In our recent article (Pasam et al. Reference Pasam, Tudball Smith, Holmes, Burton and Thompson2023), there is an error in table 3 where the relative roughness for which the shear layer momentum thickness was estimated, has been mistakenly reported as ks/D = 1.4 × 10−3 in the first two entries. This should instead be ks/D = 1.9 × 10−3. The revised version is given in table 1 below.
Table 1. Momentum thickness ($\varTheta$/D) of the shear layer at different streamwise locations.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20240125191231121-0474:S0022112023010455:S0022112023010455_tab1.png?pub-status=live)
The authors would like to apologise for this oversight.