Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T00:34:16.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct numerical simulations of bubbly flows. Part 1. Low Reynolds number arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 December 1998

ASGHAR ESMAEELI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
GRÉTAR TRYGGVASON
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Direct numerical simulations of the motion of two- and three-dimensional buoyant bubbles in periodic domains are presented. The full Navier–Stokes equations are solved by a finite difference/front tracking method that allows a fully deformable interface between the bubbles and the ambient fluid and the inclusion of surface tension. The governing parameters are selected such that the average rise Reynolds number is O(1) and deformations of the bubbles are small. The rise velocity of a regular array of three-dimensional bubbles at different volume fractions agrees relatively well with the prediction of Sangani (1988) for Stokes flow. A regular array of two- and three-dimensional bubbles, however, is an unstable configuration and the breakup, and the subsequent bubble–bubble interactions take place by ‘drafting, kissing, and tumbling’. A comparison between a finite Reynolds number two-dimensional simulation with sixteen bubbles and a Stokes flow simulation shows that the finite Reynolds number array breaks up much faster. It is found that a freely evolving array of two-dimensional bubbles rises faster than a regular array and simulations with different numbers of two-dimensional bubbles (1–49) show that the rise velocity increases slowly with the size of the system. Computations of four and eight three-dimensional bubbles per period also show a slight increase in the average rise velocity compared to a regular array. The difference between two- and three-dimensional bubbles is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press