cancer, total laryngectomy (with or without radiation) has given a five-year survival rate of 61.6 per cent in our centre. Salvage laryngectomies were associated with a higher incidence of morbidity.

Footnotes

Dr D S Kelkar is The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2014 Visiting Professor.

References

1Indian States Census 2011. In: http://www.census2011.co.in/states.php [4 January 2015]Google Scholar
2National Cancer Registry Programme (NCRP). Three Year Report of the Population Based Cancer Registries 2006-2008. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 2010Google Scholar
3Cancer Treatment Centres Licenced by Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (updated till 31/05/2012). In: http://www.aerb.gov.in/AERBPortal/pages/English/t/forms/regforms/radiotherapy/radiotherapy.pdf [23 January 2015]Google Scholar
4Jayalekshmi, PA, Nandakumar, A, Akiba, S, Gangadharan, P, Koriyama, C. Associations of tobacco use and alcohol drinking with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer risks among men in Karunagappally, Kerala, India – Karunagappally cohort study. PLoS One 2013;8:e73716Google Scholar
5International Union Against Cancer (UICC). In: Sobin, LH, Wittekind, C, eds. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th ed.New York: Wiley, 2002Google Scholar
6Remacle, M, Eckel, HE, Antonelli, A, Brasnu, D, Chevalier, D, Friedrich, G et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:227–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Moreau, PR. Treatment of laryngeal carcinoma by laser endoscopic microsurgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1000–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Peretti, G, Nicolai, P, Redaelli De Zinis, LO, Berlucchi, M, Bazzana, T, Bertoni, F et al. Endoscopic CO2 laser excision for tis, T1, and T2 glottic carcinomas: cure rate and prognosis factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:124–31Google Scholar
9Batalla, FN, Cueva, MJC, González, BS, Pendás, JLL, Gil, CG, Llames, AL et al. Voice quality after endoscopic laser surgery and radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: objective measurements emphasizing the Voice Handicap Index. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008;265:543–8Google Scholar
10Delsupehe, KG, Zink, I, Lejaegere, M, Bastian, RW. Voice quality after narrow-margin laser cordectomy compared with laryngeal irradiation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:528–33Google Scholar
11Steiner, W. Experience in endoscopic laser surgery of malignant tumours of the upper aero-digestive tract. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1988;39:135–44Google Scholar
12Mortuaire, G, Francois, J, Wiel, E, Chevalier, D. Local recurrence after CO2 laser cordectomy for early glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2006;116:101–5Google Scholar
13Michel, J, Fakhry, N, Duflo, S, Lagier, A, Mancini, J, Dessi, P et al. Prognostic value of the status of resection margins after endoscopic laser cordectomy for T1a glottic carcinoma. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011;128:297300Google Scholar
14The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1685–90Google Scholar
15Lefebvre, JL, Chevalier, D, Luboinski, B, Kirkpatrick, A, Collette, L, Sahmoud, T. Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:890–9Google Scholar
16Rao, DN, Shroff, PD, Chattopadhyay, G, Dinshaw, KA. Survival analysis of 5595 head and neck cancers –results of conventional treatment in a high-risk population. Br J Cancer 1998;77:1514–18Google Scholar
17Karatzanis, AD, Psychogios, G, Waldfahrer, F, Kapsreiter, M, Zenk, J, Velegrakis, GA. Management of locally advanced laryngeal cancer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;43:4Google Scholar
18Hamilton, DW, McMeekin, PJ, Dyson, P, Robson, AK. Laryngeal cancer management in a small, rural, multidisciplinary team setting: 15-year review. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:1203–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Spiro, RH, Gallo, O, Shah, JP. Selective jugular node dissection in patients with squamous carcinoma of the larynx or pharynx. Am J Surg 1993;166:399402Google Scholar
20Brazilian Head and Neck Cancer Study Group. End results of a prospective trial on elective lateral neck dissection vs type III modified radical neck dissection in the management of supraglottic and transglottic carcinomas. Head Neck 1999;21:694702Google Scholar
21Kaplan, MJ, Johns, ME, McLean, WC, Fitz-Hugh, GS, Clark, DA, Boyd, JC. Prognostic factors and management. Laryngoscope 1983;93:725–8Google Scholar
22Ferlito, A, Silver, CE, Rinaldo, A, Smith, RV. Surgical treatment of the neck in cancer of the larynx. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2000;62:217–25Google Scholar
23Shi, RJ, Xu, CZ, Zhang, CP, Jiang, CY, Sun, YY, Yan, XJ et al. Outcomes of laryngectomy in elderly patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Genet Mol Res 2014;13:1955–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Chen, AY, Schrag, N, Hao, Y, Flanders, WD, Kepner, J, Stewart, A et al. Changes in treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer 1985-2001. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:831–7Google Scholar
25Nunez-Batalla, F. Voice outcome after laser management of early glottic carcinoma (part A). In: Oswal, V, Remacle, M, eds. Principles and Practice of Lasers in Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 2nd edn.Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, 2014;207–22Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I Treatment type according to disease stage*

Figure 1

Table II Cordectomy type according to disease stage*

Figure 2

Table III Recurrences according to margin involvement, lesion site and tumour grade*

Figure 3

Table IV Morbidities associated with primary laryngectomy, adjuvant RT and salvage laryngectomy

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Cumulative probability of survival (Kaplan–Meier curve) for patients who underwent total laryngectomy.

Figure 5

Table V Prognosis by TNM stage, tumour stage, nodal status and tumour grade*