All Saints' Bristol is arguably the most richly documented of any of the (roughly) 10,000 parishes of late medieval England. Its archival trove includes a good collection of wills and churchwardens' accounts, various deeds relating to the parish's endowment and a long run of chantry accounts. Most precious of all is the All Saints' ‘church book’, a volume which provides a detailed record of the late medieval benefactions made to the parish, together with parochial ordinances, inventories and more. Clive Burgess has previously brought these materials to general attention through his meticulous three-volume edition of the parish's records. He has now returned to the All Saints' archive in a monograph which offers the most in-depth and stimulating account of a single medieval English parish yet to be written.
Notwithstanding some earlier evidential survivals, the bulk of the All Saints' archive relates to the hundred years before the break with Rome. Burgess painstakingly chronicles the development of the parish over these decades, which he argues represents a profound transformation in its life. The mid-fifteenth century witnessed the rebuilding of both nave aisles and the foundation of two perpetual chantries (one of which proved abortive). The priests staffing the chantries added notably to the clerical manpower of the parish, already considerable owing to the presence of the guild of Kalendars. The parochial endowment also grew substantially over the succeeding decades, not least through a series of generous gifts from widows in return for perpetual obits. As the parish's regular income grew, so did its ambitions. Alongside purchases of property and the ongoing embellishment of the church, an increasingly elaborate liturgical regime was established – aided by the employment of at least one highly-skilled musician as parish clerk. By the early sixteenth century, as Burgess demonstrates, the parish of All Saints' had much in common with a collegiate church.
The right ordering of souls is divided into five sections. In turn, Burgess surveys the wider context for the parish's pre-Reformation development; introduces the records, parishioners and key developments of late medieval All Saints'; explores the various commemorative strategies deployed within the parish; traces its complex (and highly effective) managerial structures; and details parochial investment in the church's physical environment and liturgy. In the process a number of important arguments are advanced, which challenge traditional orthodoxies about popular religion and the late medieval Church. Wills and churchwardens' accounts, genres of evidence on which parish historians must usually depend, are shown – through comparison with the All Saints' church book – seriously to under-represent parochial activities and achievements. Chantry foundations played a crucial, and highly valued, role in enhancing parish life and worship. The late medieval parish, moreover, benefited from a range of productive collaborations, which deserve greater emphasis than occasional outbreaks of conflict. Clergy, local elites and the wider body of parishioners worked closely together in the everyday management of, and longer-term strategising for, parish life. Parishes and guilds existed in mutually-enriching symbiosis. And the wider Church offered support and inspiration for parochial endeavours, with friars augmenting pastoral care, monasteries and hospitals sharing their liturgical expertise, and larger ecclesiastical corporations providing a model to which parishioners could aspire. Burgess also draws attention to the prominence of wealthy widows in the life of All Saints' parish: on their benefactions and initiative much of the parish's late medieval growth depended.
Many of these arguments will be familiar to readers of Clive Burgess's oeuvre, set out in a series of influential articles over the past three decades. But the weaving together of these various strands, with a focus on a single locality, produces a compelling and uniquely detailed depiction of parish life. Burgess exploits the All Saints' archive in a masterful manner, leaving no stone unturned and where necessary probing its silences. In a densely plotted work, he returns regularly to key events, characters and documents – a ‘repertory for reinforcement’ – considering their significance from a number of different angles. Burgess also draws on his deep knowledge of other parish archives, notably in Bristol and London, to contextualise the All Saints' records insightfully.
The remarkable growth of parochial investment and ambition at All Saints' Bristol in the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries raises a number of questions for historians to ponder. These include the factors which triggered and catalysed the developments chronicled here, and the typicality of the All Saints' experience. In his opening chapter, Burgess argues that ever-increasing parochial activity was connected to wider trends in late medieval politics, government and society. In particular, the Hundred Years War prompted the English Crown to promote enhanced liturgical performance in the parish as a means to maximise the country's ‘intercessory capacity’ and to unite the realm behind the war effort.
How representative of the late medieval English parish was All Saints'? It was by no means the largest or wealthiest parish in Bristol, and the surviving evidence from other city churches implies a similar range of activity there. On the other hand, Bristol was the third richest town in England, and therefore not exactly a typical environment. All Saints' benefited greatly from the presence of affluent parishioners, the leadership of well-educated clergy, the managerial expertise at hand from members of the civic elites and the presence of important local guilds and religious houses. While acknowledging these factors, Burgess makes a considered case for the wider applicability of his findings from All Saints'. He draws attention to glimpses of similar levels of parochial ambition and liturgical development in market towns, and argues that the achievements of parishes in large conurbations would have inspired and influenced parishioners in nearby settlements. In the light of the evidence that he surveys, Burgess concludes that ‘parishes surely represent the most fruitful area of development within the Church in the century before the Reformation’ (p. 416). He has also demonstrated the fruitfulness of the study of late medieval parish communities in a work that will do much to invigorate further this field of research. That is an achievement worthy of commemoration.