Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T22:32:38.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nasoantral window assessment by acoustic rhinometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

J. Marais*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Infirmary, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, Scotland.
A. G. D. Maran
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Infirmary, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, Scotland.
*
J. Marais, F.R.C.S.,Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Infirmary, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9EN.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty-five patients who had each had inferior meatal antrostomies performed were endoscopically examined and assessed with acoustic rhinometry six weeks and six months after surgery. No significant increase in nasal cross-sectional area could be demonstrated at the site of the antrostomy in the post-operative cases, although the nasoantral window was found to be patent in 44 of the 50 nasal cavities.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

References

Brooks, L. J., Castile, R. G., Glass, G. M., Griscom, N. T., Wohl, M. E. B., Fredberg, J. J. (1984) Reproducibility and accuracy of airway area by acoustic reflection. Journal of Applied Physiology 57(3): 777787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilberg, O., Jackson, A. C., Swift, D. L., Pederson, O. F. (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity volume by acoustic reflection. Journal of Applied Physiology 66 (1): 295303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, V. J. (1988) Inferior meatal antrostomy. Fundamental considerations of design and function. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 15 Suppl: 118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed