Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:35:38.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The taxonomic and phylogenetic status of digeneans from the genus Timoniella (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae) in the Black and Baltic seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

Y. Kvach*
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Institute of Marine Biology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Pushkinska 37, 65011 Odessa, Ukraine
A. Bryjová
Affiliation:
Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic
P. Sasal
Affiliation:
UMS 2978 CNRS – EPHE – UPVD Centre de Recherche Insulaire et Observatoire de l'Environnement (CRIOBE), Papetoai, Moorea, French Polynesia Labex CORAIL, BP 1013–98 729, Papetoai, Moorea, French Polynesia
H.M. Winkler
Affiliation:
Institut für Biowissenschaften/Zoologie, Universität Rostock, Universitätsplatz 2, 18055 Rostock, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Y. Kvach, E-mail: yuriy.kvach@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Timoniella spp. are cryptogonimid flukes (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae) that parasitize the guts of fish in brackish waters. Timoniella imbutiforme, a species from the Mediterranean Sea, is recorded in the Black Sea, while T. balthica has been described from the Baltic Sea. In this paper, we clarify the taxonomic status of Timoniella populations in the Baltic and Black seas. Adults and metacercariae of Timoniella spp. were sampled from localities in the Mediterranean Sea (France), Black Sea (Ukraine) and Baltic Sea (Germany) and subjected to molecular and morphological analysis, including Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction based on concatenated sequences of ITS1–ITS2–28S. This allowed us to construct a new key to species of the genus Timoniella. Our results suggest that T. balthica forms part of the Boreal–Atlantic relict fauna of the Black Sea and should now be considered a junior synonym of T. imbutiforme.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

The family Cryptogonimidae Ward, 1917 (Digenea: Trematoda) includes a number of flukes parasitizing the gut and pyloric caeca of poikilothermic vertebrates, including fish, reptiles and amphibians (Miller & Cribb, Reference Miller, Cribb, Bray, Gibson and Jones2008b). The genus name Timoniella was proposed by Rebecq (Reference Rebecq1960) for Timoniella atherinae Rebecq, 1960 based on metacercariae from big-scale sand-smelt (Atherina boyeri Risso, 1810) in the Mediterranean Sea. Later, these metacercariae were synonymized with Timoniella praeterita (Looss, 1901), which is now the type species for the genus (Maillard, Reference Maillard1974). In all, eight species are now known for the genus, with three being described from European marine/brackish-water fish: Timoniella balthica (Reimer et al., 1996), Timoniella imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) and T. praeterita (Brooks, Reference Brooks1980; Miller & Cribb, Reference Miller, Cribb, Bray, Gibson and Jones2008b). Adult T. praeterita are known only from European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758)) occurring off the Mediterranean coasts of Egypt, France and Italy, the Adriatic Sea, the Norwegian North Sea and the Atlantic coast of Great Britain (Looss, Reference Looss1901; Nicoll, Reference Nicoll1915; Maillard, Reference Maillard1974; Sterud, Reference Sterud2002; Radujković & Šundić, Reference Radujković and Šundić2014), although T. praeterita metacercariae have also been found on the sand-smelt A. boyeri and gilthead seabream Sparus aurata L., 1758 (Maillard, Reference Maillard1974; Maillard et al., Reference Maillard, Lambert and Raibaut1980). Timoniella imbutiforme is a widely distributed species, known from D. labrax, the European flounder (Platichthyes flesus L., 1758) and the broad-nosed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle L., 1758) in the Mediterranean Sea (Molin, Reference Molin1859; Looss, Reference Looss1901; Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Bartoli & Gibson, Reference Bartoli and Gibson2007; Culurgioni et al., Reference Culurgioni, Sabatini, De Murtas, Mattiucci and Figus2014), the Atlantic coast of Europe, the North Sea off Norway and the coast of England (Johnstone, Reference Johnstone1906; Nicoll, Reference Nicoll1915; McDowall & James, Reference McDowall and James1988; El-Darsh & Whitfield, Reference El-Darsh and Whitfield1999; Sterud, Reference Sterud2002). It is also known from the common dentex (Dentex dentex L., 1758) in the Adriatic Sea (Marengo et al., Reference Marengo, Durieux, Marchand and Francour2014; Radujković & Šundić, Reference Radujković and Šundić2014), while T. imbutiforme metacercariae are known from Pomatoschistus spp., the black goby (Gobius niger L., 1758), A. boyeri, the Mediterranean banded killifish (Aphanius fasciatus Valenciennes, 1821), P. flesus, the common dab (Limanda limanda L., 1758) and the common sole (Solea solea L., 1758) (Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Køie, Reference Køie1983; El-Darsh & Whitfield, Reference El-Darsh and Whitfield2000; Malek, Reference Malek2004; Culurgioni et al., Reference Culurgioni, Sabatini, De Murtas, Mattiucci and Figus2014). Adults have been registered from S. typhle in the Black Sea and P. flesus in the Gulf of Odessa and the Sea of Azov (Chernyshenko, Reference Chernyshenko1949; Domnich & Sarabeev, Reference Domnich and Sarabeev2000), while metacercariae are often registered on gobiid species from the same localities, and from Sevastopol Bay and lagoons of the north-western Black Sea (Naydenova, Reference Naydenova1974; Domnich & Sarabeev, Reference Domnich and Sarabeev2000; Kvach, Reference Kvach2005, Reference Kvach2010; Kvach & Oğuz, Reference Kvach and Oğuz2009; Krasnovyd et al., Reference Krasnovyd, Kvach and Drobiniak2012). Finally, adult T. balthica have been found on S. typhle from the Salzhaff Lagoon in the Baltic Sea (Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996), while metacercariae have been recorded on many small fishes, including the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L., 1758), the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius L., 1758), S. typhle, the viviparous eelpout (Zoarces viviparus L., 1758), and gobiids and gobionellids (Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996; Zander et al., Reference Zander, Reimer and Barz1999, Reference Zander, Koçoglu, Skroblies and Strohbach2002; Zander, Reference Zander2001, Reference Zander2003; Zander & Reimer, Reference Zander and Reimer2002; Kvach & Winkler, Reference Kvach and Winkler2011). This relatively newly described species (T. balthica) is morphologically very similar to T. imbutiforme from the Black Sea, which also uses the same definitive host, i.e. S. typhle.

The Black and Baltic seas are both large brackish waterbodies with salinity ranging around 18‰ in the Black Sea and 6–8‰ in the Baltic Sea (Zenkevich, Reference Zenkevich1963; Dethier, Reference Dethier1992). Forming part of the Mediterranean region, the Black Sea is characterized by the presence of both relict Boreo-Atlantic and Ponto-Caspian faunas, in addition to Mediterranean species (Zaitsev & Mamaev, Reference Zaitsev and Mamaev1997; Zaitsev, Reference Zaitsev1998). Cryptogonimids inhabiting the Black Sea are mainly of Mediterranean origin; for example, Anisocoelium capitellatum Rudolphi, 1819, Anisocladium fallax Rudolphi, 1819 and A. gracilis Looss, 1901 are all common parasites of the stargazer (Uranoscopus scaber L., 1758) throughout the Mediterranean basin, including the Black Sea (Bartoli & Gibson, Reference Bartoli and Gibson2000). Metadena pauli Vlasenko, 1931 was originally described from fish of the Black Sea, although it has since also been recorded in fish species from the eastern and western Mediterranean Sea (Sey, Reference Sey1970; Naydenova, Reference Naydenova1974; Fischthal, Reference Fischthal1980; Bartoli & Bray, Reference Bartoli and Bray1987; Bartoli & Gibson, Reference Bartoli and Gibson1995). On the other hand, Aphallus tubarium Rudolphi, 1819, a common species found on many fish in the Mediterranean Sea, has only been recorded in S. typhle in the Black Sea (Korniychuk & Gaevskaya, Reference Korniychuk and Gaevskaya2004). Aphalloides coelomicola Dollfus et al., 1957 is the only Boreal–Atlantic species, its distribution covering both the Mediterranean basin and northern Europe (Kvach et al., Reference Kvach, Bryjová, Sasal and Winkler2017).

Due to the overall similarity of the Black and Baltic seas as habitat, and the similarity of representatives of Timoniella found within them, the status of these taxa remains unclear. Hence, the aim of this work was to undertake a morphological and genetic comparison of Timoniella spp. from different geographical regions (the Baltic, Black and Mediterranean seas) in order to clarify the taxonomic status of the Black Sea and Baltic Sea populations.

Materials and methods

Adults and metacercariae of Timoniella spp. were sampled from different localities in the Mediterranean Sea (Saint-Nazaire Lagoon, France), the Black Sea (Budaki Lagoon, Sevastopol Bay and the Gulf of Odessa, Ukraine) and the Baltic Sea (Salzhaff, Germany) (site details are provided in table 1). Examples of each parasite were fixed in pure 96% ethanol for molecular study and hot 4% formaldehyde for morphological study (Cribb & Bray, Reference Cribb and Bray2010). Formaldehyde-preserved worms were then stained with iron acetic carmine, dehydrated in ethanol of increasing concentration and mounted in Canada balsam as permanent slides (Georgiev et al., Reference Georgiev, Biserkov and Genov1986). All metacercariae were identified based on the number of spines in the oral sucker crown (Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996).

Table 1. Samples used for genetic analysis of Timoniella spp.

DNA was extracted from individual worms using the JetQuick kit (Genomed, Löhne, Germany), while the KAPA2G Robust HotStart PCR Kit (Kapabiosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) was used to amplify the internal transcribed spacer-1–internal transcribed spacer-2–28S rDNA (ITS1–ITS2–28S rDNA) nuclear genomic region (primers and annealing temperatures are detailed in table 2). Sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products was performed commercially at GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany), with sequences edited and aligned using Geneious 9.0.5 (Kearse et al., Reference Kearse, Moir, Wilson, Stones-Havas, Cheung, Sturrock, Buxton, Cooper, Markowitz, Duran, Thierer, Ashton, Mentjies and Drummond2012). Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction was based on concatenated ITS1–ITS2–28S sequences of ten newly sequenced Timoniella individuals (table 1). This represents the first sequencing of the ITS1–ITS2–28S region in morphologically identified Timoniella spp. Samples of five other cryptogonimid species from our own samples (see table 1) were used as an outgroup. Also included in the outgroup were sequences for Acanthostomum burminis Bhalerao, 1926 (KC489791; Jayawardena et al., Reference Jayawardena, Tkach, Navaratne, Amerasinghe and Rajakaruna2013), Siphoderina jactus Miller & Cribb, Reference Miller, Cribb, Bray, Gibson and Jones2008b (EU571263) and Siphoderina poulini Miller & Cribb, 2008 (EU571267; Miller & Cribb, Reference Miller and Cribb2008a). Acanthostomum burminis is presently considered a sister lineage to the remaining cryptogonimids. PartitionFinder 1.0.1 (Lanfear et al., Reference Lanfear, Calcott, Ho and Guindon2012) detected all three regions (ITS1, ITS2, 28S) as forming a single partition, indicating GTR+G as the most suitable substitution model to use. Hence, Bayesian analysis of evolutionary relationships using a single partition with GTR+G model priors was performed in MrBayes 3.2.1 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, Reference Ronquist and Huelsenbeck2003), as implemented in Geneious 9.0.5.

Table 2. DNA sites and primers used for genetic sequencing of Timoniella spp. (T °C = annealing temperature).

Table 3. Morphological and morphometric parameters used for differentiating adult Timoniella imbutiforme sampled from different regions (see ‘Materials and methods’ for an explanation of the abbreviations used).

Descriptions of adult Timoniella were used for the morphological study (Chernyshenko, Reference Chernyshenko1949; Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996). Measurements were made of total body length (TBL), total body width (TBW), forebody length (FBL) and hindbody length (HBL), with all parameters measured in micrometres. TBW was taken as maximum body width for all further calculations. FBL was measured as distance from the anterior extremity to the anterior margin of the ventral sucker, while HBL was measured from the anterior margin of the ventral sucker to the posterior end of the body. FBL was calculated as the percentage of TBL. We also measured the length and width of the oral (OS) and ventral (VS) suckers, the pharynx, the seminal receptacle, the ovary (Ov), the anterior (AT) and posterior (PT) testes, and the egg, along with the length of the prepharynx and oesophagus, the distance from the ovary to the anterior testis (Ov/AT), and distance from the posterior testis to the posterior end of the body (PT/PostB). The number of spines in the oral-sucker spine crown was calculated, as was the length and width of a single spine. Finally, ratios of TBL to TBW (TBL/TBW), OS width to length (OS W/L), VS width to length (VS W/L), and OS to VS length (OS/VS) were calculated as a percentage.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction based on the ITS1–ITS2–28S genomic region indicated a highly supported monophyletic group encompassing four cryptogonimid genera in two pairs (posterior probability PP = 1.00); with Acanthochasmus as a highly supported sister genus to Neochasmus (PP = 1.00), and slightly lower support (PP = 0.79) for a sister relationship between Timoniella and Aphalloides (fig. 1). The genus Timoniella was monophyletic and included all samples from France, Germany and Ukraine (PP = 1.0). Timoniella worm sequences from different hosts showed little variability and no clear structure caused by host fish species.

Fig. 1. Cryptogonimid phylogenetic tree based on Timoniella sp. ITS–28S rDNA sequences.

Morphological study

There was no morphological difference between worms sampled from different regions (table 3, fig. 2), although morphometric parameters within each region showed high variability. As a result, there is some overlap between regions and with data from previous work, including the original descriptions (see table 3; Chernyshenko, Reference Chernyshenko1949; Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996). Based on this morphological study, we provide a re-description of T. imbutiforme below.

Fig. 2. Timoniella imbutiforme ex. Syngnathus typhle, overviews (above) and spine crowns (below); (left) from Budaki Lagoon, Ukraine; (right) from Salzhaff.

Taxonomic summary

  • Family Cryptogonimidae Ward, 1917.

  • Genus Timoniella Rebeqc, 1960.

  • Timoniella imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Brooks, 1980 (fig. 2).

  • Synonyms. Distomum imbutiforme Molin, 1859; Anoikostoma imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Stossich, 1899; Acanthochasmus imbutiformis (Molin, 1859) Looss, 1901; Echinostomum imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Johnstone, 1906; Acanthostomum imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Gohar, 1934; Acanthostomum balthicum Reimer et al., 1996; Timoniella balthica (Reimer et al., 1996) Miller & Cribb, 2008.

  • Type host. Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758) (Actinopterygii: Moronidae).

  • Other hosts. Syngnathus typhle L., 1758, Syngnathus abaster Risso, 1826 (Actinopterygii: Syngnathidae), Dentex dentex (L., 1758) (Actinopterygii: Sparidae), Platichthys flesus L., 1758 (Actinopterygii: Pleuronectidae); metacercariae in Atherina boyeri Risso, 1810 (Actinopterygii: Atherinidae), Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae), Pomatoschistus marmoratus (Risso, 1810), Pomatoschistus microps (Krøyer, 1838) (Actinopterygii: Gobionellidae), and many other brackish-water fish species.

  • Type locality. Mediterranean Sea near Egypt.

  • Other localities. Gulf of Leon, Nile delta, Adriatic Sea, Black Sea, Sea of Azov, North Sea, Themes delta, Øresund, south-western Baltic Sea.

  • Site in host. Intestine.

  • Voucher material. C-616 (Helminthological collection of the Institute of Parasitology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, České Budějovice, Czech Republic).

  • Representative sequence. MF491832–MF491865 (NCBI GenBank).

Description

Body elongate, 743.5–3944 in length. Forebody usually shorter than hindbody, 22–50% of total body length. Maximum body width in forebody, 113–500, at the level of ventral sucker. Ratio between body length and width 5.3–11.6. Tegument covered with small spines. Two brown eyespots at level of pharynx.

Oral sucker terminal, funnel-shaped, 79–304 × 65–277. Oral sucker with crown of 17–20 spines, 13–78 × 5–10. In specimens fixed in hot formalin, oral sucker partly everted and spines curved. Ventral sucker same size as acetabulum, almost round, sometimes prolonged laterally, 69–179 × 40–154 (sometimes up to 205–304). Ratio of oral/ventral sucker length is 80–124%.

Prepharynx 40–255 long, usually winding. Pharynx muscular, elongate–oval, 34–151 × 40–139. Oesophagus commonly shorter than prepharynx, 30–85. Intestinal bifurcation in central forebody, anterior to ventral sucker. Caeca terminate blindly close to posterior extremity. Excretory pore terminal, excretory vesicle Y-shaped.

Genital pore located immediately anterior to ventral sucker. Gonotyle small, simple, located anterior to ventral sucker, associated with ventral sucker. Seminal vesicle tubular, posterior to ventral sucker.

Gonads in posterior hindbody. Testes two, oval, tandem, close to posterior extremity of body. Post-testicular distance about 51–94, measured from last one. Testes of similar size with high variability, 40–436 × 39–227. Ovary entire, globular, 80–200 × 64–220, anterior to testes, contiguous with, or up to about 27–137 from, anterior testes. Seminal receptacle obliquely anterior to ovary, sometimes overlapping, thick-walled, oval to circular, 28–102 × 26–65. Follicular vitellarium in two lateral groups, from posterior testis (rarely from middle of anterior testis) to middle of distance between anterior testis and ventral sucker. Eggs small, elongate–oval, with some variability in size, 20–33 × 9–15, yellowish-brown, not embryonated.

Discussion

Based on the results of this study, we propose T. balthica as a junior synonym of T. imbutiforme, making this the second Boreal–Atlantic cryptogonimid species registered in the Black Sea fauna. The other species, A. coelomicola, was originally described from Mediterranean annual gobies, Pomatoschistus spp., and another species, Aphalloides timmi Reimer, 1970, from the same host in the Baltic Sea (Dollfus et al., Reference Dollfus, Chabaud and Golvan1957; Reimer, Reference Reimer1970). Kvach et al. (Reference Kvach, Bryjová, Sasal and Winkler2017) later considered these two taxa as the same species, A. coelomicola. The sister relationship of Timoniella and Aphalloides was also confirmed by Kvach et al. (Reference Kvach, Bryjová, Sasal and Winkler2017), suggesting that both species probably form part of the Boreal–Atlantic relict fauna of the Black and Baltic seas, dating from the Upper Miocene.

Unlike A. coelomicola, whose life cycle is strongly synchronized with that of Pomatoschistus spp. (Pampoulie et al., Reference Pampoulie, Lambert, Rosecchi, Crivelli, Bouchereaut and Morand2000), the T. imbutiforme life cycle includes different definitive and secondary intermediate hosts, with D. labrax previously described as the main definitive host and Pomatoschistus spp. as the main second intermediate host (Maillard, Reference Maillard1973). In the Black and Baltic seas, however, S. typhle is the main definitive host (Chernyshenko, Reference Chernyshenko1949; Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996), although Pomatoschistus spp. remains the main secondary intermediate host (Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996; Zander et al., Reference Zander, Reimer and Barz1999, Reference Zander, Koçoglu, Skroblies and Strohbach2002; Zander & Reimer, Reference Zander and Reimer2002; Kvach, Reference Kvach2005, Reference Kvach2010; Krasnovyd et al., Reference Krasnovyd, Kvach and Drobiniak2012). Small fish such as Pomatoschistus spp. are important dietary items of S. typhle (Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Erzini and Gonçalves2007). Both main definitive hosts (D. labrax and S. typhle) are widely distributed along European coasts, stretching from the North Sea off Norway to the Mediterranean and Black seas in the south (note that D. labrax is absent from the Baltic Sea) (Dawson, Reference Dawson, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielsen and Tortonese1986; Smith, Reference Smith, Quero, Hureau, Karrer, Post and Saldanha1990). While the main definitive hosts have a Boreal–Atlantic distribution, the first intermediate host of the parasite, mud snails of the Hydrobia group (Maillard, Reference Maillard1973; Reimer et al., Reference Reimer, Hildebrand, Scharberth and Walter1996), are part of a group of European lagoon species distributed throughout the Boreal zone (Barnes, Reference Barnes1989).

Our analysis confirms two European species within the genus Timoniella: T. imbutiforme and T. praeterita. Both representatives appear to be Boreal–Atlantic species, with T. imbutiforme having the wider range. Taking into account the absence of T. praeterita in the Black Sea, we suggest that T. imbutiforme is of older origin, representing a Boreal relict within the Black Sea fauna. The maritae and metacercariae of these two species can be distinguished by the termination of the intestinal caeca and the oral sucker armature (see Brooks, Reference Brooks1980). We provide (below) a new key for the identification of Timoniella.

According to Brooks (Reference Brooks1980) the genus was previously considered a representative of the subfamily Acanthostominae. The Acanthostominae, with Acanthostomum Looss, 1899 as its type genus, includes both fish and reptile parasites. Based on our own data, A. burminis, a parasite of the Asiatic water snake, Xenochrophis piscator Schneider, 1799, was found to lie far from the fish parasites (see fig. 1). As such, we consider adult cryptogonimid parasites of fish to constitute a common monophyletic group, while reptile parasites should be considered as a separate group.

Key for the identification of Timoniella (modified from Brooks, Reference Brooks1980).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Kevin Roche (Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences) for proof reading the English text.

Financial support

The study received financial support from the European Centre of Ichthyoparasitology – Centre of Excellence, Grant Agency of the Czech Republic Project No. P505/12/G112.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Barnes, RSK (1989) What, if anything, is a brackish-water fauna? Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Earth Sciences 80, 235240.Google Scholar
Bartoli, P and Bray, RA (1987) Redescriptions of two cryptogonimid digeneans from the fish Dentex dentex (L., 1758) (Sparidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Systematic Parasitology 10, 117127.Google Scholar
Bartoli, P and Gibson, DI (1995) Three rare and little known cryptogonimid digeneans from the sciaenid fish Sciaena umbra (L.) in the western Mediterranean. Systematic Parasitology 30, 121139.Google Scholar
Bartoli, P and Gibson, DI (2000) Three little known acanthostomine digeneans from Uranoscopus scaber L. in the western Mediterranean. Systematic Parasitology 46, 123141.Google Scholar
Bartoli, P and Gibson, DI (2007) Synopsis of the life cycles of Digenea (Platyhelminthes) from lagoons of the northern coast of the western Mediterranean. Journal of Natural History 41, 15531570.Google Scholar
Bowles, J, Hope, M, Tiu, WU, Liu, XS and McManus, DP (1993) Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers highly conserved between Chinese and Philippine Schistosoma japonicum. Acta Tropica 55, 217229.Google Scholar
Brooks, DR (1980) Revision of the Acanthostominae Poche, 1926 (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 70, 313332.Google Scholar
Chernyshenko, А (1949) Novye gelminty ryb Chernogo morya. Pratsi Odeskogo Universytetu 4, 7991.Google Scholar
Cribb, TH and Bray, RA (2010) Gut wash, body soak, blender and heat-fixation: approaches to the effective collection, fixation and preservation of trematodes of fishes. Systematic Parasitology 76, 17.Google Scholar
Cribb, TH, Anderson, GR, Adlard, RD and Bray, RA (1998) A DNA-based demonstration of a three-host life-cycle for the Bivesiculidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). International Journal for Parasitology 28, 17911795.Google Scholar
Culurgioni, J, Sabatini, A, De Murtas, R, Mattiucci, S and Figus, V (2014) Helminth parasites of fish and shellfish from the Santa Gilla Lagoon in southern Sardinia, Italy. Journal of Helminthology 88, 489498.Google Scholar
Dawson, CE (1986) Syngnathidae. pp. 628639 in Whitehead, PJP, Bauchot, M-L, Hureau, J-C, Nielsen, J and Tortonese, E (Eds) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vol. 2. Paris, Unesco.Google Scholar
Dethier, MN (1992) Classifying marine and estuarine natural communities: an alternative to the Cowardin system. Natural Areas Journal 12, 90100.Google Scholar
Dollfus, RP, Chabaud, AG and Golvan, YJ (1957) Helminthes de la région de Banyuls. V. Nouveau Distome Aphalloïdes coelomicola n. gen. n. sp. de la cavité générale d'un Gobius d'eau saumâtre. Annales de Parasitologie 32, 2940.Google Scholar
Domnich, IF and Sarabeev, VL (2000) Suchasna fauna parazytiv ryb u pivnichniy chastyni Azovskogo morya. Visnyk Zaporizkogo Universytetu 1, 224231.Google Scholar
El-Darsh, HEM and Whitfield, PJ (1999) The parasite community infecting flounders, Platichthys flesus, in the tidal Thames. Journal of Helminthology 73, 203214.Google Scholar
El-Darsh, HEM and Whitfield, PJ (2000) Ultrastructure of the tegument of the metacercariae of Timoniella imbutiforme. Journal of Helminthology 74, 5766.Google Scholar
Fischthal, JH (1980) Some digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from Israel's Mediterranean coast and their zoogeography, especially those from Red Sea immigrant fishes. Zoologica Scripta 9, 1123.Google Scholar
Georgiev, B, Biserkov, V and Genov, T (1986) In toto staining method for cestodes with iron acetocarmine. Helminthologia 23, 279281.Google Scholar
Jayawardena, UA, Tkach, VV, Navaratne, AN, Amerasinghe, PH and Rajakaruna, RS (2013) Malformations and mortality in the Asian common toad induced by exposure to pleurolophocercous cercariae (Trematoda: Cryptogonimidae). Parasitology International 62, 246252.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J (1906) Internal parasites and diseased conditions of fishes. Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society 20, 151185.Google Scholar
Kearse, M, Moir, R, Wilson, A, Stones-Havas, S, Cheung, M, Sturrock, S, Buxton, S, Cooper, A, Markowitz, S, Duran, C, Thierer, T, Ashton, B, Mentjies, P and Drummond, A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 16471649.Google Scholar
Køie, M (1983) Digenetic trematodes from Limanda limanda (L.) (Osteichthyes, Pleuronectidae) from Danish and adjacent waters, with special reference to their life-histories. Ophelia 22, 201228.Google Scholar
Korniychuk, YM and Gaevskaya, AV (2004) The first record of Aphallus tubiarum (Trematoda, Cryptogonimidae) in the Black Sea. Vestnik Zoologii 38, 7980.Google Scholar
Krasnovyd, V, Kvach, Y and Drobiniak, O (2012) The parasite fauna of the gobiid fish (Actinopterygii, Gobiidae) in the Sykhyi Lyman, Black Sea. Vestnik Zoologii 46, 483490.Google Scholar
Kvach, Y (2005) A comparative analysis of helminth faunas and infection of ten species of gobiid fishes (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae) from the North-Western Black Sea. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 35, 103110.Google Scholar
Kvach, Y (2010) Helminths of the marbled goby (Pomatoschistus marmoratus), a Mediterranean immigrant in the Black Sea fauna. Vestnik Zoologii 44, 509518.Google Scholar
Kvach, Y and Oğuz, MC (2009) Communities of metazoan parasites of two fishes of the Proterorhinus genus (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae). Helminthologia 46, 168176.Google Scholar
Kvach, Y and Winkler, HM (2011) The colonization of the invasive round goby Neogobius melanostomus by parasites in new localities in the South-Western Baltic Sea. Parasitology Research 109, 769780.Google Scholar
Kvach, Y, Bryjová, A, Sasal, P and Winkler, HM (2017) A revision of the genus Aphalloides (Digenea: Cryptogonimidae), parasites of European brackish water fishes. Parasitology Research 116, 19731980.Google Scholar
Lanfear, R, Calcott, B, Ho, SYW and Guindon, S (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 16951701.Google Scholar
Littlewood, DTJ (1994) Molecular phylogenetics of cupped oysters based on partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3, 221229.Google Scholar
Littlewood, DTJ, Rohde, K and Clough, KA (1997) Parasite speciation within or between host species? – Phylogenetic evidence from site-specific polystome monogeneans. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 12891297.Google Scholar
Looss, A (1901) Ueber die Fascioliden genera Stephanochasmus, Acanthochasmus, und einige andere. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parazitenkunde 29, 595661.Google Scholar
Luton, K, Walker, D and Blair, D (1992) Comparison of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 56, 323328.Google Scholar
Maillard, C (1973) Etude du cycle évolutif du Trématode: Acanthostomum imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Gohar, 1934, parasite de Morone labrax (Linné, 1758). Annales Parasitologie humaine et comparée 48, 3346.Google Scholar
Maillard, C (1974) Cycle évolutif de Timoniella praeteritum (Looss, 1901) (Trematoda, Acanthostomidae) parasite de Morone labrax (Teleostei, Serranidae). Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 99, 245257.Google Scholar
Maillard, C, Lambert, A and Raibaut, A (1980) Nouvelle forme de distomatose larvaire. Étude d'un Trématode pathogène pour les alevins de Daurades (Sparus aurata L., 1758) en closerie. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 290, 535538.Google Scholar
Malek, M (2004) Parasites as discrimination keys in two sympatric species of gobies. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists 24, 173179.Google Scholar
Marengo, M, Durieux, EDH, Marchand, B and Francour, P (2014) A review of biology, fisheries and population structure of Dentex dentex (Sparidae). Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 24, 10651088.Google Scholar
McDowall, AA and James, BL (1988) The functional morphology of the circumoral spines of Timoniella imbutiforme (Molin, 1859) Brooks, 1980 (Digenea: Acanthostomidae). International Journal for Parasitology 18, 523530.Google Scholar
Miller, TL and Cribb, TH (2008a) Eight new species of Siphoderina Manter, 1934 (Digenea, Cryptogonimidae) infecting Lutjanidae and Haemulidae (Perciformes) off Australia. Acta Parasitologica 53, 344364.Google Scholar
Miller, TL and Cribb, TH (2008b) Family Cryptogonimidae Ward, 1917. pp. 51112 in Bray, RA, Gibson, DI and Jones, A (Eds) Keys to the Trematoda, Vol. 3. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Molin, R (1859) Nuovi Myzelmintha raccolti ed esaminati. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie Wissenschaften Wien, Mathematisch Naturwissenschaftliche 37, 818854.Google Scholar
Naydenova, NN (1974) Parazitofauna ryb semeystva Gobiidae Chernogo i Azovskogo morey. Kiev, Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
Nicoll, W (1915) A list of the trematode parasites of British marine fishes. Parasitology 7, 339378.Google Scholar
Oliveira, F, Erzini, K and Gonçalves, JMS (2007) Feeding habits of the deep-snouted pipefish Syngnathus typhle in a temperate coastal lagoon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72, 337347.Google Scholar
Pampoulie, C, Lambert, A, Rosecchi, E, Crivelli, AJ, Bouchereaut, J-L and Morand, S (2000) Host death: A necessary condition for the transmission of Aphalloides coelomicola Dollfus, Chabaud, and Golvan, 1957 (Digenea, Cryptogonimidae)? Journal of Parasitology 86, 416417.Google Scholar
Radujković, BM and Šundić, D (2014) Parasitic flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea, Digenea, Cestoda) of fishes from the Adriatic Sea. Natura Montenegrina 13, 7280.Google Scholar
Rebecq, JM (1960) Timoniella atherinae nov. gen. nov. sp. (Trematoda: Acanthostomotidae) metacercaire parasite d'Atherina mochon C.V. pp. 257–262 in Libro Homenaje al Dr. Eduardo Caballero y Caballero, Jubileo 1930–1960. México, Editorial Politeécnica.Google Scholar
Reimer, L (1970) Digene Trematoden und Cestoden der Ostseefische als natürliche Fischmarken. Parasitologische SchriftenReiche 20, 1144.Google Scholar
Reimer, LW, Hildebrand, A, Scharberth, D and Walter, U (1996) Trematodes of the brackish waters of the Baltic Sea and their distribution together with that of related species in other European areas. Applied Parasitology 37, 177185.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F and Huelsenbeck, JP (2003) Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 15721574.Google Scholar
Sey, O (1970) Parasitic helminths occurring in Adriatic fishes. Part II (Flukes and Tapeworms). Acta Adriatica 13, 315.Google Scholar
Smith, CL (1990) Moronidae. pp. 692694 in Quero, JC, Hureau, JC, Karrer, C, Post, A and Saldanha, L (Eds) Check-list of the fishes of the eastern tropical Atlantic (CLOFETA), Vol. 2. Lisbon, JNICT.Google Scholar
Sterud, E (2002) Parasites of wild sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax from Norway. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 48, 209212.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, YP (1998) Samoe sinee v mire. New York, UN Publication.Google Scholar
Zaitsev, Y and Mamaev, V (1997) Biological diversity in the Black Sea: a study of change and decline. New York, UN Publication.Google Scholar
Zander, CD (2001) The guild as a concept and a means in ecological parasitology. Parasitology Research 87, 484488.Google Scholar
Zander, CD (2003) Four-year monitoring of parasite communities in gobiid fishes of the south-western Baltic. I. Guild and component community. Parasitology Research 90, 502511.Google Scholar
Zander, CD and Reimer, LW (2002) Parasitism at the ecosystem level in the Baltic Sea. Parasitology 124, S119S135.Google Scholar
Zander, CD, Reimer, LW and Barz, K (1999) Parasite communities of the Salzhaff (Northwest Mecklenburg, Baltic Sea). I. Structure and dynamics of communities of littoral fish, especially small-sized fish. Parasitology Research 85, 356372.Google Scholar
Zander, CD, Koçoglu, O, Skroblies, M and Strohbach, U (2002) Parasite populations and communities from the shallow littoral of the Orther Bight (Fehmarn, SW Baltic Sea). Parasitology Research 88, 734744.Google Scholar
Zenkevich, LA (1963) Biologiya morey SSSR. Moskva, Izdatelsto AN SSSR.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Samples used for genetic analysis of Timoniella spp.

Figure 1

Table 2. DNA sites and primers used for genetic sequencing of Timoniella spp. (T °C = annealing temperature).

Figure 2

Table 3. Morphological and morphometric parameters used for differentiating adult Timoniella imbutiforme sampled from different regions (see ‘Materials and methods’ for an explanation of the abbreviations used).

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Cryptogonimid phylogenetic tree based on Timoniella sp. ITS–28S rDNA sequences.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Timoniella imbutiforme ex. Syngnathus typhle, overviews (above) and spine crowns (below); (left) from Budaki Lagoon, Ukraine; (right) from Salzhaff.