Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:12:12.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme patterns in auricular pseudocyst fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

P-P Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
S-M Tsai
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
H-M Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
L-F Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
C-Y Chien
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
N-C Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
K-Y Ho*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Kuen-Yao Ho, Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, 100 Tzyou 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 807, Taiwan E-mail: kuyaho@cc.kmu.edu.tw
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

We investigated lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme patterns in the cyst fluid of auricular pseudocysts and autogenous blood, to assist the diagnosis of auricular pseudocyst.

Methods:

Twenty patients with auricular pseudocysts participated in this study conducted in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital between February 2007 and June 2010. Patterns of lactate dehydrogenase in cyst fluid and autogenous blood were analysed.

Results:

Levels of lactate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 were lower in auricular pseudocysts than in autogenous blood, whereas levels of lactate dehydrogenase 4 and 5 were higher; this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme patterns in auricular pseudocyst fluid indicated higher percentage distributions of lactate dehydrogenase 4 and 5 and lower percentage distributions of lactate dehydrogenase 1 and 2. An effective laboratory method of evaluating the different lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme components was developed; this method may improve the accuracy of auricular pseudocyst diagnosis.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Introduction

An auricular pseudocyst is a fluid-filled cavity present within the cartilage of the ear, which is not lined by epithelium.Reference Botella-Anton, Matos Mula, Jimenez Martinez, Pinazo-Canales, Castells-Rodellas and Moragon-Gordon1Reference Engel4 Clinically, it is an uncommon, benign, idiopathic disease which typically presents as a painless, spontaneously arising swelling on the upper anterior surface of the auricle, and which contains sterile, straw-coloured fluid on aspiration.Reference Salgado, Hardy, Mardini, Dockery and Matthews5, Reference Ichioka, Yamada, Ueda and Harii6

In 1966, Engel reported 17 cases in young, healthy, Chinese men and gave the first description of the histological changes seen in auricular pseudocysts.Reference Engel4 Although these lesions can occur in both genders, all races and at any age, they occur predominantly among males, especially young, Asian males.Reference Engel4, Reference Lim, Goh, Chao, Lim and Lim7Reference Kanotra and Lateef10 A hormonal influence modulating the inflammatory process has been suggested to explain the marked male predominance of this condition.Reference Kanotra and Lateef10 Most auricular pseudocysts are unilateral, but bilateral cases have been described.Reference Engel4, Reference Choi, Lam, Chan, Ghadially and Ng11Reference Saunders, Jones and Balsitis13 They are most commonly located in the concha fossa.Reference Kanotra and Lateef10

Various aetiological theories have been suggested, including chronic minor trauma, congenital embryonic dysplasia, autoimmune defect and circulatory disturbances in the auricle; however, the exact cause remains unclear.Reference Tuncer, Basterzi and Yavuzer3, Reference Ichioka, Yamada, Ueda and Harii6, Reference Miyamoto, Oida, Onuma and Uchiyama14Reference Takeda, Tomita and Goto20

In 1985, Okuma described successful treatment of an auricular pseudocyst with needle aspiration followed by local steroid injection.Reference Miyamoto, Okajima and Takahashi21 Since then, many different treatments have been employed, with varying success.Reference Salgado, Hardy, Mardini, Dockery and Matthews5, Reference Lim, Goh, Chao, Lim and Lim7, Reference Tan and Hsu9, Reference Miyamoto, Oida, Onuma and Uchiyama14, Reference Miyamoto, Okajima and Takahashi21Reference Lee and Panarese28

The auricle can be the site of a variety of cystic lesions, many of which involve potential spaces between the auricular cartilage and the perichondrium or within the skin and the subcutaneous tissues.Reference Secor, Farrell and Haydon22 Therefore, it is important to properly diagnose and treat auricular pseudocysts. If misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately, or left untreated, permanent deformity of the auricle may result.

In several cases of auricular pseudocysts, high levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) have been reported in the cyst fluid.Reference Kanotra and Lateef10, Reference Miyamoto, Oida, Onuma and Uchiyama14 The LDH isoenzyme patterns within cyst fluid have been examined, and LDH-4 and LDH-5 have been found to predominate in a small group of patients.Reference Ichioka, Yamada, Ueda and Harii6, Reference Lim, Goh, Chao, Lim and Lim7, Reference Miyamoto, Oida, Onuma and Uchiyama14

In this study, we assessed and compared the distribution of LDH isoenzymes in the cyst fluid and autogenous sera of a group of patients with auricular pseudocysts. Such an investigation has not previously been reported. We also attempted to determine an accurate method with which to diagnose auricular pseudocyst in clinically suspicious cases, in addition to the usual clinical features.

Materials and methods

Between February 2007 and June 2010, 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with auricular pseudocysts participated in this prospective study conducted at the otolaryngology department of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan. None of the patients had received any previous treatment for their auricular pseudocyst. All patients were initially treated with needle aspiration of cyst fluid, followed by injection of steroid solution (triamcinolone, 1 ml ampoule of 10 mg/ml suspension) into the pseudocyst cavity (using a separate syringe) until it regained its original size. Autogenous blood was drawn at the same time.

The volume of aspirated cyst fluid and blood was measured, and the presence and percentage distribution of LDH isoenzymes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were analysed.

The study protocol was approved by the hospital institutional review board. Statistical evaluations were performed using the paired t-test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The cohort consisted of 15 males (75 per cent) and 5 females (25 per cent) with a mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of 42.05 ± 13.43 years. Ten patients had left-sided lesions and 10 had right-sided lesions. No case of bilateral pseudocysts was seen. The pseudocyst was located in the concha fossa in 12 patients (60 per cent), in the scaphoid fossa in 1 patient (5 per cent) and in the triangular fossa in 5 patients (25 per cent). The final two patients (10 per cent) had large pseudocysts, one extending over three sites (the concha fossa, triangular fossa and scaphoid fossa) and one extending over the triangular fossa and scaphoid fossa.

The mean ± SD and range of the percentage distribution of LDH isoenzymes in cyst fluid and sera in the 20 patients are presented in Table I. In our hospital laboratory, the normal reference percentage distributions of LDH isoenzymes in sera were: LDH-1, 25–30 per cent; LDH-2, 32–35 per cent; LDH-3, 20–25 per cent; LDH-4, 7–10 per cent; and LDH-5, 7–10 per cent.

Table I LDH isoenzyme patterns in cyst fluid and serum

Pts = patients; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; SD = standard deviation

All patients had fairly normal percentage distributions of LDH isoenzymes in their serum. However, very different LDH isoenzyme distributions were seen in the cyst fluid (Table I), and this difference was statistically significant (paired t-test, p < 0.001). The mean ± SD percentage distributions of LDH-4 and LDH-5 in auricular pseudocyst fluid were 30.33 ± 8.12 per cent and 42.01 ± 7.84 per cent, respectively; these values were substantially higher than corresponding serum values (Table I). In contrast, serum LDH-1 and LDH-2 had mean ± SD percentage distributions of 21.05 ± 5.05 per cent and 32.78 ± 2.70 per cent, respectively; these were substantially higher than cyst fluid values (Table I). Plotted graphically, the overall gradient of LDH isoenzyme percentage distribution was positive in cyst fluid but negative in serum (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in cyst fluid and autogenous serum, in 20 patients with auricular pseudocyst.

This pattern was also seen on an individual level, following analysis of initially clear, yellowish cyst fluid from a 35-year-old, female patient with a clinical diagnosis of left auricular pseudocyst in the concha fossa (Figure 2), and after analysis of dark brownish cyst fluid from a 30-year-old, female patient with a suspected auricular pseudocyst in the left scaphoid fossa (Figure 3): the percentage distributions of LDH-4 and LDH-5 were higher in cyst fluid than in serum, those of LDH-1 and LDH-2 were higher in serum than in cyst fluid (Fig 2 and 3). This confirmed the accuracy of auricular pseudocyst diagnosis in both these cases.

Fig. 2 Clinical photographs showing an auricular pseudocyst in the left concha fossa of a 35-year-old woman, and aspirated clear, yellowish cyst fluid, together with the percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in this patient's cyst fluid and serum.

Fig. 3 Clinical photographs showing an auricular pseudocyst in the left scaphoid fossa of a 30-year-old woman, and aspirated dark brownish cyst fluid, together with the percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in this patient's cyst fluid and serum.

Discussion

An auricular pseudocyst is a benign, asymptomatic, fluctuant outpouching with no epithelial lining, which is usually located on the anterior surface of the auricle.Reference Botella-Anton, Matos Mula, Jimenez Martinez, Pinazo-Canales, Castells-Rodellas and Moragon-Gordon1Reference Engel4 Some believe that these lesions arise as a consequence of repeated minor trauma of the auricular cartilage, for example due to sleeping on a hard pillow or wearing stereo headphones or a motorcycle helmet; cases have also been reported in children.Reference Tuncer, Basterzi and Yavuzer3, Reference Ichioka, Yamada, Ueda and Harii6, Reference Miyamoto, Oida, Onuma and Uchiyama14, Reference Miyamoto, Okajima and Takahashi21, Reference Kim, Kim and Yoon25

Several authors have described the histology of these lesions.Reference Botella-Anton, Matos Mula, Jimenez Martinez, Pinazo-Canales, Castells-Rodellas and Moragon-Gordon1Reference Engel4 Perivascular, lymphocytic infiltrates are consistently evident in the connective tissue layer just superficial to the anterior segment of the cartilage. In the present study, an inflammatory response was seen in all specimens.

Minor trauma may trigger the release of LDH in cyst fluid; however, there is conflicting evidence on an association with trauma.Reference Miyamoto, Okajima and Takahashi21, Reference Lim, Goh, Chao and Lynne29 Others have suggested aetiological mechanisms such as lysosomal abnormalities, enzyme leakage with subsequent cartilage degeneration, and ischaemic necrosis secondary to repeated low-grade trauma.Reference Kanotra and Lateef10, Reference Lee and Panarese28 A more likely pathogenetic mechanism is that individuals are predisposed to endochondral pseudocysts during embryological development of the ears. The complex fusion and folding of the first and second brachial arches results in formation of the auricle cartilage, but may also leave residual tissue planes within the mesenchyme. These planes may later reopen to cause a pseudocyst.Reference Engel4, Reference Lim, Goh, Chao, Lim and Lim7, Reference Kanotra and Lateef10, Reference Lee and Panarese28

Studies on LDH isoenzyme patterns in auricular pseudocyst fluid have shown that LDH-4 and LDH-5 predominate quantitatively, despite a normal serum LDH isoenzyme pattern.Reference Kanotra and Lateef10 Lactate dehydrogenase 4 and 5 have been reported to predominate in the auricular cartilage of rabbits, cows and humans.Reference Miyamoto, Okajima and Takahashi21 Ickioka et al. theorised that, as the LDH isoenzyme pattern of auricular pseudocyst fluid was consistent with that of cartilage, and as histological examination of pseudocyst walls revealed cartilage degeneration, LDH may be released from disrupted auricular cartilage during pseudocyst formation.Reference Ichioka, Yamada, Ueda and Harii6

  • This study assessed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzyme patterns in auricular pseudocyst fluid and serum

  • Cyst fluid had higher proportions of LDH-4 and LDH-5 and lower proportions of LDH-1 and LDH-2, compared with serum

  • A characteristic LDH isoenzyme pattern was identified which could assist auricular pseudocyst diagnosis

Many treatment modalities have been reported for auricular pseudocyst, but the problems of recurrence and cosmetic appearance persist. Treatments include conservative management and surgical intervention, and usually address cosmetic considerations. One successful approach is local aspiration followed by local injection of a topical steroid or sclerosing agent, followed by application of a compression dressing to ensure a better cosmetic appearance of the pinna. A more aggressive treatment comprises deroofing the anterior leaflet of the cyst and curetting the posterior leaflet to remove granulation tissue and debris. Such deroofing surgery is a safe, easy and reliable procedure for auricular pseudocyst treatment, if conservative measures fail or are declined by the patient.Reference Salgado, Hardy, Mardini, Dockery and Matthews5, Reference Kanotra and Lateef10, Reference Chang, Kuo, Lin, Wang, Ho and Tsai26

In the present study, cyst fluid was found to have high percentage distributions of LDH-4 and LDH-5 and low percentage distributions of LDH-1 and LDH-2, despite fairly normal serum LDH isoenzyme patterns. Plotted graphically, the percentage distribution of LDH isoenzymes had a positive gradient in cyst fluid but a negative gradient in serum (Figure 1).

This analytical result can be applied clinically to help improve the accuracy of auricular pseudocyst diagnosis in clinically suspicious cases. This is illustrated by the patient shown in Figure 3. This patient had previously undergone needle aspiration of her cyst twice in a local clinic before being seen at our hospital. The percentage values of LDH-4 and LDH-5 were higher in the cyst fluid than the serum. The percentage distribution plot of the various LDH isoenzymes had a positive gradient for cyst fluid but a negative gradient for serum. Therefore, this patient was diagnosed with auricular pseudocyst and successfully treated, with no recurrence at the time of writing.

Conclusion

In this study of patients with auricular pseudocysts, the percentage distributions of various LDH isoenzymes differed in cyst fluid compared with autogenous serum: percentage distributions of LDH-4 and LDH-5 were higher in cyst fluid than in serum, while those of LDH-1 and LDH-2 were higher in serum than in cyst fluid. This result could provide a useful, laboratory-generated marker assisting accurate diagnosis of auricular pseudocyst in clinically suspicious cases, in addition to observation of the usual clinical features. This would facilitate successful treatment of the lesion.

Acknowledgement

No funding was received for this study.

Footnotes

Presented at the 89th Annual Academic Meeting, Taiwan Otolaryngological Society, 13–14 November 2010, Taipei, Taiwan

References

1Botella-Anton, R, Matos Mula, M, Jimenez Martinez, A, Pinazo-Canales, MI, Castells-Rodellas, A, Moragon-Gordon, M. Pseudocysts of the auricle. Clinical and histological studies of 3 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1984;111:919–23Google ScholarPubMed
2Heffner, DK, Hyams, VJ. Cystic chondromalacia (endochondral pseudocyst) of the auricle. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:740–3Google ScholarPubMed
3Tuncer, S, Basterzi, Y, Yavuzer, R. Recurrent auricular pseudocyst: a new treatment recommendation with curettage and fibrin glue. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:1080–3Google ScholarPubMed
4Engel, D. Pseudocysts of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Otolaryngol 1966;83:197202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Salgado, CJ, Hardy, JE, Mardini, S, Dockery, JM, Matthews, MS. Treatment of auricular pseudocyst with aspiration and local pressure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:1450–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ichioka, S, Yamada, A, Ueda, K, Harii, K. Pseudocyst of the auricle: case reports and its biochemical characteristics. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:471–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Lim, CM, Goh, YH, Chao, SS, Lim, LH, Lim, L. Pseudocyst of the auricle: a histologic perspective. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1281–4Google ScholarPubMed
8Foglia Fernandez, M, Gonzalez Compta, X, Arias Cuchi, G, Sandoval Puig, M, Nogues Orpi, J, Dicenta Sousa, M. An auricular pseudocyst. A report of 4 cases [in Spanish]. An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am 1998;25:121–9Google ScholarPubMed
9Tan, BY, Hsu, PP. Auricular pseudocyst in the tropics: a multi-racial Singapore experience. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:185–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Kanotra, SP, Lateef, M. Pseudocyst of pinna: a recurrence-free approach. Am J Otolaryngol 2009;30:73–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Choi, S, Lam, KH, Chan, KW, Ghadially, FN, Ng, AS. Endochondral pseudocyst of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110:792–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Santos, AD, Kelley, PE. Bilateral pseudocyst of the auricle in an infant girl. Pediatr Dermatol 1995;12:152–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Saunders, MW, Jones, NS, Balsitis, M. Bilateral auricular pseudocyst: a case report and discussion. J Laryngol Otol 1993;107:3941CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Miyamoto, H, Oida, M, Onuma, S, Uchiyama, M. Steroid injection therapy for pseudocyst of the auricle. Acta Derm Venereol 1994;74:140–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Zhu, L, Wang, X. Histological examination of the auricular cartilage and pseudocyst of the auricle. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:103–4Google ScholarPubMed
16Stankevice, D, Nielsen, KO. Two cases of auricular pseudocyst [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2009;171:907Google ScholarPubMed
17Chen, Q, Fei, Y, Zhao, T, Luo, D, Wu, B, Yang, X. Research on the immunological cause of auricular pseudocyst [in Chinese]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2001;15:304–5Google ScholarPubMed
18Chen, Q, Zhao, T, Yang, X. The immunological cause of auricular pseudocyst [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 1999;34:236–7Google ScholarPubMed
19Glamb, R, Kim, R. Pseudocyst of the auricle. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;11:5863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Takeda, M, Tomita, H, Goto, N. Morphological characteristics of the auricular blood vessels related to idiopathic pseudocyst of the auricle. Auris Nasus Larynx 1990;17:199210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Miyamoto, H, Okajima, M, Takahashi, I. Lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in and intralesional steroid injection therapy for pseudocyst of the auricle. Int J Dermatol 2001;40:380–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Secor, CP, Farrell, HA, Haydon, RC 3rd. Auricular endochondral pseudocysts: diagnosis and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1451–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Han, A, Li, LJ, Mirmirani, P. Successful treatment of auricular pseudocyst using a surgical bolster: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis 2006;77:102–4Google Scholar
24Goktay, F, Aslan, C. Successful treatment of auricular pseudocyst with clothing button bolsters alone. J Dermatolog Treat 2011;22:285–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Kim, TY, Kim, DH, Yoon, MS. Treatment of a recurrent auricular pseudocyst with intralesional steroid injection and clip compression dressing. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:245–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Chang, CH, Kuo, WR, Lin, CH, Wang, LF, Ho, KY, Tsai, KB. Deroofing surgical treatment for pseudocyst of the auricle. J Otolaryngol 2004;33:177–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Ophir, D, Marshak, G. Needle aspiration and pressure sutures for auricular pseudocyst. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:783–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Lee, JA, Panarese, A. Endochondral pseudocyst of the auricle. J Clin Pathol 1994;47:961–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Lim, CM, Goh, YH, Chao, SS, Lynne, L. Pseudocyst of the auricle. Laryngoscope 2002;112:2033–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table I LDH isoenzyme patterns in cyst fluid and serum

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in cyst fluid and autogenous serum, in 20 patients with auricular pseudocyst.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Clinical photographs showing an auricular pseudocyst in the left concha fossa of a 35-year-old woman, and aspirated clear, yellowish cyst fluid, together with the percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in this patient's cyst fluid and serum.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Clinical photographs showing an auricular pseudocyst in the left scaphoid fossa of a 30-year-old woman, and aspirated dark brownish cyst fluid, together with the percentage distribution of analysed lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes in this patient's cyst fluid and serum.