Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:30:00.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term outcomes of ossiculoplasty using bone cement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2019

B Demir*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
A Binnetoglu
Affiliation:
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A Sahin
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
U Derinsu
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
Ç Batman
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Berat Demir, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Marmara UniversityMedical Faculty, Mimar Sinan Caddesi No. 41, Fevzi Cakmak Mahallesi, Ust Kaynarca-Pendik, 34899 Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: drberatdemir80@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of ossiculoplasty using bone cement.

Method

Forty patients (24 females and 16 males; mean age: 34.1 ± 11.8 years; range, 9–54 years) with chronic otitis media with perforation but without cholesteatoma who had undergone incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty using bone cement were evaluated retrospectively. Pre-operative and post-operative audiograms were evaluated. Bone conduction, air conduction and air–bone gaps were calculated according to international guidelines.

Results

There was a mean reduction in pre-operative and post-operative air conduction (12.30 ± 11.98 dB), and this result was significant (p = 0.0001). There was a mean reduction in pre-operative and post-operative bone conduction (4.30 ± 6.69 dB), and this result was significant (p < 0.0001). The pre-operative air–bone gap was 27.65 dB and decreased to 19.65 dB during follow-up (p = 0.0001). No adverse reactions or complications were observed.

Conclusion

Bone cement is reliable for the repair of incudostapedial-joint defects.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Introduction

The causes of middle-ear diseases of the ossicular chain include chronic ear diseases, trauma and congenital ossicular anomalies. When treating chronic ear disease, the main aims are to avoid irreversible disease and improve auditory function. The incus is the ossicle that is the most vulnerable to damage in chronic diseases of the middle ear.Reference Austin1 Reconstruction of the incudostapedial joint can be achieved in several ways. The use of bone cement to maintain incudostapedial continuity has increased in recent years.

Bone cement is often used for implant fixation in various types of orthopaedic or trauma surgery and for dental applications.Reference Vaishya, Chauhan and Vaish2 Bone cement consists of powder and liquid mixed at certain ratios. This mixture hardens within minutes through an exothermic process. In Ketac Cem Radiopaque Permanent Glass Ionomer Luting Cement (3M, Maplewood, Minnesota, USA), glass powder, polycarboxylic acid and pigments are used as the powder, and water, tartaric acid and preservative agents are used as the liquids. The mixing time is 2.5 minutes, and the hardening is completed in 5–10 minutes. When the bone cement hardens, it no longer reacts with the surrounding liquids.

In this study, we evaluated the results of our clinical experience with bone cement repair of ossicular discontinuity between the incus and stapes.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty between June 2006 and June 2010 were evaluated retrospectively.

The collected data comprised patients' age, sex, primary diagnosis, surgical procedure, side of surgical procedure, surgical outcome, and pre- and post-operative audiograms. Patients who had a disease-free or cleansed middle ear and mastoid, no cholesteatoma, and an intact ossicular chain apart from discontinuity within the incus long process and the head of stapes were included.

The study started with 51 patients, but 11 patients were lost at follow up. Therefore, 40 patients (24 females and 16 males; mean age: 34.1 ± 11.8 years; range, 9–54 years) took part in the present study. Patients visited our clinic at least five years after incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty. All patients underwent tympanoplasty through post-auricular incision for chronic otitis media with perforation but without cholesteatoma. Temporalis muscle fascia was applied as a graft material in patients with chronic otitis media, and auricular cartilage was used to prevent direct contact between the bone cement and the tympanic membrane.

Procedures

Post-auricular approaches were used to expose the middle ear. Bone cement was formed by mixing liquid and powder as described in manufacturer instructions. Pre-operative and post-operative pure tone audiometric scores were used to calculate the air–bone gap (ABG), and hearing gain was calculated at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz. According to the recommendation of the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines, an ABG of less than 20 dB post-operatively was used as the criterion for successful ossiculoplasty.3

Statistical analyses

Data were analysed using SPSS® (version 16) statistical software. Pre-operative and post-operative bone conduction and air conduction were compared using the paired t-test. For comparison of the hearing results of independent groups, the Kruskal–Wallis and chi-square tests were used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results are given as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

A total of 24 right ears and 16 left ears underwent incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty. The mean ± SD duration after incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty was 62.4 ± 5.1 months (range, 61–74 months). The pre-operative ABG of patients who underwent incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty was 15–50 dB. The mean ± SD ABG was 27.6 ± 7.6 dB.

The mean pre-operative air conduction was 47.9 ± 13.6 dB, and the post-operative air conduction was 35.6 ± 15.4 dB at 62.4 months (mean) after incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty. The mean reduction between pre-operative and post-operative air conduction was 12.3 ± 11.9 dB. There was a significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative air conduction (p < 0.05).

The mean pre-operative bone conduction was 20.2 ± 8.1 dB. The mean post-operative bone conduction was 15.9 ± 9.4 dB at 62.4 months (mean) after incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty. The mean reduction between the pre-operative and post-operative bone conduction was 4.3 ± 6.6 dB. These results were significantly different (p < 0.05).

The pre- and post-operative conduction thresholds at high frequencies (1, 2, 3 and 4 kHz) were measured. The mean change for high frequencies showed an improvement of 4.6 dB (± 7.3 dB). These results were significantly different (p < 0.05).

The mean pre-operative ABG was 27.6 dB and decreased to 19.6 dB after 62.4 (± 5.1) months (mean) since incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty (p < 0.05) (Table 1). A post-operative ABG of 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 dB was seen in 12, 21 and 7 patients, respectively. This would demonstrate that 33 patients had a post-operative ABG of less than 20 dB.

Table 1. Long-term outcomes of ossiculoplasty using bone cement

All values are mean ± standard deviation. ABG = air–bone gap; Pre-op = pre-operative; Post-op = post-operative

For male patients, the mean pre-operative and post-operative ABG was 23.6 dB and 19 dB, respectively. For female patients, the mean pre-operative and post-operative ABG was 30.3 dB and 20 dB, respectively. These results showed no significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative ABG in terms of gender (p < 0.05).

For female patients, the mean pre-operative air conduction was 50.5 ± 15.9 dB, and the mean post-operative air conduction was 39.7 ± 15.8 dB. The mean pre-operative bone conduction was 20.2 ± 8.9 dB, and the mean post-operative bone conduction was 19.6 ± 9 dB. There was a significant difference between pre-operative and post-operative air conduction (p < 0.05) but not bone conduction (p > 0.05).

Comparison between the pre-operative and post-operative values in male and female patients showed no significant difference in air or bone conduction (p > 0.05). However, comparison of post-operative results for male and female patients showed male patients to have significantly better results (p < 0.05).

Discussion

Various methods are used for reconstruction of the incudostapedial joint. Total ossicular replacement prostheses or partial ossicular replacement prostheses, autologous bone and cartilage, combined prostheses, or cortical bone grafts have been used for many years. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement can be also employed to reconstruct the ossicular chain in chronic otitis media.Reference Ozer, Bayazit, Kanlikama, Mumbuc and Ozen4

Several methods have been described for reconstruction of the incudostapedial joint, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Definitive hearing results, cost-effectiveness and easy application are the main advantages of this method.Reference Ozer, Bayazit, Kanlikama, Mumbuc and Ozen4 Another advantage of ossiculoplasty using bone cement is that it maintains the anatomy and physiology of the ossicular chain.Reference Celenk, Baglam, Baysal, Durucu, Karatas and Mumbuc5 Hearing results using bone cement are good. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement maintains the natural anatomy and physiology of the ossicular chain, but it also results in better hearing and has high success rates.

In our study, the ABG fell to 19.6 dB at follow up. Babu and Seidman performed ossiculoplasty using bone cement on 18 patients, and successful results were obtained for 17 of them.Reference Babu and Seidman6 Celenk et al. performed incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty in 50 patients and achieved an ABG of less than 20 dB in 78 per cent of the patients.Reference Celenk, Baglam, Baysal, Durucu, Karatas and Mumbuc5 Ozer et al. performed ossiculoplasty using bone cement in 15 patients and achieved successful hearing results in 9 patients after 1 year.Reference Ozer, Bayazit, Kanlikama, Mumbuc and Ozen4

The resonance frequency of the middle ear differs for air and bone conduction stimuli. Although airway stimulation averages between 0.8 and 1.2 kHz, the mean shifts towards high frequencies during bone path stimulation (between 1.5 and 2 kHz).Reference Homma, Du, Shimizu and Puria7 There are also differences in the transmission of air and bone conduction stimuli. In air conduction, the sound pressure in the ear canal is primarily transmitted through the tympanic membrane and the ossicular chain to the cochlea. However, bone conduction involves multiple pathways, including distortional, inertial-ossicular and osseotympanic pathways.Reference Silman and Silverman8 Therefore, the post-operative air and bone threshold corrections may not be parallel. The improvements in bone conduction pathway thresholds depend on the extent to which bone chain movement can be achieved. However, in our study both bone and air conduction improved in a similar way. The improvement of the conduction thresholds at high frequencies can be interpreted as a sign of the resonance frequency being caught, indicating that the ossicular configuration is approaching normal. The mean change in conduction thresholds showed an improvement of 4.6 dB (± 7.9 dB) in our study. This suggests that bone cement provides a transmission close to the original in bone conduction. The difference in ABG between the genders was not expected in terms of pathology. There is no study found in the literature that shows significant differences in the air–bone range in terms of gender.

Ossiculoplasty using bone cement is inexpensive because one box of cement provides the material for many patients. Application of bone cement is simple, but certain requirements must be met for incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty using bone cement. If using bone cement for ossiculoplasty, there should be no blood or haemorrhage in the middle ear.Reference Baylancicek, Iseri, Topdağ, Ustundag, Ozturk and Polat9 The mucosa overlying the head of stapes and remnant of the long process of incus must be removed to expose the ‘pure’ bone surfaces needed for adhesion of the glass ionomer bone cement.

Due to the potential neurotoxicity of glass ionomeric cement, contact with neural structures, perilymph or dura should be avoided.Reference Ozer, Bayazit, Kanlikama, Mumbuc and Ozen4, Reference Kum and Kulacoglu10 In the event of contamination, bone cement should be aspirated instantly and multiple attempts at aspiration and irrigation of the middle-ear cavity with serum is essential to extract the bone cement.Reference Bayazit, Ozer, Kanlikama, Durmaz and Yilmaz11 Reconstruction with bone cement should be undertaken at its most appropriate stiffness to avoid contamination. Small pieces of sponge can be used to prevent cement being transmitted to middle-ear structures.Reference Bayazit, Ozer, Kanlikama, Durmaz and Yilmaz11

Although bone cement has a neurotoxic effect by increasing inflammation and the formation of granulation tissue, Kum and Kulacoglu reported that it does not give rise to permanent dysfunction of facial nerves.Reference Kum and Kulacoglu10 The heat produced in the preparation of bone cement is perhaps another disadvantage of bone cement. Our research team has not observed heat-related problems or neurotoxicity to facial nerves. It has also been reported that use of relatively large amounts of bone cement to repair large craniotomy defects can cause neurotoxic effects and even death due to aluminium toxicity.Reference Reusche, Pilz, Oberascher, Lindner, Egensperger and Gloeckner12 Although less bone cement is used for ossiculoplasty than to repair craniotomy defects, the risk of aluminium toxicity should be considered.

Hydroxyapatite bone cement is another type of glass ionomer, but it is more expensive than glass ionomer bone cement. However, hydroxyapatite bone cement does not lead to significant neurotoxic properties, aluminium toxicity or formation of granulation tissue.Reference Gérard, De Bie, Franceschi, Deggouj and Gersdorff13 Hydroxyapatite bone cement carries a lower risk of inner-ear damage than other prostheses.Reference Pitiot, Hermann, Tringali, Dubreuil and Truy14 The disadvantages of hydroxyapatite bone cement are high cost, difficulty of preparation and placement, and drying time.Reference Galy-Bernadoy, Akkari, Mathiolon, Mondain, Uziel and Venail15 This cement remains forgeable for 3–4 minutes before placement and can harden completely in 5 minutes.Reference Galy-Bernadoy, Akkari, Mathiolon, Mondain, Uziel and Venail15

Bone cement is not associated with the graft take rate.Reference Bayazit, Ozer, Kanlikama, Durmaz and Yilmaz11 Cement ossiculoplasty can be applied before or after placement of a temporalis fascia graft, but we prefer ossiculoplasty after grafting. We have performed tympanoplasty using the over–underlay method with standard sponges and auricular cartilage to hinder the connection between bone cement and the tympanic membrane. This is particularly important in patients with Eustachian-tube dysfunction.

One of the most important factors affecting the long-term consequences of ossiculoplasty is persistent disease such as cholesteatoma, atelectasis and Eustachian-tube dysfunction.Reference Celenk, Baglam, Baysal, Durucu, Karatas and Mumbuc5 The absence of these persistent diseases in our patients showed the success of our method. Furthermore, extrusion or absorption of prosthetic material may be a long-term complication, particularly as a result of Eustachian-tube dysfunction,Reference Celenk, Baglam, Baysal, Durucu, Karatas and Mumbuc5 but this was not observed in our study. The distance between stapes and the long process of the incus should be evaluated carefully for bone-cement application. The ‘ideal’ patient for ossiculoplasty using bone cement will have a gap of less than one-third of the incus long arm. Ossiculoplasty can be applied for lengths of up to two-thirds of the incus long process.Reference Celenk, Baglam, Baysal, Durucu, Karatas and Mumbuc5

  • Incus long process defects are a common cause of ossicular discontinuity

  • Bone cement ossiculoplasty is a reliable method for repairing incus long process defects

  • Hearing gain is maintained in the long term after using bone cement to manage incus long process defects

The retrospective nature and absence of audiograms at one year after incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty were the main limitations of our study. Nevertheless, this was the first study showing the long-term results of ossiculoplasty using bone cement.

Conclusion

Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty using bone cement is a safe and reliable method that gives good long-term hearing results.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Dr B Demir takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Austin, DF. Ossicular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol 1971;94:525–35Google Scholar
2Vaishya, R, Chauhan, M, Vaish, A. Bone cement. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:157–63Google Scholar
3American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186–7Google Scholar
4Ozer, E, Bayazit, YA, Kanlikama, M, Mumbuc, S, Ozen, Z. Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:643–6Google Scholar
5Celenk, F, Baglam, T, Baysal, E, Durucu, C, Karatas, ZA, Mumbuc, S et al. Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:842–7Google Scholar
6Babu, S, Seidman, MD. Ossicular reconstruction using bone cement. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:98101Google Scholar
7Homma, K, Du, Y, Shimizu, Y, Puria, S. Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125:968–79Google Scholar
8Silman, S, Silverman, CA. Auditory Diagnosis: Principles and Applications. Orlando: Academic Press, 1991Google Scholar
9Baylancicek, S, Iseri, M, Topdağ, , Ustundag, E, Ozturk, M, Polat, S et al. Ossicular reconstruction for incus long-process defects: bone cement or partial ossicular replacement prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151:468–72Google Scholar
10Kum, RO, Kulacoglu, S. Effects of glass ionomer cement on facial nerve: a clinical and histopathologic evaluation. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:814– 17Google Scholar
11Bayazit, YA, Ozer, E, Kanlikama, M, Durmaz, T, Yilmaz, M. Bone cement ossiculoplasty: incus to stapes versus malleus to stapes cement bridge. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:364–7Google Scholar
12Reusche, E, Pilz, P, Oberascher, G, Lindner, B, Egensperger, R, Gloeckner, K et al. Subacute fatal aluminum encephalopathy after reconstructive otoneurosurgery: a case report. Hum Pathol 2001;32:1136–40Google Scholar
13Gérard, JM, De Bie, G, Franceschi, D, Deggouj, N, Gersdorff, M. Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1629–35Google Scholar
14Pitiot, V, Hermann, R, Tringali, S, Dubreuil, C, Truy, E. Revision stapes surgery for lysis of the long process of the incus: comparing hydroxyapatite bone cement versus malleovestibulopexy and total ossicular replacement prosthesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2515–21Google Scholar
15Galy-Bernadoy, C, Akkari, M, Mathiolon, C, Mondain, M, Uziel, A, Venail, F. Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014;131:289–92Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Long-term outcomes of ossiculoplasty using bone cement