Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:47:11.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular identification of zoonotic hookworms in dogs from four counties of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

E. Mulinge*
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
S.M. Njenga
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Odongo
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
J. Magambo
Affiliation:
Meru University of Science and Technology, Meru, Kenya
E. Zeyhle
Affiliation:
Meru University of Science and Technology, Meru, Kenya
C. Mbae
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Kagendo
Affiliation:
Meru University of Science and Technology, Meru, Kenya
H. Kanyi
Affiliation:
Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
R.J. Traub
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
M. Wassermann
Affiliation:
Parasitology Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
P. Kern
Affiliation:
University Hospital Ulm, Department of Medicine III, Ulm, Germany
T. Romig
Affiliation:
Parasitology Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: E. Mulinge E-mail: erastusmulinge@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All canine hookworms are known to be zoonotic, causing infections ranging from transient skin irritations to prolonged ‘creeping eruptions’, eosinophilic enteritis and even patent intestinal infections. There is little information on canine hookworm species and their public health significance in sub-Saharan Africa. This study determined the prevalence and species of hookworms in dogs from different climatic zones of Kenya. Dog faecal samples were collected from the environment, and hookworm eggs were isolated by zinc chloride flotation and subjected to DNA extraction. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2, 5.8S and 28S ribosomal RNA of Ancylostoma spp. and Uncinaria stenocephala were performed, and hookworm species were identified by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or DNA sequencing. Hookworm eggs were detected by microscopy in 490/1621 (30.23%, 95% CI 28.01–32.54) faecal samples. Estimates of faecal prevalence were high in counties receiving higher rainfall (Narok 46.80%, Meru 44.88%) and low in those with a more arid climate (Isiolo 19.73%, Turkana 11.83%). In a subset of 70 faecal samples, Ancylostoma caninum (n = 59) was the most common species, followed by A. braziliense (n = 10) and A. cf. duodenale (n = 1). This study reports for the first time the detection of A. cf. duodenale in dog faeces and zoonotic hookworm species in Kenyan dogs. These findings emphasize the need for control measures such as enforcing laws for restraining stray dogs, regular deworming of dogs, and public health awareness programmes aimed at informing communities on outdoor use of footwear.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Introduction

The canine hookworms Ancylostoma caninum, Ancylostoma braziliense, Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Uncinaria stenocephala are well known for their detrimental impacts on canine health. Ancylostoma caninum is a leading cause of acute, potentially fatal haemorrhagic enteritis in young puppies and causes chronic iron-deficiency anaemia in older dogs (Miller, Reference Miller1968; Georgi et al., Reference Georgi, LeJambre and Ractliffe1969). However, in addition to their veterinary significance, all four species of canine hookworms also have zoonotic potential. In humans, all these species are capable of producing cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) or ‘ground itch’, which is usually self-limiting (Bowman et al., Reference Bowman2010). Only A. braziliense can cause a more severe form of CLM (‘creeping eruptions’), resulting in raised, highly pruritic tracks in humans (Malgor et al., Reference Malgor1996), which usually necessitate treatment (Caumes, Reference Caumes2000; Hochedez and Caumes, Reference Hochedez and Caumes2007). Ancylostoma ceylanicum is the only species of canine hookworms capable of causing patent infections in humans, both naturally and experimentally (Traub, Reference Traub2013). This hookworm is the agent of an emerging zoonosis that is being increasingly detected during molecular-based epidemiological surveys in the Asia Pacific region comprising Cambodia (Inpankaew et al., Reference Inpankaew2014), Malaysia (Ngui et al., Reference Ngui2012), Thailand (Traub et al., Reference Traub2008; Jiraanankul et al., Reference Jiraanankul2011), Laos (Sato et al., Reference Sato2010; Conlan et al., Reference Conlan2012), Solomon Islands (Speare et al., Reference Speare, Bradbury and Croese2016; Bradbury et al., Reference Bradbury2017), and Australia (Koehler et al., Reference Koehler2013; Smout et al., Reference Smout2017). In rare cases, A. caninum larvae develop into pre-adult, non-patent worms in the human intestine, causing eosinophilic enteritis (Landmann and Prociv, Reference Landmann and Prociv2003). It is likely that this zoonosis is grossly underdiagnosed due to the obscure and non-specific clinical signs that often accompany the infection coupled with the challenges of diagnosis (Bradbury and Traub, Reference Bradbury, Traub and Loukas2016).

There is little information on the occurrence and public health significance of zoonotic canine hookworms in sub-Saharan Africa, as most reports of CLM are based on cases of tourists diagnosed after returning to their home countries (Jelinek et al., Reference Jelinek1994; Bouchaud et al., Reference Bouchaud2000; Blackwell and Vega-Lopez, Reference Blackwell and Vega-Lopez2001; Kelkar, Reference Kelkar2007; Dhir et al., Reference Dhir, O'Dempsey and Watts2010). However, lack of recognition is the most likely reason for this apparent absence in the local population (Ngui et al., Reference Ngui2012). Previous studies in Kenya have reported the occurrence of adult hookworms in dogs following post-mortem examination, but the species were never identified either morphologically or by molecular methods (Wachira et al., Reference Wachira1993; Buishi et al., Reference Buishi2006). However, in a recent study in Tanzania, four zoonotic hookworm species (A. caninum, A. braziliense, A. ceylanicum and U. stenocephala) were detected in dogs (Merino-Tejedor et al., Reference Merino-Tejedor2018). As the frequency of hookworm infection is associated with climatic conditions, and is usually more frequent in regions with higher rainfall because of better conditions for soil larvae, the sites for this study were regions of Kenya within different climatic zones. We report here the estimated prevalence and species of zoonotic hookworms in dogs from four different ecological regions of Kenya.

Materials and methods

Study sites

Turkana County is situated in north-western Kenya between 1°30′ and 5°30′ N and between 34°30′ and 36°40′ E. The climate is hot and arid to semi-arid, with temperatures ranging between 20°C and 41°C. The county receives 150–400 mm of erratic rainfall annually, leading to recurring drought conditions. Isiolo County is situated in northern-central Kenya between 0°05′ S and 2° N and 36°50′ and 39°30′ E. The temperature range is lower than in Turkana (12–28°C), with similar aridity (300–500 mm annual rainfall). Meru County lies to the immediate east of Mt Kenya, straddling the equator (between 0°6′ N and 0°1′ S, and between 37°5′ E and 38°25′ E). The climate is temperate, with an average temperature between 16°C and 23°C and average annual rainfall of 1600 mm. Narok County is situated in South Rift Valley, sharing borders with Tanzania in the south. The climate is also temperate, with average temperature in the range 12–28°C and average rainfall in the range 500–1800 mm per annum. Its geographical coordinates are 0°50′ to 2°05′ S and 35°28′ to 36°25′ E. Narok County includes the Maasai Mara National Reserve (fig. 1).

Fig. 1. A map showing the study sites of Turkana, Meru, Isiolo and Narok counties, in Kenya, and the distribution and frequency of hookworm species.

Dog faecal sample collection

Single canine faecal samples were collected from the environment, as described previously (Mulinge et al., Reference Mulinge2018), between September 2013 and June 2016. Samples were collected from households with dogs, from pathways leading to the homes, and in some rural and urban centres. Faecal samples were mainly identified according to field signs, as described previously (Verster, Reference Verster1965), and in some cases with the help of the household members. To minimize multiple sampling from the same dog, only very fresh samples (up to one day old) were collected. The faecal samples (~20–30 g) were preserved in 80% ethanol immediately after collection.

Isolation of hookworm eggs

Briefly, the ethanol was drained, 2 ml (~2 g) of stool was transferred into 15 ml falcon tubes and the sample was rinsed with 8 ml of distilled water. Helminth eggs were recovered using the zinc chloride flotation/sieving method (specific density: 1.45) (Mathis et al., Reference Mathis, Deplazes and Eckert1996). The concentrate/pellet was examined microscopically for the presence of helminth eggs.

DNA extraction

A total of 78/490 microscopically positive faecal samples were selected randomly for DNA extraction (table 1). All the faecal samples selected had parasite intensity of at least 300 eggs per gram, based on the McMaster method (results not shown here), and these included 20 from three study sites (Turkana, Meru, Narok) and 18 samples from Isiolo. The eggs from each sample were settled by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 1 minute, and the excess water was removed by decanting. The QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used to extract total DNA according to the manufacturer's protocol, with slight modification. Briefly, the eggs were lysed through three rounds of freezing (−80°C for 30 minutes) and thawing (80°C for 15 minutes). DNA was eluted in 50 μl elution buffer and stored at −20°C awaiting PCR processing. Positive control genomic DNA for A. caninum and A. ceylanicum was provided by Prof. Rebecca Traub (University of Melbourne, Australia).

Table 1. Faecal prevalence of hookworm eggs in dog faeces, and molecular species determination.

Polymerase chain reaction of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2, 5.8S and 28S rRNA

Direct PCRs were carried out using primers RTGHF1 (5′-CGT GCT AGT CTT CAG GAC TTT G-3′) and RTABCR1 (5′-CGG GAA TTG CTA TAA GCA AGT GC-3′) targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-1, 5.8S and ITS 2 regions, yielding a 544 base pairs (bp) PCR product for A. caninum, A. ceylanicum and A. duodenale and 552 bp for A. braziliense (Traub et al., Reference Traub2004). With negative samples, a second separate PCR was performed using the primer pair NC1 (5′-ACG TCT GGT TCA GGG TTC TT-3′) and NC2 (5′-TTA GTT TCT TTT CCT CCG CT-3′) to amplify an approximately 310 bp region of the internal transcribed spacer-2 (ITS-2), 5.8S and 28S ribosomal RNA gene (Gasser et al., Reference Gasser1993). PCR was done in a final reaction volume of 50 μl, consisting of 5 μl genomic DNA, 2 mm MgCl2, 0.2 mm dNTPs, 0.5 μm of each primer, 1 × DreamTaq™ Green Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1.25 units of DreamTaq™ Green DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The cycling conditions included initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s and a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. Ten microliters of the PCR products were detected on 2% agarose gel stained in ethidium bromide.

Host species identification

To identify the host (source) of a faecal sample containing A. duodenale eggs, genomic DNA was extracted from the faecal sample as described by Dinkel et al. (Reference Dinkel1998) and subjected to a nested PCR to amplify the canid and felid specific cytochrome b gene using the primer pairs and methods previously described by Huttner et al. (Reference Huttner2009) and Kagendo et al. (Reference Kagendo2014).

Amplification of cytochrome c oxidase I

A single PCR reaction of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) was performed on hookworm isolate identified as A. duodenale by the ITS regions PCR. The forward primer AceyCOX1F (5′-GCT TTT GGT ATT GTA AGA CAG-3′) and reverse primer AceyCOX1R (5′-CTA ACA ACA TAA TAA GTA TCA TG-3′) amplified a fragment of 377 bp (Inpankaew et al., Reference Inpankaew2014). The 50 μl PCR reaction consisting of 5 μl genomic DNA, 2 mm MgCl2, 0.2 mm dNTPs, 0.25 μm of each primer, 1 × DreamTaq™ Green Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1.25 units of DreamTaq Green DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cycling conditions were the same as those of the ITS 1 and 2 regions PCR except for the annealing temperature, which was increased to 58°C. Ten microlitres of the PCR products were detected on 2% agarose gel stained in ethidium bromide.

Species identification by restriction fragment length polymorphism

Restriction digests were performed on the 544–552 bp PCR products only; restriction endonucleases (HinFI and RsaI) (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) were used (Traub et al., Reference Traub2004). Briefly, 10 μl of the PCR product was digested separately in a 20 μl final volume in a reaction consisting of 5 units’ enzymes, 1 × CutSmart® Buffer (NEB). The digests were incubated overnight at 37°C, and separated on 3% agarose gel to identify hookworm species, according to Palmer et al. (Reference Palmer2007). PCR products from known A. caninum and A. ceylanicum were digested alongside the test samples as controls.

Sequencing of PCR products

Thirty-five PCR products generated by NC1 and NC2 (15) and RTGHF1 and RTABCR1 (20) primers were purified using Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) and sequenced with reverse primers RTABCR1 (5′-CGG GAA TTG CTA TAA GCA AGT GC-3′) and NC2 (5′-TTA GTT TCT TTT CCT CCG CT-3′), respectively, at GATC Biotech AG, Germany. The cox1 PCR product was also purified and sequenced using both primers (AceyCOX1F and AceyCOX1R). The chromatograms were checked manually and edited using GENtle v. 1.9.4 (http://gentle.magnusmanske.de), and species were confirmed through identity search of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) reference sequences, using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST).

Data analysis

The prevalence and exact binomial confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each study site. Statistical differences between the study sites were assessed using Fisher's exact chi-square test on SPSS version 22.0. Significance was indicated by a probability of P < 0.05.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Scientific Ethics Review Unit (SERU) and the Animal Care and Use Committee at Kenya Medical Research Institute (SSC. No. 2658). Permission was also obtained from the Department of Veterinary Services, Kenya.

Results

Prevalence of hookworm eggs in dog faecal samples

Hookworm eggs were detected by microscopy in 490/1621 (30.23%; 95% CI 28.01–32.59%) faecal samples. Narok county (Maasai Mara region) had the highest prevalence (46.80%; 95% CI 42.37–51.28%) (234/500), followed by Meru (44.88%; 95% CI 39.22–50.67%) (136/303), Isiolo (19.73%; 95% CI 15.43–24.84%) (58/294) and Turkana (11.83%; 95% CI 9.25–14.98%) (62/524) (table 1). There was a significant difference in hookworm prevalence in the four counties (P < 0.0001).

Molecular identification of species

PCR products were obtained from 70/78 samples with either of the two sets of primers; eight DNA samples failed to yield a product with either of the two PCR methods (table 1 and supplementary material). The first PCR successfully amplified DNA from 55/78 faecal samples, whereas 15/78 PCR products were obtained with the second PCR (NC1/2 primers). RFLP identified hookworm species in all 55 amplified products from the first PCR. The restriction profiles following digestion with both endonuclease RsaI and HinFI are shown in table 2 and fig. 2. Hookworm species were identified by sequencing of all 15 PCR products (second PCR). To further confirm the RFLP results, 20 of 55 PCR products (first PCR) were selected randomly for sequencing. Hookworm species identified included A. caninum (n = 59), A. braziliense (n = 10) and A. cf. duodenale (n = 1) (table 1 and supplementary material). Neither of the detection methods gave indications of multiple species infections (e.g. double peaks). All A. caninum (n = 25) and A. braziliense (n = 10) sequences were 100% identical to references DQ438071 and DQ438061 (e Silva et al., Reference e Silva2006), respectively. All the nucleotide sequences obtained from A. braziliense and A. caninum isolates were identical for each species, and therefore only representative sequences for each species were deposited in GenBank, under accession numbers MG271917, MG271918 and MG271920. The A. cf. duodenale sequence showed 99% identity with A. duodenale accession number EU344797 (Wang et al., unpubl. data), with three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occurring at ITS 1 (2) and ITS 2 (1) regions. This nucleotide sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession number MK271367. Amplification and partial sequencing of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) confirmed the A. duodenale isolate. The nucleotide sequence of this isolate was 99% identical to the reference sequence accession number AJ417718 (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Chilton and Gasser2002) and was deposited in GenBank under accession number MK288015.

Fig. 2. RFLP of PCR product RTGHF1-RTABCR1 following digestion with restriction endonucleases (a) RsaI and (b) HinFI. Digests were separated on 3% (w/v) agarose gel and stained in ethidium bromide. Lane M: molecular weight marker; lane 1: Ancylostoma duodenale (TNU 331); lanes 2–4: Ancylostoma braziliense; lanes 5 & 6: Ancylostoma caninum; lane 7: Ancylostoma caninum positive control; lane 8: Ancylostoma ceylanicum positive control; lane 9: uncut PCR product.

Table 2. Restriction profile of RTGHF1-RTABCR1 PCR products following digestion with restriction endonucleases (RsaI & HinFI).

*Product too small to visualize on gel

Geographical distribution of hookworm species

Ancylostoma caninum was the most common species in all study sites and the only species detected in Narok (Maasai Mara). Ancylostoma braziliense was common in Turkana, with 8/20 positive faecal samples, but was found in only one faecal sample from Isiolo and one sample from Meru. Ancylostoma cf. duodenale was detected in only one faecal sample from Turkana (table 1 and fig. 1).

Discussion

This study is the first to report the prevalence and species of hookworms from dog faecal samples in Kenya. The overall prevalence of hookworms in this study (30.23%) is in the range of prevalence reported from Nigeria (34.6%) (Sowemimo, Reference Sowemimo2009) and Gabon (34.8%) (Davoust et al., Reference Davoust2008). Within Kenya, there are only two previous studies available for comparison, both with a small number of dogs examined from single locations. One study was done in Nairobi, where 88% of 156 dogs were found to be infected (Wachira et al., Reference Wachira1993). The second study was done in Turkana, giving a prevalence (11.8% of 42 dogs; Buishi et al., Reference Buishi2006) that is remarkably close to our data (11.9%). However, these studies were based on post-mortem examination, which would be expected to give higher sensitivities due to the identification of pre-patent infections. Also, hatching of hookworm eggs in the faeces before collection is likely to decrease the sensitivity of our method, as is desiccation of eggs in the environment (Levecke et al., Reference Levecke2011).

Narok and Meru counties had far higher prevalence than Isiolo and Turkana counties. This may be attributed to the hot (> 40°C) and dry conditions (annual average rainfall 250 mm) in Turkana and Isiolo, which are known to negatively affect the survival of hookworm larvae in the environment (Crompton, Reference Crompton2001; Mudenda et al., Reference Mudenda2012), while high-rainfall conditions in Meru and Narok are favourable for larval development in contaminated soil. Eggs of hookworms do not develop below 15°C and larvae prefer shady and moist areas with temperatures at or above 30°C, only being killed at temperatures above 45°C. Larvae also survive for longer periods at lower temperatures (20–25°C) than at temperatures above 30°C (Udonsi and Atata, Reference Udonsi and Atata1987; Brooker et al., Reference Brooker, Clements and Bundy2006; Pullan and Brooker, Reference Pullan and Brooker2012).

In this study three hookworm species, namely A. caninum, A. braziliense and A. cf. duodenale, were identified in canine faecal samples. Ancylostoma caninum was the most common species, found in 84.3% of positive faecal samples, an observation also reported in Australia (Palmer et al., Reference Palmer2007), Brazil (Coelho et al., Reference Coelho2011; Oliveira-Arbex et al., Reference Oliveira-Arbex2017), China (Liu et al., Reference Liu2015), India (Traub et al., Reference Traub2003; George et al., Reference George2016) and Thailand (Traub et al., Reference Traub2008). The failure to amplify hookworm DNA in eight samples could be as a result of microscopy misdiagnosis of hookworm eggs with other related nematode eggs, such as Trichostrongylus and Oesophagostomum, which are morphologically similar to hookworm eggs (Jozefzoon and Oostburg, Reference Jozefzoon and Oostburg1994; Ziem et al., Reference Ziem2006). Occasionally mite eggs are also confused with hookworm eggs (Werneck et al., Reference Werneck2007). Genomic DNA extracted from faecal samples is known to contain PCR inhibitors, which results in false negatives (Traub et al., Reference Traub2004; Repetto et al., Reference Repetto2013). Furthermore, low egg counts are also linked with limited or undetectable DNA by PCR (Palmer et al., Reference Palmer2007; Hu et al., Reference Hu2016). Ancylostoma caninum is the most widely distributed hookworm species in the tropics, subtropics and in warm temperate areas in southern Europe (Galanti et al., Reference Galanti, Fusco and Nardiello2002; Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi2006). This is not surprising given the biological advantage of A. caninum in relation to the other hookworm species in the ability of its larvae to undergo transmammary transmission and arrested development in tissue during seasons unfavourable for its survival in the environment. Although eosinophilic enteritis caused by A. caninum has not been reported in humans in Kenya, this study provides a basis for future investigation. A recent study in India detected A. caninum eggs in human stool; however, the authors could not provide evidence that these eggs were the result of natural infection or an inadvertent passage (George et al., Reference George2016). Moreover, as A. caninum and A. duodenale are closely related and appear to have recently diverged, it is possible that the ITS region of the rRNA is too conserved to allow confident differentiation of the two species (Traub et al., Reference Traub2007).

Ancylostoma braziliense was the second most abundant species of canine hookworms in this study (found in 14.3% of faecal samples). This parasite is limited to tropical and subtropical regions, including Central and South America, the Caribbean, south-eastern USA, Africa, Malaysia, and northern Australia (Del Giudice et al., Reference Del Giudice2002; Schaub et al., Reference Schaub, Perruchoud and Buechner2002). It is responsible for causing ‘creeping eruptions’ caused by cutaneous larva migrans, often reported in travellers returning from endemic areas (Bowman et al., Reference Bowman2010). Two patients in the UK and two in France were treated for cutaneous larva migrans after visiting Kenya (Bouchaud et al., Reference Bouchaud2000; Kelkar, Reference Kelkar2007; Dhir et al., Reference Dhir, O'Dempsey and Watts2010). Furthermore, 32% of 44 patients treated for cutaneous larva migrans at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, originated from Africa (Blackwell and Vega-Lopez, Reference Blackwell and Vega-Lopez2001), whereas in Germany 10.2% of patients treated for creeping eruption at a travel-related-disease clinic had visited East Africa (Jelinek et al., Reference Jelinek1994). Hookworm-related cutaneous larva migrans has been reported in other areas where A. braziliense is endemic in dogs and cats (Hochedez and Caumes, Reference Hochedez and Caumes2007; Bowman et al., Reference Bowman2010). Human cases of cutaneous larva migrans in Kenya are limited or not documented; therefore, the public health significance of this hookworm may be underestimated, possibly due to misdiagnosis for other skin conditions, as observed elsewhere (Mahdy et al., Reference Mahdy2012).

Ancylostoma cf. duodenale was characterized by DNA sequencing in a single faecal sample originating from Turkana. However, in the absence of adult worms to confirm this finding, we postulate that this observation could be a result of coprophagy of human stools containing A. duodenale eggs, which is common in the area (personal observation). Furthermore, detection of Echinococcus felidis (Mulinge et al., Reference Mulinge2018) and Taenia saginata (Mulinge et al., unpubl. data) in dog faeces in related studies confirms that dog coprophagy is common. The mechanical transmission of human parasites by dogs has been demonstrated by the passive passage of viable Toxoplasma gondii oocysts after feeding on cat faeces (Lindsay et al., Reference Lindsay1997; Frenkel et al., Reference Frenkel2003), and passage of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in dog faeces (Joshi and Sabne, Reference Joshi and Sabne1977; Traub et al., Reference Traub2002). Dogs were also involved in transient passage of other canid parasites, such as Toxocara canis, as a result of coprophagy (Fahrion et al., Reference Fahrion2011); this phenomenon has often led to an overestimation of the occurrence of patent helminth infections in dogs (Nijsse et al., Reference Nijsse2014). Although the ITS region is thought to be too conserved for accurate differentiation of A. caninum and A. duodenale (Traub et al., Reference Traub2007), this is unlikely to be the case in this study because the isolate was confirmed as A. duodenale by amplification and partial sequencing of the cytochrome c oxidase gene. The possibility that this isolate originated from human faeces as a result of misidentification as dog faeces was ruled out after detecting the latter's DNA from the faecal sample. This finding is interesting because human infections with A. duodenale are rare in Kenya and have been identified through morphological characterization (Miller, Reference Miller1970; Macpherson and Craig, Reference Macpherson, Craig, Macpherson and Craig1991). Moreover, recent molecular-based studies have identified Necator americanus as the only hookworm species infecting humans in Kenya (Arndt et al., Reference Arndt2013; Easton et al., Reference Easton2016).

The zoonotic canine hookworm A. ceylanicum was not reported in this study. However, only 70 faecal samples of the 490 microscopically positive hookworm samples were characterized by PCR-RFLP and/or DNA sequencing. The failure to detect this species could be attributed to the inability of the PCR to detect mixed infections (George et al., Reference George2016), especially where the primary hookworm A. caninum is dominant, and would necessitate the use of species-specific primers (Merino-Tejedor et al., Reference Merino-Tejedor2018). Additionally, despite co-infection with different hookworm species, eggs are not shed equally. Dogs experimentally infected with A. caninum excreted more eggs than those infected with A. braziliense; however, more adult worms of the latter were detected than those of A. caninum (Loukas et al., Reference Loukas2005; Dias et al., Reference Dias2013). Ancylostoma ceylanicum has been reported in humans and cats in African countries, including Sierra Leone, Madagascar and South Africa (Traub, Reference Traub2013). Ancylostoma ceylanicum was recently detected in four dog faecal samples in Tanzania, and this was only possible after using species-specific primers to show a coinfection with the dominant A. caninum (Merino-Tejedor et al., Reference Merino-Tejedor2018). This observation confirms our postulation that A. ceylanicum may be prevalent in dogs in Kenya, as both countries experience similar climatic conditions. In previous post-mortem studies in Kenya, A. ceylanicum might have been overlooked due to the morphological similarities with A. braziliense, which was reported from Turkana (Wachira et al., Reference Wachira1993; Buishi et al., Reference Buishi2006; Traub, Reference Traub2013).

In conclusion, the findings of this study highlight the need to consider the public health importance of domestic dogs as reservoirs of zoonotic ancylostomiasis. As environmental hygiene is poorly regulated in Kenya, public areas, including beaches, parks, shared water sources (humans and animals) and playing grounds for children, can be significant sources of such zoonoses. Ideal effective control measures against zoonotic ancylostomiasis would include regular deworming of community dogs by integrated anthelmintic treatment, with ongoing dog population control and vaccination programmes implemented by the county governments in collaboration with the department of veterinary services and other partners. The public should be educated in relation to responsible pet ownership (prohibiting free roaming), the importance of at least monthly deworming protocols, and appropriately disposing of dog faeces as advocated by the Tropical Council for Companion Animal Parasite (TroCCAP) “Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and control of canine endoparasites” (www.troccap.com). The public and tourists should also be educated on basic hygienic principles, including the use of protective footwear in parks, playgrounds or beaches.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X1900018X

Author ORCIDs

E. Mulinge, 0000-0003-2402-7913

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge participants in this study with whose consent we collected faecal samples from their dogs. We acknowledge field assistants and veterinary officers for their support during fieldwork. We appreciate the undergraduate students and interns who offered technical support. This work is published with permission from the Director, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI).

Financial support

This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) RO3753-1/1, -2/1, -3/1 through the Cystic Echinococcosis in sub-Saharan Africa Research Initiative (CESSARi).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

See Materials and methods section.

References

Arndt, MB et al. (2013) Impact of helminth diagnostic test performance on estimation of risk factors and outcomes in HIV-positive adults. PLoS ONE 8, e81915.Google Scholar
Blackwell, V and Vega-Lopez, F (2001) Cutaneous larva migrans: clinical features and management of 44 cases presenting in the returning traveller. British Journal of Dermatology 145, 434437.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, O et al. (2000) Cutaneous larva migrans in travelers: a prospective study, with assessment of therapy with ivermectin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 31, 493498.Google Scholar
Bowman, DD et al. (2010) Hookworms of dogs and cats as agents of cutaneous larva migrans. Trends in Parasitology 26, 162167.Google Scholar
Bradbury, R and Traub, RJ (2016) Hookworm infection in Oceania. In Loukas, A (ed), Neglected Tropical Diseases - Oceania. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 3368.Google Scholar
Bradbury, R et al. (2017) Ancylostoma ceylanicum hookworm in the Solomon Islands. Emerging Infectious Diseases 23, 252257.Google Scholar
Brooker, S, Clements, AC and Bundy, DA (2006) Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Advances in Parasitology 62, 221261.Google Scholar
Buishi, I et al. (2006) Canine echinococcosis in Turkana (north-western Kenya): a coproantigen survey in the previous hydatid-control area and an analysis of risk factors. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology 100, 601610.Google Scholar
Caumes, E (2000) Treatment of cutaneous larva migrans. Clinical Infectious Diseases 30, 811814.Google Scholar
Coelho, WM et al. (2011) Occurrence of Ancylostoma in dogs, cats and public places from Andradina city, Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo 53, 181184.Google Scholar
Conlan, JV et al. (2012) Soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Laos: a community-wide cross-sectional study of humans and dogs in a mass drug administration environment. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 624634.Google Scholar
Crompton, DW (2001) Ascaris and ascariasis. Advances in Parasitology 48, 285375.Google Scholar
Davoust, B et al. (2008) Epidemiological survey on gastro-intestinal and blood-borne helminths of dogs in north-east Gabon. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 75, 359364.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, P et al. (2002) Loeffler's syndrome and cutaneous larva migrans: a rare association. British Journal of Dermatology 147, 386388.Google Scholar
Dhir, L, O'Dempsey, T and Watts, MT (2010) Cutaneous larva migrans with optic disc edema: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports 4, 209.Google Scholar
Dias, SR et al. (2013) Evaluation of parasitological and immunological aspects of acute infection by Ancylostoma caninum and Ancylostoma braziliense in mixed-breed dogs. Parasitology Research 112, 21512157.Google Scholar
Dinkel, A et al. (1998) Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the definitive host: coprodiagnosis by PCR as an alternative to necropsy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36, 18711876.Google Scholar
e Silva, LM et al. (2006) Differential diagnosis of dog hookworms based on PCR-RFLP from the ITS region of their rDNA. Veterinary Parasitology 140, 373377.Google Scholar
Easton, AV et al. (2016) Multi-parallel qPCR provides increased sensitivity and diagnostic breadth for gastrointestinal parasites of humans: field-based inferences on the impact of mass deworming. Parasite & Vectors 9, 38.Google Scholar
Fahrion, AS et al. (2011) Toxocara eggs shed by dogs and cats and their molecular and morphometric species-specific identification: is the finding of T. cati eggs shed by dogs of epidemiological relevance? Veterinary Parasitology 177, 186189.Google Scholar
Frenkel, JK et al. (2003) Dogs as possible mechanical carriers of Toxoplasma, and their fur as a source of infection of young children. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 7, 292293.Google Scholar
Galanti, B, Fusco, FM and Nardiello, S (2002) Outbreak of cutaneous larva migrans in Naples, southern Italy. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96, 491492.Google Scholar
Gasser, RB et al. (1993) Rapid sequencing of rDNA from single worms and eggs of parasitic helminths. Nucleic Acids Research 21, 25252526.Google Scholar
George, S et al. (2016) Molecular identification of hookworm isolates in humans, dogs and soil in a tribal area in Tamil Nadu, India. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 10, e0004891.Google Scholar
Georgi, JR, LeJambre, LF and Ractliffe, LH (1969) Ancylostoma caninum burden in relationship to erythrocyte loss in dogs. Journal of Parasitology 55, 12051211.Google Scholar
Hochedez, P and Caumes, E (2007) Hookworm-related cutaneous larva migrans. Journal of Travel Medicine 14, 326333.Google Scholar
Hu, M, Chilton, NB and Gasser, RB. (2002) The mitochondrial genomes of the human hookworms, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus (Nematoda: Secernentea). International Journal for Parasitology 32, 145158.Google Scholar
Hu, W et al. (2016) Levels of Ancylostoma infections and phylogenetic analysis of cox 1 gene of A. ceylanicum in stray cat faecal samples from Guangzhou, China. Journal of Helminthology 90, 392397.Google Scholar
Huttner, M et al. (2009) A survey of Echinococcus species in wild carnivores and livestock in East Africa. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 12691276.Google Scholar
Inpankaew, T et al. (2014) High prevalence of Ancylostoma ceylanicum hookworm infections in humans, Cambodia, 2012. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20, 976982.Google Scholar
Jelinek, T et al. (1994) Cutaneous larva migrans in travelers: synopsis of histories, symptoms, and treatment of 98 patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases 19, 10621066.Google Scholar
Jiraanankul, V et al. (2011) Incidence and risk factors of hookworm infection in a rural community of central Thailand. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 84, 594598.Google Scholar
Joshi, BN and Sabne, SS (1977) Incidence of Toxocara canis infection in stray dogs in Miraj area. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 20, 239242.Google Scholar
Jozefzoon, LM and Oostburg, BF (1994) Detection of hookworm and hookworm-like larvae in human fecocultures in Suriname. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 501505.Google Scholar
Kagendo, D et al. (2014) A survey for Echinococcus spp. of carnivores in six wildlife conservation areas in Kenya. Parasitology International 63, 604611.Google Scholar
Kelkar, R (2007) Cutaneous larva migrans in England: a case in a returning traveller. Journal of Emergency Medicine 24, 678.Google Scholar
Koehler, AV et al. (2013) Genetic characterization of selected parasites from people with histories of gastrointestinal disorders using a mutation scanning-coupled approach. Electrophoresis 34, 17201728.Google Scholar
Landmann, JK and Prociv, P (2003) Experimental human infection with the dog hookworm, Ancylostoma caninum. Medical Journal of Australia 178, 6971.Google Scholar
Levecke, B et al. (2011) A comparison of the sensitivity and fecal egg counts of the McMaster egg counting and Kato-Katz thick smear methods for soil-transmitted helminths. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5, e1201.Google Scholar
Lindsay, DS et al. (1997) Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Veterinary Parasitology 73, 2733.Google Scholar
Liu, YJ et al. (2015) Molecular identification of hookworms in stray and shelter dogs from Guangzhou city, China using ITS sequences. Journal of Helminthology 89, 196202.Google Scholar
Loukas, A et al. (2005) Vaccination with recombinant aspartic hemoglobinase reduces parasite load and blood loss after hookworm infection in dogs. PLoS Medicine 2, e295.Google Scholar
Macpherson, CNL and Craig, PS (1991) The African hookworm problem: an overview. In Macpherson, CNL and Craig, PS (eds), Parasitic Helminths and Zoonoses in Africa. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 101137.Google Scholar
Mahdy, MA et al. (2012) Prevalence and zoonotic potential of canine hookworms in Malaysia. Parasite & Vectors 5, 88.Google Scholar
Malgor, R et al. (1996) High prevalence of Ancylostoma spp. infection in dogs, associated with endemic focus of human cutaneous larva migrans, in Tacuarembo, Uruguay. Parasite 3, 131134.Google Scholar
Mathis, A, Deplazes, P and Eckert, J (1996) An improved test system for PCR-based specific detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. Journal of Helminthology 70, 219222.Google Scholar
Merino-Tejedor, A et al. (2018) Molecular identification of zoonotic hookworm species in dog faeces from Tanzania. Journal of Helminthology, doi: 10.1017/S0022149X18000263.Google Scholar
Miller, TA (1968) Pathogenesis and immunity in hookworm infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 62, 473489.Google Scholar
Miller, TA (1970) Studies on the incidence of hookworm infection in East Africa. East African Medical Journal 47, 354363.Google Scholar
Mudenda, NB et al. (2012) Modelling the ecological niche of hookworm in Brazil based on climate. Geospatial Health 6, S111123.Google Scholar
Mulinge, E et al. (2018) Molecular characterization of Echinococcus species in dogs from four regions of Kenya. Veterinary Parasitology 255, 4957.Google Scholar
Ngui, R et al. (2012) Epidemiological and genetic data supporting the transmission of Ancylostoma ceylanicum among human and domestic animals. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1522.Google Scholar
Nijsse, R et al. (2014) Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination. Veterinary Parasitology 204, 304309.Google Scholar
Oliveira-Arbex, AP et al. (2017) Molecular identification of Ancylostoma species from dogs and an assessment of zoonotic risk in low-income households, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of Helminthology 91, 1419.Google Scholar
Palmer, CS et al. (2007) The veterinary and public health significance of hookworm in dogs and cats in Australia and the status of A. ceylanicum. Veterinary Parasitology 145, 304313.Google Scholar
Pullan, RL and Brooker, SJ (2012) The global limits and population at risk of soil-transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasite & Vectors 5, 81.Google Scholar
Repetto, SA et al. (2013) An improved DNA isolation technique for PCR detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool samples. Acta Tropica 126, 110114.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L et al. (2006) Canine faecal contamination and parasitic risk in the city of Naples (southern Italy). BMC Veterinary Research 2, 29.Google Scholar
Sato, M et al. (2010) Copro-molecular identification of infections with hookworm eggs in rural Lao PDR. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 104, 617622.Google Scholar
Schaub, N, Perruchoud, AP and Buechner, S (2002) Cutaneous larva migrans associated with Loffler's syndrome. Dermatology 205, 207209.Google Scholar
Smout, FA et al. (2017) The hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum: an emerging public health risk in Australian tropical rainforests and Indigenous communities. One Health 3, 6669.Google Scholar
Sowemimo, OA (2009) The prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasites of dogs in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Journal of Helminthology 83, 2731.Google Scholar
Speare, R, Bradbury, RS and Croese, J (2016) A case of Ancylostoma ceylanicum infection occurring in an Australian soldier returned from Solomon Islands. Korean Journal of Parasitology 54, 533536.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ (2013) Ancylostoma ceylanicum, a re-emerging but neglected parasitic zoonosis. International Journal for Parasitology 43, 10091015.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ et al. (2002) The role of dogs in transmission of gastrointestinal parasites in a remote tea-growing community in northeastern India. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 67, 539545.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ et al. (2003) Humans, dogs and parasitic zoonoses–unravelling the relationships in a remote endemic community in northeast India using molecular tools. Parasitology Research 90 Suppl 3, S156157.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ et al. (2004) Application of a species-specific PCR-RFLP to identify Ancylostoma eggs directly from canine faeces. Veterinary Parasitology 123, 245255.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ et al. (2007) A case of mistaken identity–reappraisal of the species of canid and felid hookworms (Ancylostoma) present in Australia and India. Parasitology 134, 113119.Google Scholar
Traub, RJ et al. (2008) PCR-based coprodiagnostic tools reveal dogs as reservoirs of zoonotic ancylostomiasis caused by Ancylostoma ceylanicum in temple communities in Bangkok. Veterinary Parasitology 155, 6773.Google Scholar
Udonsi, JK and Atata, G (1987) Necator americanus: temperature, pH, light, and larval development, longevity, and desiccation tolerance. Experimental Parasitology 63, 136142.Google Scholar
Verster, AJ (1965) Review of Echinococcus species in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 32, 7118.Google Scholar
Wachira, TM et al. (1993) Intestinal helminths of public health importance in dogs in Nairobi. East African Medical Journal 70, 617619.Google Scholar
Werneck, JS et al. (2007) Mites in clinical stool specimens: potential misidentification as helminth eggs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 101, 11541156.Google Scholar
Ziem, JB et al. (2006) Distribution and clustering of Oesophagostomum bifurcum and hookworm infections in northern Ghana. Parasitology 132, 525534.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A map showing the study sites of Turkana, Meru, Isiolo and Narok counties, in Kenya, and the distribution and frequency of hookworm species.

Figure 1

Table 1. Faecal prevalence of hookworm eggs in dog faeces, and molecular species determination.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. RFLP of PCR product RTGHF1-RTABCR1 following digestion with restriction endonucleases (a) RsaI and (b) HinFI. Digests were separated on 3% (w/v) agarose gel and stained in ethidium bromide. Lane M: molecular weight marker; lane 1: Ancylostoma duodenale (TNU 331); lanes 2–4: Ancylostoma braziliense; lanes 5 & 6: Ancylostoma caninum; lane 7: Ancylostoma caninum positive control; lane 8: Ancylostoma ceylanicum positive control; lane 9: uncut PCR product.

Figure 3

Table 2. Restriction profile of RTGHF1-RTABCR1 PCR products following digestion with restriction endonucleases (RsaI & HinFI).

Supplementary material: File

Mulinge et al. supplementary material

Mulinge et al. supplementary material 1

Download Mulinge et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.1 KB