Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T22:05:23.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term outcome of ossiculoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2014

Z Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, PR China
L Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, PR China Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Ministry of Education of China), Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, PR China
D Han*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, PR China Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Ministry of Education of China), Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, PR China
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Demin Han, No.17, HouGouHuTong, DongCheng District, Beijing 100005, PR China Fax: 86 10 8511 5988 E-mail: dr.luozhang@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To observe the long-term outcome of ossiculoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone in chronic otitis media in-patients.

Methods:

Sixty-one ears of 57 in-patients with chronic otitis media, with or without cholesteatoma, underwent type III tympanoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone as the prosthetic material. Twenty-one ears were treated by canal wall down mastoidectomy and 40 ears by canal wall up mastoidectomy. The follow-up period was 3 to 6 years (average 4.2 years). Pure tone averages for thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz were calculated using standard conventional audiometry.

Results:

The pre-operative mean air–bone gap of 31.6 dB, for all ears, was reduced to 20.3 dB post-operatively. For the 40 canal wall up ears, this value decreased from 30.8 dB to 19.9 dB, and for the 21 canal wall down ears it decreased from 33.0 dB to 21.0 dB. The differences between the pre- and post-operative mean air–bone gap values were significant.

Conclusion:

No cases of extrusion, necrosis or resorption were exhibited for the autogenous mastoid cortical bone prosthesis. A significant hearing improvement was obtained in the majority of cases and this remained stable over time.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Introduction

Numerous ossiculoplasty materials are available today. These include high-density polyethylene sponge (Plastipore™), hydroxyapatite, titanium, autogenous cartilage and autogenous ossicles. However, the extrusion of artificial prostheses remains one of the main problems, resulting in post-operative hearing loss. Plastipore extrusion rates range from 0.89 to 6.30 per cent,Reference Slater, Rizer, Schuring and Lippy1Reference Felek, Celik, Islam, Elham, Demirci and Samim5 and hydroxyapatite extrusion rates range from 5 to 14 per cent.Reference House and Teufert3, Reference Goldenberg and Drive6Reference Kobayashi, Gyo, Shinohara and Yanagihara9 Titanium ossicular prostheses have been presented as being easily shaped, trimmable, lightweight implants that theoretically transmit sound better through lower impedance; however, extrusion is still a problemReference Ho, Battista and Wiet10 unless cartilage is interposed between the prosthesis and the tympanic membrane.Reference Kim and Wiet11

In this paper, we review the outcome of ossiculoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone, which has been utilised as a reconstructive material at our institution since 2005. The main advantages of this material for ossiculoplasty are stable post-operative hearing, a reduced risk of extrusion and no requirement for the insertion of cartilage between the prosthesis and the tympanic membrane.

Materials and methods

Patients and indications

From January 2005 to January 2008, 61 ears of 57 in-patients with chronic otitis media, with or without cholesteatoma, underwent type III tympanoplasty using autogenous mastoid cortical bone as the prosthetic material. The follow-up period was 3 to 6 years (average of 4.2 years).

The patients consisted of 30 females (33 ears) and 27 males (28 ears), aged 15 to 61 years (average age of 37.5 years). Pre-surgery, there was no evidence of obstruction of the eustachian tube, as revealed by the Valsalva manoeuvre. There were no records of any surgical treatment for any of the patients. All patients had intact and mobile stapes as evidenced during surgery. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired for all patients.

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Committee of the Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology.

Surgical technique

A traditional postauricular skin incision was performed. Bone columella was harvested by drilling the mastoid cortical bone and was put aside for use as the ossiculoplasty material. Canal wall up mastoidectomy (including mastoidectomy with reconstruction of the lateral attic wallReference Yu, Yang, Wang, Han and Zhang12) or canal wall down mastoidectomy procedures were carried out. Pathological conditions around the ossicles were carefully removed, as was the damaged incus and/or head of malleus. The handle of malleus was kept in place as much as possible. The stapes were confirmed as being intact and mobile.

The prosthetic sculpturing was performed as follows. A 1 mm diamond burr was used to create a groove on one end of the bone columella, which would accommodate the stapes capitulum; the groove was approximately 0.5–1.0 mm deep, so that its edge did not touch the fallopian canal or the promontory. A facet with a slight slant on the other end of the bone columella was fashioned, which would contact the tympanic membrane. The middle part of the bone columella was trimmed to decrease the weight of the prosthesis (Figure 1). The length of the prosthesis was about 1.75–2.50 mm. This sculpting process took about 5–10 minutes.

Fig. 1 Photograph of a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis sculpted from autogenous mastoid cortical bone (a) and a line drawing of the prosthesis (b).

The prosthesis was then placed to bridge the head of the stapes and the new tympanic membrane (temporalis fascia graft). In order to reproduce a sharp tympanomeatal angle and avoid lateralisation of the graft, it was very important to keep the anterior tympanomeatal skin flap intact when elevated. The skin flap would overlay the reflected part of the temporalis fascia graft and keep the graft in place for total drum replacement. For the cases with attic cholesteatomas, in which the pars tensa was intact, a modified underlay technique was used to repair pars flaccida defects. The canal or opened mastoid cavity was packed with Gelfoam® soaked in hydrocortisone and cotton wicks soaked with antibiotic ointment.

The packing was removed 14 days later. The condition of the canal walls (in canal wall up cases), the mastoid cavities (in canal wall down cases) and the new tympanic membranes were observed by electric otoscope or otoendoscope. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 6 years (average of 4.2 years) and the follow-up rate was 52 per cent. Those patients with inadequate follow up were excluded from the study.

Second-look surgery was performed in those cases where: a suspicious cholesteatoma recurred, the prosthesis was dislocated, or any other conditions resulting in significant conductive hearing loss occurred. All such conditions occurred within three years in our consecutive patients.

Audiometric evaluation

For the pre- and post-operative assessments of hearing level, pure tone averages (PTAs) for thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz were calculated. The PTA for 3 kHz hearing was calculated as the average of 2 and 4 kHz hearing, because this frequency (3 kHz) is not usually measured in China.

Standard conventional audiometry was carried out one to two weeks before surgery to assess pre-operative hearing. For the post-operative hearing assessment, the latest audiometry results were used in the data analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS® statistics (version 17.0) package (paired t-test or independent-sample t-test), and p values of less than 0.05 were regarded as significant.

Results

During the first two years after surgery, recurrence or residue of cholesteatomas presented in five ears. Perforation of the eardrum occurred in one ear, lateralisation of the graft was evident in two ears and displacement of the prosthesis was apparent in two ears, with significant air–bone gaps (ABGs). Revision surgery was performed in these cases. Two ears with cholesteatoma residue were subsequently incorporated into the canal wall down group. The follow-up time was calculated from the time of revision surgery.

During our later follow up (three to six years after surgery), four canal wall up ears presented with self-cleaning mesotympanic retraction, which remained self-cleaning and stable; a ‘wait-and-see’ policy was adopted. Slight lateralisation of the graft, or tympanomeatal angle blunting, with an ABG of less than 30 dB, recurred in three ears, with no further deterioration over time. The patients were unwilling to undergo further revision surgery. There were no major complications (such as facial paralysis) in any of the patients. In addition, there were no cases of prosthesis extrusion, necrosis or resorption. A distinct incudostapedial joint and good aeration in the tympanic cavity could be seen on CT images, even at six years after the operation (Figure 2).

Fig. 2 Coronal computed tomography image showing a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (hollow arrow) in good condition six years after ossiculoplasty (white arrow indicates the incudostapedial joint).

According to the Wullstein classification of tympanoplasty, ossiculoplasty between the stapes head and eardrum is classed as a type III tympanoplasty. All patients in this study underwent type III tympanoplasty.

The pre-operative mean ABG of 31.6 dB was reduced to 20.3 dB post-operatively (61 ears) (a change of 11.3 dB); this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05, paired t-test). A closure of the ABG to 20 dB or lower was evident in 70.5 per cent of ears, whereas closure to 10 dB or lower was achieved in 13.1 per cent of ears. An ABG closure of between 21 dB and 30 dB was evident in 26.2 per cent of cases, and a closure of over 31 dB was evident in 3.3 per cent.

For the 40 canal wall up ears, a pre-operative mean ABG of 30.8 dB was reduced to 19.9 dB post-operatively (p < 0.05, paired t-test). For the 21 canal wall down ears, mean ABG was reduced from 33.0 dB to 21.0 dB (p < 0.05, paired t-test). Table I shows the significant differences between pre- and post-operative mean ABG values for canal wall up and canal wall down cases. However, there was no significant difference between canal wall up and canal wall down cases in terms of the post-operative mean ABG values (independent-sample t-test, p > 0.05) (Table II).

Table I Differences between pre- and post-operative mean ABG values*

* For patients who underwent type III tympanoplasty. ABG = air–bone gap; SD = standard deviation; pre-op = pre-operative; post-op = post-operative

Table II Group differences in post-operative mean ABG values*

* For patients who underwent type III tympanoplasty. ABG = air–bone gap; post-op = post-operative; SD = standard deviation

Discussion

The most frequent ossicular chain defect that the otological surgeon encounters is a defect or absence of the incus.Reference Babu and Seidman13 Hence, the most common reconstruction model for an ossicular defect is a type III tympanoplasty.Reference O'Reilly, Cass, Hirsch, Kamerer, Bernat and Poznanovic14, Reference Iurato, Marioni and Onofri15 In this type of tympanoplasty, whether the stapes is movable or fixed is a crucial factor in obtaining improved hearing results. For patients with mobile stapes, hearing results have been shown to be significantly better than for those with fixed stapes.Reference Tsuzuki, Yanagihara, Hinohira and Sakagami16 The cause of poor hearing results in fixed stapes patients may be the refixation of the stapes, rather than the failure of the reconstruction between the stapes head and the malleus handle.Reference Felek, Celik, Islam, Elham, Demirci and Samim5 In order to observe the long-term outcome of ossiculoplasty using a prosthesis formed from autogenous mastoid cortical bone and to exclude the effect of stapes fixation, we reviewed only those cases with an intact and mobile stapes (as observed during type III tympanoplasty).

Besides the condition of the stapes, many factors, such as disease severity, follow-up period, eustachian tube function and surgical technique, affect the outcome of ossiculoplasty.Reference Kartush17, Reference Mishiro, Sakagami, Kitahara, Kondoh and Kubo18 The treatment of different pathological conditions is beyond the scope of this article; rather, we discuss those patients for whom ossiculoplasty was necessary to improve hearing and review their long-term outcomes.

In most previous studies of ossiculoplasty, which report findings based on short-term, medium-term or a mixture of follow-up periods, the rates of ABG closure to within 20 dB have been reported to range from 60 to 97 per cent.Reference Slater, Rizer, Schuring and Lippy1, Reference Felek, Celik, Islam, Elham, Demirci and Samim5, Reference Iurato, Marioni and Onofri15, Reference Krueger, Feghali, Shelton, Green, Beatty and Wilson19Reference Silverstain, McDaniel and Lichtenstein22 Long-term follow up requires commitment and resources that can be difficult to achieve. To our knowledge, reports on the long-term follow up for type III tympanoplasty are rare; the rates of post-operative ABG closure to within 20 dB range from 48 to 81.3 per cent.Reference Malafronte, Filosa and Mercone23Reference Berenholz, Burkey and Lippy27 Our results are within this range.

The post-operative condition of the artificial prosthesis (e.g. extrusion) also undoubtedly affects the outcome of ossiculoplasty. Similar hearing results have been obtained using prostheses composed of different materials, including titanium, hydroxyapatite and autografts.Reference Goldenberg and Drive6, Reference Iurato, Marioni and Onofri15, Reference Krueger, Feghali, Shelton, Green, Beatty and Wilson19, Reference Yung and Vowler26 However, the relatively high extrusion rate of titanium and hydroxyapatite remains one of the main problems (leading to post-operative hearing loss), unless cartilage is interposed between the prosthesis and the tympanic membrane.Reference Kim and Wiet11 Compared with those artificial prosthesis materials, autogenous mastoid cortical bone has good biocompatibility. There were no cases of prosthesis extrusion during the follow-up period in our study, even in those cases of tympanic membrane retraction or atelectasis. Certainly, middle-ear ventilation dysfunction remains a problem. In addition, maintaining an intact anterior tympanomeatal skin flap and reproducing a sharp tympanomeatal angle can be helpful in avoiding lateralisation of the graft and achieving good hearing over a long period.

  • Type III tympanoplasty is the most common reconstruction model for an ossicular defect

  • Numerous materials for ossiculoplasty are available, but these have their drawbacks

  • A prosthesis made of autogenous mastoid cortical bone exhibited no extrusion, necrosis or resorption

  • Furthermore, a significant hearing improvement was achieved, which remained stable for a long time

  • Autogenous mastoid cortical bone remains one of the best available materials for ossiculoplasty

Previous reports,Reference Merchant, Rosowski and McKenna28Reference Merchant and Nadol30 and the findings of this study, have shown that autologous grafts for minor columellae (partial ossicular replacement prostheses) maintain their morphological contours, size, shape and physical integrity for long periods, sometimes longer than 20 years.Reference Merchant, Rosowski and McKenna28Reference Merchant and Nadol30 They do not trigger the formation of new bone or undergo resorption in the absence of infection. They have an extremely low incidence of extrusion, even in cases of chronic tubal dysfunction and tympanic membrane atelectasis.Reference Merchant, Rosowski and McKenna28 These features, combined with their low cost, and the lack of a need for cartilage insertion between the prosthesis and the tympanic membrane, lead us to prefer autogenous mastoid cortical bone as the first choice of material for minor columellar reconstruction (type III tympanoplasty). Although autogenous ossicles can be used as the reconstruction material, in cases with cholesteatoma the ossicles may sometimes be missing, or the ossicles may have been involved in the cholesteatoma, in which case there is a risk that the disease will be implanted.Reference Mishiro, Sakagami, Kitahara, Kondoh and Kubo18 Auricular cartilage may sometimes be very thin in small women and children,Reference Mishiro, Sakagami, Kitahara, Kondoh and Kubo18 and the potential for resorptionReference Goode and Nishihara31 and extra trauma occur simultaneously.

Certainly, longer-term observations and larger sample sizes, or comparison with other prosthesis materials, are necessary; all of these further studies are currently underway.

Conclusion

During our follow up of ossiculoplasty cases, there was no evidence of extrusion, necrosis or resorption of the autogenous mastoid cortical bone prostheses. A significant hearing improvement was obtained in the majority of cases and this remained stable over time. Furthermore, the cost of the prosthesis is negligible. Although the use of sculpted autogenous bone has declined, autogenous mastoid cortical bone remains one of the best available materials for ossiculoplasty.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Special Fund of Sanitation Elite Reconstruction of Beijing (grant numbers 2009-3-35, 2009-2-04, 2009-1-04 and 2009-2-007), awarded to ZY, DH and LZ.

References

1Slater, PW, Rizer, FM, Schuring, AG, Lippy, WH. Practical use of total and partial ossicular replacement prostheses in ossiculoplasty. Laryngoscope 1997;107:1193–8Google Scholar
2Bayazit, Y, Goksu, N, Beder, L. Functional results of Plastipore prostheses for middle ear ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1999;109:709–11Google Scholar
3House, JW, Teufert, KB. Extrusion rates and hearing results in ossicular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:135–41Google Scholar
4Murphy, TP. Hearing results in pediatric patients with chronic otitis media after ossicular reconstruction with partial ossicular replacement prostheses and total ossicular replacement prostheses. Laryngoscope 2000;110:536–44Google Scholar
5Felek, SA, Celik, H, Islam, A, Elham, AH, Demirci, M, Samim, E. Type 2 ossiculoplasty: prognostic determination of hearing results by middle ear risk index. Am J Otol 2010;31:325–31Google Scholar
6Goldenberg, RA, Drive, M. Long-term results with hydroxyapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:635–42Google Scholar
7Grote, JJ. Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with hydroxyapatite prostheses. Am J Otol 1987;8:396401Google ScholarPubMed
8Vrabec, JT, Stierman, K, Grady, JJ. Hydroxyapatite prosthesis extrusion. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:653–6Google Scholar
9Kobayashi, T, Gyo, K, Shinohara, T, Yanagihara, N. Ossicular reconstruction with hydroxyapatite prostheses with interposed cartilage. Am J Otol 2002;23:222–7Google Scholar
10Ho, SY, Battista, RA, Wiet, RJ. Early results with titanium ossicular implants. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:149–52Google Scholar
11Kim, HH, Wiet, RJ. Preferred technique in ossiculoplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;14:243–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Yu, ZL, Yang, BT, Wang, ZCW, Han, DM, Zhang, L. Reconstruction of lateral attic wall using autogenous mastoid cortical bone. Am J Otol 2011;32:361–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Babu, S, Seidman, MD. Ossicular reconstruction using bone cement. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:903–9Google Scholar
14O'Reilly, RC, Cass, SP, Hirsch, BE, Kamerer, DB, Bernat, RA, Poznanovic, SP. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear index. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:835–8Google Scholar
15Iurato, S, Marioni, G, Onofri, M. Hearing result of ossiculoplasty in Austin-Kartush group A patients. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:140–4Google Scholar
16Tsuzuki, K, Yanagihara, N, Hinohira, Y, Sakagami, M. Tympanosclerosis involving the ossicular chain: mobility of the stapes in association with hearing results. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:1046–52Google Scholar
17Kartush, JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitulum to malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:689715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Mishiro, Y, Sakagami, M, Kitahara, T, Kondoh, K, Kubo, T. Long-term hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty in comparison to short-term outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:326–9Google Scholar
19Krueger, WW, Feghali, JG, Shelton, C, Green, JD, Beatty, CW, Wilson, DF et al. Preliminary ossiculoplasty results using the Kurz titanium prostheses. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:836–9Google Scholar
20De Vos, C, Gersdorff, M, Gerard, JM. Prognosis factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:61–7Google Scholar
21Gardner, EK, Jackson, CG, Kaylie, DM. Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses. Laryngoscope 2004;114:6570Google Scholar
22Silverstain, H, McDaniel, AB, Lichtenstein, R. A comparison of PORP, TORP, and incus homograft for ossicular reconstruction in chronic ear surgery. Laryngoscope 1986;96:159–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Malafronte, G, Filosa, B, Mercone, F. A new double-cartilage block ossiculoplasty: long-term results. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:531–3Google Scholar
24Shinohara, T, Gyo, K, Saiki, T, Yanagihara, N. Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prostheses: long-term results. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000;25:287–92Google Scholar
25Farrior, JB, Nichols, SW. Long-term results using ossicular grafts. Am J Otol 1996;17:386–92Google Scholar
26Yung, M, Vowler, SL. Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:874–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Berenholz, LP, Burkey, JM, Lippy, WH. Short- and long-term results of ossicular reconstruction using partial and total plastipore prostheses. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:884–9Google Scholar
28Merchant, SN, Rosowski, JJ, McKenna, MJ. Tympanoplasty. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;14:224–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Schuknecht, HF. Pathology of the Ear, 2nd edn.Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger,1993Google Scholar
30Merchant, SN, Nadol, JB Jr.Histopathology of ossicular implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:813–33Google Scholar
31Goode, RL, Nishihara, S. Experimental models of ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:663–75Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Photograph of a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis sculpted from autogenous mastoid cortical bone (a) and a line drawing of the prosthesis (b).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Coronal computed tomography image showing a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (hollow arrow) in good condition six years after ossiculoplasty (white arrow indicates the incudostapedial joint).

Figure 2

Table I Differences between pre- and post-operative mean ABG values*

Figure 3

Table II Group differences in post-operative mean ABG values*