Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T18:39:56.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone: case reports and literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2013

G Wong*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
P Randhawa
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
J Stephens
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
H Saleh
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr G Wong, Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK E-mail: gentleckwong@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia commonly affects the larger mandible and the maxillary bones. Although involvement of the frontal, temporal and sphenoid bones has been described, fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone has not been previously described; the two cases reported here have been made rarer by their isolated involvement. Clinical management is dependent on disease activity and patient symptoms.

Objective:

To present two cases of isolated fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone: a 46-year-old woman with gradual widening of the nasal bridge and a 47-year-old man with an incidental finding of a nasal bone mass.

Method:

Two case reports.

Results:

The 46-year-old woman underwent excision of the lesion while the 47-year-old man opted for watchful waiting.

Conclusion:

We have presented the first case reports of fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone. The care of these patients should be customised to their needs and wishes.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Introduction

Fibrous dysplasia is a benign skeletal disease resulting in bony expansion due to the abnormal development of fibrous tissue. It can affect single (monostotic) or multiple (polyostotic) bones. Craniofacial bones are affected in approximately 10 per cent of monostotic fibrous dysplasia cases. This rises to 50–100 per cent in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia.Reference Feller, Wood, Khammissa, Lemmer and Raubenheimer1 Fibrous dysplasia is an indolent bone disorder. Common sites of involvement in the head and neck are the maxillary bone and the mandible, resulting in craniofacial deformity.

Other symptoms can range from headache, facial pain and auditory impairment to visual loss due to optic nerve compression. Rarely, fibrous dysplasia may be associated with endocrinological abnormalities, particularly if the pituitary gland is involved. McCune–Albright syndrome, a variant of fibrous dysplasia, is suspected when two of the following three features are present: endocrine dysfunction, polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, unilateral café-au-lait spots.Reference Dumitrescu, Collins and McCune-Albright2 Most commonly, the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia is made radiologically, with the classical ground-glass appearance seen on computed tomography (CT) imaging. Fine needle aspiration cytology has been shown to be a useful diagnostic adjunct in lesions around the sinonasal region, mainly to exclude a more sinister pathology.Reference Gupta, Gupta, Bakshi and Rajwanshi3, Reference Okada, Matsumoto, Oomine, Kaneda and Yamamoto4

While fibrous dysplasia has been shown to affect a number of bones in the craniofacial region, involvement of the nasal bones in isolation has never been described. We describe two such cases and highlight the different management options.

Case report 1

A 46-year-old woman was referred by her general practitioner after they noticed a gradual widening of her nasal bridge over the last few years. There was no history of trauma and the patient did not describe any rhinological or neurological symptoms.

Examination confirmed asymmetrical nasal bones, with a solid, firm mass on the right side. Computed tomography of her facial bones demonstrated fibro-osseous change in the right nasal bone (Figure 1). She was initially managed expectantly with serial imaging; however, the lesion began to grow after several months and she opted for surgical intervention. An external incision was made intra-operatively on the edge of the nasal bone, revealing spongy bone. A microdebrider was then used to smooth out the nasal bones. A cartilage construct, harvested from the septum, was then used to fill the defect and this was fixed with a vicryl suture threaded through the skin. Histology confirmed a benign fibro-osseous lesion, consistent with the radiological diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia. The patient has remained well post-operatively, with no evidence of recurrence at the one-year follow up.

Fig. 1 Axial computed tomography scan demonstrating fibro-osseous change in the right nasal bone (L = left side; R = right side).

Case report 2

A 47-year-old man presented to the ENT clinic following an incidental CT finding, which was requested as part of the diagnostic work-up for dental implantation. This showed a small, bony and radiopaque mass attached to the lateral aspect of the left nasal bone. The mass measured approximately 11 × 8 × 6 mm, blended with the nasal bone surface and showed a faintly trabeculated pattern (Figure 2). Radiological findings were consistent with fibrous dysplasia. As there were no rhinological symptoms, a policy of watchful waiting was adopted. After four years, there remains no evidence of growth of the lesion.

Fig. 2 Axial computed tomography scan demonstrating a small, bony, radiopaque mass attached to the lateral aspect of the left nasal bone, blending with the nasal bone surface and showing a faintly trabeculated pattern.

Discussion

Fibrous dysplasia is an uncommon, benign disorder characterised by a tumour-like proliferation of fibro-osseous tissue. It is a genetic disease, caused by activating mutations of the GNAS complex locus gene on chromosome 20, resulting in the somatic activating mutation of the Gsα subunit of a G protein-coupled receptor, with upregulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate.Reference Riminucci, Robey, Saggio and Bianco5

Commonly, the diagnosis of fibrous dysplasia is made radiologically and it is then correlated with clinical and pathological findings. The radiological features of fibrous dysplasia are diverse and are dependent on the proportion of mineralised bone to fibrous tissue in the lesion. Maturing fibrous dysplasia lesions acquire a mixed radiolucent/radiopaque appearance; established fibrous dysplasia exhibits mottled radiopaque patterns resembling ground glass – small, diffusely distributed opacities.Reference Feller, Wood, Khammissa, Lemmer and Raubenheimer1

Unlike fibrous dysplasia elsewhere in the axial skeleton, the margins of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia are ill-defined, often blending with normal adjacent bone. Histologically, fibrous dysplasia is composed of interconnected trabeculae of mixed woven and lamellar bone in fibrous stroma, and the lesional tissue is usually in continuity with the surrounding, normal cortical bone.Reference Charpurlat and Meunier6, Reference Slootweg and Müller7

In monostotic fibrous dysplasia, 75 per cent of patients present with lesions in the ribs, femur, tibia or skull. The polyostotic form affects the proximal femur, craniofacial bones, tibia, humerus and ribs in decreasing order of incidence.Reference Yochum, Rowe, Yochum and Rowe8 The mandible and the maxillary bone are the most commonly affected craniofacial bones. Involvement of other craniofacial bones, such as the frontal, temporal, sphenoid, parietal and orbital bones have been described.Reference Cai, Ma, Xu, Gruen, Li and Yang9

Fibrous dysplasia is often managed conservatively, but surgical intervention is advocated when complications occur, e.g. visual impairment, cosmetic deformity, mucocele, haemorrhage and aneurysmal bone cysts.Reference Amit, Collins, FitzGibbon, Butman, Fliss and Gil10, Reference Michael, Lee, Patrinely, Stal and Blacklock11 A recent meta-analysis comparing watchful waiting versus surgery found that optic nerve decompression is the preferred treatment in patients with symptomatic ophthalmic disease.Reference Amit, Collins, FitzGibbon, Butman, Fliss and Gil10 Surgery, however, is challenging since these lesions are highly vascular and excision should not be undertaken lightly and without adequate expertise. Some authors have advocated lifelong follow up in view of the continuous evolving nature of certain lesions, although the natural history of fibrous dysplasia is that it tends to ‘burn out’ in the third and fourth decade.Reference Posnick12

In the case reports described here, both patients had isolated fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone that has never been described in the literature. These two small, oblong bones, which form the bridge of the nose, articulate with four other bones: two of the cranium, the frontal and ethmoid; and two of the face, the opposite nasal bone and the maxilla. Fibrous dysplasia of the larger frontal and maxillary bones has been frequently described and there have been a small number of cases described involving the ethmoid bones. The general consensus on management is to offer regular follow ups to ensure that the lesion does not increase in size, recurs or involves other bones as it can cross suture lines.

  • These are the first described case reports of fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bone

  • Diagnosis was based on clinical, radiological and pathological correlation

  • Treatment was based on patient symptom(s) and disease progression

  • Regular, long-term follow up is advocated due to the risk of growth or recurrence

Other indicators of surgery may be persistent sinonasal symptoms, such as headache, nasal obstruction and pain, secondary to involvement of the paranasal sinuses.Reference Ooi, Glicksman, Vescan and Witterick13 When the temporal bone is involved, a patient may present with 80 per cent hearing loss because the inner-ear canal narrows. Further, it may cause facial nerve paralysis or vertigo.

There is continual research into the role of medical therapy. Treatment with bisphosphonates is predicated on the rationale that in fibrous dysplasia, there is an increase in interleukin-6-induced osteoclastic bone resorption, similar to another osteoclast-driven condition, osteitis deformans (Paget's disease of bone).Reference Chapurlat14 Various reports on the use of pamidronic and alendronic acid have shown significant reduction in bone pain and bone turnover.Reference Lane, Khan, O'Connor, Nydick, Hommen and Schneider15, Reference Kitagawa, Tamai and Ito16

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, we have described the first isolated case series of fibrous dysplasia of the nasal bones. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, radiological and pathological correlation. Similar to fibrous dysplasia of other craniofacial bones, treatment options depend on clinical presentation and patient choice. Regular, long-term follow up of these patients is advised as these lesions evolve and have the potential for recurrence.

References

1Feller, L, Wood, NH, Khammissa, RA, Lemmer, J, Raubenheimer, EJ. The nature of fibrous dysplasia. Head Face Med 2009;5:22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Dumitrescu, CE, Collins, MT. McCune-Albright, syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008;3:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Gupta, N, Gupta, R, Bakshi, J, Rajwanshi, A. Fine needle aspiration cytology in a case of fibrous dysplasia of jaw. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:920–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Okada, H, Matsumoto, T, Oomine, H, Kaneda, T, Yamamoto, H. Rare example of the use of fine-needle aspiration cytology for periapical osseous dysplasia. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:510–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Riminucci, M, Robey, PG, Saggio, I, Bianco, P. Skeletal progenitors and the GNAS gene: fibrous dysplasia of bone read through stem cells. J Mol Endocrinol 2010;45:355–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Charpurlat, RD, Meunier, PJ. Fibrous dysplasia of bone. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2000;14:385–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Slootweg, PJ, Müller, H. Differential diagnosis of fibro-osseous jaw lesions. A histological investigation on 30 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990;18:210–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Yochum, TR, Rowe, LJ. Tumors and tumor-like processes. In: Yochum, TR, Rowe, LJ, eds. Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, 3rd edn.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005;1334Google Scholar
9Cai, M, Ma, L, Xu, G, Gruen, P, Li, J, Yang, M et al. Clinical and radiological observation in a surgical series of 36 cases of fibrous dysplasia of the skull. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:254–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Amit, M, Collins, MT, FitzGibbon, EJ, Butman, JA, Fliss, DM, Gil, Z. Surgery versus watchful waiting in patients with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia – a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011;6:e25179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Michael, CB, Lee, AG, Patrinely, JR, Stal, S, Blacklock, JB. Visual loss associated with fibrous dysplasia of the anterior skull base. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2000;92:350–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Posnick, JC. Fibrous dysplasia of the craniomaxillofacial region: current clinical perspectives. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:264–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Ooi, EH, Glicksman, JT, Vescan, AD, Witterick, IJ. An alternative management approach to paranasal sinus fibro-osseous lesions. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2011;1:5563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Chapurlat, RD. Medical therapy in adults with fibrous dysplasia of bone. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21(suppl 2):114–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Lane, JM, Khan, SN, O'Connor, WJ, Nydick, M, Hommen, JP, Schneider, R et al. Bisphosphonate therapy in fibrous dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;382:612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kitagawa, Y, Tamai, K, Ito, H. Oral alendronate treatment for polyostotic fibrous dysplasia: a case report. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:521–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Axial computed tomography scan demonstrating fibro-osseous change in the right nasal bone (L = left side; R = right side).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Axial computed tomography scan demonstrating a small, bony, radiopaque mass attached to the lateral aspect of the left nasal bone, blending with the nasal bone surface and showing a faintly trabeculated pattern.