Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T16:36:41.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous reconstruction of large skin and mucosal defect following head and neck surgery with a single skin paddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2006

P Chaturvedi
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
P S Pai
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
K A Pathak
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
D A Chaukar
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
M S Deshpande
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
A K D’Cruz
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap is commonly used for head and neck reconstruction especially in impoverished nations. PMMC is a sturdy pedicled flap with relatively fewer complications, the learning curve is short and no specialized training in microvascular surgery is needed in order to use this flap. In a defect that requires a large skin and mucosal lining the authors routinely use either a bi-paddle PMMC or a combination of PMMC (for the mucosal lining) and a delto-pectoral flap (for the skin defect). It is indisputable that free tissue transfer is a better way of reconstruction for the majority of most such defects. Unfortunately, not all patients can be offered this form of reconstruction due to the cost, time, expertise and infrastructural constraints in high volume centres such as ours. Bi-paddling of PMMC is hazardous in obese males and most female patients. In such patients the skin defect is reconstructed usually by the delto-pectoral (DP) flap but this, for obvious reasons, is less welcomed by the patients. The authors suggest a technique wherein mucosal lining is created by the myofascial lining (inner surface) of the flap and the skin defect is reconstructed by the skin paddle of the single paddle PMMC. It should be considered wherever a DP flap is unacceptable, or bi-paddling or free tissue transfer is not possible.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2005 Royal Society of Medicine Press