Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:23:44.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Day-case tonsillectomy for children in Glasgow: the impact of changing indications and deprivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

W A Clement*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr W A Clement, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Scotland, UK Fax: 0141 2010865 E-mail: wclement@nhs.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the number of children undergoing tonsillectomy that could have this performed as a day surgery procedure.

Methods:

This paper reports a prospective cohort study, which entailed a comparison of children's eligibility for day-case surgery between 2001 and 2011 and an assessment of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation scores.

Results:

In total, 148 children were enrolled. In 2011, 60 children (42 per cent) were eligible for surgery with same day discharge compared with 27 per cent in 2001. The percentage of children undergoing tonsillectomy for sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome increased from 26 per cent to 55 per cent.

Conclusion:

Eligibility for tonsillectomy with same day discharge has increased. This appears to be related to an increase in the number of children who are able to fulfil the social criteria for same day discharge. The results indicate an association between deprivation and tonsillectomy, particularly surgery carried out for the symptoms of sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome. There has been a significant increase in the percentage of children undergoing tonsillectomy for the indication of sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013

Introduction

Paediatric day-case tonsillectomy is a well-established and safe procedure for appropriately selected children.Reference Brigger and Brietzke1, Reference Bhattacharyya2 There is, however, a large degree of variability, both nationally and internationally, regarding the percentage of children that are appropriate for ambulatory day-case surgery. Many factors will affect eligibility, including medical, social and geographical factors.

This study was undertaken to assess changes in trends in terms of patient eligibility for this procedure in the local population, and to examine what factors might have influenced this. Individuals at the author's institution were particularly interested in the role of deprivation as this has been associated with higher tonsillectomy rates and also has a strong impact on patient selection and appropriateness for tonsillectomy day-case surgery.Reference Bisset and Russell3, Reference Drake-Lee and Harris4 In addition, we wanted to assess changes in the indications for surgery, particularly regarding the number of procedures being undertaken for sleep-related breathing disorders and obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS), to see if this reflected current international trendsReference Parker and Walner5Reference Erickson, Larson, St Sauver, Meverden and Orvidas7 and also examine what impact, if any, this had on eligibility rates for day-case surgery.

Materials and methods

The study was undertaken prospectively, using 150 children who were enrolled sequentially. All parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy, grommet insertion or other minor procedure, who were attending the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, were questioned as part of a routine pre-assessment undertaken by the pre-assessment nursing team at the author's institution. Social and geographical eligibility for day-case surgery was identified using a questionnaire. This was adapted from the ‘Guidelines for Day Case Surgery’ issued by The Royal College of Surgeons of England8 and the ‘Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Inpatient Guidelines’ published by the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (AAO–HNS).Reference Brown and Cunningham9

The inclusion criteria are defined in Table I. Patient notes were reviewed to determine the following exclusion criteria: any additional procedure(s) that the children may have been scheduled for that required an overnight stay; American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of more than 2; children aged 3 years or younger; and pulse oximetry or polysomnography results showing 10.0 or more dips per hour of more than 4 per cent from baseline. A comparison of the results of studies carried out in 200110 and 2011 by individuals at the author's institution was then performed.

Table I Inclusion criteria for same day discharge

Min = minutes; OSAHS = obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists score; y = years

Social deprivation scores were identified using the ‘Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation’ (2009).11 This index contains 37 indicators of deprivation covering 7 domains, including: current income; employment; health; education, skills and training; geographic access to services; housing; and crime. The index is presented at data zone level, thereby enabling small pockets of deprivation to be identified. The data zones, which have a median population size of 769, are ranked from most deprived (1) to least deprived (6505) on the overall index and on each of the individual domains. Overall deprivation scores are available for each postal code and are divided into vigintiles for the identification of 5 per cent groupings of deprivation, and quintiles for the identification of 20 per cent groupings of deprivation. Postal codes were used to calculate the percentage of children in each deprivation quintile, with 1 representing the lowest 20 per cent (most deprived) and 5 representing the highest 20 per cent (most affluent). These were then compared to eligibility for day-case surgery. The statistics for the categorical data were calculated using Fisher's exact test.12 Unpaired data were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test.13

Results

In total, 148 children were enrolled. Two were excluded as they did not require tonsillectomy. Of the 146 children, 67 (46 per cent) underwent tonsillectomy for symptoms of sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS, 64 (44 per cent) underwent tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis, 14 (10 per cent) underwent tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis and sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS, and 1 (less than 1 per cent) underwent tonsillectomy for tonsillar asymmetry.

The results for deprivation related to indications for surgery are shown in Figure 1. Thirty-eight children underwent tonsillectomy with or without other procedures, and 108 children underwent adenotonsillectomy with or without other procedures. Other procedures included grommet insertion (10 cases), microlaryngobronchoscopy (8 cases including 1 supraglottoplasty) and other minor procedures (3 cases). There were 98 boys and 67 girls. The average age of all children undergoing tonsillectomy was 5.0 years (median = 5.0 years, range 1–13 years). The respective mean and median ages were 6.8 years and 6.5 years (range 1–13 years) for the recurrent tonsillitis group, 3.5 years and 3.0 years (range 1–9 years) for the sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS group, and 3.7 years and 3.0 years (range 2–11 years) for those children listed as having both indications. Age distribution for the indications is shown in Figure 2. The average age of all children undergoing tonsillectomy in the 2001 cohort was 7.4 years.

Fig. 1 Number of children undergoing tonsillectomy in each deprivation quintile per indication in 2011. SRDB = sleep related disordered breathing; OSAHS = obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

Fig. 2 Age distribution of all children undergoing tonsillectomy for each indication. Y = years; SRDB = sleep related disordered breathing; OSAHS = obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

Sixty children (42 per cent) were eligible to have their procedure(s) performed with same day discharge. A comparison of the 2001 and 2011 results is shown in Table II. Forty-one children (28 per cent) were ineligible for social reasons, including distance. This was less than in 2001 but the difference did not reach statistical significance. A breakdown of eligibility due to social criteria is provided in Table III. Sixty-six children (45 per cent) were ineligible for medical reasons, including 9 that were due to have other operations performed under the same anaesthetic which were not suitable for same day discharge, 12 children were ineligible because their American Society of Anesthesiologists score was more than 2, and 61 were ineligible as they were 3 years or younger. Of the 81 children undergoing tonsillectomy with symptoms of sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS, 35 (43 per cent) underwent pre-operative sleep examination (33 using home pulse oximetry and 2 using polysomnography). The findings for 5 of these children (14 per cent) demonstrated more than 10 dips per hour of greater than 4 per cent, which is consistent with moderate to severe OSAHS.

Table II Eligibility for same day discharge in 2001 and 2011

*Data values as reported in the 2001 study.10 Incl = including; excl = excluding; y = years

Table III Ineligibility for same day discharge in 2001 and 2011*

* A comparison of social and geographical reasons. Data values as reported in the 2001 study.10 Min = minutes

Deprivation was associated with tonsillectomy, with 39 per cent of children falling into the most deprived quintile and 13 per cent in the least deprived quintile. There was a trend for an association between eligibility for day-case surgery and deprivation when tonsillectomy overall was examined, with 39 per cent of children in the lowest quintile being eligible for same day discharge compared with 52 per cent of those in the highest quintile, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.366). There was, however, a strong association between eligibility for day-case surgery and deprivation when children with sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS were examined as a subgroup, with only 10 per cent of children in the lowest quintile being eligible for same day discharge compared with 57 per cent of those in the highest quintile (p = 0.012; Figure 3). For tonsillectomies overall, an examination of eligibility for same day discharge due to social reasons and deprivation demonstrated a weak trend, which again did not reach statistical significance: 69 per cent of children in the lowest quintile were eligible for same day discharge compared with 88 per cent of those in the highest quintile in this group (p = 0.067). However, there was a strong association when examining this eligibility criterion for the sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS subgroup: 54 per cent of children in the lowest quintile were eligible for same day discharge compared with 100 per cent of those in the highest quintile (p = 0.013).

Fig. 3 Same day discharge eligibility rates of all children undergoing tonsillectomy for sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome in each deprivation quintile.

Discussion

Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed paediatric surgical procedures in the UK, with 27 319 procedures performed on children aged 14 years or younger in England within the last year.14 Paediatric day-case tonsillectomy has been established as a safe procedure for appropriately selected children and is frequently undertaken in North America, Australasia and Europe.Reference Brigger and Brietzke1, Reference Bhattacharyya2, Reference Segerdahl, Warrén-Stomberg, Rawal, Brattwall and Jakobsson15, Reference Kanerva, Tarkkila and Pitkäranta16 There is a growing drive to increase the number of ambulatory same day discharge tonsillectomies in the UK. However, same day discharge in the UK remains uncommon; between 2003 and 2004, only 12.4 per cent of all patients – adults and children included – underwent tonsillectomy as a planned same day discharge procedure in England and Northern Ireland.17

This study was undertaken to determine changes in patient eligibility for day-case tonsillectomy in the local population, and to ascertain what factors may have influenced such changes. An initial study was undertaken in 2001 to assess the possibility of establishing a same day discharge service.Reference Kishore, Haider-Ali and Geddes10 This demonstrated such a low eligibility rate that it was felt the service was not viable at that time. At the author's institution, eligibility for day surgery has subsequently increased from 27 per cent to 42 per cent over the 10-year period. This appears to mainly be due to a change in the social factors associated with eligibility, with only 28 per cent now being excluded on these criteria compared with 39 per cent in 2001. The percentage of children ineligible for medical reasons has remained constant at around 40–45 per cent.

Compared with other studies, eligibility rates at the author's institution are in the mid-range. These other studies show considerable regional variations in eligibility, within the UK and also internationally. In the UK, reported day-case surgery eligibility rates have ranged between 16 and 92 per cent.Reference Kubba and Messersmith18Reference Hellier, Knight, Hern and Waddell23 Internationally, individual unit studies from the US, France and New Zealand have reported patient eligibility rates of 80 per cent, 86 per cent and 93 per cent respectively.Reference Shott, Myer and Cotton24Reference Chaplin, Stevenson and Stewart26

When examining how many children are eligible for day-case tonsillectomy, it is important to determine the grounds on which they might fail to be eligible. Overall ineligibility on social grounds appears to be more common in the UK, with rates ranging between 24 and 82 per cent, compared with ineligibility on medical grounds, which ranges between 8 and 40 per cent.Reference Kubba and Messersmith18Reference Drake-Lee and Stokes21 Interestingly, this was not the case in this study, in which the main reason for ineligibility was medical reasons. It is suspected that this decrease in exclusion on social grounds most likely represents an overall improvement in social conditions over time. However, no other studies seem to have examined this factor and so it is not possible to provide any comparisons.

There are a multitude of factors that may have contributed to the large variations in eligibility for same day surgery across different populations. These include: variations within populations in terms of medical, geographical, economic factors and so on; the available facilities (e.g. high dependency unit, paediatric intensive care unit and paediatric anaesthetic services); and also the interpretation and compliance with, or variations in, local or national clinical guidelines.Reference Leong and Davis27Reference Clement and Dempster29

There are several clinical guidelines, including those for paediatric tonsillectomy relating to indications, appropriateness for day surgery, the recommended level of post-operative care, and guidelines for when investigation is required.8Reference Brown and Cunningham9, 3035 The clinical guidelines for recurrent tonsillitis are the most robust, but there remains a great deal of flexibility in the guidelines for tonsillectomy as a treatment for sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS, which is mainly due to the limited evidence on which they are based.

The Royal College of Surgeons of England have issued ‘Guidelines for Day Case Surgery’ in the UK,8 as have the AAO–HNS in North America,Reference Brown and Cunningham9 although there remains significant debate concerning the latter.Reference Brigger and Brietzke1 At the author's institution, we have based our same day discharge criteria on these two documents, but no longer adhere to the absolute contraindication of sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS when considering a child for same day discharge. We based this decision on the work of Brigger and Brietzke.Reference Brigger and Brietzke1 They compiled an evidence-based review of out-patient tonsillectomy in children, which incorporated 17 articles and included 7500 children. The authors identified a higher rate of complications in those children with sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS but noted that ‘the increased complication rate among those with OSAHS as a possible diagnosis may be secondary to age effects and not indicative of OSAHS as an independent modifier of operative risk’. The majority of children with sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS had been, as they were in the current series, diagnosed on clinical grounds alone. Individuals at the author's institution are extremely cautious regarding this issue and have used overnight pulse oximetry in selected children to try to identify those whose surgery might be more appropriately undertaken on an in-patient basis. We recognise that polysomnography remains the gold standard for the investigation and diagnosis of OSAHS, and that the sensitivity and specificity of pulse oximeters and their effectiveness in diagnosing OSAHS is still a matter of debate.Reference Saito, Araki, Ozawa, Mizutari, Inagaki and Habu36Reference Nixon, Kermack, Davis, Manoukian, Brown and Brouillette38 However, as we have reasonable accessibility to pulse oximetry and waiting times for full polysomnography are lengthy, we continue to use pulse oximeters as a screening tool to identify those children who may require overnight admission, and we are not alone in taking this approach.Reference Blenke, Anderson, Raja, Bew and Knight28, Reference Brown, Morin, Hickey, Manoukian, Nixon and Brouillette39, Reference Weatherly, Mai, Ruzicka and Chervin40 Sleep studies (predominantly pulse oximetry) would have altered the management in 6 per cent of children (5 out of 81) who underwent tonsillectomy for sleep-related dissociative disorders and OSAHS in this study.

With regards to the risk factors for post-operative complications and unplanned re-admissions, two large studies have identified an increased risk for children aged less than four years. In their meta-analysis, Brigger and BrietzkeReference Brigger and Brietzke1 demonstrated that being under the age of four years was associated with a higher rate of early complications (12.3 per cent vs 7.9 per cent) and unplanned admissions (13.7 per cent vs 8.5 per cent) in children undergoing tonsillectomy, compared with older children. This is supported by the work of BhattacharyyaReference Bhattacharyya2 who reviewed tonsillectomies as part of the US National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery in 2006. The review, which incorporated around half a million children, revealed that those under the age of 4 years had a return to hospital rate of 2.5 per cent, with an unplanned admission rate of 9.28 per cent. These rates were significantly higher than those of older children. The author's institution therefore included being aged four years or older as one of the inclusion criteria, which is a year older than in the original study. A large number of children (42 per cent) in the current series were not eligible for day-case surgery on these grounds. There are two presumed reasons why so many of the children in this series are aged three years or younger. Firstly, sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS are more prevalent in this age group. Secondly, there may be a possible referral bias as a result of The Royal College of Anaesthetists document ‘Guidance on the provision of paediatric anaesthesia services’;41 several district general hospitals that are geographically close to our hospital now routinely refer younger children to our department for surgery.

Bisset and RussellReference Bisset and Russell3 were the first to note an association between deprivation and tonsillectomy in the UK. Internationally, both Croxford et al. Reference Croxford, Friedberg and Coyte42 and Brouillette et al. Reference Brouillette, Horwood, Constantin, Brown and Ross43 noted a similar association in Canada. However, deprivation appears to be inversely related to tonsillectomy in the US. Boss et al. Reference Boss, Smith and Ishman44 reported that, in the US, children with private medical insurance were more likely to undergo adenotonsillectomy. In addition, these authors identified that children of racial and/or ethnic minority and low socioeconomic status appeared to have a higher prevalence and greater risk for sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS. Drake-Lee and HarrisReference Drake-Lee and Harris4 have previously commented on the impact of social deprivation on the eligibility of paediatric patients for day-case tonsil surgery. They noted that children deemed socially suitable for day-case tonsillectomy dropped from 95 per cent in the least deprived quintile to 55 per cent in the most deprived quintile. A similar but weaker association was noted in the current study (88 per cent in the most affluent quintile compared with 69 per cent in the most deprived quintile). In our study, the association was strongest in the sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS subgroup when looking at both social reasons alone as well as all reasons for ineligibility for same day discharge.

  • Day-case tonsillectomy appears safe in appropriately selected children, but remains uncommon in the UK

  • Tonsillectomy is associated with deprivation

  • Eligibility rates for day-case tonsillectomy appear to be rising due to improved social conditions

  • Internationally, tonsillectomies undertaken for sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome are increasing

  • Changes in case mix reflect international trends; this has not previously been documented in the UK

This study identified a significant change over time in terms of the indications for tonsillectomy. In particular, there was an increase in the number of procedures being undertaken for sleep-related breathing disorders and OSAHS. This change reflects current international trends, which show a decrease in the number of children undergoing tonsillectomy for infective causes and an increase in those having the surgery for sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS.Reference Parker and Walner5Reference Erickson, Larson, St Sauver, Meverden and Orvidas7 There has been no study of trends for these indications in the UK, but the 2003–2004 national audit of tonsillectomies carried out in England, Wales and Northern Ireland did identify that sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS were the indications for tonsillectomy in 33 per cent of children under 5 years and in 9 per cent of 6–16 year olds.17 The reason that this indication is as high as 55 per cent in the current study is because all children with symptoms of sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS were included in this group. Even if those children with symptoms of both sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS and recurrent tonsillitis are excluded, sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS alone still results in 46 per cent of the total. The frequency of sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS as indications for surgery in this series is similar to the findings of two recent North American studies. Parker and Walner (2011)Reference Parker and Walner5 identified that obstruction was the primary indication for tonsillectomy in 91.8 per cent of patients in a 0–3 year age group. This rate fell to 73.2 per cent in a group of 4–10 year olds and to 43.0 per cent in a group of 11–18 year olds. Erickson et al. Reference Erickson, Larson, St Sauver, Meverden and Orvidas7 identified a significant increase in the incidence of children having their tonsils out for the indication of upper airway obstruction, increasing from 12 per cent in 1970 to 77 per cent in 2005. We suspect that the high incidence in this study is likely to be a reflection of these trends and the result of a referral bias as previously discussed.

There are several acknowledged weaknesses of this study. These include the small sample size. There is also the possibility that the deprivation associated with the tonsillectomy group may simply reflect the general population distribution for the catchment area, as the author's institution provides a service to some of the areas of greatest deprivation in Scotland.Reference Bisset and Russell3 However, a much larger national population-based study, that included our catchment area, has already demonstrated the association between tonsillectomy and deprivation.Reference Bisset and Russell3 It is also recognised that the evidence behind the age inclusion criteria and the use of pulse oximetry for screening is not as robust as one would like them to be and that these factors have a significant impact on eligibility. It is possible that some children in the 2–4 year old group might be appropriate candidates for ambulatory day-case surgery. In addition, the study arbitrarily used 10 dips per hour of greater than 4 per cent from baseline saturations on overnight pulse oximetry for the eligibility criteria, although the research supporting this threshold was derived using polysomnography.Reference Roland, Rosenfeld, Brooks, Friedman, Jones and Kim34

In conclusion, the eligibility rates for day-case tonsillectomy appear to have increased over time due to improved social conditions. Tonsillectomy remains associated with deprivation, and sleep-related breathing disorders or OSAHS appear to have a stronger association with deprivation than recurrent tonsillitis.

References

1Brigger, MT, Brietzke, SE. Outpatient tonsillectomy in children: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Bhattacharyya, N. Ambulatory pediatric otolaryngologic procedures in the United States: characteristics and perioperative safety. Laryngoscope 2010;120:821–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Bisset, AF, Russell, D. Grommets, tonsillectomies, and deprivation in Scotland. BMJ 1994;308:1129–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Drake-Lee, A, Harris, S. Social conditions and paediatric day case tonsillectomy. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999;4:101–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Parker, NP, Walner, DL. Trends in the indications for pediatric tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:282–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Bhattacharyya, N, Lin, HW. Changes and consistencies in the epidemiology of pediatric adenotonsillar surgery, 1996–2006. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;143:680–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Erickson, BK, Larson, DR, St Sauver, JL, Meverden, RA, Orvidas, LJ. Changes in incidence and indications of tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy, 1970–2005. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:894901CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines for Day Case Surgery. London: RCSENG - Professional Standards and Regulation, 1992Google Scholar
9Brown, OE, Cunningham, MJ. Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Inpatient Guidelines: recommendations of the AAO-HNS Pediatric Otolaryngology Committee. American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Bulletin 1996;15:14Google Scholar
10Kishore, A, Haider-Ali, AM, Geddes, NK. Patient eligibility for day case paediatric adenotonsillectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:47–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
122-way contingency table analysis. In: http://statpages.org/ctab2x2.html [29 February 2012]Google Scholar
15Segerdahl, M, Warrén-Stomberg, M, Rawal, N, Brattwall, M, Jakobsson, J. Children in day surgery: clinical practice and routines. The results from a nation-wide survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:821–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Kanerva, M, Tarkkila, P, Pitkäranta, A. Day-case tonsillectomy in children: parental attitudes and consultation rates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:777–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17The Royal College of Surgeons of England. National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit. London: The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2005Google Scholar
18Kubba, H, Messersmith, R. Is day case tonsillectomy suitable for children in Cumbria? Clin Perform Qual Health Care 1999;7:130–3Google ScholarPubMed
19Yardley, MP, Fairley, JW, Durham, LH, Parker, AJ. Day case tonsil and adenoid surgery: how many are eligible? J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994;39:162–3Google ScholarPubMed
20Drake-Lee, A, Weiner, G. Suitability of children for ENT day case procedures. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1997;22:215–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Drake-Lee, A, Stokes, M. A prospective study of the length of stay of 150 children following tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23:491–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Shah, C, Shahab, R, Robb, P, Roy, D. Role of a home care team in paediatric day-case tonsillectomy. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:3943CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Hellier, WP, Knight, J, Hern, J, Waddell, T. Day case paediatric tonsillectomy: a review of three years experience in a dedicated day case unit. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999;24:208–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Shott, SR, Myer, CM 3rd, Cotton, RT. Efficacy of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy as an outpatient procedure: a preliminary report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987;13:157–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Truy, E, Merad, F, Robin, P, Fantino, B, Morgon, A. Failures in outpatient tonsillectomy policy in children: a retrospective study in 311 children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994;29:3342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Chaplin, J, Stevenson, S, Stewart, I. Paediatric day surgery adenotonsillectomy in New Zealand. Aust J Otolaryngol 1995;2:1115Google Scholar
27Leong, AC, Davis, JP. Morbidity after adenotonsillectomy for paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: waking up to a pragmatic approach. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:809–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Blenke, EJ, Anderson, AR, Raja, H, Bew, S, Knight, LC. Obstructive sleep apnoea adenotonsillectomy in children: when to refer to a centre with a paediatric intensive care unit? J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:42–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Clement, WA, Dempster, JH. Implementation by Scottish otolaryngologists of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network document Management of Sore Throats and the Indications for Tonsillectomy: four years on. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:357–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Management of sore throat and indications for tonsillectomy. A national clinical guideline. In: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign117.pdf [24 January 2012]Google Scholar
31Baugh, RF, Archer, SM, Mitchell, RB, Rosenfeld, RM, Amin, R, Burns, JJ et al. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144(Suppl 1):S130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Robb, PJ, Bew, S, Kubba, H, Murphy, N, Primhak, R, Rollin, AM et al. Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children with sleep-related breathing disorders: consensus statement of a UK multidisciplinary working party. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009;91:371–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Section on Pediatric Pulmonology, Subcommittee on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Pediatrics 2002;109:704–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Roland, PS, Rosenfeld, RM, Brooks, LJ, Friedman, NR, Jones, J, Kim, TW et al. Clinical practice guideline: polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing prior to tonsillectomy in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145(Suppl 1):S115Google ScholarPubMed
35Working party on sleep physiology and respiratory control disorders in childhood: standards for services for children with disorders of sleep physiology. In: http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/asset_library/Research/Clinical%20Effectiveness/Endorsed%20guidelines/Sleep%20Physiology%20Disorders%20%28RCPCH%29/Report%20TextC.pdf [4 January 2013]Google Scholar
36Saito, H, Araki, K, Ozawa, H, Mizutari, K, Inagaki, K, Habu, N et al. Pulse-oximetery is useful in determining the indications for adeno-tonsillectomy in pediatric sleep-disordered breathing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Kirk, VG, Bohn, SG, Flemons, WW, Remmers, JE. Comparison of home oximetry monitoring with laboratory polysomnography in children. Chest 2003;124:1702–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Nixon, GM, Kermack, AS, Davis, GM, Manoukian, JJ, Brown, KA, Brouillette, RT. Planning adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive sleep apnea: the role of overnight oximetry. Pediatrics 2004;113:e1925CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Brown, KA, Morin, I, Hickey, C, Manoukian, JJ, Nixon, GM, Brouillette, RT. Urgent adenotonsillectomy: an analysis of risk factors associated with postoperative respiratory morbidity. Anesthesiology 2003;99:586–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Weatherly, RA, Mai, EF, Ruzicka, DL, Chervin, RD. Identification and evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea prior to adenotonsillectomy in children: a survey of practice patterns. Sleep Med 2003;4:297307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Guidance on the provision of paediatric anaesthesia services. In: http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/gpas-paeds.pdf [1 February 2012]Google Scholar
42Croxford, R, Friedberg, J, Coyte, PC. Socio-economic status and surgery in children: myringotomies and tonsillectomies in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2000. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:1245–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Brouillette, RT, Horwood, L, Constantin, E, Brown, K, Ross, NA. Childhood sleep apnea and neighborhood disadvantage. J Pediatr 2011;158:789–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Boss, EF, Smith, DF, Ishman, SL. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:299307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table I Inclusion criteria for same day discharge

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Number of children undergoing tonsillectomy in each deprivation quintile per indication in 2011. SRDB = sleep related disordered breathing; OSAHS = obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Age distribution of all children undergoing tonsillectomy for each indication. Y = years; SRDB = sleep related disordered breathing; OSAHS = obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

Figure 3

Table II Eligibility for same day discharge in 2001 and 2011

Figure 4

Table III Ineligibility for same day discharge in 2001 and 2011*

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Same day discharge eligibility rates of all children undergoing tonsillectomy for sleep-related breathing disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome in each deprivation quintile.