Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T07:02:36.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supraphysiological estradiol levels on the hCG trigger day are associated with SGA for singletons born from fresh embryo transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2021

Junwei Zhang
Affiliation:
The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Kangfuqian Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People’s Republic of China
Mingze Du
Affiliation:
The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Kangfuqian Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People’s Republic of China
Lijun Sun*
Affiliation:
The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Kangfuqian Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People’s Republic of China
*
Address for correspondence: Lijun Sun, The Reproduction Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Kangfuqian Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, People’s Republic of China. Email: workzhangjw@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of supraphysiological estradiol (E2) on neonatal outcomes and the significance of specific E2 concentrations remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether supraphysiological E2 levels on the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day are associated with small size for gestational age (SGA) in singletons born from fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Patients with singleton pregnancies who delivered after the transfer of fresh embryos, during the period from July 2012 to December 2017, at our center were included. We excluded cycles involving a vanishing twin, maternal age >35 years, basal follicle-stimulating hormone ≥10 mIU/ml, or anti-Müllerian hormone ≤1 ng/ml. We then divided all cycles into five groups by E2 level on trigger day: group A, <2000 pg/ml (reference group); group B, 2000 pg/ml≤E2<2999 pg/ml; group C, 3000 pg/ml≤E2<3999 pg/ml; group D, 4000 pg/ml≤E2<4999 pg/ml; and group E, ≥5000 pg/ml. The prevalence of SGA among singletons from fresh ET was the primary outcome. The SGA rate significantly increased when the E2 level was ≥4000 pg/ml, as observed by comparing groups D (odds ratio [OR]: 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·16–2·76, P = 0·01) and E (OR: 1·68, 95% CI: 1·10–2·56, P = 0·02) with the reference group. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a serum E2 level of at least 4000 pg/ml on the hCG trigger day was associated with increased SGA and with significant differences for groups D (adjusted OR [AOR]: 1·65, 95% CI: 1·05–2·59, P = 0·03) and E (AOR: 1·60, 95% CI: 1·03–2·53, P = 0·04) relative to the reference group. In conclusion, in fresh ET cycles, the supraphysiological E2 ≥4000 pg/ml on the hCG trigger day increases the risk of SGA.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Background

The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to treat infertility is steadily increasing, and the number of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles has dramatically risen over the past decade. Reference Pereira and Rosenwaks1 In a recent European survey, the FET cycles accounted for 32·4% of all in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, representing a significant increase from the previously reported data. Reference Gliozheni, Calhaz-Jorge and De Geyter2 Based on observational studies and randomized controlled trials, the following reasons may explain this phenomenon. First, vitrification, a newer technology, has significantly increased embryo cryosurvival rates relative to slow freezing, leading to improved clinical outcomes for FET cycles. Reference Rienzi, Gracia and Maggiulli3 Second, to minimize the occurrence of multiple pregnancies, single ET has become the dominant strategy. Moreover, the development of preimplantation genetic testing has resulted in additional extra embryos for cryopreservation. Finally, perinatal and neonatal safety have always been of profound importance. We previously reported that based on the data from 2053 FET cycles and 2059 ET cycles, FET was associated with a reduced risk of small size for gestational age (SGA) and low birth weight (LBW) for singleton births. Reference Zhang, Du and Li4 Several other studies have reported similar findings, Reference Sazonova, Kallen, Thurin-Kjellberg, Wennerholm and Bergh5Reference Wennerholm, Henningsen and Romundstad7 which have important implications for the potential physiological mechanisms of SGA and LBW in ART cycles.

The most notable difference between fresh ET and FET cycles is that fresh ET cycles expose embryos to the supraphysiological estradiol (E2) milieu that is characteristic of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). In an oocyte donor study involving 56,792 identified infants from oocyte donor recipients who underwent no ovarian hormonal stimulation, including 38,626 infants and 18,166 infants conceived following the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos, respectively, the risk of LBW did not differ between fresh ET and FET cycles. Reference Kalra, Ratcliffe, Coutifaris, Molinaro and Barnhart8 Whether supraphysiological E2 impacts neonatal birth weight remains uncertain. Imudia et al. Reference Imudia, Awonuga and Doyle9 reported that high peak serum E2 (>3450 pg/ml) during COH was associated with increased risks of SGA and preeclampsia for singleton pregnancies after IVF. In a subsequent study, these researchers confirmed that elective cryopreservation of all embryos in patients with elevated peak serum E2 may reduce the risk of SGA for singleton births. Reference Imudia, Awonuga, Kaimal, Wright, Styer and Toth10 Additionally, Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Reichman, Goldschlag, Lekovich and Rosenwaks11 reported that a peak E2 level >3069·2 pg/ml during fresh ET cycles was associated with increased odds of full-term LBW for singleton births. Liu et al. Reference Liu, Kuang and Wu12 reported that high E2 levels after COH were correlated with lower birth weight and SGA. Moreover, Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Elias and Christos13 found that supraphysiological E2 (≥2500 pg/ml) was an independent predictor of LBW for full-term singletons born after fresh ET. However, Wang et al. Reference Wang, Hao and Bao14 reported that high serum E2 (>3757 pg/ml) associated with COH did not increase the risks of LBW, preterm birth (PTB), or neonatal malformation. In addition, Dunne et al. Reference Dunne, Cho and Shan15 suggested that high serum E2 (≥3552 pg/ml) was unassociated with adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes, including PBT and SGA, among others. Therefore, the effects of supraphysiological E2 on neonatal outcomes and the significance of specific E2 concentrations remain unclear. Thus, this study assessed the impact of supraphysiological E2 levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger following COH on SGA, LBW, PTB, and full-term LBW for singleton births.

Materials and methods

Population

The review board of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University approved this retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles that resulted in singleton live births at the Reproductive Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between July 2012 and December 2017 were analyzed for potential inclusion. Cycles with pregnancy-related complications, including pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placental abruption, and premature membrane rupture, were excluded. We further excluded cycles involving a vanishing twin, maternal age >35 years, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ≥10 mIU/ml, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤1 ng/ml, neonatal malformation, or incomplete records.

We then divided all cycles into five groups by E2 level on the day of hCG trigger: group A, <2000 pg/ml (reference group); group B, 2000 pg/ml≤E2<2999 pg/ml; group C, 3000 pg/ml≤E2<3999 pg/ml; group D, 4000 pg/ml≤E2<4999 pg/ml; and group E, ≥5000 pg/ml.

Clinical and laboratory protocols

All women underwent a standardized ovarian stimulation regimen using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (Diphereline, lpsen, France) and recombinant FSH (Gonal-f; Merck Serono, Germany). The FSH dose depended on maternal age, weight, and AMH and was adjusted based on ovarian response monitoring via three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and testing of serum sex steroids. Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at a dose of 5000 to 10,000 IU was injected to induce oocyte maturation when at least 60% of the follicles measured 18 mm or more. On the trigger day, we routinely measured serum E2, progesterone, FSH, and LH levels, using the Roche cobas immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The preparation, setup, dilutions, adjustment, assay, and quality control procedures were performed per the manufacturer’s instructions. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 10% for all measurements. Vaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval was performed 36–38 hours later. Based on sperm quality, routine IVF or ICSI was performed approximately 4–6 hours after follicular aspiration. Luteal-phase support was provided by injecting 60 mg of progesterone (Xianju, Zhejiang, China) or intravaginally administering 90 mg of a sustained-release progesterone vaginal gel (Merck Serono, Germany), beginning on the day of oocyte retrieval. Based on the recommendations of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, up to two 2-d embryos or one 5-d blastocyst was selected and transferred. Beta hCG serum levels were measured 14 d after transfer. For women with a positive hCG test, the luteal-phase support was continued until 10 weeks of pregnancy. All data regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes were obtained via reviewing our center’s medical records.

Outcome measures

Our primary concern was whether the risk of SGA was associated with the E2 level on the day of hCG trigger of the fresh ET. SGA was defined as a neonatal birth weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age. Reference Dai, Deng and Li16 Prespecified secondary efficacy outcomes included LBW (birth weight <2500 g), very LBW (VLBW, birth weight <1500 g), PTB (gestational weeks <37), and full-term LBW (gestational weeks ≥37 and birth weight <2500 g).

Statistical analysis

For continuous data, the one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to check for normality. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to assess the differences in continuous variables with abnormal distributions, and these variables were represented by medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables were expressed as the number of cases (n) and the corresponding percentage (%); differences in measurements were assessed using chi-square analyses. For SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW, multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for the effects of the study site and baseline characteristics. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and their 95% CIs were calculated. All statistical management and analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 22·0. A two-sided P value <0·05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study population

From July 2012 through December 2017, a total of 12,547 fresh ET cycles were performed, and 3033 cycles satisfied the eligibility criteria. A total of 9514 cycles were excluded for the following reasons: nonpregnancy (n = 6133), miscarriage (n = 951), multiple gestation (n = 750), a vanishing twin (n = 204), repeated patients (n = 56), maternal age >35 years, basal FSH ≥10 mIU/ml or AMH ≤1 ng/ml (n = 1093), pregnancy complications (including pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta previa, placental abruption and premature membrane rupture), neonatal malformation (n = 117), history of PTB (n = 68), or incomplete records (n = 142). Based on the E2 level on the hCG trigger day, the 3033 included cycles were divided into five groups: group A (n = 551), group B (n = 748), group C (n = 649), group D (n = 500), and group E (n = 585) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Overview of the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Characteristics of the study groups

Table 1 lists the study groups’ fundamental maternal and cycle characteristics. No significant between-group differences were observed in maternal age, infertility duration type, infertility, parity, ovarian stimulation duration, ART method, number of embryos transferred, gestational weeks, delivery mode, or neonatal sex. However, maternal body mass index (BMI) (P = 0·00) and infertility diagnoses (P = 0·01) differed between groups. Between-group differences were found in basal FSH (0·01), AMH (P = 0·00), antral follicle count (P = 0·00), gonadotropin dosage (P = 0·00), endometrial thickness on the hCG trigger day (P = 0·03), number of embryos retrieved (P = 0·00), and embryo stage (P = 0·00). Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for the baseline characteristics.

Table 1. Material and cycle characteristics between A and E groups

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) or percentage.

FSH, follicle-stimulation hormone; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.

SGA and secondary outcomes

Differences in serum E2 levels on the hCG trigger day were associated with significant differences in SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW (Table 2). When serum E2 levels were at least 4000 pg/ml, the risk of SGA was significantly increased, with an OR of 1·79 (95% CI: 1·16–2·76, P = 0·01) for group D compared with that of group A. SGA incidence was significantly higher in group E than in the reference group, with an associated OR of 1·68 (95% CI: 1·10–2·56, P = 0·02).

Table 2. Odds ratio of SGA, LBW, VLBW, PTB, and full-term LBW with increasing E2 levels

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; E2, estradiol; SGA, small for gestational age; LBW, low birth weight; VLBW, very low birth weight; PT, preterm birth.

The LBW rate was significantly higher in groups D and E than in the reference group, with ORs of 1·93 (95% CI: 1·21–3·09, P = 0·01) and 2·02 (95% CI: 1·28–3·18, P = 0·00), respectively. Moreover, the frequency of full-term LBW was greater in groups D (OR: 2·44, 95% CI: 1·33–4·48, P = 0·00) and E (OR: 2·59, 95% CI: 1·44–4·66, P = 0·00) than in the reference group. However, VLBW and PTB did not significantly differ between the five groups.

Variables independently associated with SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW: multivariate logistic regression analysis

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding factors (Table 3). The model included maternal age (<30 years vs. ≥30 years), BMI, parity (0 vs. ≥1), infertility type (primary vs. secondary), infertility diagnosis (tubal/male/other), gonadotropin dosage (<2500 IU vs. ≥2500 IU), endometrial thickness on the hCG trigger day, ART method (IVF vs. ICSI), embryo stage (D3 vs. D5), number of embryos transferred (1 vs. 2), mode of delivery (vaginal vs. cesarean), neonatal sex (male vs. female), and E2 level on the hCG trigger day (divided into five aforementioned groups).

Table 3. Multiple logistic regression analysis to account for confounding variables of SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW

AOR, adjusted odds ratios.

The variables that significantly affected SGA were maternal BMI (AOR: 0·87, 95% CI: 0·82–0·91, P = 0·00), serum E2 level on the hCG trigger day, and being in group D (AOR: 1·65, 95% CI: 1·05–2·59, P = 0·03) or E (AOR: 1·60, 95% CI: 1·03–2·53, P = 0·04).

LBW was significantly increased in groups D (AOR: 1·87, 95% CI: 1·15–3·03, P = 0·01) and E (AOR: 1·97, 95% CI: 1·23–3·16, P = 0·01) compared with that in the reference group. In addition, maternal BMI significantly affected the LBW rate (AOR: 0·94, 95% CI: 0·89–0·99, P = 0·02).

The factors that significantly affected full-term LBW were maternal BMI (AOR: 0·89, 95% CI: 0·82–0·96, P = 0·00), serum E2 level on the hCG trigger day, and being in group D (AOR: 2·27, 95% CI: 1·22–4·25, P = 0·01) or E (AOR: 2·42, 95% CI: 1·31–4·49, P = 0·01).

Discussion

In our study of women with infertility and normal ovarian reserves who underwent IVF/ICSI, those with supraphysiological E2 levels on the day of hCG trigger had significantly higher rates of SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW than did women with lower E2 levels. Multivariate analysis revealed associations between E2 levels of more than 4000 pg/ml on the trigger day and SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW.

Moreover, we found that lower BMI was an independent risk factor for the SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW rates.

Comparisons with other reports

Singleton births via ART are associated with significantly increased risks of SGA, LBW, PTB, perinatal mortality, and maternal complications Reference Schieve, Meikle, Ferre, Peterson, Jeng and Wilcox17Reference Bohlmann, Fritzsching and Luedders23 compared with spontaneous singleton births. Biological traits that may be associated with this phenomenon include intrinsic characteristics of the infertile couple, in vitro culture methods/media, the supraphysiological hormonal environment associated with COH, or a combination of these factors; however, the exact mechanisms leading to increased risks of these conditions remain unknown. In recent years, observational studies have demonstrated that singletons from FET have a reduced risk of LBW. Reference Zhang, Du and Li4,Reference Sazonova, Kallen, Thurin-Kjellberg, Wennerholm and Bergh5,Reference Shih, Rushford and Bourne24 The most important physiological difference between FET and fresh ET is that FET involves a hormonal milieu closer to that of the physiological environment. Therefore, studies regarding how supraphysiological E2 levels during COH are associated with LBW or SGA have begun to emerge. Reference Imudia, Awonuga and Doyle9,Reference Pereira, Reichman, Goldschlag, Lekovich and Rosenwaks11Reference Wang, Hao and Bao14 However, no unified standard definition exists for E2 levels. Supraphysiological serum E2 levels have been defined in various ways, such as in terms of the 50th, Reference Wang, Hao and Bao14,Reference Hu, Feng and Lin25 75th, Reference Wu, Li and Ma26 90th, Reference Dunne, Cho and Shan15 and 95th Reference Pereira, Reichman, Goldschlag, Lekovich and Rosenwaks11 percentiles. Therefore, no universal standard exists for E2 levels for different populations, ovulation protocols, or laboratory standards. Many studies have suggested that a supraphysiological hormonal milieu may contribute to LBW, albeit with variable confounding factors. Recently, Pereira et al., Reference Pereira, Elias and Christos13 using receiving–operating curve analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to account for potential confounding factors, highlighted that supraphysiological E2, defined as E2 ≥2500 pg/ml, independently predicted LBW for full-term singletons born from fresh ET, with an AOR of 10·8 (95% CI: 9·2–12·5). However, this study included cycles with pregnancy complications, which are also associated with neonatal outcomes, including LBW, SGA, macrosomia, and large size for gestational age. For example, Yen et al. Reference Yen, Yang and Hsieh27 found that preeclampsia increased the risk of VLBW. Additionally, a population-based study showed that chronic hypertension increased the probability of SGA after adjusting for important confounders. Therefore, the effects of high E2 levels on SGA occurrence, accounting for neonatal sex and gestational weeks, should be further explored. SGA is an important cause of neonatal death; it affects physical and mental development during childhood and adolescence and is associated with significantly increased arterial stiffness and metabolic dysfunction during adulthood. Reference Chan, Morris, Leslie, Kelly and Gallery28

Plausible biological mechanisms

The results of our study suggest that supraphysiological E2 levels on the day of hCG trigger may contribute to SGA pathogenesis; however, the exact biological mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unknown. The main mechanisms addressed in the research are as follows. First, Valbuena et al. Reference Valbuena, Martin, de Pablo, Remohi, Pellicer and Simon29 reported that high E2 levels were deleterious to embryo adhesion in vitro, mainly because they exert direct toxic effects on embryos. Moreover, Ertzeid G et al. Reference Ertzeid and Storeng30 performed a study using an embryo donation model in mice and concluded that ovarian stimulation appeared to impair embryo quality and uterine milieu. Additionally, Bittner et al. Reference Bittner, Horsthemke, Winterhager and Grummer31 analyzed the effects of ovulation on embryonic development in mice and showed that a supraphysiological hormonal milieu had toxic effects on fertility and embryonic development during ART treatment. Second, at least in animal models, elevated E2 levels also affect normal trophoblastic vascular invasion. Albrecht et al. Reference Albrecht, Bonagura, Burleigh, Enders, Aberdeen and Pepe32 reported that E2 during early baboon pregnancy suppressed the extravillous trophoblast invasion of uterine spiral arteries. In addition, Bonagura et al. Reference Bonagura, Babischkin, Aberdeen, Pepe and Albrecht33 found that prematurely elevating E2 during the early stages of baboon pregnancies diminished uterine artery remodeling and affected the expression of extravillous placental vascular endothelial growth factors, thereby potentially contributing to neonatal SGA and LBW pathogeneses. Consistent with these animal model studies, human research has shown that elevated E2 levels can affect endometrial receptivity Reference Simon, Cano, Valbuena, Remohi and Pellicer34 by altering endometrial gene expression profiles, Reference Haouzi, Assou and Mahmoud35,Reference Horcajadas, Riesewijk and Polman36 leading to abnormal implantation and placentation. Ng et al. Reference Ng, Chan, Tang, Yeung and Ho37 used 3D ultrasound examination to reconfirm that ovarian stimulated cycles were associated with lower endometrial and subendometrial blood flow than natural cycles. Kolibianakis et al., Reference Kolibianakis, Bourgain and Albano38 using aspirational endometrial biopsies, observed more advanced endometrial maturation in fresh embryo cycles. Given this evidence from both humans and animals, supraphysiological levels of E2 after COH expose embryos to an abnormal uterine and endometrial environment, which negatively affects the embryo quality, extravillous trophoblast invasion, endometrial receptivity, and placental development, thus disrupting fetal growth.

Regarding maternal weight, we found that lower BMI was associated with higher risks of SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW, although our study did not explore specific values. Consistent with the findings from a prior prospective multicenter cohort study, low maternal birth weight was an independent risk factor for SGA. Reference McCowan, Roberts and Dekker39 Spada et al. Reference Spada, Chiossi, Coscia, Monari and Facchinetti40 reported that maternal height and BMI should be considered when evaluating birth weight. In further research, we will explore the effects of maternal BMI on offspring birth weights to provide suggestions for clinics to reduce the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Such research will require a large prospective data sample for the examined population.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include its large data set (n = 3131). To our knowledge, our study, for which selection and statistical bias were minimized, is the largest investigation (n = 3131) to explore the effect of serum E2 levels on the day of hCG trigger on SGA for fresh ET cycles. Moreover, to reduce potential bias, our study accounted for variables that could potentially impact neonatal birth weight, including maternal age, BMI, parity, infertility type, infertility diagnosis, gonadotropin dosage, endometrial thickness on the hCG trigger day, ART method, embryo stage, number of embryos transferred, delivery mode, neonatal sex, and E2 levels on the day of hCG trigger. Another strength of our study is that our findings are applicable to clinical practice: when E2 ≥4000 pg/ml, embryos should be frozen and ET performed later in the subsequent cycle.

Our study was limited by its retrospective design; therefore, a prospective cohort study is needed. Furthermore, between-group differences were found in certain baseline characteristics, including BMI (P = 0·00), infertility diagnosis (P = 0·01), basal FSH (P = 0·01), AMH (P = 0·00), antral follicle count (P = 0·00), gonadotropin dosage (P = 0·00), number of embryos retrieved (P = 0·00), endometrial thickness on the hCG trigger day (P = 0·03), and embryo stage (P = 0·00); however, multivariable regression analysis was performed to minimize sources of bias.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results indicated that for fresh ET cycles, supraphysiological E2 (≥4000 pg/ml) on the day of hCG trigger increases the risks of singleton SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW, further confirming the adverse effects of a supraphysiological hormonal environment on offspring safety. Additionally, our study demonstrated that lower maternal BMI is an independent risk factor for SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW; however, the exact mechanism is unclear.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

All data are included in this article and its additional files.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

We did not receive any funding for this study

Authors’ contributions

SLJ and ZJW selected the population to be included and excluded, complete data statistics and analysis as well as complete manuscript writing. And ZJW and DMZ contributed equally to this article. SLJ participated in research design, guidance, and manuscript revision.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Footnotes

The first two authors should be considered similar in author order.

References

Pereira, N, Rosenwaks, Z. A fresh(er) perspective on frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(2), 257258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gliozheni, O, Calhaz-Jorge, C, De Geyter, C, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(10), 19571973.Google Scholar
Rienzi, L, Gracia, C, Maggiulli, R, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23(2), 139155.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Du, M, Li, Z, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2018; 11(1), 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sazonova, A, Kallen, K, Thurin-Kjellberg, A, Wennerholm, UB, Bergh, C. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(5), 13431350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kansal Kalra, S, Ratcliffe, SJ, Milman, L, Gracia, CR, Coutifaris, C, Barnhart, KT. Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(2), 548553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wennerholm, UB, Henningsen, AK, Romundstad, LB, et al. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(9), 25452553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalra, SK, Ratcliffe, SJ, Coutifaris, C, Molinaro, T, Barnhart, KT. Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(4), 863871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imudia, AN, Awonuga, AO, Doyle, JO, et al. Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(6), 13741379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imudia, AN, Awonuga, AO, Kaimal, AJ, Wright, DL, Styer, AK, Toth, TL. Elective cryopreservation of all embryos with subsequent cryothaw embryo transfer in patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduces the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(1), 168173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, N, Reichman, DE, Goldschlag, DE, Lekovich, JP, Rosenwaks, Z. Impact of elevated peak serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the birth weight of term singletons from fresh IVF-ET cycles. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2015; 32(4), 527532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, S, Kuang, Y, Wu, Y, et al. High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum beta-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(2), 189196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, N, Elias, RT, Christos, PJ, et al. Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(7), 14101417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M, Hao, C, Bao, H, et al. Effect of elevated estradiol levels on the hCG administration day on IVF pregnancy and birth outcomes in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: analysis of 3393 cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 295(2), 407414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, C, Cho, K, Shan, A, et al. Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian stimulation is not associated with lower levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a or small for gestational age infants: a cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2017; 39(10), 870879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, L, Deng, C, Li, Y, et al. Birth weight reference percentiles for Chinese. PloS One. 2014; 9(8), e104779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieve, LA, Meikle, SF, Ferre, C, Peterson, HB, Jeng, G, Wilcox, LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(10), 731737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, M, Kurinczuk, JJ, Bower, C, Webb, S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(10), 725730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisborg, K, Ingerslev, HJ, Henriksen, TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(6), 21022106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, SD, Han, Z, Mulla, S, Ohlsson, A, Beyene, J, Murphy, KE. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 148(2), 105113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieve, LA, Rasmussen, SA, Buck, GM, Schendel, DE, Reynolds, MA, Wright, VC. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes? Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(6), 11541163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti, E, Mazzotti, S, Calderoni, S, Saviozzi, I, Guzzetta, A. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk of autism spectrum disorders? A systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(12), 33163327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohlmann, MK, Fritzsching, B, Luedders, DW, et al. Impact of assisted reproduction on obstetrics and neonatology. Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2009; 213(6), 221227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shih, W, Rushford, DD, Bourne, H, et al. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(7), 16441653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, XL, Feng, C, Lin, XH, et al. High maternal serum estradiol environment in the first trimester is associated with the increased risk of small-for-gestational-age birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(6), 22172224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Z, Li, R, Ma, Y, et al. Effect of HCG-day serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on pregnancy outcomes in GnRH agonist cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 24(5), 511520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, TA, Yang, HI, Hsieh, WS, et al. Preeclampsia and the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in VLBW infants: a population based study. PloS One. 2013; 8(9), e75168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, PY, Morris, JM, Leslie, GI, Kelly, PJ, Gallery, ED. The long-term effects of prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction on cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic function. Int J Pediat. 2010; 2010, 280402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valbuena, D, Martin, J, de Pablo, JL, Remohi, J, Pellicer, A, Simon, C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(5), 962968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertzeid, G, Storeng, R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(2), 221225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittner, AK, Horsthemke, B, Winterhager, E, Grummer, R. Hormone-induced delayed ovulation affects early embryonic development. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(7), 23902394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albrecht, ED, Bonagura, TW, Burleigh, DW, Enders, AC, Aberdeen, GW, Pepe, GJ. Suppression of extravillous trophoblast invasion of uterine spiral arteries by estrogen during early baboon pregnancy. Placenta. 2006; 27(4–5), 483490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonagura, TW, Babischkin, JS, Aberdeen, GW, Pepe, GJ, Albrecht, ED. Prematurely elevating estradiol in early baboon pregnancy suppresses uterine artery remodeling and expression of extravillous placental vascular endothelial growth factor and alpha1beta1 and alpha5beta1 integrins. Endocrinology. 2012; 153(6), 28972906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, C, Cano, F, Valbuena, D, Remohi, J, Pellicer, A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(9), 24322437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haouzi, D, Assou, S, Mahmoud, K, et al. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(6), 14361445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horcajadas, JA, Riesewijk, A, Polman, J, et al. Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005; 11(3), 195205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, EH, Chan, CC, Tang, OS, Yeung, WS, Ho, PC. Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(10), 23852390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolibianakis, E, Bourgain, C, Albano, C, et al. Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78(5), 10251029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCowan, LM, Roberts, CT, Dekker, GA, et al. Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age infants by customised birthweight centiles: data from an international prospective cohort study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 117(13), 15991607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spada, E, Chiossi, G, Coscia, A, Monari, F, Facchinetti, F. Effect of maternal age, height, BMI and ethnicity on birth weight: an Italian multicenter study. J Perinat Med. 2017. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Overview of the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Figure 1

Table 1. Material and cycle characteristics between A and E groups

Figure 2

Table 2. Odds ratio of SGA, LBW, VLBW, PTB, and full-term LBW with increasing E2 levels

Figure 3

Table 3. Multiple logistic regression analysis to account for confounding variables of SGA, LBW, and full-term LBW