Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:11:17.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening for gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malays with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss, using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2008

Z Siti Aishah
Affiliation:
Human Genome Centre, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
M D Mohd Khairi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
A R Normastura
Affiliation:
Schools of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
Z Zafarina
Affiliation:
Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
B A Zilfalil
Affiliation:
Human Genome Centre, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
*
Address for correspondence: Dr M D Mohd Khairi, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. E-mail: khairi@kck.usm.my
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the frequency and type of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss.

Methods:

A total of 33 Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss were screened for mutations in the Cx26 coding region. Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from buccal swab samples and subjected to polymerase chain reaction. Slow-reannealing was performed, followed by screening using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography.

Results:

Eight of the samples (24.2 per cent) showed heterozygous peaks, and further sequencing of these samples revealed four patients (50.0 per cent) with the W24X mutation, two (25.0 per cent) with the V37I mutation and another two (25.0 per cent) with the G4D mutation.

Conclusions:

Analysis of buccal swab samples by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography is noninvasive and suitable for rapid and reliable screening of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss have different kinds of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations which are rarely found in other populations.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Introduction

Hearing loss is the most common congenital sensory deficit in humans. Roughly one to three children in a thousand are born with hearing impairment.Reference Watkin1Reference Watkin and Baldwin5 The occurrence of hearing loss is considerably greater in certain sub-populations; for example, it is present in one to five in 100 neonatal intensive care patients and infants selected from at-risk registers.Reference Mason and Herrmann3, Reference Shannon, Felix, Krumholz, Goldstein and Harris6Reference Khairi, Din, Shahid and Normastura11 Hearing loss can be caused by environmental factors as well as genetic factors. Genetic causes represent 50–70 per cent of hearing loss, with autosomal recessive inheritance representing approximately 80 per cent of this total.Reference Tomaski and Grundfast12 It is believed that more than 100 genes may be involved in hearing impairment. Several of these genes have been identified, one of which is the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. The identification of this deafness gene has facilitated understanding of the molecular process of hearing, and it offers prospects for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing.

Mutations in the gap junction protein beta-2 gene (also know as the connexin 26 gene) are responsible for half of the cases of autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. The 35delG mutation of this gene has been reported to be common in several countries.Reference Laer, Coucke, Mueller, Caethoven, Flothmann and Prasad13 However, in non-white populations, the 35delG mutation is either absent or very rare, with other common mutations prevailing, such as the 235delC mutation in the Japanese,Reference Abe, Usami, Shinkawa, Kelley and Kimberling14 the V37I mutation in MalaysiansReference Ruszymah, Farah Wahida, Zakinah, Zahari, Norazlinda and Saim15 and the 167delT mutation in Ashkenazi Jews.Reference Morell, Kim, Hood, Goforth, Friderici and Fisher16

The increasing demand for gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation detection warrants the need for a rapid and accurate method of screening for these mutations. This study was undertaken in order (1) to investigate the types and frequencies of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss, and (2) to assess the effectiveness of buccal smears and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography in screening for such mutations.

Materials and methods

This study received approval from the Universiti Sains Malaysia research and ethics committee.

The study group comprised 33 Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. The exclusion criteria were acquired hearing loss and mixed race Malay origin. Written consent was obtained from all patients before sampling.

Samples were collected by gently rubbing the patient's inner cheek with a sterile cotton swab. Genomic DNA was extracted from the swab using the GeneAll® DNA extraction kit (General Biosystem, Seoul, South Korea), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

The collected DNA was then subjected to polymerase chain reaction, using a first primer pair as described by Zelante et al., Reference Zelante, Gasparini, Estivill, Melchionda, D'Agruma and Govea17 and electrophoresed on 1.5 per cent agarose gel to confirm the presence of amplicons. The polymerase chain reaction product was then mixed with wild-type amplicons in a ratio of 1:1. Slow-reannealing was performed before screening for mutations, using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. Samples which showed heterozygous peaks were then sequenced, using an automated DNA sequencing system.

Results

Buccal smears were taken in all subjects, without complication. In all 33 patients, the buccal smear sample provided sufficient genomic DNA to enable polymerase chain reaction of the second exon of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene, and subsequent DNA sequencing.

Following denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, eight (24.2 per cent) of the 33 samples showed heterozygous peaks. Sequencing results indicated that four patients (50.0 per cent) were carrying the W24X mutation, two (25.0 per cent) the V37I mutation and another two (25.0 per cent) the G4D mutation. Figures 1, 2 and 3 show the sequencing results for samples with mutations.

Fig. 1 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 71G→A (W24X) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. G = guanine; A = adenine; T = thymine; C = cytosine

Fig. 2 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 109G→A (V37I) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. C = cytosine; T = thymine; A = adenine; G = guanine

Fig. 3 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 11G→A (G4D) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. T = thymine; G = guanine; A = adenine; C = cytosine

Discussion

Severe to profound congenital deafness is a common genetic disorder. Mutations in the gap junction protein beta-2 gene, encoding the connexin 26 gap-junction protein, account for a significant proportion of autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. The substantial contribution to gap junction genes encode beta connexins of several nuclear genesReference Rabionet, Gasparini and Estivill18 has been established in some populations. More than 20 gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations have been described, in different population distributions. The prevalence of some gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations is known to depend on the population's ethnic origin.

Data concerning the molecular basis of autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss in the Malaysia population are scarce. The present study was designed to explore the effectiveness of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography as a molecular scanning method for analysis of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations, and also to assess the pattern of this mutation within a Malay population.

Buccal smears were able to be taken conveniently without complication in all subjects. This non-invasive method provided sufficient genomic DNA for subsequent analysis. Analytical results suggested that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography screening followed by DNA sequencing was adequate for identification of all sequence alterations in Cx26. All eight samples found to have heterozygous peaks on denaturing high performance liquid chromatography analysis were found to have gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations. Our results show that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography is a highly specific technique for mutation detection, and is applicable for the detection of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations. Lin et al. Reference Lin, Goldstein, Mhatre, Lustig, Pfister and Lalwani19 found that both the sensitivity and specificity of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography in detecting gap junction protein beta-2 gene sequence alterations were 100 per cent. Gurtler et al. Reference Gurtler, Kim, Mhatre, Muller, Probst and Lalwani20 reported these values as 100 and 83 per cent, respectively.

In our analysis, gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations were observed in 24.0 per cent of patients. Three different types of mutations were detected – W24X, V37I and G4D – of which W24X was the most common (50 per cent), followed by V37I and G4D in equal frequencies (both 25 per cent).

Mutation of the W24X gene sequence is very rare in many populations. A very low prevalence has been reported in Thais,Reference Kudo, Ikeda, Oshima, Kure, Tammasaeng and Prasansuk21 Greeks,Reference Pampanos, Economides, Iliadou, Neou, Leotsakos and Voyiatzis22 IraniansReference Najmabadi, Cucci, Sahebjam, Kouchakian, Farhadi and Kahrizi23 and Germans.Reference Schade, Kothe, Ruge, Hess and Meyer24 However, it is common in other populations, such as in IndiaReference Maheshwari, Vijaya, Ghosh, Shastri, Kabra and Menon25 and Pakistan.Reference Santos, Wajid, Pham, Hussan, Ali and Ahmad26 Minarik et al. Reference Minarik, Ferak, Ferakova, Ficek, Polakova and Kadasi27 and Alvarez et al. Reference Alvarez, del Castillo, Villamar, Aguirre and lez-Neira28 found the W24X mutation to be the commonest mutation in Solvak Romany and Spanish Romani (i.e. Gypsy) ethnic groups, both of which originated in India. These ethnic groups accounted for 23.2 and 79.0 per cent of autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss patients, respective to Solvak RomanyReference Minarik, Ferak, Ferakova, Ficek, Polakova and Kadasi27 and Spanish RomaniReference Alvarez, del Castillo, Villamar, Aguirre and lez-Neira28. Kalay et al. observed that the W24X mutation was the second most common gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation in a group of Turkish autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss sufferersReference Kalay, Caylan, Kremer, de Brouwer and Karaguzel29 (the majority of whom originated from Middle Asia). These findings support the suggestion that the W24X mutation originates from Asian populations.

The V37I mutation was observed in 25.0 per cent of our patients. Dahl et al. observed that this mutation was the commonest gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation in patients from the west coast of Malaysia.Reference Ruszymah, Farah Wahida, Zakinah, Zahari, Norazlinda and Saim15 However, this study did not specify the ethnic origin(s) of the population studied. Our study focussed on patients of Malay origin. The V37I mutation has been found to be relatively common in Chinese Australians,Reference Dahl, Saunders, Kelly, Osborn, Wilcox and Cone-Wesson30 and has also been detected at low percentages in JapaneseReference Abe, Usami, Shinkawa, Kelley and Kimberling14 and Chinese populations.Reference Liu, Xia, Ke, Ouyang, Du and Liu31

  • This study assessed the frequency and type of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malay patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss

  • Increasing demand for gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation detection warrants the need for a rapid and accurate method of screening for such mutations

  • The 35delG mutation is not common in Malays with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. The most common gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation is W24X

  • The G4D mutation is a new type of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation found in Asian populations with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss

Two out of eight patients (25.0 per cent) in our sample group were found to carry the G4D type of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation. To our knowledge, there have been only two previously reported cases of the G4D mutation. In Texas, Tang et al. Reference Tang, Fang, Ward, Schmitt, Darilek and Manolidis32 reported one case of G4D mutation out of 46 patients with hearing impairment and gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations. In an African American population with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Alabama, Ross et al. Reference Ross, Novak, Kumbla, Zhang, Fowler and Boppana33 found the G4D mutation in a normal hearing subject and reported it as a novel mutation. We believe that this very rare mutation is one of the important causes of deafness within the Malay population of Malaysia.

Our findings on gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in Malay patients suggest that the mutation pattern differs from that found within other Asian populations, e.g. in Japan,Reference Abe, Usami, Shinkawa, Kelley and Kimberling14 Thailand,Reference Kudo, Ikeda, Oshima, Kure, Tammasaeng and Prasansuk21 ChinaReference Liu, Xia, Ke, Ouyang, Du and Liu31 and even in other parts of Malaysia.Reference Ruszymah, Farah Wahida, Zakinah, Zahari, Norazlinda and Saim15 Even though the most common gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutation (i.e. W24X) has also been found in IndianReference Maheshwari, Vijaya, Ghosh, Shastri, Kabra and Menon25 and PakistaniReference Santos, Wajid, Pham, Hussan, Ali and Ahmad26 populations, the V371 and G4D mutations have not been reported in those countries. However, we suggest that further study, of a larger population, is needed in order to confirm the pattern of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in the Malay population of Malaysia.

Conclusion

In this study, we found buccal swabbing to be a good alternative to blood testing when collecting samples for genomic DNA analysis. Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography analysis was found to be a suitable method for rapid and reliable screening of gap junction protein beta-2 gene mutations in patients with autosomal recessive, non-syndromic hearing loss. Malay patients with this type of hearing loss had different kinds of gap junction protein beta-2 mutations, some of which have been rarely reported in other populations.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing financial support for this study, via their short grant 304/PPSP/6131446.

References

1Watkin, PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:F1625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Finitzo, T, Albright, K, O'Neal, J. The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery. Paediatrics 1998;102:1452–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Mason, JA, Herrmann, KR. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Paediatrics 1998;101:221–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Vohr, BR, Carty, LM, Moore, PE, Letourneau, K. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996). J Pediatr 1998;133:353–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Watkin, PM, Baldwin, M. Confirmation of deafness in infancy. Arch Dis Child 1999;81:380–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Shannon, DA, Felix, JK, Krumholz, A, Goldstein, PJ, Harris, KC. Hearing screening of high-risk newborns with brainstem auditory evoked potentials: a follow up study. Paediatrics 1984;73:22–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Watkin, PM, Baldwin, M, McEnergy, G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:1130–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Watson, DR, McClelland, RJ, Adams, DA. Auditory brainstem response screening for hearing loss in high risk neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1996;36:147–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Hess, M, Finckh-Kramer, U, Bartsch, M, Kewitz, G, Versmold, H, Gross, M. Hearing screening in at-risk neonate cohort. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998;46:81–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Jan, CM, Hildmann, WA, Henneckeet, KH. Neonatal screening for hearing disorders in infants at risk: incidence, risk factors, and follow up. Paediatrics 1999;104:900–4Google Scholar
11Khairi, MD, Din, S, Shahid, H, Normastura, AR. Hearing screening of infants in Neonatal Unit, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:678–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tomaski, SM, Grundfast, KM. A stepwise approach to the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary hearing loss. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46:3548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Laer, LV, Coucke, P, Mueller, RF, Caethoven, G, Flothmann, K, Prasad, SD et al. A common founder for the 35delG GJB2 gene mutation in connexin 26 hearing impairment. J Med Genet 2001;38:515–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Abe, S, Usami, S, Shinkawa, H, Kelley, PM, Kimberling, WJ. Prevalent connexin 26 gene (GJB2) mutations in Japanese. J Med Genet 2000;37:41–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Ruszymah, BHI, Farah Wahida, I, Zakinah, Y, Zahari, Z, Norazlinda, MD, Saim, L, et al. Congenital deafness: high prevalence of a V37I mutation in the GJB2 gene among deaf schoolchildren in Alor Setar. Med J Malaysia 2005;60:269–74Google Scholar
16Morell, RJ, Kim, HJ, Hood, LJ, Goforth, L, Friderici, K, Fisher, R et al. Mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) among Ashkenazi Jews with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1500–05CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Zelante, L, Gasparini, P, Estivill, X, Melchionda, S, D'Agruma, L, Govea, N et al. Connexin26 mutations associated with the most common form of non-syndromic neurosensory autosomal recessive deafness (DFNB1) in Mediterraneans. Hum Mol Genet 1997;9:1605–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Rabionet, R, Gasparini, P, Estivill, X. Molecular genetics of hearing impairment due to mutations in gap junction genes encodes beta connexins. Hum Mutat 2000;16:1902023.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Lin, D, Goldstein, JA, Mhatre, AN, Lustig, LR, Pfister, M, Lalwani, AK. Assessment of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) in screening for mutations in connexin 26 (GJB2). Hum Mutat 2001;18:4251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Gurtler, N, Kim, Y, Mhatre, A, Muller, R, Probst, R, Lalwani, AK. GJB2 Mutations in the Swiss hearing impaired. Ear Hear 2003;24:440–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Kudo, T, Ikeda, K, Oshima, T, Kure, S, Tammasaeng, M, Prasansuk, S et al. GJB2 (Connexin 26) mutations and childhood deafness in Thailand. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:858–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Pampanos, A, Economides, J, Iliadou, V, Neou, P, Leotsakos, P, Voyiatzis, N et al. Prevalence of GJB2 mutations in prelingual deafness in the Greek population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;65:101–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Najmabadi, H, Cucci, RA, Sahebjam, S, Kouchakian, N, Farhadi, M, Kahrizi, K et al. GJB2 mutations in Iranians with autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. Hum Mutat 2002; http://www.interscience.wiley.com/humanmutation/pdf/mutation/504.pdf; [5 February 2008]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Schade, G, Kothe, C, Ruge, G, Hess, M, Meyer, CG. Screening auf GJB2-Mutationen mit Wangenabstrichmaterial zur nicht-invasiven Diagnostik genetisch bedingter Innenohrschwerhörigkeit [in German]. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2003;82:397401Google Scholar
25Maheshwari, M, Vijaya, R, Ghosh, M, Shastri, S, Kabra, M, Menon, PSN. Screening of Families with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment (ARNSHI) for mutations in GJB2 gene: Indian scenario. Am J Med Genet 2003;120A:180–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Santos, RLP, Wajid, M, Pham, TL, Hussan, J, Ali, G, Ahmad, W et al. Low prevalence of connexin 26 (GJB2) variants in Pakistani families with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing impairment. Clinic Genet 2005;67:61–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Minarik, G, Ferak, V, Ferakova, E, Ficek, A, Polakova, H, Kadasi, L. High frequency of GJB2 mutation W24X among Slovak Romany (Gypsy) patients with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL). Gen Physiol Biophys 2003;22:549–56Google ScholarPubMed
28Alvarez, A, del Castillo, I, Villamar, M, Aguirre, LA, lez-Neira, AG. High prevalence of the W24X mutation in the gene encoding connexin-26 (GJB2) in Spanish Romani (Gypsies) with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. Am J Med Genet 2005;137A:255–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Kalay, E, Caylan, R, Kremer, H, de Brouwer, APM, Karaguzel, A. GJB2 mutations in Turkish patients with ARNSHL: prevalence and two novel mutations. Hear Res 2005;203:8893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Dahl, HH, Saunders, K, Kelly, TM, Osborn, AH, Wilcox, S, Cone-Wesson, B et al. Prevalence and nature of connexin 26 mutations in children with non-syndromic deafness. Med J Aust 2001;175:182–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Liu, XZ, Xia, XJ, Ke, XM, Ouyang, XM, Du, LL, Liu, YH et al. The prevalence of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in the Chinese population. Hum Genet 2002;111:394–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Tang, HY, Fang, P, Ward, PA, Schmitt, E, Darilek, S, Manolidis, S et al. DNA Sequence analysis of GJB2, encoding connexin 26: observations from a population of hearing impaired cases and variable carrier rates, complex genotypes, and ethnic stratification of alleles among controls. Am J Med Genet 2006;140A:2401–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Ross, SA, Novak, Z, Kumbla, RA, Zhang, A, Fowler, KB, Boppana, S. GJB2 and GJB6 mutations in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Res 2007;61:687–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 71G→A (W24X) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. G = guanine; A = adenine; T = thymine; C = cytosine

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 109G→A (V37I) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. C = cytosine; T = thymine; A = adenine; G = guanine

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Sequencing analysis of a patient's deoxyribonucleic acid, showing a heterozygous G/A nucleotide at position 11G→A (G4D) of the gap junction protein beta-2 gene. T = thymine; G = guanine; A = adenine; C = cytosine