Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:49:36.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Was Hans Denck Thought To Be a Universalist?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2004

MORWENNA LUDLOW
Affiliation:
Theology Faculty Centre, 41 St Giles, Oxford OX 3LW; e-mail: morwenna.ludlow@theology.oxford.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hans Denck is commonly cited as a universalist. Probably he was not, but there are several reasons why it was easy for his opponents to claim the opposite: his theology admitted the possibility that all people will be saved; his broadly Origenistic conceptions of freedom, divinisation and punishment tempted opponents to attribute Origen's idea of universalism to him; and he so challenged the core beliefs of mainstream Reformation theology that his opponents may have found it difficult to understand how he could claim that God wills all to be saved, Christ died for all and all are free, without being universalist.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

HDS=Hans Denck Schriften, ed. Georg Baring and Walter Fellmann, Gütersloh 1955–60; MQR=Mennonite Quarterly Review