Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:38:09.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sicily and Roman Republican History in Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2018

Daniel Jolowicz*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Chariton's Chaereas and Callirhoe is a Greek novel that is extremely rich in historical and historiographical allusions. Virtually all of those so far detected derive from Greek texts and events in Greek history. In this article I shift the focus to Roman history, and suggest that Rome is not as absent as it is usually supposed to be in the Greek novels. In support of this claim, I propose that Chariton's choice of Sicily as a topographical setting can be related to three episodes from the Republican period that all involve Roman interventions in Sicily. Section I: the removal of Callirhoe (described at the beginning of the novel as an ἄγαλμα) from Syracuse recalls Verres’ provincial mismanagement of Sicily (73–71 BC), specifically his removal from Syracuse of Sappho's statue. Section II: the character of the pirate Theron is freighted with markers that point to the ‘pirate’ Sextus Pompey and his conflict with Octavian from 42–36 BC. Section III: Chaereas’ triumphant return to Syracuse at the end of the novel, loaded with spoils from the Persian king, symbolically reverses and redresses Marcellus’ sack of Syracuse in 211 BC. These all have significant ramifications for how readers (ancient and modern) approach the Greek novels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 2018 

Footnotes

*

dj334@cam.ac.uk. I am extremely grateful to Tim Whitmarsh and Richard Hunter for reading and commenting on previous drafts of this piece, and to JHS’ two anonymous referees, and editor, Douglas Cairns, for their many valuable observations.