Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:51:42.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical value of tone burst vestibular evoked myogenic potentials at threshold in acute and stable Ménière's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2007

V Osei-Lah*
Affiliation:
Department of Neuro-Otology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
B Ceranic
Affiliation:
Department of Audiological Medicine, St George's Hospital and Medical School, London, UK
L M Luxon
Affiliation:
Department of Neuro-Otology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Victor Osei-Lah, 61 Ridgewell Close, London SE26 5AP, UK. Fax: 0208 2962704 E-mail: vicabe@lycos.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

The objectives of this preliminary, prospective, cohort study were to ascertain the characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials at threshold levels in two groups of Ménière's disease patients – acute and stable – and to identify whether vestibular evoked myogenic potentials can provide any specific, objective information to distinguish acute from stable Ménière's disease.

Subjects and methods:

The study was based at a tertiary neuro-otology centre. Twenty adult patients who fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery1 criteria for Ménière's disease were divided into two groups: 11 patients with acute Ménière's disease and nine patients with stable Ménière's disease. Eighteen healthy adult volunteers served as controls. All subjects underwent vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing with ipsilateral, short tone burst stimuli at 500 Hz, as well as pure tone audiometry. The patients also underwent caloric testing.

Results:

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were present in all controls, and were present in 65 per cent of patients but absent in 35 per cent. The mean absolute threshold (Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential) ± standard deviation in normal controls was 116 ± 7.7 dBSPL; this did not differ statistically from that in patients, nor did it differ between acute and stable Ménière's disease. The p13/n23 latencies at the threshold levels in the normal, acute and stable groups (mean ± standard deviation) were respectively: 15 ± 2.2 ms/23.0 ± 2.5 ms; 15.7 ± 0.9 ms/23.7 ± 0.9 ms; and 15.3 ± 2.0 ms/24.2 ± 1.9 ms. The mean interaural amplitude difference ratio (IAD) ± standard deviation was significantly higher in the stable group compared with the acute group (0.54 ± 0.33 vs −0.15 ± 0.22; p = 0.007) and with the controls (0.54 ± 0.33 vs 0.1 ± 0.22; p = 0.05).

Conclusions:

The parameter that best differentiated acute from stable Ménière's disease at threshold was the interaural amplitude difference ratio. Therefore, this parameter may be used to monitor the clinical course of Ménière's disease.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Introduction

The recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials is emerging as a useful tool in clinical vestibular practice. Clinical and experimental studies have suggested that vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are generated by saccular afferents in response to loud acoustic stimuli, and may be recorded by surface electrodes on a tonically contracted sternocleidomastoid muscle.Reference McCue and Guinan2, Reference Murofushi, Curthoys, Topple, Colebatch and Halmagyi3 The putative pathway for ipsilateral vestibular evoked myogenic potential is the saccule, inferior vestibular nerve, lateral vestibular nucleus, lateral vestibulospinal tract and the sternocleidomastoid muscle (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Pathway for ipsilateral vestibular evoked myogenic potential. S = superior vestibular nucleus; M = medial vestibular nucleus; L = lateral vestibular nucleus; D = descending vestibular nucleus; LVST = lateral vestibulospinal tract; MLF = medial longitudinal fasciculus; SCM = sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Ménière's disease is an inner-ear disorder with an entirely unpredictable clinical course. The pathophysiology is unknown, although endolymphatic hydrops is believed to be the main histopathological correlate. The disease in its typical form is characterised by acute phases (exacerbation), with attacks of aural fullness, vertigo, tinnitus and hearing loss, separated by variable periods of remission (stable phase). The underlying mechanism for such a clinical course is unclear. Furthermore, at present, several tests are used to characterise Ménière's disease, including the caloric test, electronystagmography, electrocochleography and osmotic tests. However, results are highly variable, such that no one test is diagnostic. Moreover, all these tests may cause some degree of discomfort.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are thought to provide specific information about the saccule, which, according to histological studies, is the most common site of morphological alteration in the vestibular labyrinth.Reference Okuno and Sando4, Reference Sando, Orita and Hirsch5 Thus, the recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials could be a suitable test for Ménière's disease, as it is easy to perform, non-invasive and well tolerated. It is therefore anticipated that vestibular evoked myogenic potentials could be used in cases of Ménière's disease to: aid understanding of the pathophysiology; aid diagnosis (particularly regarding early detection of contralateral ear involvement); and monitor the clinical course of the disease.

There have been a number of reports on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in Ménière's disease, with variable results.

De Waele et al. Reference de Waele, Tran, Huy, Diard, Freyss and Vidal6 studied 59 patients with Ménière's disease and reported absent vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (in response to clicks) in 54 per cent of patients; this result correlated with the degree of low frequency hearing loss and poor postural performance, but not with canal paresis.

Seo et al. Reference Seo, Node, Yukimasa and Sakagami7 reported a case of saccular hydrops in a patient presenting with non-rotatory disequilibrium, in which a depressed vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitude recovered to normal after furosemide administration. The same groupReference Seo, Yoshida, Shibano and Sakagami8 subsequently demonstrated an increase in p13-n23 amplitude in seven of 18 cases and the reappearance of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in three out of seven cases after furosemide loading. These results suggest that reversal of reflex attenuation is due to reduction of saccular hydrops following diuresis. However, in those in whom vestibular evoked myogenic potentials remained absent after furosemide loading, severe hydrops might have caused irreversible saccular degeneration.

Detection of either absent or reduced vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitudes has been widely reported.Reference Young, Huang and Cheng9Reference Wu and Young12 Kuo et al. Reference Kuo, Yang and Young13 reported abnormal vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (absent or depressed) in eight out of 12 Ménière's disease patients within 24 hours of an acute attack; however, in four of those patients, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials returned to normal after 48 hours. These authors postulated that abnormal vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were due to saccular hydrops affecting oscillation of the endolymph, whereas the reappearance of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials could be attributed to drainage of the saccular hydrops.

Although most studies have focussed on amplitude changes, recent reports indicate that threshold is probably a more reliable measure of vestibular evoked myogenic potential changes in Ménière's disease.Reference Rauch, Silveira, Zhou, Kujawa, Wall and Guinan14, Reference Lin, Timmer, Oriel, Zhou, Guinan and Kujawa15 Lin et al. Reference Lin, Timmer, Oriel, Zhou, Guinan and Kujawa15 reported elevated mean vestibular evoked myogenic potential thresholds in affected ears and also, to a lesser extent, in contralateral asymptomatic ears, compared with normal controls. They concluded that vestibular evoked myogenic potentials could be used to predict contralateral ear involvement and eventual bilateral Ménière's disease.

The distinct characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in acute and stable Ménière's disease are unknown. Therefore, this study examined vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in normal subjects and in patients with Ménière's disease, and also compared results for patients in the acute and stable phases of the disease.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Twenty patients who fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery1 criteria for Ménière's disease, and who attended a tertiary neuro-otology clinic at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, were recruited for the study. All patients were interviewed to obtain a full clinical history and underwent a full clinical neuro-otological examination. The acute (exacerbation) group (11 patients) consisted of those who had had an attack in the preceding three months and were still symptomatic. The stable (remission) group (nine patients) had been free of attacks and symptoms for more than three months. Eighteen healthy volunteers (36 ears) aged between 18 and 60 years, with no history of neurological or otological disease, acted as controls.

The study was approved by the joint ethics committee of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery and the Institute of Neurology.

Methods

Audiovestibular tests

Pure tone audiometry was performed in all subjects.16 The patients also underwent immitance audiometry,16 transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions,Reference Kemp, Ryan and Bray17 direct current electronystagmography, and caloric testing by the Fitzgerald–Hallpike technique, according to the standard protocol of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, neuro-otology department.18

Recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

The sternocleidomastoid muscle was used as the target muscle. Subjects were tested while laying on a couch with the head rest adjusted 30° to the horizontal plane. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded by attaching Ag/AgCl electrodes on the mid-point of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (active), the mid-clavicle (negative) and the upper sternum (ground). From the recumbent position, subjects were instructed to lift their head up, in order to activate both sternocleidomastoid muscles symmetrically; a 500 Hz short tone burst (1 ms rise and fall, 2 ms plateau) was then delivered via TDH 49 calibrated headphones (Telephonics Corporation, New York, New York, USA), mono-aurally at a rate of 4.7 Hz, using the Medelec Synergy EMG/EP system (Oxford Instruments Limited, Surrey, UK). Tone bursts instead of clicks were used because the former involved less scatter of energy at suprathreshold level. A frequency of 500 Hz was used because this is the frequency reported to best differentiate normal from abnormal responses at threshold.Reference Rauch, Zhou, Kujawa, Guinan and Herrmann19 Electromyographic signals were amplified, band pass filtered between 20 and 2000 Hz, and sampled for 100 ms. Two hundred stimuli were averaged for each test run. The stimulus was delivered at 130 dBSPL to elicit the initial positive (p13) and negative (n23) waves ipsilateral to the stimulus (Figure 2). The stimulus was then reduced in 5 dB steps and the minimum intensity required to elicit a p13-n23 response was taken to be the threshold of stimulation, designated Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential. For each p13-n23 waveform, the peak-to-peak amplitude of the unrectified EMG was measured, as was the amplitude of the rectified EMG which reflected the degree of muscle activation. The latencies of p13 and n23 were measured and the interaural amplitude difference and ratio, as well as the interaural threshold difference and ratio, were computed.

Fig. 2 Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) p13/n23 wave complex.

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 11 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for data analyses. The Student t-test was used to compare the results of the two patient groups, side-to-side differences, and differences between affected ears and control ears.

Comparisons of the results for the three subject groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance, with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. A significance level of 0.05 was used.

Results and analysis

The study included 12 female and six male controls with a mean age of 34.1 years (standard deviation (SD), 5.9 years; range, 26–49 years).

The characteristics of the patients are summarised in Table I. The mean age of the Ménière's disease patients was 48.5 years (SD, 11.3 years; range, 20–61 years) and their median duration of illness was 4.5 years (range, 1–22 years). There were 10 women and 10 men. Eleven (55 per cent) patients had acute Ménière's disease and nine (45 per cent) had stable disease. In 11 (55 per cent) and nine (45 per cent) patients, the affected side was the left and right, respectively. According to the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery criteria, 16 (80 per cent) were classified as having definite Ménière's disease, whereas two (10 per cent) each had possible and probable disease.

Table I Characteristics of ménière's disease patients

Yr = years; MD = Ménière's disease; VEMP = vestibular evoked myogenic potential; F = female; M = male; L = left; R = right; Y = yes; N = no; NA = no asymmetry

Four patients had normal caloric test responses, and one patient did not undergo the test because of an in situ grommet. The remaining patients had significant canal paresis in the affected ear, ranging between 8 and 100 per cent (normal canal paresis, for this department, was less than 8 per cent) (Table I).

Vestibular evoked myogenic potential results

The mean ± SD threshold (Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential) for the controls (36 ears) was 116 ± 7.7 dBSPL (±104.5 dBnHL). Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were present in 13 (65 per cent) of the 20 affected ears. Of the seven (35 per cent) affected ears without a measurable vestibular evoked myogenic potential, two had acute disease and five had stable disease. Thus, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were recorded in 81 per cent of the acute group but in only 44 per cent of the stable group. There was no correlation between the duration of Ménière's disease and the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The mean ± SD Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential for the affected ears in the acute and stable groups were respectively 118 ± 7.9 dBSPL and 120 ± 4.0 dBSPL. The same parameter in non-affected patient ears was 117 ± 5.3 dBSPL. There was no statistical difference in Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential between acute and stable patients, control ears and affected ears, and control ears and non-affected ears (Table II).

Table II Vemp characteristics of controls and of affected and non-affected ears

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. VEMP = vestibular evoked myogenic potential; TVEMP = mean absolute VEMP threshold

Twelve patients underwent vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for both sides (affected and non-affected). Of these, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were absent bilaterally in three, absent on the diseased side only in two and absent on the non-diseased side in a further two patients. Thus, in five patients, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were absent in the non-affected ear.

The mean ± SD p13 and n23 latencies at threshold in the controls were respectively 15 ± 2.2 ms and 23 ± 2.5 ms. Statistically, these results did not differ from the respective results for the affected ears in the acute group (15.7 ± 0.9 ms and 23.7 ± 0.9 ms), the stable group (15.3 ± 2.0 ms and 24.2 ± 1.9 ms) or the non-affected Ménière's disease ears (15.1 ± 0.8 ms and 23.6 ± 1.1 ms). Although absolute latencies in the patients were within normal limits, p13 latency was shorter with longer duration of Ménière's disease (R =  − 0.73; p = 0.004) (Figure 3).

Fig. 3 Correlation between p13 latency and Ménière's disease duration.

The mean ± SD corrected amplitudes (the ratio of tonic EMG and amplitude) did not differ between groups, being 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.9 ± 0.5 and 2.5 ± 1.1 for normal controls, acute ears and stable affected ears, respectively. The mean ± SD interaural amplitude difference ratios (i.e. right to left amplitude difference divided by the sum of amplitudes) for controls and for acute and stable Ménière's disease affected ears were respectively 0.1 ± 0.22, −0.15 ± 0.22 and 0.54 ± 0.33. The mean ± SD interaural amplitude difference ratio was significantly higher in the stable group compared with the acute group (0.54 ± 0.33 vs −0.15 ± 0.22; p = 0.007) and with the controls (0.54 ± 0.33 vs 0.1 ± 0.22; p = 0.05). Interaural threshold difference and interaural threshold difference ratios were determined for all groups, but differences did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

This study compared vestibular evoked myogenic potential characteristics at threshold levels in patients with acute and stable Ménière's disease, using 500 Hz short tone burst stimuli. It has been widely reported that vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are frequency-sensitive in healthy individuals, as reflected in the ‘frequency tuning curves’. Although Todd et al. Reference Todd, Cody and Banks20 reported maximum vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitude responses of between 300 and 350 Hz, the optimum frequency of the tone burst in healthy adults has been reported to be 500 Hz.Reference Rauch, Zhou, Kujawa, Guinan and Herrmann19, Reference Murofushi, Matsuzaki and Wu21 In the study by Rauch et al., Reference Rauch, Zhou, Kujawa, Guinan and Herrmann19 poorer tuning was apparent in Ménière's disease patients at 500 Hz, and this was the frequency that best differentiated normal from diseased subjects. However, this ‘best’ frequency can lie between 500 and 1000 HzReference Welgampola and Colebatch22 or between 500 and 700 Hz.Reference Node, Seo, Miyamoto, Adachi, Hashimoto and Sakagami23 The alteration in tuning and threshold shift in Ménière's disease has been attributed to the presumed hydropic distension of the saccule.Reference Node, Seo, Miyamoto, Adachi, Hashimoto and Sakagami23

In this study, Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential was 116 ± 7.7 dBSPL. The threshold vestibular evoked myogenic potential response in healthy adults ranges between 11019 and 114.4 dBSPL.Reference Welgampola and Colebatch22 The apparent differences may be due to differences in methodology.

Studies reporting threshold changes in Ménière's disease are few. In contrast to the present study, in which there was no statistically significant Tvestibular evoked myogenic potential difference between the ears of healthy volunteers and the affected and non-affected ears of Ménière's disease patients, Rauch et al. Reference Rauch, Zhou, Kujawa, Guinan and Herrmann19 reported significantly elevated thresholds both in the affected and unaffected ears of Ménière's disease patients, compared with normal subjects. Lin et al., Reference Lin, Timmer, Oriel, Zhou, Guinan and Kujawa15 from the same centre, reported an elevated mean vestibular evoked myogenic potential threshold in affected ears and also, to a lesser extent, in the contralateral asymptomatic ears, compared with normal controls. These authors concluded that the vestibular evoked myogenic potential threshold can be used to predict contralateral ear involvement and eventual bilateral Ménière's disease; they also emphasised the importance of multifrequency testing to study the frequency tuning characteristics in Ménière's disease.

In the present study, the vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameter that best differentiated the three groups was the interaural amplitude difference ratio. This ratio was 0.10 ± 0.22 for controls, −0.15 ± 0.22 for acute Ménière's disease affected ears and 0.54 ± 0.33 for stable Ménière's disease affected ears. In the literature, there is no information on values using tone burst, but for click-evoked vestibular evoked myogenic potential, a normal interaural amplitude difference ratio range of 0.14 ± 0.11 (mean ± 1 SD) has been reported.Reference Young, Huang and Cheng9 These same authors reported a positive correlation between interaural amplitude difference ratios and the stage of disease, i.e. the higher the stage, the higher the ratio. This was not the case in our study, probably due to the small sample size. We found that the interaural amplitude difference ratio was significantly higher in stable disease when compared with acute disease (p = 0.007) and with controls (p = 0.05). Although the number of patients in our study was small, the interaural amplitude difference ratio appears to be a promising parameter for monitoring Ménière's disease progression; further research is needed to refine its clinical utility.

Rauch et al. Reference Rauch, Silveira, Zhou, Kujawa, Wall and Guinan14 reported that, in unilateral Ménière's disease, the interaural threshold difference correctly assigned side-of-disease in 85 per cent of cases. In this study, the interaural threshold difference did not vary between groups, probably due to differences in methodology and sample size.

  • Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are generated by saccular afferents in response to loud acoustic stimuli

  • Ipsilateral vestibular evoked myogenic potentials specifically assess saccular function

  • The saccule is the commonest vestibular site affected by Ménière's disease

  • In this study, the interaural amplitude difference ratio appeared to be a valuable vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameter that differentiated between acute and stable Ménière's disease

  • The interaural amplitude difference ratio may be useful in monitoring the clinical course of Ménière's disease

Latencies were normal in all groups. However, the p13 latency correlated negatively with the duration of Ménière's disease (R =  −0.73; p = 0.004). The p13 latency was shorter with a longer duration of Ménière's disease. The reason for this finding is not clear. Latency changes are believed to reflect changes within the central conducting pathways of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential reflex. Latency has been found to be stable in a variety of peripheral vestibular disorders, including Ménière's disease.Reference Young, Huang and Cheng11, Reference Murofushi, Shimizu, Takegoshi and Cheng24, Reference Ochi, Ohashi and Nishino25 Murofushi et al. Reference Murofushi, Shimizu, Takegoshi and Cheng24 also reported prolonged p13 latency both in patients with multiple sclerosis and in those with a large vestibular schwannoma compressing the brainstem. They concluded that lesions within the brainstem pathway of the vestibulospinal tract are a prerequisite for the prolongation of p13. Similar findings were reported by Alpini et al.,Reference Alpini, Pugnetti, Caputo and Cesarani26 who attributed the prolonged latencies in multiple sclerosis to demyelination, either of the primary afferent axons at the root entry zone or of secondary vestibulospinal tract axons. However, a few studies have reported prolonged p13 and n23 latencies in Ménière's disease, attributed to a high endolymphatic pressure in the saccule, impairing sound transmission.Reference Young, Huang and Cheng9, Reference Akkuzu, Akkuzu and Ozlouglu27 One possible explanation for the latency findings in this study could be retrograde degeneration in Scarpa's ganglion and the vestibular nerve, reducing the conduction velocity of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential reflex as the disease progresses, although there are conflicting reports as to whether this occurs in Ménière's disease. Spoendlin et al. Reference Spoendlin, Balle, Bock, Bredberg, Danckwardt-Lillierstrom and Felix28 and Kitamura et al. Reference Kitamura, Takahashi, Kakoi, Sugimoto and Silverstein29 reported degeneration and decrease in vestibular nerve fibres, whereas Ylikoski et al. Reference Ylikoski, Collan and Palva30 and Kitamura et al. Reference Kitamura, Kaminaga, Ishida and Silverstein31 found no such evidence.

Conclusion

The recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials is an emerging, non-invasive vestibular function test which can be applied to Ménière's disease. The interaural amplitude difference ratio appears to be a valuable parameter which can be used to monitor the clinical course of the disease, and in particular to identify the acute phase of Ménière's disease so as to guide appropriate treatment. However, in order to refine its clinical utility and to recommend its routine use in Ménière's disease, large, prospective, controlled, longitudinal vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies (during different phases of Ménière's disease) are required, in order to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the various vestibular evoked myogenic potential parameters.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Ménière's Society (UK). The study also formed part of a thesis submitted to the University College London by the first author, as partial fulfilment for the award of an MSc in Audiological Medicine.

Footnotes

Excerpts presented at the 5th British Society of Neuro-otology Meeting, 10 October 2005, Imperial College, London, and at the Ménière's Society (UK) Annual Conference, 17 October 2006, London.

References

1 Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere's disease. American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck and Surgery, Inc (AAOHNS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:181–5Google Scholar
2 McCue, MP, Guinan, JJ. Acoustically responsive fibres in the vestibular nerve of the cat. J Neurosci 1994;14:6058–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Murofushi, T, Curthoys, IS, Topple, AN, Colebatch, JG, Halmagyi, GM. Responses of guinea pig primary vestibular neurons to clicks. Exp Brain Res 1995;103:174–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Okuno, T, Sando, I. Localization, frequency, and severity of endolymphatic hydrops and the pathology of the labyrinthine membrane in Meniere's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987;96:438–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Sando, I, Orita, Y, Hirsch, BE. Pathology and pathophysiology of Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2002;35:517–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 de Waele, C, Tran, Ba Huy, P, Diard, JP, Freyss, G, Vidal, PP. Saccular dysfunction in Meniere's patients. A vestibular-evoked myogenic potential study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;871:392–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Seo, T, Node, M, Yukimasa, A, Sakagami, M. Furosemide loading vestibular evoked myogenic potential for unilateral Meniere's disease. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:283–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Seo, T, Yoshida, K, Shibano, A, Sakagami, M. A possible case of saccular endolymphatic hydrops. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999;61:215–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Young, YH, Huang, TW, Cheng, PW. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in delayed endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1623–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Wang, SJ, Young, YH. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 2003;185:43–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Young, YH, Huang, TW, Cheng, PW. Assessing the stage of Meniere's disease using vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:815–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Wu, CL, Young, YH. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in acute low-tone sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2004;114:2172–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Kuo, S-H, Yang, T-H, Young, YH. Changes in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials after Menière attacks. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:717–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Rauch, SD, Silveira, MB, Zhou, G, Kujawa, SG, Wall, C 3rd, Guinan, JJ et al. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials versus vestibular test battery in patients with Meniere's disease. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:981–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Lin, MY, Timmer, FC, Oriel, BS, Zhou, G, Guinan, JJ, Kujawa, SG et al. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) can detect asymptomatic saccular hydrops. Laryngoscope 2006;116:987–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for tympanometry. Br J Audiol 1992;26:255–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Kemp, DT, Ryan, S, Bray, P. A guide to effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:93105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for caloric test. Br J Audiol 1999;33:179–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Rauch, SD, Zhou, G, Kujawa, SG, Guinan, JJ, Herrmann, BS. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials show altered tuning in patients with Ménière's disease. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:333–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Todd, NP, Cody, FW, Banks, JR. A saccular origin of frequency tuning in myogenic vestibular evoked potentials?: implications for human responses to loud sounds. Hear Res 2000;141:180–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Murofushi, T, Matsuzaki, M, Wu, CH. Short tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials on the sternocleidomastoid muscle: are these potentials also of vestibular origin? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:660–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Welgampola, MS, Colebatch, JG. Characteristics of tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials in the sternocleidomastoid muscles. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:796802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Node, M, Seo, T, Miyamoto, A, Adachi, A, Hashimoto, M, Sakagami, M. Frequency dynamic shift of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with endolymphatic hydrops. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1208–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Murofushi, T, Shimizu, K, Takegoshi, H, Cheng, PW. Diagnostic value of prolonged latencies in the vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1069–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Ochi, K, Ohashi, T, Nishino, H. Variance of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. Laryngoscope 2001;111:522–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Alpini, D, Pugnetti, L, Caputo, D, Cesarani, A. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between onset and definite cases. Int Tinnitus J 2005;11:4851Google ScholarPubMed
27 Akkuzu, G, Akkuzu, B, Ozlouglu, L. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and Meniere's disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:510–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Spoendlin, H, Balle, V, Bock, G, Bredberg, G, Danckwardt-Lillierstrom, N, Felix, H et al. Multicentre evaluation of the temporal bones obtained from a patient with suspected Menière's disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1992;499:121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Kitamura, K, Takahashi, K, Kakoi, H, Sugimoto, T, Silverstein, H. A morphological and morphometric study of the peripheral process of the human vestibular nerve following posterior cranial neurectomy. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:967–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Ylikoski, J, Collan, Y, Palva, T. Vestibular nerve in Menière's disease. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:477–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Kitamura, K, Kaminaga, C, Ishida, T, Silverstein, H. Ultrastructural analysis of the vestibular nerve in Menière's disease. Auris Nasus Larynx 1997;24:2730CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Pathway for ipsilateral vestibular evoked myogenic potential. S = superior vestibular nucleus; M = medial vestibular nucleus; L = lateral vestibular nucleus; D = descending vestibular nucleus; LVST = lateral vestibulospinal tract; MLF = medial longitudinal fasciculus; SCM = sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) p13/n23 wave complex.

Figure 2

Table I Characteristics of ménière's disease patients

Figure 3

Table II Vemp characteristics of controls and of affected and non-affected ears

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Correlation between p13 latency and Ménière's disease duration.