Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:08:55.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Awareness and attitudes towards external auditory canal exostosis and its preventability in surfers in the UK: cross-sectional study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

S Morris*
Affiliation:
School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
T Martin
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Worcester Royal Hospital, UK
D Mccahon
Affiliation:
Clinical Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK
S Bennett
Affiliation:
School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Simon Morris, 143 Warwards Lane, Selly Oak, Birmingham B29 7QX, UK Fax: 0121 414 3759 E-mail: simonrhysmorris@yahoo.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine the proportion of UK surfers aware of external auditory canal exostosis, to identify surfer characteristics associated with knowledge of the condition and to explore attitudes to earplug use.

Method:

An online, cross-sectional survey of UK-based surfers.

Results:

Of 375 surfers, 86.1 per cent (n = 323; 95 per cent confidence interval = 82.3–89.3) reported awareness of external auditory canal exostosis. Further investigation revealed that, despite their awareness of the condition, 23.4 per cent of these surfers (88 out of 323; 95 per cent confidence interval = 19.5–28.0) had little or no knowledge about external auditory canal exostosis. Predictors of knowledge included: distance from nearest surfing beach (p = 0.001), surfing standard (ability) (p = 0.008), earplug use (p = 0.024) and positive external auditory canal exostosis diagnosis (p = 0.009).

Conclusion:

The findings suggest that a significant minority of UK surfers have no knowledge about this condition. Knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis was significantly associated with earplug use when surfing. Efforts to improve surfers’ knowledge are required to enable surfers to better protect themselves, which could reduce the incidence of external auditory canal exostosis.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Introduction

External auditory canal exostosis, more commonly known as ‘surfer's ear’, is characterised by bony protrusions within the external auditory canal.Reference Seftel1, Reference Everline, Nathanson and Renneker2 This abnormal bone growth occurs as a result of an ‘evaporative cooling effect’, wherein consequential hyperaemia and vasodilation after exposure to cold water lead to increased osteoblast activity and hyperostosis near the tympanic ring.Reference King, Kinney, Iacobellis, Alexander, Harris and Torre3, Reference Cooper, Tong, Neil, Owens and Tomkinson4

The stage of external auditory canal exostosis is directly related to the duration of cold water exposure, with regular exposure increasing the risk of external auditory canal exostosis development by 10 per cent per annum.Reference Harrison5Reference Nakanishi, Tono and Kawano9 In the UK, 500 000 surfers per year are exposed to seawater below 19 °C, the critical temperature for external auditory canal exostosis development.Reference Kroon, Lawson, Derkay, Hoffmann and McCook1013

Estimates suggest that external auditory canal exostosis is present in 63 per cent of UK surfers, and that 28 per cent are afflicted with symptoms including otalgia, recurrent otitis externa and hearing loss.Reference Alexander, Lau, Beaumont and Hope14, Reference Attlmayr and Smith15 Surgical intervention is the sole means of restoring auditory canal patency and eradicating these symptoms.Reference Seftel1, Reference Everline, Nathanson and Renneker2

Earplugs limit cold water entry to the ear when surfing and can reduce the incidence of external auditory canal exostosis.Reference Timofeev, Notkinan and Smith16 Despite this, their use is limited amongst surfers, with only 2–15 per cent currently reporting regular practice.Reference Alexander, Lau, Beaumont and Hope14, Reference Reddy, Abdelrahman, Lau and Flanagan17

Awareness of the preventability of external auditory canal exostosis may influence earplug use amongst surfers and halt the growing prevalence of this condition.Reference Attlmayr and Smith15 However, there is currently little evidence regarding surfers’ awareness of external auditory canal exostosis and their attitude to earplug use. One cross-sectional study reported that 60 per cent of surfers were aware of surfer's ear.Reference Reddy, Abdelrahman, Lau and Flanagan17 That study was limited to 92 participants and, as such, the findings may not be generalisable to surfers across the UK.

This study reports the findings of a cross-sectional survey conducted to determine the proportion of surfers aware of external auditory canal exostosis and to establish the levels of knowledge regarding this condition. In addition, it explores: surfer characteristics associated with knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis, attitudes amongst surfers towards earplug use, and favourable means of educating the surfing population.

Materials and methods

Ethical considerations

The University of Birmingham Internal Ethics Review Committee approved the study in January 2015.

Study design

A cross-sectional survey of UK surfers was conducted. A questionnaire was designed to collect data, utilising a tick-box format of categorical options and Likert scales, in four sections as below.

Section one addressed surfer characteristics. Participants were asked to report their age, gender, surfing habits and standard (using the Hutt surfing skill scaleReference Hutt, Black and Mead18 (beginner = 1, 2, 3; intermediate = 4, 5; and advanced = 6, 7, 8)), earplug use, external auditory canal exostosis related aural symptoms, and diagnosis of and past surgical treatment for external auditory canal exostosis.

Section two focused on surfers’ awareness and knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis. The proportion of surfers aware of external auditory canal exostosis was assessed using an explicit yes or no question. Those answering ‘yes’ were directed to consider 10 factual statements, with 5-point Likert scales used to ascertain participants’ external auditory canal exostosis ‘knowledge’.

Section three examined surfers’ attitude to earplug use. Ten attitude statements with five-point Likert scales attempted to explore the barriers felt by participants towards wearing earplugs when surfing.

Finally, section four addressed information provision. Participants identified the most preferable means for delivery of external auditory canal exostosis advice.

The questionnaire was informed by existing literature, lay texts, and discussions with surfers and otolaryngologists who are experienced in external auditory canal exostosis. It was piloted with four experienced surfers and amended correspondingly prior to distribution.

Setting

Data collection occurred between January and April 2015. Links to the online questionnaire were distributed to the member lists of a national surfing organisation (Surfing Great Britain) and to 12 surf clubs from across the UK, and distributed in person to surfers at beaches in South Wales and Devon.

Participants

Individuals were eligible to participate if they had surfed for more than 6 months in the UK and were aged 18 years or older. Participants were informed that submission of a completed questionnaire signified consent to use of their anonymised data in analysis and publication.

Sample size

The only existing survey of surfers’ awareness of external auditory canal exostosis in the UK estimated a level of awareness of 60 per cent.Reference Reddy, Abdelrahman, Lau and Flanagan17 Based on this, a sample size of 369 was required to detect a 60 per cent proportion of surfers aware of external auditory canal exostosis, with a 5 per cent margin of error and 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs).19

Data management

The five-point Likert scale response options for the knowledge and attitude statements were coded from −2 to +2 (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Data generated from these responses were used to calculate a total score out of ±20.

Participants with scores of −20 to +5 (who responded incorrectly to more than five statements) were classified as having poor knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis. Those with scores of +6 to +14 were considered to have good knowledge and those with scores of +15 to +20 were classified as having excellent knowledge. In this study, ‘awareness’ was considered a positive answer to the initial yes/no question and ‘knowledge’ was considered a good or excellent response to the Likert statements. The 10 attitude statements categorised participants as having an overall positive (total attitude score of more than 0), neutral (score of 0) or negative (score of less than 0) attitude towards earplug use.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was undertaken using SPSS® software, version 19.0. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to generate means and standard deviations (SDs). Univariate analysis (chi-square and Fisher's exact tests) and multivariate analysis (a binary logistic regression) were used to explore relationships between external auditory canal exostosis knowledge and surfer characteristics.

Results

Background characteristics

Of 402 questionnaires that were returned, 375 were fully completed and included in the analysis. There were 303 (80.8 per cent) male respondents and 72 (19.2 per cent) female respondents. The mean age of the sample was 34.42 years (SD = 12.50) (Table I). A previous positive diagnosis of external auditory canal exostosis was reported by 102 participants, 30 of whom had undergone surgery for the condition. Earplugs were used by 40.0 per cent of the respondents (n = 150; 95 per cent CI = 35.0–44.9).

Table I Patients' background characteristics*

* Total n = 375.

Clinically significant symptoms were: otalgia, otitis externa, tinnitus and temporary deafness. SD = standard deviation; EACE = external auditory canal exostosis; GP = general practitioner

Awareness and knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis

A total of 323 individuals (86.1 per cent; 95 per cent CI = 82.3–89.3) reported that they were aware of external auditory canal exostosis.

Data derived from the subsequent ‘knowledge’ Likert statements revealed that 36 of the 323 individuals had poor knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis, 172 had good knowledge and 115 had excellent knowledge (Figure 1).

Fig. 1 Flowchart of participation, highlighting: (1) respondents’ awareness of external auditory canal exostosis (based on responses to a yes/no question); (2) their level of knowledge about the disease (based on responses to knowledge Likert statements); and (3) existence of knowledge (binary knowledge categories, as used for univariate and multivariate analyses).

After combining those individuals with a ‘good’ and ‘excellent’ response to the knowledge statements, 76.6 per cent (287 out of 375; 95 per cent CI = 72.0–80.5) were classified as having ‘knowledge’. After combining those with no awareness and a ‘poor’ knowledge response, 23.4 per cent (n = 88; 95 per cent CI = 19.5–28.0) were classified as having ‘no knowledge’.

There was variability in the proportion of aware surfers who held knowledge, particularly regarding the treatment for external auditory canal exostosis: only 35.6 per cent demonstrated knowledge that surgery is required to correct external auditory canal exostosis (Table II).

Table II Responses of ‘aware surfers’ to knowledge likert scale statements*

* A total of 323 surfers were aware of external auditory canal exostosis. EACE = external auditory canal exostosis

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify surfer characteristics associated with ‘knowledge’ versus ‘no knowledge’. All independent variables from section one of the questionnaire were tested, controlling for age and gender (Table III).

Table III Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for surfer characteristics predictive of ‘knowledge’ over ‘no knowledge’

Age and gender were controlled for in all variables.

* Clinically significant symptoms were: otalgia, otitis externa, tinnitus and temporary deafness. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; EACE = external auditory canal exostosis

Four independent variables were significantly associated with ‘knowledge’ in the multivariate analysis: Hutt's surfing standardReference Hutt, Black and Mead18 (compared to the beginner surfer (reference), the odds ratio for the intermediate surfer was 2.621 (p = 0.013), and the odds ratio for the advanced surfer was 3.715 (p = 0.003)), living less than five miles from the nearest surfing beach (odds ratio = 2.846, p = 0.001), being an earplug user (odds ratio = 2.367, p = 0.024) and a previous positive diagnosis of external auditory canal exostosis (odds ratio = 15.837, p = 0.009). Experience of clinical symptoms and the number of years surfed were not significantly associated with knowledge.

Attitudes to earplug use

Of the respondents, 69.6 per cent were categorised as having a positive attitude towards earplug use (Figure 2). Three leading barriers to earplug use emerged from the attitude Likert data: 82.4 per cent agreed that earplugs adversely affect hearing, 51.4 per cent agreed that earplugs interfere with the feeling of immersion in the sea and 41.1 per cent agreed that earplugs are uncomfortable. Of the 225 individuals who did not wear earplugs, 56.0 per cent (n = 126) said they would use earplugs if they knew more about external auditory canal exostosis.

Fig. 2 Responses of 375 surfers to attitude Likert scale statements. EACE = external auditory canal exostosis

Information provision

Of all the respondents, 84.0 per cent (n = 315) reported that they would benefit from greater levels of surfing-related health advice. Overall, 61.1 per cent of respondents favoured the delivery of surfing health advice via social media, 9.3 per cent via magazine articles, 8.3 per cent via a medical speaker at surf club meetings and 5.3 per cent via leaflets at general practitioner surgeries.

Discussion

Synopsis of key results

The findings indicate that 86.1 per cent of surfers are aware of external auditory canal exostosis; however, further investigation showed that not all ‘aware’ surfers were necessarily well informed about the implications of external auditory canal exostosis. This proportion is greater than Reddy and colleague's estimate of 60 per cent;Reference Reddy, Abdelrahman, Lau and Flanagan17 nevertheless, experienced surfers were predominantly represented in the current study's sample (49.3 per cent were advanced in terms of Hutt's surfing standardReference Hutt, Black and Mead18).

The presence of symptoms, previous surgery, number of years’ surfing experience and employment status were associated with knowledge in the unadjusted analysis; however, these factors were not significant contributors in the multivariate model when the effect of age, gender and all other independent variables were controlled for. The multivariate analysis findings suggest that surfers who used earplugs were twice as likely to have knowledge about external auditory canal exostosis as surfers who did not (odds ratio = 2.37). In addition, those with a previous diagnosis of external auditory canal exostosis were considerably more likely to have knowledge of the condition than those without a diagnosis (odds ratio = 15.83). This suggests that many surfers may gain knowledge about external auditory canal exostosis through interaction with a medical practitioner, rather than from health promotional sources.

Over half of the respondents did not use earplugs (60.0 per cent); however, the majority of these individuals (56.0 per cent) reported that they would use earplugs if they knew more about external auditory canal exostosis.

It is possible that surf organisations are currently under-utilised as sources for surfing health advice. Respondents indicated that more health information would be welcome via several routes, although the most effective means of delivering this is inconclusive. Social media was the most popular choice amongst the participants (61.1 per cent). Indeed, social media has proven benefits as a health education tool.Reference Jones, Eathington, Baldwin and Sipsma20 Therefore, education via social media through surf schools and organisations for the novice, symptom-free population may be useful to minimise the number of surfers developing this condition.

Strengths and limitations

This is the largest study of external auditory canal exostosis to date. By employing both in person and online recruitment methods, the questionnaire was accessible to surfers across the UK, and, as such, the findings are likely to be generalisable to the UK's surfing population. Unlike previous studies, this survey used several questions to assess knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis, making this a more robust determination of knowledge level. Nevertheless, although the aural symptoms self-reported are presumed to be those specified, other otological morbidities may have been misreported by the participants.

Applicability of study

Previous studies have attempted to capture the burden of this disease by examining surfers’ ears at various locations worldwide. The estimated prevalence of external auditory canal exostosis is: 30.0 per cent in Australia,Reference Hurst, Bailey and Hurst21 59.8 per cent in JapanReference Nakanishi, Tono and Kawano9 and 61.0 per cent in the Basque Coast.Reference Altuna Mariezkurrena, Gómez Suárez, Luqui Albisua, Vea Orte and Algaba Guimerá22 Therefore, based on current literature, this places the external auditory canal exostosis prevalence in the UK as the highest worldwide (63.0 per cent).Reference Attlmayr and Smith15

Studies agree that it takes approximately 10 years of surfing, which equates to over 5000 hours, in order to acquire clinically significant disease.Reference Cooper, Tong, Neil, Owens and Tomkinson4, Reference Alexander, Lau, Beaumont and Hope14, Reference Hurst, Bailey and Hurst21Reference Lennon, Murphy, Fennessy and Hughes24 Thus, this produces a 10-year lag-phase, which may make external auditory canal exostosis an increasing part of the future ENT surgeon's workload.Reference Lennon, Murphy, Fennessy and Hughes24 Currently in the Royal Cornwall Hospital, an average of 13 external auditory canal exostosis operations are completed annually.Reference Attlmayr and Smith15 Over the last 9 years, this represents an average increase of 1.23 operations per year, supporting the ‘lag-phase’.Reference Attlmayr and Smith15

  • External auditory canal exostosis, or ‘surfer's ear’, is estimated to affect 63 per cent of UK surfers, the highest estimated prevalence worldwide

  • Evidence suggests that earplug use when surfing may prevent growth of exostoses

  • Of surfers surveyed, 23.4 per cent had no knowledge of this condition

  • Knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis was associated with earplug use, higher surfing standard, living close to a surfing beach and a positive diagnosis

  • Eighty-four per cent stated they would benefit from improved surfing health advice delivery, e.g. via social media

  • Medical practitioners should make relevant individuals aware of the risk of disease progression with continued, unprotected surfing

Studies agree that earplug use can reduce the need for surgical intervention. In Alexander and colleagues’ cross-sectional study, subjects were less likely to have evidence of external auditory canal exostosis if they were regular users of earplugs.Reference Alexander, Lau, Beaumont and Hope14 Likewise, a 10-year follow up of post-operative patients showed that earplug use significantly reduced external auditory canal exostosis recurrence.Reference Timofeev, Notkinan and Smith16

These benefits of earplug use and the consequences of surfing without earplugs should be recognised by health practitioners, and surfing organisations should appreciate their role in educating individuals about the risk of external auditory canal exostosis progression with continued, unprotected surfing.

Conclusion

The current findings suggest that a proportion of the UK's surfing community are unaware of external auditory canal exostosis. Surfers with knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis are more likely to use earplugs. With surfing becoming an increasingly popular sport in the UK, improved awareness of external auditory canal exostosis amongst the currently unaware and undiagnosed populations is likely to be valuable. An educational social media campaign may improve surfers’ knowledge of external auditory canal exostosis, earplug habits and, in turn, the burden of this preventable condition.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Sayeed Haque for his statistical advice, Dr Frederique Tan for her guidance, Tom Anderson, from Surfing Great Britain, and all surf clubs and participants.

Footnotes

Presented at the South West ENT Academic Meeting, 19 June 2015, Bath, and at the British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology, 8–10 July 2015, Liverpool, UK.

References

1Seftel, D.Ear canal hyperostosis - surfer's ear: an improved surgical technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1977;103:5860Google Scholar
2Everline, C, Nathanson, A, Renneker, M.Surf Survival. New York: Skyhorse, 2011Google Scholar
3King, J, Kinney, A, Iacobellis, S, Alexander, TH, Harris, JP, Torre, P et al. Laterality of exostosis in surfers due to evaporative cooling effect. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:345–51Google Scholar
4Cooper, A, Tong, R, Neil, R, Owens, D, Tomkinson, A.External auditory canal exostoses in white water kayakers. J Sports Med 2010;44:144–7Google Scholar
5Harrison, DF.The relationship of osteomata of the external auditory meatus to swimming. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962;31:187201Google Scholar
6Kennedy, G.The relationship between auditory exostoses and cold water: a latitudinal analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;71:401–15Google Scholar
7Mlynski, R, Radeloff, A, Brunner, K, Hagen, R.Exostoses of the external auditory canal. Is the cold water hypothesis valid for patients in continental areas? [In German] HNO 2008;56:410–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Chaplin, J, Stewart, I.The prevalence of exostoses in the external auditory meatus of surfers. Clin Otolaryngol 1998;23:326–30Google Scholar
9Nakanishi, H, Tono, T, Kawano, H.Incidence of external auditory canal exostoses in competitive surfers in Japan. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:80–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Kroon, D, Lawson, M, Derkay, C, Hoffmann, K, McCook, J.Surfer's ear: external auditory exostoses are more prevalent in cold water surfers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:499504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11United Kingdom Sea temperatures 2014. In: http://www.seatemperature.org/europe/united-kingdom/ [20 February 2015]Google Scholar
13Surfers Against Sewage. The economic impact of domestic surfing on the United Kingdom. In: http://www.sas.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/SAS-Economic-Impact-of-domestic-surfing-on-the-UK-med-2.pdf [12 February 2015]Google Scholar
14Alexander, V, Lau, A, Beaumont, E, Hope, A.The effects of surfing behaviour on the development of external auditory canal exostosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1643–9Google Scholar
15Attlmayr, B, Smith, I.Prevalence of ‘surfer's ear’ in Cornish surfers. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:440–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Timofeev, I, Notkinan, N, Smith, IM.Exostoses of the external auditory canal: a long-term follow-up study of surgical treatment. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:588–94Google Scholar
17Reddy, V, Abdelrahman, T, Lau, A, Flanagan, PM.Surfers’ awareness of the preventability of ‘surfer's ear’ and use of water precautions. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:551–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Hutt, J, Black, K, Mead, S.Classification of surf breaks in relation to surfing skill. J Coastal Res 2001;29:6681Google Scholar
19Raosoft. Sample Size Calculator. In: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html [20 February 2015]Google Scholar
20Jones, K, Eathington, P, Baldwin, K, Sipsma, H.The impact of health education transmitted via social media or text messaging on adolescent and young adult risky sexual behaviour: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 2014;41:413–19Google Scholar
21Hurst, W, Bailey, M, Hurst, B.Prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Australian surfboard riders. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:348–51Google Scholar
22Altuna Mariezkurrena, X, Gómez Suárez, J, Luqui Albisua, I, Vea Orte, JC, Algaba Guimerá, J.Prevalence of exostoses among surfers of the Basque Coast [in Spanish]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2004;55:364–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Deleyiannis, F, Cockcroft, B, Pinczower, E.Exostoses of the external auditory canal in Oregon surfers. Am J Otolaryngol 1996;17:303–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lennon, P, Murphy, C, Fennessy, B, Hughes, J.Auditory canal exostoses in Irish surfers. Ir J Med Sci 2015;185:183–7Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I Patients' background characteristics*

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Flowchart of participation, highlighting: (1) respondents’ awareness of external auditory canal exostosis (based on responses to a yes/no question); (2) their level of knowledge about the disease (based on responses to knowledge Likert statements); and (3) existence of knowledge (binary knowledge categories, as used for univariate and multivariate analyses).

Figure 2

Table II Responses of ‘aware surfers’ to knowledge likert scale statements*

Figure 3

Table III Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for surfer characteristics predictive of ‘knowledge’ over ‘no knowledge’

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Responses of 375 surfers to attitude Likert scale statements. EACE = external auditory canal exostosis