Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-4kfsg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T20:30:50.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent advances in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2015

G Chilvers  and
I McKay-Davies
G Chilvers*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol, UK
I McKay-Davies
Affiliation:
ENT Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr G ChilversENT Department, St Michaels Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol, BS2 8EG, UK, E-mail: geoffreyschilvers@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to review the current advances in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and to ascertain its aetiology, whether dehiscence size correlates with symptoms, signs and investigation results, the best investigations, and its surgical management.

Methods:

A literature search using the key words ‘superior semicircular canal dehiscence’ was performed using the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database and the Embase, Health Management Information Consortium, Medline, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index, Cinahl and Health Business Elite databases for the period January 2009 to May 2014. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, prospective and retrospective case series, case reports, and observational studies were included.

Results:

Of the 205 papers identified, 35 were considered relevant.

Conclusion:

The aetiology of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome is unclear. Dehiscence size significantly affects the air–bone gap and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential thresholds. Computed tomography evaluation has a high false positive rate. The middle cranial fossa approach is the surgical standard for treating this syndrome; however, the transmastoid approach is gaining popularity.

Keywords

Inner EarVestibular Evoked Myogenic PotentialsSemicircular CanalsVertigo
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , March 2015 , pp. 217 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Minor, LB, Solomon, D, Zinreich, JS, Zee, DS. Sound-and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:249–58Google Scholar
2Sohmer, H, Freeman, S, Perez, R. Semicircular canal fenestration – improvement of bone- but not air-conducted auditory thresholds. Hear Res 2000;187:105–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Stenfelt, S, Goode, RL. Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1245–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Hiroven, TP, Carey, JP, Liang, CJ, Minor, LB. Superior canal dehiscence: mechanisms of pressure sensitivity in a chinchilla model. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1331–6Google Scholar
5Carey, JP, Minor, LB, Nager, GT. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:137–47Google Scholar
6Takahashi, N, Tsunoda, A, Shirakura, S, Kitamura, K. Anatomical feature of the middle cranial fossa in fetal periods: possible etiology of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol 2012;132:385–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Gracia-Tello, B, Cisneros, A, Crovetto, R, Martinez, C, Rodriguez, O, Lecumberri, I et al. Effect of semi-circular canal dehiscence on contralateral canal bone thickness. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2013;64:97–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Suryanarayanan, R, Lesser, TH. ‘Honeycomb’ tegmen: multiple tegmen defects associated with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:560–3Google Scholar
9Nadaraja, GS, Gurgel, RK, Fischbein, NJ, Anglemyer, A, Monfared, A, Jackler, RK et al. Radiographic evaluation of the tegmen in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1245–50Google Scholar
10El Hadi, T, Sorrentino, T, Calmels, MN, Fraysse, B, Deguine, O, Marx, M. Spontaneous tegmen defect and semicircular canal dehiscence: same etiopathogenic entity? Otol Neurotol 2012;33:591–5Google Scholar
11Nadgir, RN, Ozonoff, A, Devaiah, AK, Halderman, AA, Sakai, O. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: Congenital or acquired condition? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:947–9Google Scholar
12Parlea, E, Georgescu, M, Calarasu, R. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome – case report. Romanian Journal of Neurology 2012;11:142–6Google Scholar
13Minor, LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Am J Otol 2000;21:9–19Google Scholar
14Whyte Orozco, J, Martinez, C, Cisneros, A, Obon, J, Gracia-Tello, B, Angel Crovetto, M. Defect of the bony roof in the superior semicircular canal and its clinical implications. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2011;62:199–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Crovetto-De la Torre, MA, Whyte-Orozco, J, Crovetto-Martinez, R, Whyte-Orozco, A, Obon-Nogues, JA, Martinez-Rodriguez, A. A new cause of structural vertigo: superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Rev Neurol 2011;52:751–8Google ScholarPubMed
16Yu, A, Teich, DL, Moonis, G, Wong, ET. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence in East Asian women with osteoporosis. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2012;12:8Google Scholar
17Chien, WW, Janky, K, Minor, LB, Carey, JP. Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:810–15Google Scholar
18Yuen, HW, Boeddinghaus, R, Eikelboom, RH, Atlas, MD. The relationship between the air-bone gap and the size of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2011;40:59–64Google Scholar
19Niesten, ME, Hamberg, LM, Silverman, JB, Lou, KV, McCall, AA, Windsor, A et al. Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing. Audiol Neurootol 2014;19:97–105Google Scholar
20Manzari, L, Burgess, AM, McGarvie, LA, Curthoys, IS. Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz fz bone-conducted vibration in superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Ear Hear 2012;33:508–20Google Scholar
21Pfammatter, A, Darrouzet, V, Gartner, M, Somers, T, Van Dinther, J, Trabalzini, F et al. A superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome multicenter study: is there an association between size and symptoms? Otol Neurotol 2010;31:447–54Google Scholar
22Chi, FL, Ren, DD, Dai, CF. Variety of audiologic manifestations in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:2–10Google Scholar
23Mondina, M, Bonnard, D, Barreau, X, Darrouzet, V, Franco-Vidal, V. Anatomo-radiological study of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence of 37 cadaver temporal bones. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:55–9Google Scholar
24Tavassolie, TS, Penninger, RT, Zuniga, MG, Minor, LB, Carey, JP. Multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence: how much error, and how to minimize it? Otol Neurotol 2012;33:215–22Google Scholar
25Crovetto, M, Whyte, J, Rodriguez, OM, Lecumberri, I, Martinez, C, Elexpuru, J. Anatomo-radiological study of the Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: Radiological considerations of Superior and Posterior Semicircular Canals. Eur J Radiol 2010;76:167–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Masaki, Y. The prevalence of superior canal dehiscence syndrome as assessed by temporal bone computed tomography imaging. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:258–62Google Scholar
27Eibenberger, K, Carey, J, Ehtiati, T, Trevino, C, Dolberg, J, Haslwanter, T. A novel method of 3D image analysis of high-resolution cone beam CT and multi slice CT for the detection of semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:329–37Google Scholar
28Browaeys, P, Larson, T, Wong, M, Patel, U. Can MRI replace CT in evaluating semicircular canal dehiscence? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1421–7Google Scholar
29Brantberg, K, Lofquist, L, Fransson, PA. Large vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone-conducted sounds in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:173–82Google Scholar
30Milojcic, R, Guinan, JJ Jr., Rauch, SD, Herrmann, BS. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:360–7Google Scholar
31Zuniga, MG, Janky, KL, Nguyen, KD, Welgampola, MS, Carey, JP. Ocular versus cervical VEMPs in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:121–6Google Scholar
32Kantner, C, Gurkov, R. Characteristics and clinical applications of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Hear Res 2012;294:55–63Google Scholar
33Vlastarakos, PV, Proikas, K, Tavoulari, E, Kikidis, D, Maragoudakis, P, Nikolopoulos, TP. Efficacy assessment and complications of surgical management for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a meta-analysis of published interventional studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:177–86Google Scholar
34Ward, BK, Agrawal, Y, Nguyen, E, Della Santina, CC, Limb, CJ, Francis, HW et al. Hearing outcomes after surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal by a middle cranial fossa approach. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1386–91Google Scholar
35Beyea, JA, Agrawal, SK, Parnes, LS. Transmastoid semicircular canal occlusion: a safe and highly effective treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and superior canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1862–6Google Scholar
36Amoodi, HA, Makki, FM, McNeil, M, Bance, M. Transmastoid resurfacing of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1117–23Google Scholar
37Fiorino, F, Barbieri, F, Pizzini, FB, Beltramello, A. A dehiscent superior semicircular canal may be plugged and resurfaced via the transmastoid route. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:136–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Achar, P, Nichani, J, Freeman, S, Lloyd, S. Management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence-the perspective of neurotologists. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;37:152Google Scholar
39Silverstein, H, Van Ess, MJ. Complete round window niche occlusion for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: a minimally invasive approach. Ear Nose Throat J 2009;88:1042–56Google Scholar
40Nikkar-Esfahani, A, Banerjee, A. Occlusion of the round window: a novel way to treat hyperacusis symptoms in superior semicircular canal dehiscence. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:705–7Google Scholar
41Silverstein, H, Kartush, JM, Parnes, LS, Poe, DS, Babu, SC, Levenson, MJ et al. Round window reinforcement for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a retrospective multi-center case series. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:286–93Google Scholar