Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:32:07.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Was There So Little Government Reaction to Gunpowder Plot?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2004

A. W. R. E. OKINES
A. W. R. E. OKINES
Affiliation:
Flat 2B Basil Mansions, Basil Street, London SW3 1AP; e-mail: warwick.okines@db.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article rejects the approach that treats the Gunpowder Plot as a discrete historical episode. The plot is better understood when examined in parallel with the period after November 1605; the surprising leniency shown by the Jacobean government towards English Catholics destroys the motives upon which conspiracy theories are based. This article demonstrates that Robert Cecil, earl of Salisbury, supported King James's toleration since both wished to preserve domestic stability and peace with Spain. The assassination of King Henri IV of France in 1610 did more to jeopardise toleration than did the Gunpowder Plot, despite the latter's profound impact on the English popular consciousness.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

CSP domestic=Calendar of state papers domestic; CSP Venetian=Calendar of state papers Venetian
I am extremely grateful to Professor Jenny Wormald who read and commented on numerous drafts and helped throughout my preparation of this article.