Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T16:57:20.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reappraisal of the Kelvin–Helmholtz problem. Part 1. Hamiltonian structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 1997

T. BROOKE BENJAMIN
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24–29 St. Giles, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK
THOMAS J. BRIDGES
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper and Part 2 report various new insights into the classic Kelvin–Helmholtz problem which models the instability of a plane vortex sheet and the complicated motions arising therefrom. The full nonlinear version of the hydrodynamic problem is treated, with allowance for gravity and surface tension, and the account deals in precise fashion with several inherently peculiar properties of the mathematical model. The main achievement of the paper, presented in §3, is to demonstrate that the problem admits a canonical Hamiltonian formulation, which represents a novel variational definition of a functional representing perturbations in kinetic energy. The Hamiltonian structure thus revealed is then used to account systematically for relations between symmetries and conservation laws, and none of those examined appears to have been noticed before. In §4, a generalized, non-canonical Hamiltonian structure is shown to apply when the vortex sheet becomes folded, so requiring a parametric representation, as is well known to occur in the later stages of evolution from Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Further invariant properties are demonstrated in this context. Finally, §5, the linearized version of the problem – reviewed briefly in §2.1 – is reappraised in the light of Hamiltonian structure, and it is shown how Kelvin–Helmholtz instability can be interpreted as the coincidence of wave modes characterized respectively by positive and negative values of the Hamiltonian functional representing perturbations in total energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press