Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T09:29:22.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological and genetic characterization of Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis (Nematoda: Rictulariidae) from Necromys lasiurus (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) from Uberlândia, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

N.A. Costa
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
R.O. Simões
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
R.V. Vilela
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
J.G.R. Souza
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
S.T. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação dos Recursos Naturais, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará s/n, Uberlândia, MG, 38405-315, Brasil Laboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará s/n, Uberlândia, MG, 38405-315, Brasil
N.O. Leiner
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará s/n, Uberlândia, MG, 38405-315, Brasil
R. Gentile
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
A. Maldonado Junior*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-360, Brasil
*
Author for correspondence: A. Maldonado, E-mail: maldonad@ioc.fiocruz.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis, a nematode parasite of the small intestine of the rodent Necromys lasiurus, from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais state, Brazil, was analysed by light and scanning electron microscopy. Additionally, phylogenies were inferred from the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I gene (MT-CO1). Details of the helminth surface, such as the oral aperture, cephalic papillae, papillae in the posterior region of the body and longitudinal cuticular elements represented by spine-like projections and fans are presented, adding new taxonomic details. Molecular phylogenetic analysis, based on the MT-CO1, demonstrated that P. (P.) zygodontomis and Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) jaegerskioldi form a unique evolutionary unit in accordance with the subgenus Paucipectines and corroborated their occurrence in cricetid and didelphid hosts.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Introduction

Parasitism is one of the most common interactions among species within ecosystems (Gardner & Campbell, Reference Gardner and Campbell1992; Thomas et al., Reference Thomas, Renaud and Guégan2005), and it affects individual health, population growth, community structure and even ecosystem functioning (Grenfell, Reference Grenfell1992; Morand et al., Reference Morand, Ivanova and Vaucher1996; Morand & Arias-Gonzalez, Reference Morand and Arias-Gonzalez1997; Poulin, Reference Poulin1998). Small mammal hosts, including rodents, marsupials and bats, are infected by a variety of parasitic species, and may act as reservoirs of zoonosis, such as leishmaniasis, Chagas disease and schistosomiasis (Gentile et al., Reference Gentile, Costa Neto and D'Andrea2010; Orozco et al., Reference Orozco, Piccinali, Mora, Enriquez, Cardinal and Gürtler2014). Despite the importance of studies concerning mammal–parasite interactions for addressing the occurrence of diseases in natural and human-disturbed environments (Simões et al., Reference Simões, Gentile, Rademaker, D'Andrea, Herrera, Freitas, Lanfredi and Maldonado2010; Moreira et al., Reference Moreira, Giese, Melo, Simões, Thiengo, Maldonado and Santos2013; Cardoso et al., Reference Cardoso, Simões, Luque, Maldonado and Gentile2016), little is known about the helminth fauna, their geographic distribution, host specificity and prevalence in Neotropical small mammals. Moreover, studies containing detailed taxonomical and structural descriptions of these helminths are still scarce.

Necromys lasiurus (Lund, 1840) is a small (35 g), terrestrial rodent species which is known to be a reservoir of leishmaniasis (Brandão-Filho et al., Reference Brandão-Filho, Brito, Carvalho, Ishikawa, Cupolillo, Floeter-Winter and Shaw2003) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (Limongi et al., Reference Limongi, Moreira, Peres, Suzuki, Ferreira, Souza, Pinto and Pereira2013). Its distribution extends through central Brazil to south of the Amazon River, including north-eastern Argentina, extreme south-eastern Peru, Paraguay and Bolivia (Redford & Eisenberg, Reference Redford and Eisenberg1999), thus inhabiting the grasslands of Cerrado, Caatinga, as well as open areas in the Atlantic Forest biome in Brazil (Bonvicino et al., Reference Bonvicino, Oliveira and D'Andrea2008). It is considered to be a generalist species, being favoured by anthropogenic disturbances due to its tolerance of habitat modification and broad diet spectrum, including leaves, seeds, fruits and insects (Vieira & Baumgarten, Reference Vieira and Baumgarten1995; Redford & Eisenberg, Reference Redford and Eisenberg1999). Moreover, due to its high density and short life cycle (Francisco et al., Reference Francisco, Magnusson and Sanaiotti1995), N. lasiurus may contribute to persistence of parasite populations and their transmission among hosts (Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Guterres, Fernandes, D'Andrea, Bonvicino and de Lemos2014; Sabino-Santos et al., Reference Sabino-Santos, Maia, Jonsson, Goodin, Salazar-Bravo and Figueiredo2016).

Nematodes of the family Rictulariidae Froelich, 1802, infect mammals worldwide, including bats, marsupials, rodents, carnivores and primates. The morphological characteristics of the genus Pterygodermatites are based on the oral opening position and the total number cuticular projections, the number of prevulvar cuticular projections in females, and the positions of the papillae at the posterior end and the size of the spicules in males (Quentin, Reference Quentin1967). Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis was first described by Quentin (Reference Quentin1967) from the small intestine of the rodent N. lasiurus collected in Exú, in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. However, some morphological aspects were not described in detail, and this species has not been reported by scanning electron microscopy and molecular analysis.

Within the phylum Nematoda, phylogenetic studies based on molecular data have been carried out for the order Spirurida by Blaxter et al. (Reference Blaxter, De Ley, Garey, Liu, Scheldeman, Vierstraete and Vida1998), Wijová et al. (Reference Wijová, Moravec, Horak, Modry and Lukes2005) and Nadler et al. (Reference Nadler, Carreno, Mejía-Madrid, Ullberg, Pagan, Houston and Hugot2007). Nevertheless, so far, no molecular phylogeny has included the family Rictulariidae. In fact, just one small sequence from a member of this family is available in public databases.

In the present study, P. (P.) zygodontomis was analysed by light and scanning electron microscopy, adding new details to taxonomic characteristics. Additionally, phylogenies including representatives of this nematode genus were inferred, based on partial sequences of the mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I gene, to determine relationships of the superfamily Rictularioidea within the order Spirurida.

Materials and methods

Study sites and habitat description

Rodents were captured in Uberlândia (18°55′07″S, 48°17′19″W), in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, which is located in the Cerrado biome. Cerrado is the largest South American savannah, characterized by a tropical climate with a dry winter from April to September and a wet season from October to March. Collection was carried out in rural areas, including grassland and cornfields, and in the borders of Cerrado vegetation preserved areas, called Cerrado sensu stricto.

Collection and examination of rodents

In collaboration with the staff of the municipal government, 102 specimens of N. lasiurus were collected and analysed for helminth parasites during an investigation of hantavirus cases. Animals were captured with Tomahawk® (16 × 5 × 5 inches) and Sherman® traps (3 × 3.75 × 12 inches) baited with a mixture of peanut butter, banana, oats and bacon. Trapping occurred between December 2011 and November 2012. Biosafety techniques were used during all procedures involving biological samples (Lemos & D'Andrea, Reference Lemos and D'Andrea2014).

Helminth recovery and morphological analysis

The abdominal and thoracic cavities of the rodents were examined for the presence of helminths. Organs were placed separately in Petri dishes, washed twice in physiological saline solution, and dissected under a stereomicroscope. Worms were washed twice in saline solution to remove tissue debris and fixed in AFA (2% glacial acetic acid, 3% formaldehyde, 95% ethanol), or alternatively preserved in 70% ethanol for DNA isolation. For study of morphological characters, nine male and ten female specimens were cleared in 80% phenol (70% ethanol and phenolic acid), mounted on temporary slides and examined using a Zeiss Scope Z1 light microscope (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). The structures were measured via digital images captured by a Zeiss Axio Cam HRC using the accessory software Axio Vision Rel. 4.7.

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), six specimens (three males and three females) were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% freshly prepared formaldehyde in 0.1 m cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, washed in 0.1 m cacodylate buffer, post fixed for 2 h in 1% osmium tetroxide and 0.8% potassium ferricyanide, pH 7.2, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (20–100° GL) for 20 min each step and dried to critical point (Mafra & Lanfredi Reference Mafra and Lanfredi1998). Specimens were examined using a JEOL JSM-6390 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at the Rudolf Barth Electron Microscopy Platform of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute.

Voucher specimens of the helminths were deposited in the Coleção Helmintológica do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (P. zygodontomis numbers: CHIOC 38398, female only, from Exú, Pernambuco state and CHIOC 38399, male and female, from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais state; Pterygodermatites jaegerskioldi numbers: CHIOC 38400 and 38501 from Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul state).

Molecular and phylogenetic analysis

Genomic DNA samples were isolated from mid-section fragments of P. zygodontomis, P. jaegerskioldi, Physocephalus lassancei and Protospirura numidica adult worms (table 1). DNA isolation used the QIAGEN QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Each reaction was performed using only one specimen. Before DNA extraction, each specimen was clarified in alcohol/glycerol, identified morphologically and subsequently washed in 70% ethanol and distilled water.

Table 1. Species, geographic locality, host and GenBank accession number of species used for this study.

n/a, Not available.

DNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology was conducted using the primer cocktail: NemF1_t1 5′-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT CRA CWG TWA ATC AYA ARA ATA TTG G-3′, NemF2_t1 5′-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT ARA GAT CTA ATC ATA AAG ATA TYG G-3′, NemF3_t1 5′-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT ARA GTT CTA ATC ATA ARG ATA TTG G-3′, NemR1_t1 5′-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACT AAA CTT CWG GRT GAC CAA AAA ATC A-3′, NemR2_t1 5′-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACT AWA CYT CWG GRT GMC CAA AAA AYC A-3′ and NemR3_t1 5′-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACT AAA CCT CWG GAT GAC CAA AAA ATC A-3′, as described by Prosser et al. (Reference Prosser, Velarde-Aguilar, León-Règagnon and Hebert2013), for the barcode region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (MT-CO1). Each PCR contained 2.5 μl of 10× PCR buffer, 2 μl of 50 mm MgCl2, 0.5 μl of each primer cocktail (10 μm of a three-forward-primers mix, and 10 μm of a three-reverse-primers mix), 0.5 μl of 10 mm deoxynucleotide triphosphate solution (dNTPs), 0.2 μl of Invitrogen™ Platinum™ Taq DNA polymerase (500 U/μl) (Invitrogen, São Paulo, Brazil), 2.0 μl of genomic DNA and ultrapure water, in a total reaction volume of 25 μl. Thermal cycling conditions were 94°C for 1 min; five cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 45°C for 40 s, 72°C for 1 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 40 s, 51°C for 40 s, 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min (Prosser et al., Reference Prosser, Velarde-Aguilar, León-Règagnon and Hebert2013). The resulting amplicons were visualized on 2% agarose gels using GelRed™ nucleic acid gel stains (Biotium, Hayward, California, USA).

Successfully amplified amplicons were purified using the GE Healthcare illustra™ GFX™ PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit following the manufacturer's protocol (GE Healthcare Little Chalfont, Bucks, UK) and then cycle sequenced using the Applied Biosystems™ BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA), individually for each primer mentioned above for better accuracy. Sequencing was performed using the Applied Biosystems™ ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer. Both procedures and cycle-sequenced product precipitation were conducted at the DNA sequencing platform of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute, PDTIS/FIOCRUZ. Fragments were assembled into contigs and edited for ambiguities using the Geneious 9.1.8 software (http://www.geneious.com; Kearse et al., Reference Kearse, Moir, Wilson, Stones-Havas, Cheung, Sturrock, Buxton, Cooper, Markowitz, Duran, Thierer, Ashton, Mentjies and Drummond2012), resulting in a consensus sequence for each individual worm.

The MT-CO1 dataset included sequences from representatives of the superfamilies Rictularioidea (our two Pterygodermatites species), Acuarioidea, Camallanoidea, Dracunculoidea, Filarioidea, Gnathostomatoidea, Habronematoidea, Physalopteroidea, Spiruroidea and Thelazioidea (table 1). Plectoidea was included as the outgroup. Substitution saturation in the dataset was assessed using the test by Xia et al. (Reference Xia, Xie, Salemi, Chen and Wang2003) and Xia & Lemey (Reference Xia, Lemey, Lemey, Salemi and Vandamme2009) with the software DAMBE version 6.4.79 (Xia, Reference Xia2017).

Phylogenetic reconstructions were carried out using the software Treefinder version of March 2011 (Jobb, Reference Jobb2011) for maximum likelihood (ML) as optimality criteria and MrBayes version 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al., Reference Ronquist, Teslenko, van derMark, Ayres, Darling, Höhna, Larget, Liu, Suchard and Huelsenbeck2012) for Bayesian inference (BI). Both ML and BI analyses were performed using distinct models per codon position, to account for different evolutionary processes at each of the three codon positions.

In the ML analyses, evolutionary models were chosen by the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Schwarz, Reference Schwarz1978). ML-pairwise distances were computed using the same codon-based partitioned models using Treefinder. Robustness of nodes in ML was assessed by non-parametric bootstrap percentages (BP) after 1000 pseudoreplicates and by the expected-likelihood weights applied to local rearrangements of tree topology (LR-ELW) after 1000 replicates.

In the BI analyses, distinct GTR + I + G models were used for each codon position, with unlinking of base frequencies and parameters. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling was performed for 10,000,000 generations with four simultaneous chains, in two runs. Robustness of nodes in BI was assessed by Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) calculated from trees that were sampled every 100 generations, after removing the first 25% generations as a ‘burn-in’ stage. Adequacy of BI analyses sampling was assessed through the effective sample size (ESS) of each parameter, calculated using the software Tracer version 1.6 (Rambaut, Reference Rambaut2012). Values above 100 effectively independent samples were considered sufficient.

Results

Morphology by light and scanning electron microscopy

Description

Adult helminths exhibited sexual dimorphism. The female body was larger and more robust than the male, and both showed two columns of spine-like cuticular projections organized in pairs located ventrally, beginning below the buccal capsule and extending until near the end of the body. The oral cavity was triangulate, surrounded by six labial papillae (2 ventral, 2 lateroventral and 2 dorsal) and four external cephalic papillae (1 pair ventral and 1 pair dorsal) (figs 1A and 2B–D). There was a pair of amphids between the lateral and the dorsal labial papillae (fig. 2B). The buccal capsule with thick walls was sclerotized, trapezoidal in shape, with three oesophageal teeth (fig. 1A). The oral opening was surrounded by a toothed strip of 21 denticles in females (9 dorsal and 6 on each ventrolateral side) and 17 in males (7 dorsal and 5 on each ventrolateral side) (figs 1A and 2E). The female presented 81 ventrolateral spine-like cuticular projections arranged in pairs, being 38 prevulvar and 43 postvulvar (fig. 1B). The vulvar opening was posterior to the oesophageal–intestinal junction (fig. 1C). The tail was conical and fig. 1D indicates the position of the anus.

Fig. 1. Light microscopy of Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis. (A) Female buccal capsule with three oesophageal teeth (te) showing oral opening (asterisk). Details of apical view showing three developed lips and six labial papillae (lp); (B) vulvar (vu) region, lateral view, and spine-like posvulvar cuticular projections (sl); (C) region of transition of oesophagus (es) and intestine and vulva (vu); (D) female posterior region, lateral view, anus (a); (E) male posterior region, ventral view, details of four fans (fa) and spicules (sp); (F) right spicule (spr), left spicule (spl) and gubernaculum (g), lateral view.

Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy of P. (P.) zygodontomis. (A) Male, spine-like cuticular projections; (B) female, anterior end showing a pair of well-defined longitudinal cuticular elements, ventrolaterally located (v); (C) female, anterior end, apical view and external cephalic papillae (cp); (D) apical view, amphid (a), ventral region (v), dorsal region (d) and labial papillae (asterisk); (E) anterior end showing oral opening surrounded by a crown of teeth.

Males presented 41 spine-like ventrolateral cuticular projections (fig. 2A) with three or four fans ventral and anterior to the cloaca in juvenile and adult worms, respectively, in finfold shape (figs 1E, 2A). The posterior end of the male had nine pairs of papillae: 2 pairs precloacal, 1 pair ad-cloacal and 6 pairs postcloacal, organized in two groups. The first group was made up of two pairs of papillae and the second with three pairs of papillae near the tail tip. The ninth pair of papillae was located at the tip of the male tail, ending bluntly (figs 3B–D). A pair of phasmids was also observed between the eighth and the ninth pair of papillae (fig. 3C). The spicules were unequal in size with similar shape, at a ratio of 1:2 (right:left) (fig. 1F). The presence of a rectangular gubernaculum was observed (fig. 1F). These traits and the morphometric characteristics allowed us to identify the specimens to the species level by comparing them with other specimens belonging to P. (P.) zygodontomis recovered from N. lasiurus (table 2).

Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscopy of P. (P.) zygodontomis. (A) Male, posterior portion, ventral view, details of four fans (fa) and spicules (sp); (B) pairs of papillae (asterisk); (C) the tail, a pair of phasmids (ph) and papillae (asterisk); (D) tip of male with papillae (asterisk).

Table 2. Comparison of morphometric characteristics (in μm) of Pterygodermatites (Paucepectines) zygodontomis among specimens of Necromys lasiurus of Brazilian rodents.

dfae, Distance from anterior end.

Molecular and phylogenetic analysis

Alignment of sequences resulted in a matrix comprising 46 taxa and 876 characters, of which 309 were constant and 507 were variable characters, informative for parsimony. The test by Xia & Lemey (Reference Xia, Lemey, Lemey, Salemi and Vandamme2009) for substitution saturation provided evidence for saturation only at the third codon positions, whereas overall there was little saturation in the matrix (data not shown).

Our phylogenies, based on the MT-CO1, inferred using two different optimality criteria (ML and BI), resulted in similar topologies with little variation in nodes and support values (fig. 4). The ML method resulted in a tree with score lnL = –12339.81. The evolutionary models selected through BIC were: TN+G in the first codon positions, TVM+G in the second codon positions, and J2+G in the third codon positions, all models with optimized substitution rates, frequencies of bases and gamma distributions. The BI Markov chains provided highly significant estimated sample sizes (ESS) for all parameters.

Fig. 4. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction, based on the MT-CO1 gene. Values at the nodes are the Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 90%.

MT-CO1 sequences formed two well-supported reciprocally monophyletic groups with P. jaergerskioldi (LR-ELW = 94%, ML-BP = 98%, BPP = 100%) and P. zygodontomis (LR-ELW = 89%, ML-BP = 98%, BPP = 100%). These two clades formed a strongly supported monophyletic group (LR-ELW = 100%, ML-BP = 100%, BPP = 100%), representing the superfamily Rictularioidea.

Sequences representing the superfamily Spiruroidea were not recovered as monophyletic in any topology. Within Spiruroidea, families Spiruridae, represented by Protospirura species, and Spirocercidae, represented by Cylicospirura, Physocephalus and Spirocerca species, were not monophyletic, although Cylicospirura and Spirocerca species formed a well-supported monophyletic group (LR-ELW = 99%, ML-BP = 97%, BPP = 100%).

Although relationships between superfamilies Rictularioidea, Filarioidea, Habronematoidea Physalopteroidea, Spiruroidea and Thelazioidea were generally poorly supported, their sequences formed a strongly supported monophyletic group (LR-ELW = 100%, ML-BP = 92%, BPP = 100%) (see supplementary table S1).

ML-pairwise genetic distances of the MT-CO1 gene between Pterygodermatites species ranged from 3 to 4%, between P. (P.) jaergerskioldi and P. (P.) zygodontomis. The intraspecific distances between P. (P.) zygodontomis specimens ranged from 0.04%, between the specimens from N. lasiurus and Rhipidomys mastacalis from Uberlândia, state of Minas Gerais, to 0.05% between the specimens from N. lasiurus from Uberlândia, state of Minas Gerais, and from Exú, state of Pernambuco. The intraspecific distance between P. (P.) jaegerskioldi specimens was 0.04% (table 3).

Table 3. Interspecific and intraspecific MT-CO1 pairwise ML genetic distances, minimum and maximum percentages within spirurid genera.

*, Not applicable.

Discussion

The genus Pterygodermatites is characterized by the oral opening shape, presence of three oesophageal teeth, and number of spine-like prevulvar cuticular projections. Moreover, the subgenus Paucipectines includes the arrangement of the caudal papillae in males (Quentin, Reference Quentin1969; Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Chabaud and Willmott2009). In the Americas, 17 species belonging to the subgenus Paucipectines have been reported parasitizing rodents of the families Cricetidae and Sciuridae, marsupials of the families Caenolestidae and Didelphidae, and bats of the family Molossidae as definitive hosts (Lent & Freitas, Reference Lent and Freitas1935; Quentin, Reference Quentin1967; Sutton, Reference Sutton1979; Chabaud & Bain, Reference Chabaud and Bain1981; Sutton, Reference Sutton1984; Navone, Reference Navone1989; Navone & Suriano, Reference Navone and Suriano1992; Ramallo & Claps, Reference Ramallo and Claps2007; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Maldonado and Lanfredi2007; Jiménez & Patterson, Reference Jiménez and Patterson2012; Miño et al., Reference Miño, Rojas Herrera, Notarnicola, Robles and Navone2012; Lynggaard et al., Reference Lynggaard, García-Prieto, Guzmán-Cornejo and Osorio-Sarabia2014).

Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis was described as Rictularia zygodontomis by Quentin (Reference Quentin1967) and later transferred to Pterygodermatites by Quentin (Reference Quentin1969). Within the subgenus Paucipectines, this species can be distinguished from other species (P. coloradensis, P. peromysci, P. parkeri, P. ondatrae, P. azarai, P. microti, P. onychomis and P. hymanae) by the greater number of spine-like prevulvar cuticular projections (Lichtenfels, Reference Lichtenfels1970; Lynggaard et al., Reference Lynggaard, García-Prieto, Guzmán-Cornejo and Osorio-Sarabia2014). Furthermore, P. kozeki, P. chaetophracti, P. spinicaudatis, P. microti and P. dipodomis differ from P. zygodontomis due to the lower number of total spine-like cuticular projections in females.

In addition, P. zygodontomis differs from P. baiomydis, P. azarai and P. elegans by the smaller distance between the vulva and the oesophageal–intestinal junction. The nematodes P. jaegerskioldi and P. massoiai, both described only on females, are distinct from P. zygodontomis by the smaller distance from the spine-like cuticular projection to the tip of the tail (Sutton, Reference Sutton1979; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Maldonado and Lanfredi2007).

In the original description, P. zygodontomis was reported to present three unpaired fans in males in the posterior ventral region (Quentin, Reference Quentin1967). We observed four fans at the posterior ventral end using scanning electron microscopy. Probably, the first structure is not totally developed and cannot be visualized under light microscopy.

Although Quentin (Reference Quentin1967) described males with ten pairs of papillae, we clearly observed a pair of phasmids between the eighth and ninth pairs of papillae at the posterior end. Thus, P. (P.) zygodontomis presented nine pairs of papillae and not ten as reported previously. To date, P. (P.) zygodontomis has been described as a parasite of N. lasiurus, sharing morphological characteristics such as the number of spine-like prevulvar cuticular projections and fans, in males, and unequal spicules. However, female specimens examined in this study and by Grossmann (Reference Grossmann2015) were smaller in body length than those found by Quentin (Reference Quentin1967). Among the characteristics used to identify the species, we noted that the distance from the last spine-like cuticular projection to the tip of the tail in females was smaller than the distance observed by Quentin (Reference Quentin1967), and the distance from the vulva to the oesophago-intestinal region was also smaller in the present study. In addition, we found differences in the distance from the cloaca to the tip of the tail in males. These differences may be due to different development stages of the specimens analysed by Quentin and in the present study.

The original morphological description of P. (P.) zygodontomis by Quentin (Reference Quentin1967) was confirmed in the present study using light microscopy and SEM. We also added new characteristics using SEM, such as details of the oral opening surrounded by a toothed strip of 21 denticles, four fans and a pair of phasmids.

Additionally, our findings increase the host spectrum and the geographic distribution of P. (P.) zygodontomis, through the description of this species infecting N. lasiurus and R. mastacalis in the Cerrado biome, while the original description of the species was restricted to N. lasiurus individuals in the Caatinga biome. Cerrado and Caatinga are neighbouring biomes forming the so-called South American Dry Diagonal, a large belt of land characterized by high seasonality and low rainfall. Their mammal faunas are largely shared (120 species, including 22 rodents) (Carmignotto et al., Reference Carmignotto, de Vivo, Langguth, Patterson and Costa2012), which contributes to similarities in the helminth fauna of mammalian hosts. The presence of this parasite in both biomes may be linked to the extended distribution of N. lasiurus. Moreover, infection of R. mastacalis by P. (P.) zygodontomis may be accidental, although indicating the low host-specificity of this parasite. Distribution and feeding habits in these rodents may explain their infection by P. (P.) zygodontomis. Rodents of both species (N. lasiurus and R. mastacalis) inhabit the Cerrado biome (Carmignotto et al., Reference Carmignotto, de Vivo, Langguth, Patterson and Costa2012) and have an insectivorous–omnivorous diet (Talamoni et al., Reference Talamoni, Couto, Cordeiro and Diniz2008; Pinotti et al., Reference Pinotti, Naxara and Pardini2011), which may favour infection through the ingestion of insects that act as intermediate hosts. However, while Necromys is a genus endemic to open formations (D'Elia, Reference D'Elia2003), R. mastacalis is an arboreal species, commonly found in forest physiognomies (Atlantic Forest, woodlands and gallery or semi-deciduous forests in the Cerrado biome), although also occurring in the Caatinga. Hence, conversion of natural ecosystems to open formations, following anthropogenic disturbances occurring in the Cerrado during the past few decades, may have contributed to the transmission dynamics of P. (P.) zygodontomis between rodent species.

In our molecular phylogenies, based on the MT-CO1 gene, no phylogenetic affinities could be unambiguously established between Pterygodermatites species and other Spirurid families or superfamilies. In addition, a close relationship between families Rictulariidae and Physalopteridae, as suggested by Vicente et al. (Reference Vicente, Rodrigues, Gomes and Pinto1997), was not supported in our phylogenetic analysis. Nevertheless, we have found strong support for a group including the superfamilies Filarioidea, Habronematoidea Physalopteroidea, Rictularioidea, Spiruroidea and Thelazioidea. This group is consistent with the classifications proposed by Ley & Blaxter (Reference Ley, Blaxter and Lee2002), for an infraorder Spiruromorpha, or by Hodda (Reference Hodda and Zhang2011), for a suborder Spirurina, once excluding Camallanoidea; or is consistent with the classification proposed by Anderson et al. (Reference Anderson, Chabaud and Willmott2009), for a suborder Spirurina, once excluding Gnathostomatoidea. Conversely, Gnathostomatoidea, Dracunculoidea and Camallanoidea were more distantly related to other spirurids; with a Dracunculoidea–Camallanoidea clade supporting the suborder Camallanina proposed by Anderson et al. (Reference Anderson, Chabaud and Willmott2009).

Additionally, in topologies, our sequences of P. numidica did not form a clade with the sequence of Protospirura muricola from GenBank. That would not be expected if these specimens belonged to the same genus. Presumably, the sample from GenBank may have been erroneously assigned to the genus Prostospirura, while in fact belonging to the genus Mastophorus. Because of the inappropriate choice of characters, Protospirura has had a long and difficult history of confusion with the similar Mastophorus, as stated by Smales et al. (Reference Smales, Harris and Behnke2009). A complete morphological examination of the GenBank specimen of P. muricola could clear this matter. Moreover, genetic distances between Protospirura species were approximately 5%, which were larger than the distances between species of Brugia, Cylicospirura, Gnathostoma, Habronema, Onchocerca and Pterygodermatites, and smaller than the distances between Thelazia species.

In conclusion, the geographic distribution of P. (P) zygodontomis was expanded with this study and new morphological characters were added. In addition, this is the first report of molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Rictulariidae family, enhancing its molecular dataset and contributing to future research that may compare ancestry among the Pterygodermatites subgenera, as proposed by Quentin (Reference Quentin1969). Further studies are needed for a better understanding of the relationships between the spirurid superfamilies, including representatives of the Aproctoidea and Diplotriaenoidea superfamilies.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X17000736

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Paulo D'Andrea for providing us with his ICMBio licence; Dr Helene Santos Barbosa for the use of the Rudolf Barth Electron Microscopy Platform (PDTIS/FIOCRUZ); and Socrates Costa-Neto from the Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios for assistance with the collection of rodents and helminths. We also thank the staff of the Plataforma de Sequenciamento de DNA do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (PDTIS/FIOCRUZ) for assistance with sequencing samples in this study. Finally, we are grateful to Dr Marcelo Knoff for loaning specimens from the Coleção Helmintológica do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (CHIOC).

Financial support

This study received financial support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-CAPES, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), CNPq and FAPEMIG.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Licences for animal capture were provided by Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio authorization number 13373). All protocols followed the guidelines for capture, handling and care of the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute (according to licences L-049/08 and 066/08).

References

Anderson, RC, Chabaud, AG and Willmott, S (2009) Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. 463 pp. Wallingford, CABI.Google Scholar
Blaxter, ML, De Ley, P, Garey, JR, Liu, LX, Scheldeman, P, Vierstraete, A and Vida, JT (1998) A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature 392, 7175.Google Scholar
Bonvicino, C.R, Oliveira, JA and D'Andrea, PS (2008) Guia dos Roedores do Brasil, com chavez para gêneros baseadas em caracteres externos. 120pp. Rio de Janeiro, Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa – OPAS/OMS.Google Scholar
Brandão-Filho, SP, Brito, M.E, Carvalho, FG, Ishikawa, EA, Cupolillo, E, Floeter-Winter, L and Shaw, JJ (2003) Wild and synantrophic hosts of Leshmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis locality of Amaraji, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 37, 291296.Google Scholar
Cardoso, TS, Simões, RO, Luque, JLF, Maldonado, A and Gentile, R (2016) The influence of habitat fragmentation on helminth communities in rodent populations from a Brazilian Mountain Atlantic Forest. Journal of Helminthology 90, 460468.Google Scholar
Carmignotto, AP, de Vivo, M and Langguth, A (2012) Mammals of the Cerrado and Caatinga: distribution patterns of the tropical open biomes of Central South America. pp. 307350 in Patterson, BD and Costa, LP (Eds) Bones, clones, and biomes: the history and geography of recent Neotropical mammals. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casiraghi, M, Anderson, TJ, Bandi, C, Bazzocchi, C and Genchi, C (2001) A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology 122, 93103.Google Scholar
Chabaud, AG and Bain, O (1981) Quentius kozeki n. g., n. sp., Nématode rictulaire parasite d'um Marsupial américain. Annales de Parasitologie 56, 175178.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, A, Verma, C, Tomar, V and Singh, HS (2017) Procamallanus spiculogubernaculus Agarwal, 1958 (Nematoda: Camallanidae) from Stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis in India: morphological characterization and molecular data. Helminthologia 54, 19.Google Scholar
Crainey, JL, da Silva, TRR, Encinas, F, Marín, MA, Vicente, ACP and Luz, SLB (2016) The mitogenome of Onchocerca volvulus from the Brazilian Amazonia focus. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 111, 7981.Google Scholar
D'Elia, G (2003) Phylogenetics of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Muroidea, Cricetidae), with special reference to the Akodont group and with additional comments on historical biogeography. Cladistics 19, 307323.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J.A, Woodberry, K, Gillin, CM, Jackson, DH, Sanders, JL, Madigan, W, Bildfell, RJ and Kent, ML (2011) Cylicospirura species (Nematoda: Spirocercidae) and stomach nodules in cougars (Puma concolor) and bobcats (Lynx rufus) in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 47, 140153.Google Scholar
Francisco, AL, Magnusson, WE and Sanaiotti, TM (1995) Variation growth and reproduction of Bolomys lasiurus (Rodentia: Muridae) in an Amazonian Savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11, 419428.Google Scholar
Gardner, SL and Campbell, MI (1992) Parasites as probes for biodiversity. Journal of Parasitology 78, 596600.Google Scholar
Gentile, R, Costa Neto, SF and D'Andrea, PS (2010) Uma revisão sobre a participação do rato d'água Nectomys squamipes na dinâmica de transmissão da esquistossomose mansônica: Um estudo multidisciplinar de longo prazo em uma área endêmica. Oecologia Australis 14, 711725.Google Scholar
Ghedin, E, Wang, S, Spiro, D, et al. (2007) Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Science 80, 17561760.Google Scholar
Grenfell, BT (1992) Parasitism and the dynamics of ungulate grazing systems. American Naturalist 139, 907929.Google Scholar
Grossmann, NV (2015) Relações Parasito-Hospedeiro de Endo e Ectoparasitas em Pequenos Mamíferos em um Cerrado do Brasil Central. 167 pp. Brasília, Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas.Google Scholar
Hodda, M (2011) Phylum Nematoda Cobb 1932. pp. 6395 in Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Auckland, NZ, Magnolia Press.Google Scholar
Iorio, R, Šlapeta, J, Otranto, D, Paoletti, B, Giangaspero, A and Traversa, D (2009) Phylogenetic relationships of Habronema microstoma and Habronema muscae (Spirurida: Habronematidae) within the order Spirurida inferred using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene analysis. Parasitological Research 104, 979984.Google Scholar
Jiménez, FA and Patterson, BD (2012) A new species of Pterygodermatites (Nematoda: Rictulariidae) from the Incan shrew opossum, Lestoros inca. Journal of Parasitology 98, 604607.Google Scholar
Jobb, G. (2011) TREEFINDER version of March 2011. Munich. Distributed by the author at www.treefinder.de (accessed 16 August 2015).Google Scholar
Kearse, M, Moir, R, Wilson, A, Stones-Havas, S, Cheung, M, Sturrock, S, Buxton, S, Cooper, A, Markowitz, S, Duran, C, Thierer, T, Ashton, B, Mentjies, P and Drummond, A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 16471649.Google Scholar
Kim, J, Kern, E, Kim, T, Sim, M, Kim, J, Kim, Y, Park, C, Nadler, SA and Park, JK (2017) Phylogenetic analysis of two Plectus mitochondrial genomes (Nematoda: Plectida) supports a sister group relationship between Plectida and Rhabditida within Chromadorea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 107, 90102.Google Scholar
Lefoulon, E, Bain, O, Bourret, J, Junker, K, Guerrero, R, Cañizales, I, Kuzmin, Y, Satoto, TBT, Cardenas-Callirgos, JM, de Souza Lima, S, Raccurt, C, Mutafchiev, Y, Gavotte, L and Martin, C (2015) Shaking the tree: multi-locus sequence typing usurps current Onchocercid (filarial nematode) phylogeny. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, 119.Google Scholar
Lemos, ERS and D'Andrea, PS (2014) Trabalho com animais silvestres: procedimentos, riscos e biossegurança. 180 pp. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Fiocruz.Google Scholar
Lent, H and Freitas, JF (1935) Sobre dois novos nematódeos parasitos de quica: Caluromys philander. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 30, 535542.Google Scholar
Ley, P and Blaxter, ML (2002) Systematic position and phylogeny. pp. 130 in Lee, D (Ed.) The biology of nematodes. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lichtenfels, JR (1970) Two new species of Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) Quentin, 1969 (Nematoda: Rictulariidae) with a key to the species from North American rodents. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 37, 94101.Google Scholar
Limongi, JE, Moreira, FG, Peres, JB, Suzuki, A, Ferreira, IB, Souza, RP, Pinto, RMC and Pereira, LE (2013) Serological survey of hantavirus in rodents in Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Instituto de Medicina Tropical 55, 155158.Google Scholar
Liu, GH, Gasser, RB, Otranto, D, Xu, MJ, Shen, JL, Mohandas, N, Zhou, DH and Zhu, XQ (2013a) Mitochondrial genome of the eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda (Nematoda: Spirurida), as the first representative from the family Thelaziidae. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2029.Google Scholar
Liu, GH, Wang, Y, Song, HQ, Li, MW, Ai, L, Yu, XL and Zhu, XQ (2013b) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Spirocerca lupi: sequence, gene organization and phylogenetic implications. Parasites & Vectors 6, 4554.Google Scholar
Liu, GH, Jia, YQ, Wang, YN, Zhao, GH and Zhu, XQ (2015a) The complete mitochondrial genome of the gullet worm Gongylonema pulchrum: gene content, arrangement, composition and phylogenetic implications. Parasites & Vectors 8, 18.Google Scholar
Liu, GH, Shao, R, Cai, XQ, Li, WW and Zhu, XQ (2015b) Gnathostoma spinigerum mitochondrial genome sequence: a novel gene arrangement and its phylogenetic position within the class Chromadorea. Scientific Reports 5, 12691.Google Scholar
Liu, GH, Li, JY and Zhu, XQ (2017) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Setaria digitata (Nematoda: Setariidae) from China. Journal of Helminthology, 15. doi:10.1017/S0022149X16000912.Google Scholar
Lynggaard, C, García-Prieto, L, Guzmán-Cornejo, C and Osorio-Sarabia, D (2014) Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) baiomydis n. sp. (Nematoda: Rictulariidae), a parasite of Baiomys taylori (Cricetidae). Parasite 21, 58.Google Scholar
Mafra, AC and Lanfredi, RM (1998) Reevaluation of Physaloptera bispiculata (Nematoda: Spiruroidaea) by light and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitology 84, 582588.Google Scholar
McNulty, SN, Mullin, AS, Vaughan, JA, Tkach, V.V, Weil, GJ and Fischer, PU (2012) Comparing the mitochondrial genomes of Wolbachia-dependent and independent filarial nematode species. BMC Genomics 13, 145155.Google Scholar
Miño, MH, Rojas Herrera, EJ, Notarnicola, J, Robles, MR and Navone, GT (2012) Diversity of the helminth community of the Pampean grassland mouse (Akodon azarae) on poultry farms in central Argentina. Journal of Helminthology 86, 4653.Google Scholar
Morand, S and Arias-Gonzalez, E (1997) Is parasitism a missing ingredient in model ecosystems? Ecological Modeling 95, 6174.Google Scholar
Morand, S, Ivanova, ES and Vaucher, C (1996) Dicelis keymeri n. sp. (Nematoda: Drilonematidae) from the earthworm Octalasium pseudotranspadanum Zicsi. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 63, 1923.Google Scholar
Moreira, VLC, Giese, EG, Melo, FTV, Simões, RO, Thiengo, SC, Maldonado, A Jr and Santos, JN (2013) Endemic angiostrongyliasis in the Brazilian Amazon: natural parasitism of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Rattus rattus and R. norvegicus and sympatric giant African land snails, Achatina fulica. Acta Tropica 125, 9097.Google Scholar
Mutafchiev, Y, Mariaux, J and Georgiev, BB (2014) Description of Proyseria petterae n. sp., with an amended generic diagnosis and a review of the species of Proyseria Petter, 1959 and Stegophorus Wehr, 1934 (Nematoda: Acuariidae). Systematic Parasitology 89, 314.Google Scholar
Mutafchiev, Y, Mariaux, J and Georgiev, BB (2017) Description of Acuaria europaea n. sp. (Spirurida: Acuariidae) from Dendrocopos syriacus (Hemprich & Ehrenberg) and Oriolus oriolus (L.) (Aves) in Europe, with results of re-examination of related European species of Acuaria Bremser, 1811. Systematic Parasitology 94, 201214.Google Scholar
Nadler, SA, Carreno, RA, Mejía-Madrid, H, Ullberg, J, Pagan, C, Houston, R and Hugot, JP (2007) Molecular phylogeny of clade III nematodes reveals multiple origins of tissue parasitism. Parasitology 134, 14211442.Google Scholar
Navone, GT (1989) Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) kozeki (Chabaud et Bain, 1981) n. comb., parásito de Lestodelphys halli Tate, 1934, Didelphis albiventris L. y Thylamis pusilla (Desmarest) de la República Argentina. Anatomía y posición sistemática. Revista Ibérica de Parasitología 49, 219226.Google Scholar
Navone, GT and Suriano, DM (1992) Pterigodermatites (Paucipectines) spinicaudatis n. sp. (Nematoda: Rictularidae) from Dromiciops australis (Marsupialia: Microbiotheriidae) in Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina. Biogeographical distribution and host–parasite relationships. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 87, 533538.Google Scholar
Oliveira, RC, Guterres, A, Fernandes, J, D'Andrea, PS, Bonvicino, CR and de Lemos, ERS (2014) Hantavirus reservoirs: current status with an emphasis on data from Brazil. Viruses 6, 19291973.Google Scholar
Orozco, MM, Piccinali, RV, Mora, MS, Enriquez, GF, Cardinal, MV and Gürtler, RE (2014) The role of sigmodontine rodents as sylvatic hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Argentinean Chaco. Infection Genetics and Evolution 22, 1222.Google Scholar
Pinotti, BT, Naxara, L and Pardini, R (2011) Diet and food selection by small mammals in an old-growth Atlantic forest of south-eastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 46, 19.Google Scholar
Poulin, R (1998) Comparison of three estimators of species richness in parasite component communities. Journal of Parasitology 84, 485490.Google Scholar
Prosser, SWJ, Velarde-Aguilar, MG, León-Règagnon, V and Hebert, PDN (2013) Advancing nematode barcoding: a primer cocktail for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene from vertebrate parasitic nematodes. Molecular Ecology Resources 13, 11081115.Google Scholar
Quentin, JC (1967) Rictularia zygodontomis n. sp., nématode nouveau parasite de rongeurs Du Brésil. Bulletin du Muséum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 39, 740744.Google Scholar
Quentin, JC (1969) Essai de classification des nématodes rictulaires. Mémoires du Muséum National D'histoire Naturalle LIV, 1115.Google Scholar
Ramallo, G and Claps, LE (2007) Nuevos hospedadores y registros geograficos de Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) kozeki (Nematoda, Rictulariidae) en Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 14, 9396.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A (2012) FigTree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. Available at http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed 5 May 2017).Google Scholar
Ramesh, A, Small, ST, Kloos, ZA, Kazura, JW, Nutman, TB, Serre, D and Zimmerman, PA (2012) The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti from three geographic isolates provides evidence of complex demographic history. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 183, 3241.Google Scholar
Redford, K and Eisenberg, J (1999) Mammals of the Neotropics. 3rd edn. 624 pp. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F, Teslenko, M, van derMark, P, Ayres, DL, Darling, A, Höhna, S, Larget, B, Liu, L, Suchard, MA and Huelsenbeck, JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539542Google Scholar
Sabino-Santos, G, Maia, FGM, Jonsson, CB, Goodin, DG, Salazar-Bravo, J and Figueiredo, LTM (2016) Serologic evidence of mammarenaviruses among wild rodents in Brazil. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 52, 766769.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Institute of Mathematical Statistics. Annals of Statistics 6, 461464.Google Scholar
Setsuda, A, Da, N, Hasegawa, H, Behnke, JM, Rana, HB, Dhakal, IP and Sato, H (2016) Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation of Gongylonema pulchrum and two rodent Gongylonema spp. (G. aegypti and G. neoplasticum), with the proposal of G. nepalensis n. sp. for the isolate in water buffaloes from Nepal. Parasitological Research 115, 787795.Google Scholar
Simões, R, Gentile, R, Rademaker, V, D'Andrea, P, Herrera, H, Freitas, T, Lanfredi, R and Maldonado, A (2010) Variation in the helminth community structure of Thrichomys pachyurus (Rodentia: Echimyidae) in two sub-regions of the Brazilian Pantanal: the effects of land use and seasonality. Journal of Helminthology 84, 266275.Google Scholar
Smales, LR, Harris, PD and Behnke, JM (2009) A redescription of Protospirura muricola Gedoelst, 1916 (Nematoda: Spiruridae), a parasite of murid rodents. Systematic Parasitology 72, 1526.Google Scholar
Su, YB, Kong, SC, Wang, LX, Chen, L and Fang, R (2016) Complete mitochondrial genome of Philometra carassii (Nematoda: Philometridae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA mapping, sequencing, and analysis 27, 13971398.Google Scholar
Sun, MM, Ma, J, Sugiyama, H, Ando, K, Li, WW, Xu, QM, Liu, GH and Zhu, XQ (2016) The complete mitochondrial genomes of Gnathostoma doloresi from China and Japan. Parasitological Research 115, 40134020.Google Scholar
Sun, MM, Liu, GH, Ando, K, Woo, HC, Ma, J, Sohn, WM, Sugiyama, H and Zhu, XQ (2017) Complete mitochondrial genomes of Gnathostoma nipponicum and Gnathostoma sp., and their comparison with other Gnathostoma species. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 48, 109115.Google Scholar
Sutton, CA (1979) Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna parasitológica Argentina. IV. Rictularia massoiai sp. n. y Enterobius yagoi sp. n. (Nematoda). Acta Zoologica Lilloana 35, 2937.Google Scholar
Sutton, CA (1984) Contribución al conocimiento de la fauna parasitológica Argentina XIII Nuevos nematodes de la familia Rictulariidae. Neotropica 30, 141152.Google Scholar
Talamoni, SA, Couto, D, Cordeiro, DA Júnior and Diniz, FM (2008) Diet of some species of Neotropical small mammals. Mammalian Biology 73, 337341.Google Scholar
Thomas, F, Renaud, F and Guégan, JF (2005) Parasitism and ecosystems. 229 pp. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torres, EL, Maldonado, A Jr and Lanfredi, RM (2007) Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) jägerskiöldi (Nematoda: Rictulariidae) from Gracilinanus agilis and G. microtarsus (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Brazilian Pantanal and Atlantic Forest by light and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitology 93, 274279.Google Scholar
Vicente, JJ, Rodrigues, HO, Gomes, DC and Pinto, RM (1997) Nematoides do Brasil. Parte V: Nematóides de Mamíferos. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14(Suppl. 1), 1452.Google Scholar
Vieira, EM and Baumgarten, LC (1995) Daily activity patterns of small mammals in a Cerrado Area from central Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11, 255262.Google Scholar
Wijová, M, Moravec, F, Horak, A, Modry, D and Lukes, J (2005) Phylogenetic position of Dracunculus medinensis and some related nematodes inferred from 18S rRNA. Parasitology Research 96, 133135.Google Scholar
Xia, X (2017) DAMBE6: New tools for microbial genomics, phylogenetics and molecular evolution. Journal of Heredity 108, 431437.Google Scholar
Xia, X and Lemey, P (2009) Assessing substitution saturation with DAMBE. pp. 615630 in Lemey, P, Salemi, M and Vandamme, AM (Eds) The phylogenetic handbook: A practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny. 2nd edn. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xia, X, Xie, Z, Salemi, M, Chen, L and Wang, Y (2003) An index of substitution saturation and its application. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 17.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Species, geographic locality, host and GenBank accession number of species used for this study.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Light microscopy of Pterygodermatites (Paucipectines) zygodontomis. (A) Female buccal capsule with three oesophageal teeth (te) showing oral opening (asterisk). Details of apical view showing three developed lips and six labial papillae (lp); (B) vulvar (vu) region, lateral view, and spine-like posvulvar cuticular projections (sl); (C) region of transition of oesophagus (es) and intestine and vulva (vu); (D) female posterior region, lateral view, anus (a); (E) male posterior region, ventral view, details of four fans (fa) and spicules (sp); (F) right spicule (spr), left spicule (spl) and gubernaculum (g), lateral view.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy of P. (P.) zygodontomis. (A) Male, spine-like cuticular projections; (B) female, anterior end showing a pair of well-defined longitudinal cuticular elements, ventrolaterally located (v); (C) female, anterior end, apical view and external cephalic papillae (cp); (D) apical view, amphid (a), ventral region (v), dorsal region (d) and labial papillae (asterisk); (E) anterior end showing oral opening surrounded by a crown of teeth.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscopy of P. (P.) zygodontomis. (A) Male, posterior portion, ventral view, details of four fans (fa) and spicules (sp); (B) pairs of papillae (asterisk); (C) the tail, a pair of phasmids (ph) and papillae (asterisk); (D) tip of male with papillae (asterisk).

Figure 4

Table 2. Comparison of morphometric characteristics (in μm) of Pterygodermatites (Paucepectines) zygodontomis among specimens of Necromys lasiurus of Brazilian rodents.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction, based on the MT-CO1 gene. Values at the nodes are the Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 90%.

Figure 6

Table 3. Interspecific and intraspecific MT-CO1 pairwise ML genetic distances, minimum and maximum percentages within spirurid genera.

Supplementary material: File

Costa et al supplementary material

Costa et al supplementary material 1

Download Costa et al supplementary material(File)
File 21.9 KB