Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-9klzr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T05:30:49.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative evaluation of round window niche accessibility pre-operatively on high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone with intra-operative findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2019

R Sharma*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
R Meher
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
J C Passey
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
J Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
A Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
S Kharbanda
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Raman Sharma, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (‘GIPMER’) Hospitals and Guru Nanak Eye Centre, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India 110002 E-mail: raman.96sharma@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To compare round window niche visibility as seen endoscopically during cochlear implant surgery with pre-operative high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone.

Methods

Nineteen patients scheduled for cochlear implantation, aged 2–20 years, were referred for computed tomography from October 2016 to March 2018. Angles were measured between the lines passing through the mid-sagittal plane and cochlear basal turn on the scans. Endoscopic round window niche visibility during posterior tympanotomy was categorised as: type I = 100 per cent, type IIa = more than 50 per cent, type IIb = less than 50 per cent or type III = 0 per cent. Pre-operative computed tomography measurements were used to predict round window niche visibility before surgery and correlated with intra-operative findings.

Results

The mean (range) of pre-operative angles on computed tomography for endoscopic visibility types I, IIa and IIb, were 64.06° (61.16–69.37°), 63.81° (58.61–71.35°) and 56.48° (50.37–59.05°), respectively, a statistically significant finding (one-way analysis of variance test, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

Pre-operative high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography measurements are useful in predicting round window niche visualisation as viewed endoscopically during posterior tympanotomy. The angle was more acute in type IIb compared to type I.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Introduction

Cochlear implantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for hearing rehabilitation in paediatric and adult patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Clear visualisation of the round window niche and round window membrane through the facial recess is essential for an ENT surgeon when inserting the electrode into the cochlea during implantation. Adequate intra-operative visualisation of the round window niche can become difficult because of variations in the position of the round window.

A posterior tympanotomy approach is commonly used for cochlear implantation. It exposes the facial recess – a triangular intratemporal area bordered by the fossa incudis superiorly, a vertical segment of the facial nerve medially and the chorda tympani laterally – and provides secure access to the basal turn through the round window niche. Pre-operative prediction of round window niche visibility is important, as successful cochlear implantation by this approach depends greatly on conclusive identification of the round window niche, which may be difficult in patients with limited round window niche visibility. Axial, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the temporal bone provide radiographic information about internal ear structures, which can be helpful in predicting the round window niche visibility and accessibility pre-operatively.

Jeffery and SpoorReference Jeffery and Spoor1 suggested that there is a significant age-related reduction in the angle of the cochlea relative to the sagittal plane during fetal life, although the post-natal changes in this angle were not found to be statistically significant in their study. Li et al.Reference Li, Wang and Northrop2 suggested that the bone around the round window niche should be removed, and that a cochleostomy immediately anterior and inferior to the round window membrane should be performed, as the critical structures of the inner ear are at their greatest distance from the cochleostomy site in this position and access to the scala tympani is optimal. Pendem et al.Reference Pendem, Rangasami and Arunachalam3 showed that the distance between the short process of the incus and the round window niche, and the distance between the oval window and the round window niche, can help in determining the extent of visibility of the round window seen during posterior tympanotomy.

These measurements can be used to guide surgeons in locating the round window niche and in planning surgery. The present study was conducted to compare the mean angles of the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane, using endoscopic visualisation and categories of round window niche visibility during a posterior tympanotomy (facial recess) approach.

Materials and methods

An observational study was conducted in patients with severe-to-profound SNHL, with no congenital anomalies, who were scheduled for cochlear implantation. Prior clearance from the institutional ethical committee was obtained.

High-resolution temporal bone CT images were acquired on a 128 slice multi-detector CT scanner; the images underwent multiplanar reformatting and were then opened using MicroDOM software. Axial scans through the temporal bone were acquired in planes parallel to the infraorbitomeatal line. The most representative axial slice through the basal turn of the cochlea was identified. A line was drawn through the midline and through the long axis of the basal turn. The midline was defined by a line drawn through the junction of the face of the sphenoid bone and the nasal septum anteriorly, and through the internal occipital protuberance posteriorly. The angle between these bisecting lines was then measured using radiological software (Figure 1).

Fig. 1. Technique for measuring angles between the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane pre-operatively on axial, high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography scans.

All angles (in the first angle measurement) were measured by a single observer. However, to check intra-observer error, the measurements for the 19 consecutive patients planned for cochlear implantation were repeated by the same observer a week later (second angle measurement). The mean of the first and second angle measurements was then calculated for each patient (Table 1).

Table 1. Angles measured pre-operatively one week apart

Data represent angles, in degrees. Round window niche visibility grade: *type I, type IIa and type IIb. Pt no. = patient number

Endoscopic evaluation of the round window niche was performed using a rigid, 0°, 1.9 mm diameter Hopkins otoendoscope (Figure 2) inserted via posterior tympanotomy. The St Thomas’ Hospital ClassificationReference Leong and Jiang4 was used to assess visibility of the round window niche, according to four types (Figure 3): type I = 100 per cent of the round window niche was visible; type IIa = more than 50 per cent of the round window niche was visible; type IIb = less than 50 per cent of the round window niche was visible; type III = the round window niche was not visible (0 per cent). The averages of the mean angle measurements were calculated for all patients with endoscopic visualisation types I, IIa and IIb.

Fig. 2. Otoendoscope (0°, 1.9 mm diameter) used for endoscopic evaluation of the round window niche.

Fig. 3. Endoscopic images of round window niche visibility intra-operatively: (a) type I, (b) type IIa, (c) type IIb and (d) type IIb.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel® spreadsheet software, and were analysed and statistically evaluated using SPSS® software, version 17. Data were expressed as means ± standard deviations; a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The paired t-test was used to analyse differences in intra-operative round window niche visibility and radiographic measurements. Differences in radiographic measurements among the types of intra-operative round window niche visibility were analysed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The Pearson test was used to calculate intra-observer reliability; p < 0.001 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 19 patients who underwent cochlear implantation in our study, 8 (42 per cent) showed type I round window niche visibility, 8 (42 per cent) showed type IIa and 3 (16 per cent) showed type IIb.

The angles were measured pre-operatively on axial, high-resolution temporal bone CT scans, on two occasions one week apart, for each individual, by a single observer. The Pearson test was used to check for intra-rater reliability. The Pearson r value was calculated as 0.986, which was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). This demonstrated very high consistency between the measurements made by the same observer.

The mean angle between the long axis of the cochlear basal turn and the mid-sagittal plane for types I, IIa and IIb visibility were 64.06°, 63.81° and 56.48°, respectively (Table 2). A one-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean angle according to each round window niche visualisation type.

Table 2. Distribution of intra-operative endoscopic grading and averages of mean angle measurements

Sociodemographic profile

The patients' age ranged between 2 and 20 years. Fourteen of the 19 patients were aged 3–8 years; 2 patients were post-lingual, aged 17 years and 20 years. Ten of the patients were male and nine were female. All were scheduled to undergo endoscopic-assisted cochlear implantation under general anaesthetic.

Discussion

Cochlear implant surgery has become the standard of care for patients with severe-to-profound SNHL. Severely deaf patients currently can regain at least partial auditory function by using a cochlear implant. Whereas hearing aids deliver amplified sound to a damaged sensory system, often resulting in louder but non-interpretable information, a cochlear implant can improve speech understanding. Surgical implantation via the transmastoid approach has been well standardised.

There are three techniques to place a cochlear implant: via cochleostomy, in which the promontory is drilled to fixate the implant, via the round window, or via the extended round window, antero-inferior to round window niche. Cochleostomy was first described in the 1980s.Reference Karatas, Aud and Baglam5 Less drilling is required in the round window technique, thus reducing: trauma, loss of perilymph, and bone powder in the scala tympani.Reference Roland, Wright and Isaacson6 Preservation of residual hearing has been viable and beneficial given the combination of electrical and acoustic stimulation, but it requires non-traumatic electrode insertion to minimise damage to inner-ear structures and reduce neural tissue degeneration.Reference Francis and Niparko7

The bony round window orientation (at 90° to the oval window) and variations in the amount of bony overhang are such that, when viewed through the facial recess (without any further bone work), visibility of the membrane itself is restricted to a maximum of approximately 30 per cent of the inferior part of the vertical segment.Reference Takahashi and Sando8 It has previously been suggested that the perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma: the more posteriorly oriented the round window membrane, the greater the likelihood of atraumatic electrode insertion, with inherent implications for hearing preservation.Reference Shapira, Eshraghi and Balkany9

In contrast to the standard bony promontory cochleostomy, the round window membrane route has several distinct advantages: (1) a reduced risk of intracochlear trauma (no drilling and no bone dust into the scala tympani);Reference Pau and Just10 (2) the array will necessarily be introduced into the scala tympani;Reference Briggs, Tycocinski and Stidham11 and (3) it utilises the entire basilar turn for electrical stimulation (likelihood of stimulating residual dendrites).Reference Briggs, Tycocinski and Stidham11

Round window membrane insertion has previously been found to increase the spiral lamina length available for stimulation by approximately 2 mm, relative to standard bony cochleostomy insertion.Reference Paprocki, Biskup and Kozłowska12 Clear visualisation of the round window niche through the facial recess during cochlear implantation is a prime requisite for the operating surgeon while inserting the electrode into the cochlea. Obtuse angulation of the basal turn relative to the sagittal plane may make cochlear implantation more difficult.Reference Lloyd, Kasbekar and Kenway13 Variations in the round window position can hinder visualisation of the round window niche.

Chen et al.Reference Chen, Lyu, Xie, Yang, Zhang and Dai14 conducted a study to measure and compare the round window niche in: congenital aural atresia, congenital aural stenosis and control groups. They found that the wall, length and depth of the round window niche tended to be longer, with more severe aural malformations. Bettman et al.Reference Bettman, Appelman and van Olphen15 stated that pre-operative CT measurements, such as the width of the facial recess, and the angle between the facial recess and the cochlear basal turn, were not useful in predicting the problems encountered during surgery. They also claimed that advances in CT, such as multi-slice CT, could improve diagnostic accuracy. Pendem et al.Reference Pendem, Rangasami and Arunachalam3 conducted a study to determine the accuracy of high-resolution CT measurements of the temporal bone in predicting the actual visualisation of the round window niche as viewed during posterior tympanotomy (i.e. facial recess). The authors calculated the distance between the short process of the incus and the round window niche, and the distance between the oval window and the round window niche. They found that pre-operative high-resolution CT measurements had a sensitivity of 92.3 per cent and a specificity of 96.2 per cent in determining actual visualisation of the round window, as compared with the different categories of round window niche visibility determined intra-operatively.

The present study assessed whether the rotation of the cochlear basal turn affects round window niche visibility. We measured the angle of the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane using the slice containing most representative cross-section of the basal turn. We found that higher grades of round window niche visibility were associated with a more acute angle between the long axis of the cochlear basal turn and the mid-sagittal plane. Hence, the pre-operative high-resolution CT measurements of the angle between the basal turn long axis and the mid-sagittal plane can be useful for determining the actual visualisation of the round window niche during surgery, as viewed during posterior tympanotomy using a 0° otoendoscope.

  • This study compared round window niche visibility seen endoscopically during cochlear implant surgery with pre-operative high-resolution computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bone

  • There was a significant difference in the mean angles measured pre-operatively on CT and round window niche visibility seen intra-operatively using endoscopes

  • The mean angle of the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane was more acute with higher grades of round window niche visibility

  • Pre-operative CT measurements are useful in predicting endoscopic round window niche visualisation

  • Otoendoscopes can aid round window niche localisation, and prevent large posterior tympanotomy and surgical complications

Use of an otoendoscope in cochlear implant surgery (via posterior tympanotomy) can improve access to the round window membrane, allow successful insertion into the scala tympani without injuring intracochlear structures, and prevent the need for cochleostomy. The operation should be carried out using smooth, atraumatic electrode carriers, employing adapted surgical procedures. In order to avoid surgical trauma, insertions through the round window membrane might be effective. This was also indicated in a study undertaken to evaluate cochlear implant electrode insertion through the round window membrane in a human temporal bone model; that study concluded that smooth implantations via the round window membrane resulted in deep, atraumatic insertions into the scala tympani.Reference Adunka, Unkelbach and Mack16

Conclusion

The mean angle of the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane becomes more acute with a higher grade of round window niche visibility (seen intra-operatively). There was a statistically significant difference in the mean angles measured pre-operatively on the high-resolution temporal bone CT scans and round window niche visibility as seen intra-operatively using endoscopes. The mean angle for type I window niche visibility was 64.06° (range, 61.16–69.37°). There was a statistically significant difference between the distribution of round window membrane classifications performed using a microscope or endoscopy. Additional advantages of otoendoscopes over microscopes include: their use as a guide for locating the round window niche (mainly in visibility types IIb and III) on microscopy, the avoidance of large posterior tympanotomy and the prevention of surgical complications.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Dr R Sharma takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Jeffery, N, Spoor, F. Prenatal growth and development of the modern human labyrinth. J Anat 2004;204:7192Google Scholar
2Li, PM, Wang, H, Northrop, C. Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implications for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:641–8Google Scholar
3Pendem, SK, Rangasami, R, Arunachalam, RK. HRCT correlation with round window identification during cochlear implantation in children. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4:70Google Scholar
4Leong, AC, Jiang, D. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1237–42Google Scholar
5Karatas, E, Aud, MD, Baglam, T. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:1123–6Google Scholar
6Roland, PS, Wright, CG, Isaacson, B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1397–402Google Scholar
7Francis, HW, Niparko, JK. Cochlear implantation update. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003;50:341–61Google Scholar
8Takahashi, H, Sando, I. Computer-aided 3-D temporal bone anatomy for cochlear implant surgery. Laryngoscope 1990;100:417–21Google Scholar
9Shapira, Y, Eshraghi, AA, Balkany, TJ. The perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma in round window insertion – an anatomical study. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:284–9Google Scholar
10Pau, HW, Just, T. Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 2007;117:535–40Google Scholar
11Briggs, RJ, Tycocinski, M, Stidham, K. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:870–6Google Scholar
12Paprocki, A, Biskup, B, Kozłowska, K. The topographical anatomy of round window and related structures for the purpose of cochlear implant surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2004;63:309–12Google Scholar
13Lloyd, SK, Kasbekar, AV, Kenway, B. Developmental changes in cochlear orientation – implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:902–7Google Scholar
14Chen, K, Lyu, H, Xie, Y, Yang, L, Zhang, T, Dai, P. Morphological characteristics of round window niche in congenital aural atresia and stenosis patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:547–51Google Scholar
15Bettman, RH, Appelman, AM, van Olphen, AF. Cochlear orientation and dimensions of the facial recess in cochlear implantation. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003;65:353–8Google Scholar
16Adunka, O, Unkelbach, MH, Mack, M. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:807–12Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Technique for measuring angles between the cochlear basal turn relative to the mid-sagittal plane pre-operatively on axial, high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography scans.

Figure 1

Table 1. Angles measured pre-operatively one week apart

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Otoendoscope (0°, 1.9 mm diameter) used for endoscopic evaluation of the round window niche.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Endoscopic images of round window niche visibility intra-operatively: (a) type I, (b) type IIa, (c) type IIb and (d) type IIb.

Figure 4

Table 2. Distribution of intra-operative endoscopic grading and averages of mean angle measurements