Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:47:26.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality of life after surgery for benign disease of the parotid gland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

A N Erkan*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
H Yavuz
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
C Ozer
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
F Ozer
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
L Ozluoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Alper Nabi Erkan, ENT Department, Baskent University Adana Teaching and Medical Research Center, Baskent Seyhan Hastanesi, Baraj Yolu 1. Durak, Seyhan/Adana, Turkey. Fax: +90 322 4592622 E-mail: alpernabierkan@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate quality of life after surgery for benign neoplastic disease of the parotid gland.

Patients and methods:

A quality of life questionnaire, which was created from the Hebrew version of the University of Washington Quality of Life prototype, was applied to 55 patients who underwent surgery for benign neoplastic parotid disease. All patients were examined in Baskent University Adana Teaching and Medical Research Center, where all except 10 subjects (who responded by phone) completed the quality of life questionnaire.

Results:

The highest overall score was 96.3 indicating no salivary fistula. Only one patient complained of salivary secretion through the wound scar. The lowest overall score was 59.5 indicating loss of sensation. Although no post-surgical pain was reported by 32 (58 per cent) patients, 16 (29 per cent) patients reported a post-surgical change in their appearance. Scarring and surgical site depression were reported by 26 (47 per cent) and 17 patients (30 per cent), respectively. Facial nerve impairment was reported by seven patients (13 per cent) during the early post-operative period; these patients recovered from that impairment. The only significant statistical correlations were noted between general health and gender, and between post-surgical pain and gender. There was not any statistical correlation between all data and age, tumour type and education level.

Conclusion:

The general status of patients who have undergone surgery for a benign parotid neoplasm can be assessed with a quality of life questionnaire. Patients' post-surgical quality of life can be improved by the correct choice of surgical approach and reconstructive method.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Introduction

Benign masses account for 80 per cent of parotid gland tumours. Complete excision of that type of mass ensures minimal surgical morbidity and prevents tumour recurrence.Reference de Ru, van Benthem and Hordijk1 Parotidectomy is performed for benign and malignant diseases of the parotid gland. Various types of parotidectomy (superficial, total, radical) have been described in the literature.Reference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 Radical parotidectomy is usually performed for invasive malignant parotid tumours. After parotidectomy, complications such as facial nerve paresis or paralysis, scarring, salivary fistula, Frey's syndrome, infection, haematoma, great auricular nerve anaesthesia or recurrence of the tumour may occur.Reference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 These complications can affect quality of life. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of surgical treatment of benign parotid neoplasms on the patient's quality of life.

Patients and methods

The medical records of the 57 patients who underwent superficial or total parotidectomy for benign disease between January 2000 and December 2005 at the Baskent University Adana Teaching and Medical Research Center with a minimum six-month follow-up period were examined retrospectively. The patient related data included age, gender, education level, histological findings, procedure used, duration of follow up and complications. The patients were called in to the clinic to complete the quality of life questionnaire. In this study, the questionnaire created from the Hebrew version of the University of Washington Quality of Life prototype was used.Reference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 Two patients who were younger than 18 years of age were excluded from the study. Ten of the remaining 55 patients completed the questionnaire by phone.

The patients' data were compared with respect to the following factors: age older or younger than 45 years, gender, educational status and presence or absence of benign pleomorphic adenoma as opposed to other histological types. Statistical analyses performed included the Mann–Whitney U test, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, and the chi-square test. A p value of ≤0.5 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 55 patients studied, 28 were men and 27 were women (age range, 18–84 years; mean, 47.5 years). Nineteen patients were younger than 45 years and 46 patients were 45 years of age or older. Eleven patients had no education, eight had graduated from primary school, 15 had graduated from secondary school, 15 had graduated from high school, and six had graduated from a university. The mean duration of follow up was two years. The most common benign tumour was pleomorphic adenoma (34.5 per cent). Other benign conditions included Warthin's tumour, basal cell adenoma, oncocytoma, haemangioendothelioma, lipoma, chronic sialadenitis, tuberculosis, cyst, Sjögren's syndrome, sialadenosis and hyperplastic lymph nodes (Table I). All patients except four underwent superficial parotidectomy. Total parotidectomy was performed on only four patients, who were treated for a deep lobe tumour. Complications were evaluated with the quality of life questionnaire (Table II).

Table I Incidence of diagnostic findings in the subjects studied

Table II Results of the parotidectomy quality of life questionnaire

NA = Not applicable. Importance of each following item to overall quality of life: 1 = not important; 2 = a little bit important; 3 = somewhat important; 4 = quite a bit important; and 5 = extremely important

The highest overall score was 96.3 indicating no salivary fistula. Only one patient complained of salivary secretion through the wound scar, which resolved after a pressure dressing was applied. The lowest overall score was 59.5 indicating loss of sensation with an importance of 1.32 (corresponding to a place between “was affected but is now normal” and “sensation deficit exists but is not bothersome”). The highest importance value was 2.61 indicating local effects with a second highest score of 93.2 and the lowest importance value was 1.27 indicating a salivary fistula. No post-surgical pain was reported by 32 patients (58 per cent). However, 16 patients (29 per cent) reported a change in their appearance. Scarring and surgical site depression were reported by 26 (47 per cent) and 17 (30 per cent) patients, respectively. Facial nerve impairment was found in seven (13 per cent) patients during the early post-operative period. Facial paralysis in those seven patients was a complication of surgery that resolved. Eighteen patients responded ‘yes’ to the question addressing dry mouth and six answered ‘yes’ to the association of xerostomia with having undergone surgery. One patient was diagnosed as having Sjögren's syndrome.

No statistical correlation was found when all data were analysed according to patient age. A significant statistical correlation between general health and gender and between post-surgical pain and gender was noted. The importance of post-surgical pain related to gender was statistically significant. There was no significant correlation between all data and tumour type and between all data and the patients' education level (Table III).

Table III Results of the questionnaire comparing patient groups

Statistical analyses performed included the Mann–Whitney U test, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, and the chi-square test. Importance of each following item to overall quality of life: 1 = not important; 2 = a little bit important; 3 = somewhat important; 4 = quite a bit important; and 5 = extremely important

Discussion

Parotid masses are managed more easily today than in the past because of advances in technology and surgical technique. Surgeons continue to endeavour to minimise the risk of complications resulting from parotidectomy.Reference Reilly and Myssiorek3

Facial nerve paralysis has a significant functional and emotional impact on patients. Patients with facial nerve paralysis often complain about compromised mastication, dysphagia, drooling, poor eye closure and the social ramifications of cosmetic deformity.Reference Reilly and Myssiorek3 The incidence of facial nerve paresis or paralysis is as high as 30 per cent to 65 per cent for transient weakness and 3 per cent to 6 per cent for permanent dysfunction.Reference Kerawala, McAloney and Stassen4 Marshall and colleaguesReference Marshall, Quraishi and Bradley5 reported a transient facial nerve paresis rate of 24.4 per cent and a permanent palsy rate of 1.9 per cent in their series. Mehle and colleaguesReference Mehle, Kraus, Wood, Benninger, Eliachar and Levine6 reviewed the results of 256 consecutive patients who underwent parotid surgery for benign neoplasia over a 15-year period. Those authors reported that immediate facial nerve dysfunction occurred in 46.1 per cent of those patients and that permanent facial nerve dysfunction developed in 3.9 per cent.

Many surgeons recommend the use of intra-operative facial nerve stimulation during parotid surgery to prevent trauma to the facial nerve.Reference Reilly and Myssiorek3 In their study, Nitzan and colleaguesReference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 found 14 patients with facial impairment. Patients' perception of facial impairment is not always the same as the surgeons'. The patients may think that the facial impairment is minimal although it is completely resolved. This is so interesting that Nitzan and colleaguesReference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 include patients' perceptions in their questionnaire. We agree that this point is very important too. In our study, we found seven patients with transient facial impairment. When we compared the rate of facial paralysis with the subjects' age, gender and tumour type, we found no statistically significant correlation.

The greater auricular nerve enervates most of the auricle and a small adjacent area of skin. Division of the greater auricular nerve during parotidectomy causes a sensory deficit around the skin of the jaw and ear.Reference Hui, Wong, Wong, Ho and Wei7 Patients with that type of sensory deficit are often unable to wear earrings. They experience discomfort when they are touched or kissed and are more susceptible to burns and injuries and to sustaining cuts while shaving. Some such patients have been forced to give up skiing because cold weather causes discomfort.Reference Hui, Wong, Wong, Ho and Wei7Reference Christensen and Jacobsen9 Christensen and JacobsenReference Christensen and Jacobsen9 found that the posterior branch of the greater auricular nerve could be preserved in 70 per cent of patients if cautious dissection was performed. Marshall and colleaguesReference Marshall, Quraishi and Bradley5 reported that 66.2 per cent of patients commented on noticing a sensory deficit in the cheek area and the ear immediately after surgery, but that incidence had decreased to 30.6 per cent per cent one year after surgery. In their study, Porter and WoodReference Porter and Wood10 stated that there was no difference in the sensory loss incurred if the greater auricular nerve was sacrificed or preserved. Patel and colleaguesReference Patel, Har-El and Rosenfeld11 concluded that in 53 patients, greater auricular nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy had no significant effect on quality of life. de Ru and colleaguesReference de Ru, van Benthem and Hordijk1 reported that of 45 patients 14 (32 per cent) complained of severe dysaesthesia that greatly affected their quality of life. In their quality of life study, Nitzan and colleaguesReference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 found that of 53 patients who had undergone parotidectomy three complained of sensation impairment. In our study, 43 patients complained of a sensory deficit in the skin supplied by the greater auricular nerve. We did not preserve the greater auricular nerve in our patients. When we compared the rate of dermal sensory deficit with the subjects' age, gender, level of education and tumour type we found no statistically significant correlation. Perhaps dermal sensory deficit is related to nerve preservation.

Frey's syndrome is a well-known complication of parotidectomy. The clinical incidence of Frey's syndrome after parotid surgery has been reported to be as high as 53 per cent.Reference Dulguerov, Quinodoz, Cosendai, Piletta, Marchal and Lehmann12 Frey's syndrome is characterised by unilateral sweating and flushing of the facial skin in the area of the parotid gland during eating. The pathogenesis of Frey's syndrome is based on the aberrant regeneration of sectioned parasympathetic fibres, which occurs when the connection of those nerve fibres with parotid tissue has been interrupted.Reference Casler and Conley13 Several procedures can prevent Frey's syndrome occuring during parotidectomy. Surgical methods (thick skin flap elevation or the use of fascia lata grafts, dermal fat grafts, sternocleidomastoid muscle flaps, superficial musculoaponeurotic system flaps or temporoparietal fascia flapsReference Singleton and Cassisi14Reference Asal, Koybasioglu, Inal, Ural, Uslu and Ceylan18) involve interposing a barrier between the sweat glands and the exposed post-ganglionic parasympathetic nerve fibres. Asal and colleaguesReference Asal, Koybasioglu, Inal, Ural, Uslu and Ceylan18 used the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in 12 of 24 patients, and no flap was used in the other 12 patients in their study. Those authors indicated that the result was zero per cent in the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap group and 50 per cent in the non-flap group, as determined by the starch–iodine test. Casler and ConleyReference Casler and Conley13 prevented Frey's syndrome by using an inter opposing flap made of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system. The authors found no clinical evidence of gustatory sweating in their groups of patients. de Ru and colleaguesReference de Ru, van Benthem and Hordijk1 reported that five of 45 patients with Frey's syndrome did not receive that type of flap. In our study, nine patients complained of flushing and gustatory sweating. In all patients, preventive measures for Frey's syndrome were not taken intra-operatively. When the rate of Frey's syndrome was correlated with the subjects' age, gender, education level and tumour type, we found no statistically significant correlation. Frey's syndrome may be related to the surgical techniques used or to the type of surgery performed.

Salivary fistula, which is an unpleasant complication of parotid surgery, occurs in less than 2 per cent of patients who have undergone the procedure.Reference O'Brien19 In one study, the incidence of post-parotidectomy fistula was reported as 14 per cent.Reference Wax, Tarshis and Post-parotidectomy20 Although a number of treatments for post-parotidectomy fistula have been advocated, there is no standard therapeutic approach. Methods of treating that complication include completion parotidectomy; radiation therapy; tympanic neurectomy; the use of pressure dressings, anticholinergic medications or botulinum toxin; and the restriction of oral intake.Reference Cavanaugh and Park21, Reference Kizilay, Aladag and Ozturan22 Salivary fistula after parotidectomy developed in only one of our patients. We treated that fistula with a pressure dressing. We found that the rate of salivary fistula, when correlated with the subjects' age, gender, level of education and tumour type was not statistically significant.

  • This study aims to evaluate quality of life after surgery for benign neoplastic disease of the parotid gland

  • A quality of life questionnaire, which was created from the Hebrew version of the University of Washington Quality of Life prototype, was applied to 55 patients who underwent surgery for benign neoplastic parotid disease

  • After parotidectomy, complications such as facial nerve paresis or paralysis, scarring, salivary fistula, Frey's syndrome, infection, haematoma, great auricular nerve anaesthesia or recurrence of the tumour may occur

  • Patients' post-surgical quality of life can be improved by the correct choice of surgical approach and reconstructive method

Post-surgical scarring and surgical site depression, which can affect facial contour, are important to some patients. Scarring can be minimised by modification of the incision.Reference Terris, Tuffo and Fee23 Terris and colleaguesReference Terris, Tuffo and Fee23 suggested a modified face lift incision, which, when compared with the results of the modified Blair incision, resulted in improved patient satisfaction. Surgical site depression can be prevented by rotation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Chow and colleaguesReference Chow, Lam, Chiu, Lim and Kwok24 suggested that sternomastoid muscle transposition combined with a face lift incision would improve the cosmetic outcome of superficial parotidectomy. Meningaud and colleaguesReference Meningaud, Bertolus and Bertrand25 proposed superficial musculoaponeurotic system lifting techniques as a new standard procedure for parotidectomy that would prevent a conspicuous scar and the formation of a deep hollow dorsal to the mandible. However, those techniques cannot be used in obese patients or in those from whom a malignant tumour has been removed. In our patients, we used a modified Blair incision but did not perform reconstruction. We found that 26 patients experienced post-surgical scarring and 17 exhibited a compromised facial contour. We found no statistically significant correlation between the rate of scarring and the subjects' age, gender, level of education or tumour type or between facial contour and those factors. However, in their study, Nitzan and colleaguesReference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2 found a significant correlation between patients' age and appearance.

Post-surgical pain can vary according to the operation type, the patient's personality and the medicine prescribed as post-surgical treatment. In our study, there was a statistically significant correlation between gender and post-surgical pain (which affected women more than men). We noted another statistically significant correlation between our subjects'overall health and gender. Nitzan and colleaguesReference Nitzan, Kronenberg, Horowitz, Wolf, Bedrin and Chaushu2, however, found a significant correlation between their subjects' overall health and age.

Conclusion

All complications of parotid surgery can affect the patient's quality of life. The degree of that impact, however, is a factor of the patient's personality. We did not find a statistically significant correlation between the incidence of complications and the subjects' age, gender, educational status and tumour type, with the exception of overall health and gender and post-surgical pain and gender. The quality of life of patients who undergo surgery for a benign parotid neoplasm can be assessed by the questionnaire used in this study and can be improved by the appropriate selection of surgical approach and reconstructive method.

Acknowledgement

This study has been done at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine (Project No: KA05/193).

References

1 de Ru, JA, van Benthem, PP, Hordijk, GJ. Morbidity of parotid gland surgery: results 1 year post-operative. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:582–5Google ScholarPubMed
2 Nitzan, D, Kronenberg, J, Horowitz, Z, Wolf, M, Bedrin, L, Chaushu, G et al. Quality of life following parotidectomy for malignant and benign disease Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1060–7Google Scholar
3 Reilly, J, Myssiorek, D. Facial nerve stimulation and postparotidectomy facial paresis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;128:530–3Google Scholar
4 Kerawala, CJ, McAloney, N, Stassen, LF. Prospective randomised trial of the benefits of a sternocleidomastoid flap after superficial parotidectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40:468–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Marshall, AH, Quraishi, SM, Bradley, PJ. Patients' perspectives on the short- and long-term outcomes following surgery for benign parotid neoplasms. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:624–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Mehle, ME, Kraus, DH, Wood, BG, Benninger, MS, Eliachar, I, Levine, HL et al. Facial nerve morbidity following parotid surgery for benign disease: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience. Laryngoscope 1993;103:386–8Google Scholar
7 Hui, Y, Wong, DS, Wong, LY, Ho, WK, Wei, WI. A prospective controlled double-blind trial of great auricular nerve preservation at parotidectomy. Am J Surg 2003;185:574–9Google Scholar
8 Brown, JS, Ord, RA. Preserving the great auricular nerve in parotid surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;27:459–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Christensen, NR, Jacobsen, SD. Parotidectomy. Preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:556–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Porter, MJ, Wood, SJ. Preservation of the great auricular nerve during parotidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1997;22:251–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Patel, N, Har-El, G, Rosenfeld, R. Quality of life after great auricular nerve sacrifice during parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:884–8Google Scholar
12 Dulguerov, P, Quinodoz, D, Cosendai, G, Piletta, P, Marchal, F, Lehmann, W. Prevention of Frey syndrome during parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:833–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Casler, JD, Conley, J. Sternocleidomastoid muscle transfer and superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication in the prevention of Frey's syndrome. Laryngoscope 1991;101:95100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Singleton, GT, Cassisi, NJ. Frey's syndrome: incidence related to skin flap thickness in parotidectomy. Laryngoscope 1980;90:1636–9Google Scholar
15 Wallis, KA, Gibson, T. Gustatory sweating following parotidectomy: correction by a fascia lata graft. Br J Plast Surg 1978;31:6871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Nosan, DK, Ochi, JW, Davidson, TM. Preservation of facial contour during parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;104:293–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Rubinstein, RY, Rosen, A, Leeman, D. Frey syndrome: treatment with temporoparietal fascia flap interposition. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:808–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Asal, K, Koybasioglu, A, Inal, E, Ural, A, Uslu, SS, Ceylan, A et al. Sternocleidomastoid muscle flap reconstruction during parotidectomy to prevent Frey's syndrome and facial contour deformity. Ear Nose Throat J 2005;84:173–6Google Scholar
19 O'Brien, CJ. Current management of benign parotid tumors – the role of limited superficial parotidectomy. Head Neck 2003;25:946–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Wax, M, Tarshis, L. Post-parotidectomy, fistula. J Otolaryngol 1991;20:1013Google Scholar
21 Cavanaugh, K, Park, A. Postparotidectomy fistula: a different treatment for an old problem. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999;47:265–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Kizilay, A, Aladag, I, Ozturan, O. Successful use of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of salivary fistula following parotidectomy [in Turkish]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2003;10:7881Google ScholarPubMed
23 Terris, DJ, Tuffo, KM, Fee, WE Jr. Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108:574–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Chow, TL, Lam, CY, Chiu, PW, Lim, BH, Kwok, SP. Sternomastoid-muscle transposition improves the cosmetic outcome of superficial parotidectomy. Br J Plast Surg 2001;54:409–11Google Scholar
25 Meningaud, JP, Bertolus, C, Bertrand, JC. Parotidectomy: assessment of a surgical technique including facelift incision and SMAS advancement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:34–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table I Incidence of diagnostic findings in the subjects studied

Figure 1

Table II Results of the parotidectomy quality of life questionnaire

Figure 2

Table III Results of the questionnaire comparing patient groups