Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T08:14:19.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nature of the schwa/zero alternation in French clitics: experimental and non-experimental evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2007

MARIE HÉLÈNE CÔTÉ  and
GEOFFREY STEWART MORRISON
MARIE HÉLÈNE CÔTÉ
Affiliation:
Département de linguistique/Department of Linguistics, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa, C.P. 450, Succursale A/P.O. Box 450, Station A, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada e-mail: mhcote@uottawa.ca
GEOFFREY STEWART MORRISON
Affiliation:
Département de linguistique/Department of Linguistics, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa, C.P. 450, Succursale A/P.O. Box 450, Station A, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada e-mail: mhcote@uottawa.ca Now at Boston University.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article examines the phonological status of schwa in clitics, in particular whether or not schwa should be included in their lexical representation. Several distributional and experimental arguments pointing to the lexical status of clitic schwas are reviewed and are shown to be inconclusive, due to the existence of additional data that suggest a different interpretation not involving underlying schwas. The discussion includes experimental results that fail to show residual lip rounding in the vicinity of an omitted schwa at clitic boundaries, contra Barnes and Kavitskaya's (2002) previous claim. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the non-contrastive nature of clitic schwas militates against their underlying status.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 159 - 186
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments. This research was supported by a grant to the first author from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#410-2002-0793).