Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:56:38.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nerve-sparing subcapsular resection of head and neck schwannomas: technique evaluation and literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

A J Battoo
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India
Z A Sheikh
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India
K Thankappan
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India
W Hicks Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
S Iyer
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Cochin, Kerala, India
M A Kuriakose*
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Bommasandara, Bangalore, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr M A Kuriakose, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Bommasandara, Bangalore-560099, Karnataka, India Fax: 091-80-2832648 E-mail: makuriakose@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The head and neck region harbours crucial structures and hence the surgical technique used to remove schwannomas from this region should cause minimal damage to these structures, with complete removal of pathology.

Methods:

This study entailed a retrospective analysis of 10 patients with head and neck schwannomas that were excised using a nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique. The primary aims were to assess the functional impact of the surgical technique on the structure of origin and to evaluate local control.

Results:

One patient with parapharyngeal schwannoma developed symptoms suggestive of ‘first bite syndrome’ in the late post-operative period. Another patient with facial nerve schwannoma had House–Brackmann grade II weakness in the immediate post-operative period, which subsequently resolved. None of the patients developed recurrence during a median follow-up period of two years.

Conclusion:

The nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique provided effective local control of tumour pathology, with relative preservation of neural function post-operatively.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Introduction

Schwannomas are tumours of the neurilemma or Schwann nerve sheath cells. They were first established as a pathological entity by Verocay in 1910.Reference Bradley and Bowerman1 Stout introduced the term neurilemmoma in 1935, although they are now commonly referred to as schwannomas.Reference Bradley and Bowerman1 About 25–45 per cent of extracranial schwannomas occur in the head and neck region.Reference Colreavy, Lacy, Hughes, Bouchier-Hayes, Brennan and O'Dwyer2 In the parapharyngeal space of the head and neck, schwannomas most commonly arise from the vagus nerve and cervical sympathetic chain. They constitute around 31 per cent of vagal tumours.Reference Green, Olsen, DeSanto and Scheithauer3 Schwannomas of the sympathetic chain are quite rare, with fewer than 40 cases reported.Reference Souza, Williams, Dalton and Solis4

Schwannomas are usually benign, solitary, encapsulated tumours that are attached to or surrounded by a nerve. They appear to push the nerve axons aside as they grow, and can often be dissected free, with preservation of the nerve of origin.Reference Moore, Yarington and Mangham5 Variable neural function preservation rates have been reported.Reference Valentino, Boggess, Ellis, Hester and Jones6 Although preservation of function following sympathetic chain schwannoma resection has been described, an interruption of the sympathetic pathway may occur, with the secondary development of Horner's syndrome.Reference Kara and Topuz7

In view of the benign nature of these tumours, the surgical resection technique employed should be effective enough to completely remove the disease, with minimal post-operative morbidity and no neurologic sequelae. This paper evaluates the efficacy of the nerve-sparing subcapsular resection technique practiced at our institution for removal of these tumours.

Materials and methods

In terms of medical protocol and ethics, this study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the institutional ethical review board.

The study entailed a retrospective analysis of 10 consecutive cases of head and neck schwannomas operated on over a period of 7 years (2004–2010) at a tertiary care head and neck referral institute. The electronic medical records of these patients were reviewed, and information regarding clinical features, imaging studies and pathological evaluations were recorded.

Diagnosis on imaging of the probable nerve of involvement, which for parapharyngeal tumours was either the vagus nerve or sympathetic trunk, was made as per the Furukawa et al. Reference Furukawa, Furukawa, Katoh and Tsukuda8 and modified Furukawa (Saito et al. Reference Saito, Glastonbury, El-Sayed and Eisele9) criteria. According to the Furukawa criteria, vagal nerve schwannomas always cause separation of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or common carotid artery (CCA) and the internal jugular vein (IJV), whereas sympathetic chain schwannomas do not produce an observable separation. However, Saito et al. observed that a schwannoma of the vagus nerve may displace the IJV and the CCA or ICA in a posterior direction without splaying them apart.Reference Saito, Glastonbury, El-Sayed and Eisele9 A large schwannoma of the sympathetic chain can similarly result in posterior and slight lateral displacement. Saito et al. therefore proposed a corollary to the paradigm of Furukawa: when the carotid sheath vessels are displaced posteriorly but not splayed apart by the lesion, one should also consider (1) the volume of the lesion and (2) if any distance between the vessels exists.

The operation notes were reviewed for surgical details. Post-operative progress notes were reviewed for both immediate and late neurological sequelae.

Surgical technique

The nerve-sparing subcapsular resection technique for schwannomas is based on the principle that nerve fibres get expanded and stretched out on the tumour rather than getting embedded within it. The technique described herein potentially preserves these nerve fibres without significantly compromising nerve function as nerve continuity is maintained.

The dissection is preferably carried out using a ×3.5 magnification surgical loupe. After identifying the location of the important blood vessels and nerves in relation to the tumour, the mass is delineated on all sides. The proximal and distal ends of the nerve abutting the tumour are identified and meticulous sharp dissection is carried out, parallel to the axis of the nerve (minimising damage to collateral nerve fibres), until the cleavage plane between the tumour tissue and tumour capsule is reached. Once in the subcapsular plane, the tumour mass is carefully freed proximally, distally and from the sides, and then excised. Care is taken to minimise traction to the surrounding nerve fibres. The tumour is thus resected with preservation of the majority of nerve fibres (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Intra-operative view of the nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique showing the tumour being freed on all sides before being resected.

Results and analysis

The study comprised 10 patients: 6 male and 4 female. Mean age was 43 years (range 14–73 years). Schwannomas involved the vagus nerve in six cases, the sympathetic chain in one case, the facial nerve in one case and the VIth cervical nerve in one case. Another patient had two lesions, involving both the vagus nerve and the sympathetic chain. The clinical picture at presentation is depicted in Table I.

Table I Clinico-cytohistological schwannoma features

*One case had undergone debulking of tumour 16 years previously and post-operative histology was reported as schwannoma. Pt = patient; yrs = years; M = male; F = female; dur = duration; R = right-sided; L = left-sided; pre-op = pre-operative; post-op = post-operative; w/ = with

Pre-operative cytology was carried out in seven patients, but diagnosis of schwannoma was reported in only one case. For this one case, immunohistochemistry revealed a positive result for the S-100 protein, and negative results for cytokeratin and leukocyte common antigen. One patient had undergone debulking of a tumour 16 years previously and post-operative histology was reported as schwannoma.

Pre-operative imaging involved contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in five cases and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the other five cases. Contrast-enhanced CT scans showed the lesions to be heterogeneously enhancing. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed the lesions to be hypointense on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences (Figure 2). In one of the cases with parotid region swelling, MRI revealed swelling extending from the superficial lobe to the deep lobe of the left parotid, with hypointense signals on the T1-weighted sequence and intermediate signals on the T2-weighted sequence. In the cases of parapharyngeal schwannoma, the probable nerve of involvement was documented to be the vagus nerve in five cases and the sympathetic chain in three cases (as per imaging criteria described in the methods section). No discrepancy was noted between the two imaging criteria (Table II).

Fig. 2 (a) Coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing tumour hypointensity and (b) axial T2-weighted MRI scan showing hyperintensity in a patient with parapharyngeal schwannoma.

Table II Nerve of origin evaluation data for parapharyngeal schwannomas

Pt no = patient number; CECT = contrast-enhanced computed tomography; CCA = common carotid artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; IJV = internal jugular vein; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; ECA = external carotid artery

All patients underwent surgical resection which, besides cure, offered correct identification of the nerve of origin in the cases of parapharyngeal schwannoma. In two cases, the nerve of origin was different to that suggested by the imaging studies, involving the vagus nerve rather than the sympathetic chain in one case and vice versa in the other case. Surgical access to the tumours was obtained through a cervical approach with the incision placed in one of the upper neck creases. The modified Blair incision was used in one case of parotid schwannoma.

Histopathological analysis led to a diagnosis of schwannoma in eight cases and ancient schwannoma in two cases. All eight cases of schwannoma demonstrated Antoni A and B configurations. Verocay bodies were present in seven cases.

The findings of a post-operative functional evaluation of the VIIth, IXth, Xth and XIIth cranial nerves are depicted in Table III. None of the patients had permanent neural sequelae. The patient with two lesions (involving the vagus nerve and sympathetic chain), who presented with pre-operative vocal fold palsy, had a hypoxic cardiac arrest on the second post-operative day following a bout of vomiting and probable aspiration. In the late post-operative period, one patient diagnosed with vagal schwannoma developed features suggestive of ‘first bite syndrome’, which is characterised by excruciating pain in the parotid region after the first few bites of food. The patient with facial schwannoma had House–Brackmann grade II weakness in the immediate post-operative period, which subsequently resolved.

Table III Neural function outcome*

* Outcome data for VIIth, IXth, Xth and XIIth cranial nerves following tumour excision using the nerve-sparing technique. Patient had a hypoxic cardiac arrest on second post-operative day following a bout of vomiting and probable aspiration. Patient expired. **Patient had tumour in the parotid region found (pre-operatively) to involve lower division of facial nerve. Pt no = patient number; pre-op = pre-operative; post-op = post-operative; NE = not examined

The median follow-up period was 36 months (range 6–60 months). No recurrence was observed in the follow-up period.

Discussion

Schwannomas are rare tumours, and clinical presentations reported in published series (which often comprise only a small number of patients) vary widely. In our study, there were more male than female patients, although predominance of either sex has been reported variably.Reference Zhang, Cai, Wang, Liu, Ye and Chen10Reference Torossian, Beziat, Abou Chebel, Devouassoux-Shisheboran and Fischer13 Similarly, a wide age range has been reported in the literature, with the median age range being 30–50 years.Reference Zhang, Cai, Wang, Liu, Ye and Chen10, Reference Leu and Chang11, Reference Gilmer-Hill and Kline14 Vagal schwannomas often originate near the nodose ganglion; 9 out of 11 vagal schwannomas reported by Green et al. affected this region.Reference Green, Olsen, DeSanto and Scheithauer3 The cases described in the present study were generally in line with these features.

The classic schwannoma feature of compact groups of parallel spindle-shaped nuclei (Verocay bodies) were previously found to be present in only 37 per cent of cases.Reference Colreavy, Lacy, Hughes, Bouchier-Hayes, Brennan and O'Dwyer2 In our series, only one case with classic schwannoma demonstrated an absence of Verocay bodies on histopathology. Immunochemistry has been used to aid the diagnosis of these tumours where doubt exists in terms of the classic morphological features. The S-100 protein, which is a neural crest marker antigen present in the supporting cells of the nervous system, is an important diagnostic tool, as schwannomas show intense immunostaining for S-100.Reference Donnelly, Al-Sader and Blaney15 However, in cases of malignant tumours it may only be reactive in up to half of the cases.Reference Stefansson, Woolmans and Jerkovic16

In a series of nine patients, Furukawa et al. (1996) reported that pre-operative imaging revealed differences in the vessel displacement patterns caused by vagal and sympathetic chain schwannomas.Reference Furukawa, Furukawa, Katoh and Tsukuda8 These criteria were slightly modified by Saito et al. in terms of the described imaging features of parapharyngeal schwannomas.Reference Saito, Glastonbury, El-Sayed and Eisele9 In the current study, both criteria were equally efficient in diagnosing the nerve of origin. However, in two out of eight cases (involving either the Xth cranial nerve or sympathetic chain), both criteria failed to accurately identify the nerve of origin of the parapharyngeal schwannomas.

As schwannomas are benign, all efforts should be made to preserve nerve function so that quality of life is unaffected. Valentino et al. Reference Valentino, Boggess, Ellis, Hester and Jones6 considered neural deficits to be the result of tumour neuritis, and Russel and RubinsteinReference Russel and Rubinstein17 reported neural fibres within schwannomas to be the cause of such deficits, independent of the employed surgical technique. Various techniques have been described for removal of these tumours, including: tumour excision with neural sacrifice followed by primary anastomosis or neural graft interposition; tumour excision with neural preservation; tumour enucleation between adjacent healthy nerve fibres when possible; tumour emptying (preserving the tumour capsule); and even the ‘shelling out’ of the tumour (leaving gross tumour inside the capsule). The nerve-sparing subcapsular resection technique for schwannomas described in the current study potentially preserves the nerve fibres, without significantly compromising the nerve function as nerve continuity is maintained.

A literature review by Valentino et al. showed that the various surgical techniques offered different function preservation rates.Reference Valentino, Boggess, Ellis, Hester and Jones6 In those who underwent tumour excision without neural sacrifice, 64 per cent had permanent neural deficits, while 29 per cent had temporary deficits. Patients who had their tumours either enucleated or shelled out had a permanent neural deficit rate of 29 per cent and a transient deficit rate of 42 per cent. In those who underwent a shelling out procedure, 29 per cent had no neural deficits at all. In a review of relevant English language literature, de Araujo et al. found that only 31 enucleated schwannoma cases had been reported along with their neurological post-operative outcome.Reference de Araujo, Ramos, Moyses, Durazzo, Cernea and Ferraz18 Of these, 16 patients (51.6 per cent) had partial or complete functional preservation of the affected nerve. In their series of 22 patients, de Araujo et al. reported 10 patients who had undergone enucleation, with a neural function preservation rate of at least 70 per cent. In one of their cases, there was complete recovery of a previously paralysed vagus nerve following the surgical procedure. None of the patients in the current series suffered permanent post-operative neural sequelae. However, one patient with pre-existing vocal fold palsy suffered a cardiac arrest on the second post-operative day due to vomiting and probable aspiration. Another patient developed symptoms of ‘first bite syndrome’ with pain in the preauricular parotid region, which was managed conservatively using medication. A further patient diagnosed with facial schwannoma suffered House–Brackmann grade II weakness in the immediate post-operative period, which subsequently resolved.

  • Removal of head and neck schwannomas with the associated nerves can cause significant neurological impairment

  • This study reports 10 patients with head and neck schwannomas who underwent nerve-sparing subcapsular resection

  • The technique gave excellent post-operative neural function results and tumour control

Incomplete excision may lead to slow local recurrence over a period of months to years.Reference Zbaren and Markwalder19 Torossian et al. reported two recurrences in a series of 15 cases with a median follow up of 4.1 years, which were attributed to the lack of microscopic dissection.Reference Torossian, Beziat, Abou Chebel, Devouassoux-Shisheboran and Fischer13 These recurrences occurred within one and two years following surgery. The affected patients were submitted to a new surgical procedure under microscopic view to enucleate the tumour, with good results. In their series of 22 patients, de Araujo et al. reported no recurrence in a median follow up of 1 year (range 1–54 months).Reference de Araujo, Ramos, Moyses, Durazzo, Cernea and Ferraz18 The technique described in the current study may be criticised for the possibility that a few tumour cells remain, with a remote chance of recurrence. As schwannoma is a benign, slow-growing tumour, any long-term recurrence can be dealt with by further resection. No recurrences were observed in our series with a median follow up of 36 months (range 6–60 months).

Conclusion

This single institution series reports 10 head and neck schwannoma cases for which a nerve-sparing subcapsular resection technique was utilised. This technique provided excellent post-operative neural function results and effective control of tumour pathology.

References

1Bradley, N, Bowerman, JE. Parapharyngeal neurilemmomas. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;27:139–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Colreavy, MP, Lacy, PD, Hughes, J, Bouchier-Hayes, D, Brennan, P, O'Dwyer, AJ et al. Head and neck schwannomas: a 10 year review. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:119–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Green, JD Jr, Olsen, KD, DeSanto, LW, Scheithauer, BW. Neoplasms of the vagus nerve. Laryngoscope 1988;98:648–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Souza, JW, Williams, JT, Dalton, ML, Solis, MM. Schwannoma of the cervical sympathetic chain: it's not a carotid body tumour. Am Surg 2000;66:52–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Moore, G, Yarington, CT Jr, Mangham, CA Jr.Vagal body tumours: diagnosis and treatment. Laryngoscope 1986;96:533–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Valentino, J, Boggess, MA, Ellis, JL, Hester, TO, Jones, RO. Expected neurologic outcome for surgical treatment of cervical neurilemmomas. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1009–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Kara, CO, Topuz, B. Horner's syndrome after excision of cervical sympathetic chain schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:127–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Furukawa, M, Furukawa, MK, Katoh, K, Tsukuda, M. Differentiation between schwannoma of the vagus nerve and schwannoma of the cervical sympathetic chain by imaging diagnosis. Laryngoscope 1996;106:1548–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Saito, DM, Glastonbury, CM, El-Sayed, IH, Eisele, DW. Parapharyngeal space schwannoma: preoperative imaging determination of the nerve of origin. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:662–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Zhang, H, Cai, C, Wang, S, Liu, H, Ye, Y, Chen, X. Extracranial head and neck schwannomas: a clinical analysis of 33 patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:278–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Leu, YS, Chang, KC. Extracranial head and neck schwannomas: a review of 8 years experience. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:435–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Hood, RJ, Reibel, JF, Jensen, ME, Levine, PA. Schwannoma of the cervical sympathetic chain: the Virginia experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:4851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Torossian, JM, Beziat, JL, Abou Chebel, N, Devouassoux-Shisheboran, M, Fischer, G. Extracranial schwannomas: a series of 15 patients. J Craniofac Surg 1999;10:389–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Gilmer-Hill, HS, Kline, DG. Neurogenic tumours of the cervical vagus nerve: report of four cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1498–503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Donnelly, MJ, Al-Sader, MH, Blaney, AW. Benign nasal schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:1011–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Stefansson, K, Woolmans, R, Jerkovic, M. S-100 protein in soft tissue tumours derived from Schwann cells and melanocytes. Am J Pathol 1982;106:261–8Google ScholarPubMed
17Russel, D, Rubinstein, L. Pathology of Tumours of the Nervous System. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989Google Scholar
18de Araujo, CE, Ramos, DM, Moyses, RA, Durazzo, MD, Cernea, CR, Ferraz, AR. Neck nerve trunks schwannomas: clinical features and postoperative neurologic outcome. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1579–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Zbaren, P, Markwalder, R. Schwannoma of the true vocal cord. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:837–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Intra-operative view of the nerve-sparing subcapsular dissection technique showing the tumour being freed on all sides before being resected.

Figure 1

Table I Clinico-cytohistological schwannoma features

Figure 2

Fig. 2 (a) Coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing tumour hypointensity and (b) axial T2-weighted MRI scan showing hyperintensity in a patient with parapharyngeal schwannoma.

Figure 3

Table II Nerve of origin evaluation data for parapharyngeal schwannomas

Figure 4

Table III Neural function outcome*