Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T00:01:52.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of the periconceptional environment on the programming of adult disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

A. J. Watkins*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK
E. S. Lucas
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK
T. P. Fleming
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK
*
Address for correspondence: A. J. Watkins, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX, UK. (Email ajw7@soton.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The periconceptional period of mammalian development has been identified as an early ‘developmental window’ during which environmental conditions may influence the pattern of future growth and physiology. Studies in humans and animal models have revealed that factors such as maternal nutritional status or in vitro culture and manipulation of developing gametes and preimplantation embryos can impact upon the long-term health and physiology of the offspring. However, the mechanisms involved in the programming of adult disease in response to altered periconceptional development require increased investigation. The role of epigenetic modifications to DNA and chromatin organisation has been identified as a likely mechanism through which environmental perturbations can affect gene expression patterns resulting in phenotypic change. This study will highlight the sensitivity of two critical stages in early mammalian development, gametogenesis and preimplantation development. We will detail how changes to the immediate environment can not only impact upon developmental processes taking place at that time, but can also affect long-term aspects of offspring health and physiology. We will also discuss the emerging role of epigenetics as a mechanistic link between the environment and the later phenotype of the developing organism.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2009

Introduction

It is now well established that the risk of developing cardiovascular and metabolic disease in adulthood may stem not only from lifestyle factors and genetic predisposition, but can also be attributed to the nature of development in utero. Retrospective epidemiological observations made by Barker and colleagues in the late 1980s identified a causal association between sub-optimal foetal growth and an increased propensity for cardiovascular disease in later life.Reference Barker and Osmond1, Reference Barker, Osmond, Golding, Kuh and Wadsworth2 Since then, similar observations have been reported from several large independent human cohort studies from around the world,Reference de Rooij, Painter and Roseboom3Reference Ravelli, van der Meulen and Michels6 identifying a link between sub-optimal foetal growth and increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, hypertension, elevated cholesterol and cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Interestingly, studies have revealed both short and long term effects on development, dependent on the timing and nature of the altered intrauterine environments. Analysis of women who became pregnant during the Dutch Hunger Winter, a period of 5 months famine in the winter of 1944–1945 in Amsterdam, revealed that maternal undernutrition during embryonic or early foetal development induced an enhanced risk of coronary heart disease, increased body mass index, and glucose intolerance in their offspring.Reference de Rooij, Painter and Roseboom3, Reference Painter, de Rooij and Bossuyt7, Reference Ravelli, van der Meulen, Osmond, Barker and Bleker8 However, mothers who became pregnant prior to the famine and experienced malnutrition during the later stages of pregnancy gave birth to children of reduced birth weights but who then became obese in adulthood.Reference Ravelli, van der Meulen, Osmond, Barker and Bleker8, Reference McMillen and Robinson9 Similarly, protein-derived energy levels during early pregnancy have been positively associated with placental and birth weights,Reference Moore and Davies10 whilst low maternal dietary protein intake during late pregnancy results in babies that are thinner at birth.Reference Godfrey, Barker, Robinson and Osmond11

The use of animal models provides an invaluable tool with which it is possible to precisely control and target maternal nutrition to specific gestational periods, given the obvious barriers to such studies in humans. Numerous animal studies have demonstrated that the earliest stages of development display particular sensitivity to the effects of altered maternal nutrition, response to which may influence the pattern of future growth and physiology via several developmental pathways. Early gestational nutrient restriction in sheep alters cardiovascular function and circulating cortisol levels in the foetus,Reference Gardner, Pearce and Dandrea12, Reference Gardner, Van Bon and Dandrea13 and results in the hypertrophy of the cardiac muscle in adult offspring.Reference McMillen and Robinson9, Reference Cleal, Poore and Boullin14, Reference Gluckman, Hanson and Beedle15 Our own studies have revealed that whilst maternal low protein diet (LPD) given throughout gestation in the mouse induces hypertension within the adult offspring, targeting the LPD exposure exclusively to the preimplantation period exacerbates the effect, inducing a spectrum of alterations in postnatal cardiovascular and behavioural phenotype.Reference Watkins, Ursell and Panton16 Similarly, in the rat model, maternal protein restriction exclusive to the preimplantation period is sufficient to cause adult hypertension.Reference Kwong, Wild, Roberts, Willis and Fleming17 In response to studies like these, attention is now beginning to focus on understanding the molecular mechanisms by which environmental conditions can affect long-term development, such as epigenetic change within the genome of the developing offspring.

Epigenetics and developmental programming

Epigenetic modifications result in specific packaging of chromatin to generate either a transcriptionally permissive or repressed state at a given locus, which can vary in a temporal or tissue-specific manner. As such, these modifications can influence the gene expression status of specific regions of DNA, without altering the underlying nucleotide sequence, thus providing a causal mechanism linking a single genotype with multiple phenotypic outcomes.Reference Waddington18 In mammals, these modifications include the methylation of DNA at cytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides, addition of methyl, phospho or acetyl groups to specific residues within histone tails and the recruitment of multiprotein chromatin remodelling complexes.Reference Kim, Samaranayake and Pradhan19 During both gametogenesis and preimplantation development the mammalian genome undergoes an extensive reorganisation of epigenetic marks, in order to establish the appropriate patterns for differentiation and tissue-specific gene expression.Reference Santos and Dean20 Investigations into environmentally induced epigenetic changes during development frequently focus on imprinted genes, wherein parent-specific expression is achieved by epigenetic silencing of one allele and monoallelic expression subsequently occurs from the active allele. However, genes expressed in a tissue-specific manner and regions of non-coding repetitive DNA, both of which are frequently epigenetically modified, are just as likely to be influenced by environmental factors during development.Reference Thurston, Lucas, Allegrucci, Steele and Young21In vitro or in vivo environmental conditions may feasibly impact on the epigenetic remodelling which takes place during germline and early embryonic development, thus altering the methylation status of gene promoters and potentially resulting in downstream alterations in their expression and implications for offspring long-term health.Reference Kwong, Miller and Ursell22, Reference Young, Fernandes and McEvoy23

Gametogenesis

Mammalian gametogenesis is a highly orchestrated series of events, resulting in the differentiation and production of highly specialized, developmentally competent haploid gametes. However, despite the critical function of gametogenesis in reproduction and development, the mechanisms regulating this process are at present poorly defined. Human and animal gametes are routinely subjected to non-physiological conditions both in vitro and in vivo, despite our limited knowledge about their sensitivity to such manipulations and the potential long-term impacts on the resultant offspring.

Mammalian oogenesis has been shown to display sensitivity to its immediate environment, such that gene expression patterns within the ovary,Reference Martin, Pearson and Brenneman24 oocyteReference Watson, De and Caveney25 and resultant blastocystsReference Russell, Baqir, Bordignon and Betts26 can be altered. Both in vitro culture and suboptimal maternal diet during oocyte development and maturation have been shown to impact on embryo developmentReference Wakefield, Lane and Schulz27 and the future health of offspring in several species.Reference Howie, Sloboda, Kamal and Vickers28Reference Watkins, Wilkins and Cunningham30 In domestic animals, follicular growth and oocyte quality have been shown to be altered by a range of dietary manipulations.Reference Armstrong, McEvoy and Baxter31 Follicle morphology, number and the composition of follicular fluid in ewes and heifers are all affected by maternal dietary energy levels.Reference Boland, Lonergan and O’Callaghan32, Reference O’Callaghan, Yaakub, Hyttel, Spicer and Boland33 Increased intake of dietary protein and urea elevate ammonia levels in follicular fluid and lead to reduced blastocyst development.Reference McEvoy, Robinson, Aitken, Findlay and Robertson34, Reference Sinclair, Kuran, Gebbie, Webb and McEvoy35 In mice, significantly decreased cell numbers were observed in the blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) after feeding the females with diets of high or low in protein for several weeks prior to fertilization.Reference Mitchell, Schulz, Armstrong and Lane36 These morphological changes occurred in unison with elevated markers of metabolic stress in high protein diet embryos, whilst an apparent reduction of metabolic activity was observed in LPD embryos.Reference Mitchell, Schulz, Armstrong and Lane36 Such changes may have far-reaching consequences for the developing offspring. Maternal periconceptional undernutrition in the sheep increases foetal blood pressure, alters growth dynamics of the fetus and placenta and increases the activation of the foetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.Reference Edwards and McMillen37Reference McMillen, MacLaughlin, Muhlhausler, Gentili, Duffield and Morrison40 Feeding sheep diets deficient in B vitamins and methionine, which are essential factors for the methyl cycle, during the periconceptional period resulted in offspring who became heavier and fatter than controls, displayed altered immune responses, became insulin-resistant and had elevated blood pressure.Reference Sinclair, Allegrucci and Singh29 These authors also reported wide spread changes in methylation status of the foetal liver genome, demonstrating the interaction between maternal environment and epigenetic modification.Reference Sinclair, Allegrucci and Singh29 While the findings of such studies have resulted from dietary intervention for several weeks preceding conception, the window of oocyte sensitivity has been refined even further to encompass just the final stages of maturation with the demonstration that maternal LPD provided for just 3.5 days prior to fertilisation resulted in offspring displaying elevated blood pressure, impaired vascular responsiveness, altered anxiety-related behaviour and changes in kidney glomerular numbers.Reference Watkins, Wilkins and Cunningham30

One manipulation routinely used in human assisted reproduction and in domestic animal production and conservation, as well as in experimental settings, is the process of superovulation. Large doses of hormones are used to induce the maturation and ovulation of multiple oocytes at the same time. However, this practice has been reported to affect the developmental competence of the embryo in mice,Reference Shi and Haaf41 as well as leading to the appearance of abnormal DNA methylation patterns within embryonic and foetal DNA,Reference Fortier, Lopes, Darricarrere, Martel and Trasler42 and altered DNA methylation patterns in the sperm of male offspring, with subsequent transgenerational inheritance.Reference Stouder, Deutsch and Paoloni-Giacobino43 The establishment of appropriate methylation patterns at imprinted gene loci takes place during meiosis I in the growing oocyte,Reference Allegrucci, Thurston, Lucas and Young44 thus the premature recruitment of oocytes by superovulation may result in incomplete establishment of genomic imprints and subsequent alterations in allelic expression of these genes. Temporal differences have been reported in the timing of DNA methylation establishment both at maternally imprinted genes during oocyte maturation,Reference Song, Min, Pan, Shi and Shen45 as well as at paternally imprinted genes during different stages of spermatogenesis,Reference Boyano, Andollo, Zalduendo and Arechaga46 thus the specific timing of adverse environmental stimuli may affect different genes and result in varied phenotypic outcomes. In vitro maturation of mouse, sheep and human oocytes has also been shown to reduce viability and developmental competence,Reference Barnes, Kausche, Tiglias, Wood, Wilton and Trounson47Reference Mikkelsen, Smith and Lindenberg50 and has been shown to alter foetal growth,Reference Bertolini, Mason and Beam48 again likely due to altering the temporal dynamics of the maturation process and the exposure to non-physiological culture conditions.

Less attention has been focused on the environmental sensitivity of spermatogenesis, however, several studies have shown adverse effects of in vitro and in vivo environments on sperm motility,Reference Polyzos, Schmid, Pina-Guzman, Quintanilla-Vega and Marchetti51, Reference Si, Men, Benson and Critser52 DNA breakageReference Polyzos, Schmid, Pina-Guzman, Quintanilla-Vega and Marchetti53 and apoptosis.Reference Anway, Rekow and Skinner54 These changes have been further associated with alterations in DNA methyltransferase expression and transgenerational inheritance of altered phenotype.Reference Anway, Rekow and Skinner54, Reference Lucas and Fleming55 The impact of maternal gestational nutritional status has also been highlighted as being fundamental for successful spermatogenesis. In rats, maternal dietary vitamin B12 deficiency results in defects of the testis development and spermatogenesis in male offspring.Reference Watanabe, Ebara and Kimura56 The subsequent feeding of a diet sufficient in B12 to male offspring, following exposure to a maternal vitamin B12 deficient diet, did lead to some recovery in seminiferous tubule development and spermatogenesis, although still not comparable to control animals.Reference Watanabe, Ebara and Kimura56In vitro organ culture experiments have also demonstrated specific windows of oestrogen-sensitivity in rat testicular development,Reference Delbes, Duquenne, Szenker, Taccoen, Habert and Levacher57 wherein cell proliferation is reduced specifically in testicular samples taken during foetal but not neonatal development, whilst inhibition of testosterone production is suppressed continually by oestrogen exposure.Reference Delbes, Duquenne, Szenker, Taccoen, Habert and Levacher57

The apparent sensitivity of the maturing gametes to environmental factors clearly has implications for the success of embryonic and foetal development, as well as for the health of the resulting adult. However, this sensitivity is certainly not limited to the gametes and post-fertilisation environment may be equally as important to the future phenotype and disease propensity.

Preimplantation embryo development

The relatively short developmental time from fertilisation to implantation encompasses several critical events. These include the first cleavage division, the timing of which can be an indicator of developmental competence;Reference Lonergan, Khatir, Piumi, Rieger, Humblot and Boland58 a switch in the regulation of development from maternally stored transcripts and proteins to the activation of the embryonic genome; and embryo compaction at the morula stage which permits the formation of the blastocyst. At the blastocyst stage, the embryo is composed of two distinct cell populations; the outer polarised epithelial trophectoderm (TE) cells and the inner pluripotent non-polar ICM cells. From these two lineages the chorioallantoic placenta and foetal tissues are derived respectively. The establishment of differential DNA methylation and histone tail modifications of the ICM and TE lineages marks a major differentiation landmark in the developing embryo, and the allocation of cells to these lineages can be predicted by the asymmetry of histone modifications within the chromatin of blastomeres during the cleavage stages.Reference Thurston, Lucas, Allegrucci, Steele and Young59, Reference Torres-Padilla60 Manipulation of the extent of DNA methylation in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, which are derived from the ICM, has been shown to be capable of influencing cell fate decisions. ES cells deficient in the maintenance DNA methyltransferase, Dnmt1, and thus hypomethylated, have been reported to differentiate readily into trophoblast derivatives in association with a loss of methylation at the Elf5 promoter region.Reference Ng, Dean and Dawson61 Since Dnmt1 null embryos fail to develop past E8.5, in association with a failure to differentiate during gastrulation,Reference Li, Bestor and Jaenisch62 the importance of establishing appropriate methylation patterns during early embryonic development cannot be underestimated.

During preimplantation development, changing metabolic requirements and sensitivity to the stimulatory effects of essential and non essential amino acids, as well as the expression of different growth factors and their receptors, occur in a spatial and temporal fashion.Reference Gardner, Lane, Stevens and Schoolcraft63Reference Martin and Leese65 The maternal reproductive tract responds to these changing requirements by providing oviductal and uterine environments that match precisely the needs of the developing embryo,Reference Casslen66, Reference Gardner, Lane, Calderon and Leeton67 with oviductal culture resulting in a embryonic gene expression profile almost identical to that of in vivo derived blastocystsReference Corcoran, Fair and Park68 and culture in oviductal fluid improving cleavage and blastocysts rates.Reference Lloyd, Romar and Matas69 It is therefore imperative that a better understanding of this intimate maternal-embryo interaction and the implications of manipulating are gained in order to minimise the potential for negative consequences during pregnancy and post-gestational life.

Environmental manipulation in vitro and in vivo

In vitro culture and embryo manipulation are widely used for treatment of human infertility, derivation of ES cell lines and the preservation of endangered or important domestic and wild animal species. However, despite advances in these techniques and the development of enhanced culture media, in vitro culture conditions still remain relatively sub-optimal in relation to the in vivo environment when examining blastocyst developmental rates, ICM and TE cell numbers, gene expression and post-transfer viability.Reference Fernandez-Gonzalez, Moreira and Bilbao70Reference Lonergan, Rizos and Kanka73

Variations in culture media components have been shown to impact on the developmental potential of mouse embryos in vitro in several studies in a strain specific manner.Reference Dandekar and Glass74 The addition of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1 and albumin to the media stimulates mouse embryo metabolism, increases the number of cells within the ICM and stimulates foetal growth post transfer.Reference Harvey and Kaye75Reference Mihalik, Rehak and Koppel77 Embryo culture in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), when in the absence of albumin, can enhance blastocyst cell numbers and ICM development.Reference Karagenc, Lane and Gardner78 The addition of GM-CSF to the culture medium has also been shown to prevent the negative impacts on adverse foetal, placental and postnatal development associated with embryo culture and transfer and to increase the surface area of placental trophoblast available for nutrient exchange.Reference Sjoblom, Roberts, Wikland and Robertson79 Changes in metabolic and signalling activity in response to in vivo or in vitro environments are more than likely to be accompanied by changes in gene expression patterns. Comparison of bovine blastocysts derived from in vitro or in vivo environments have revealed that culture induces significant changes in transcript levels of genes involved in a wide array of key developmental pathways such as transcription and translation, cellular metabolism,Reference Lloyd, Romar and Matas69 nutrient transport, apoptosis and gap junction formation.Reference Rizos, Gutierrez-Adan, Perez-Garnelo, de la, Boland and Lonergan80 Interestingly, these changes occur in a temporal fashion,Reference Wrenzycki, Herrmann, Carnwath and Niemann81, Reference Lonergan, Rizos and Gutierrez-Adan82 indicating that specific pathways may vary in the timing of their sensitivity to the environment. Survival rates following embryo transfer have also been shown to be compromised following the culture or manipulation of bovine embryos.Reference Dandekar and Glass74, Reference Mansouri-Attia, Sandra and Aubert83 The bovine endometrium has been shown to display a plasticity in its gene expression patterns in response to embryos derived from somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer (SCNT) or in vitro fertilisation (IVF),Reference Mansouri-Attia, Sandra and Aubert83 suggesting that the influence of the in vitro culture environment may persist even after the culture period. Furthermore, the inclusion of non-physiological levels of some nutrients, such as methyl-folate cycle cofactors, may affect the establishment and maintenance of epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation during embryo cultureReference Steele, Allegrucci and Singh84 with consequences likely to extend into foetal and adult life.

There is now increasing evidence that the effects of in vitro culture and embryo manipulation do in fact extend far beyond preimplantation and foetal development, altering perinatal and adult development. In cattle and sheep, the phenomenon of large offspring syndrome has been recorded following a range of embryo environment manipulations, including in vitro culture in the presence of serum, cloning by SCNT, exposure to a maternal uterine environment high in progesterone, and granulosa cell co-culture.Reference Sinclair, McEvoy and Maxfield85Reference Yang, Smith, Tian, Lewin, Renard and Wakayama87 As a result a range of foetal and postnatal consequences including enhanced foetal growth and weight at birth, alterations in organ sizing and elevated rates of sudden perinatal death have been reported.Reference Sinclair, McEvoy and Maxfield85, Reference Thompson, Gardner, Pugh, McMillan and Tervit88, Reference Wells, Misica and Tervit89 Studies from our own laboratory have demonstrated that both prolonged (two-cell to blastocyst) or relatively short-term (approximately 2 h immediately prior to blastocyst transfer) periods of in vitro culture significantly elevated offspring postnatal systolic blood pressure.Reference Watkins, Platt and Papenbrock72 Significant changes in the activity of key homoeostatic enzymes regulating both cardiovascular (serum angiotensin converting enzyme) and metabolic (hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PEPCK) pathways were also observed in female offspring.Reference Watkins, Platt and Papenbrock72 Significant changes in postnatal memory and growth profiles have also been demonstrated following the in vitro culture and transfer of mouse embryos.Reference Fernandez-Gonzalez, Moreira and Bilbao70, Reference Ecker, Stein and Xu90 Recently, it has been demonstrated that the effects of embryo culture can even perpetuate into a second generation. Significant changes in postnatal growth and organ sizes following mouse embryo culture and transfer were transmitted to the F2 generation, despite no further manipulations being performed.Reference Mahsoudi, Li and O’Neill91 This suggests that a ‘memory’ of the environmental change experienced by the F0 dam is retained in the genome of the offspring, likely by an epigenetic change within the germline.

With approximately 1%–3% of births in developed countries involving some form of assisted reproduction technology (ART),Reference Manipalviratn, DeCherney and Segars92 an increasing number of long-term follow-up studies into the health and development of ART children are being conducted. Increased incidences of prematurity and low birth weight have been widely associated with ART, but often have been attributed to a higher frequency of multiple births following the transfer of several embryos.Reference Fauser, Devroey and Macklon93, Reference Steel and Sutcliffe94 However, there is evidence to suggest that even singleton ART children are at risk from preterm birth and low birth weight.Reference Helmerhorst, Perquin, Donker and Keirse95 Some studies have reported slight but non-significant specific neuro-developmental conditions in ART childrenReference Belva, Henriet, Liebaers, Van, Celestin-Westreich and Bonduelle96Reference Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, Bonduelle and Barnes98 and several studies have shown an association between IVF and an increased incidence of cerebral palsy.Reference Hvidtjorn, Schieve and Schendel99, Reference Stromberg, Dahlquist, Ericson, Finnstrom, Koster and Stjernqvist100 Additionally, elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and elevated fasting glucose levels have been reported in pre-pubertal IVF children, independent of early life factors or parental characteristics.Reference Ceelen, van Weissenbruch, Vermeiden, van Leeuwen and Delemarre-van de Waal101

In humans, the use of ART has also been associated with increased incidence of several imprinting disorders, including Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Angelman syndrome and Silver-Russel syndrome.Reference Helmerhorst, Perquin, Donker and Keirse95 Abnormal DNA methylation profiles at a cluster of imprinted genes on human chromosome 11p15.5, in association with loss of imprinted mono-allelic expression, have been reported to associate with the incidence of these syndromes.Reference Helmerhorst, Perquin, Donker and Keirse95 However, a recent study has shown altered methylation status of the KvDMR imprinting control region (ICR) at this locus even in clinically normal children after assisted conception.Reference Gomes, Huber, Ferriani, maral Neto and Ramos102 Investigation into the impact of ICR hypomethylation on gene expression in these children would be needed to identify a functional outcome of the altered methylation status, and to tease out the possible role of specific in vitro manipulations. Importantly, imprinted genes are not the only genomic loci that demonstrate epigenetic sensitivity during early development.Reference Thurston, Lucas, Allegrucci, Steele and Young103 The Agouti viable yellow (A vy) allele in mice is one example whereby a repetitive element situated within a gene (in this case controlling coat colour) can be regulated by DNA methylation. Environmental conditions, such as diet or embryo culture, have been used to experimentally alter the methylation status of this locus,Reference Morgan, Jin, Li, Whitelaw and O’Neill104, Reference Waterland and Jirtle105 providing a visual read-out of methylation change via the coat colour of the mouse. In vitro mouse embryo manipulations have been shown to reduce methylation at the A vy locus, shifting coat colours from pseudo-agouti (brown) to mottled or yellow coats, with a significant increase in proportion of animals with yellow or mottled coats observed with increasing duration/extent of manipulation.Reference Morgan, Jin, Li, Whitelaw and O’Neill104 Maternal dietary manipulation can also affect the methylation status at the A vy locus. Supplementation of maternal diet with methyl cycle donors and cofactors, including choline, folic acid and vitamin B12, increases methylation levels resulting in a coat colour shift in offspring towards the pseudo-agouti brown associated with CpG methylation, and thus silencing, of the IAP repetitive element within the A vy gene.Reference Waterland and Jirtle105

The long-term impact of maternal nutrition during preimplantation development on the programming of offspring development has been extensively covered in recent studies.Reference Lucas and Fleming55, Reference Watkins, Papenbrock and Fleming106, Reference Watkins and Fleming107 The large majority of studies examining the role of maternal diet and its effects on subsequent foetal and postnatal health, have centred on the use of diets altered for protein content, and have typically been coupled with the use of rodent models. In studies from our laboratory, maternal LPD diet targeted exclusively to the rodent preimplantation period results in a range of embryonic, foetal and postnatal consequences, including altered blastocyst cell numbers, altered foetal liver gene expression of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (Hsd11b1) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Pepck, Pck1), postnatal hypertension increased patterns of anxiety-related behaviour in an open field test, and alter the relative sizes of organs.Reference Watkins, Ursell and Panton16, Reference Kwong, Wild, Roberts, Willis and Fleming108, Reference Kwong, Miller and Wilkins109 Interestingly, we further identified a compensatory response mediated by the visceral yolk sac in response to maternal gestational LPD. We observed that endocytosis of maternal proteins mainly via the multi-ligand megalin low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2 receptor was increased in response to LPD.Reference Watkins, Ursell and Panton16 This elevation of yolk sac histiotrophic function appeared subject to developmental plasticity, providing a mechanism by which embryos could respond to maternal undernutrition in order to protect foetal growth and postnatal competive fitness. In the sheep, maternal undernutrition from days 0–30/31 of pregnancy increases circulating plasma cortisol levels in female lambs and altered cardiovascular function of lambs at 1 year of age.Reference Gardner, Pearce and Dandrea12, Reference Gardner, Van Bon and Dandrea13

Conclusions

There is now a growing body of evidence that factors such as maternal nutrition, hormonal imbalance, in vitro culture conditions and other environmental factors can have a profound effect on gamete quality and subsequent embryo development (Fig. 1). This has clear implications and relevance for the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease hypothesis. It is also becoming increasingly apparent that changes to the normal pattern of early development can result in long-term changes in offspring health and physiology. It is therefore imperative that a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and signalling pathways involved is established. Whilst the mechanisms and pathways involved in postnatal programming of adult health following adverse preimplantation embryo environments are likely to be complex and involve several interacting pathways, epigenetic changes occurring during germline and preimplantation development may be one critical mechanism through which the early-life environment can affect subsequent disease susceptibility, and even result in the transmission of environmentally induced phenotypic change between generations. However, further studies are still required for a better understanding of how the mammalian embryo responds to its immediate environment and the potential long-term programming effects that can occur. Whilst our understanding of certain physiological systems are well characterised (cardiovascular), areas such as digestive function, the immune system and cognative functions are understood to a lesser extent. It is also essential that further development of existing animals models occur if we are to define the limits of the early mammalian embryo, and design improved conditions for the culture and manipulation of human embryos. As most ART children are still relatively young, a wider analysis of postnatal phenotype focusing on cardiovascular and metabolic profiles, as well as substantiation of those effects already well characterised from animal studies is required in these children.

Fig. 1 (Colour online) A summary diagram detailing the impact of environmental conditions on gametogenesis and development, and the short- and long term consequences which may be observed.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the BBSRC (grant number BBF007450), the National Institutes of Health, USA as part of the NICHD National Cooperative Program on Female Health and Egg Quality under cooperative agreement (grant number U01 HD04435) and the Gerald Kerkut Charitable Trust.

References

1.Barker, DJ, Osmond, C. Low birth weight and hypertension. Br Med J. 1988; 297, 134135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Barker, DJ, Osmond, C, Golding, J, Kuh, D, Wadsworth, ME. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Br Med J. 1989; 298, 564567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.de Rooij, SR, Painter, RC, Roseboom, TJ, et al. Glucose tolerance at age 58 and the decline of glucose tolerance in comparison with age 50 in people prenatally exposed to the Dutch famine. Diabetologia. 2006; 49, 637643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Eriksson, JG, Forsen, T, Tuomilehto, J, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ. Early growth and coronary heart disease in later life: longitudinal study. Br Med J. 2001; 322, 949953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Forsen, T, Eriksson, JG, Tuomilehto, J, Teramo, K, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ. Mother’s weight in pregnancy and coronary heart disease in a cohort of Finnish men: follow up study. Br Med J. 1997; 315, 837840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ravelli, AC, van der Meulen, JH, Michels, RP, et al. Glucose tolerance in adults after prenatal exposure to famine. Lancet. 1998; 351, 173177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Painter, RC, de Rooij, SR, Bossuyt, PM, et al. Early onset of coronary artery disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006; 84, 322327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ravelli, AC, van der Meulen, JH, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ, Bleker, OP. Obesity at the age of 50 y in men and women exposed to famine prenatally. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 70, 811816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.McMillen, IC, Robinson, JS. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85, 571633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Moore, VM, Davies, MJ. Diet during pregnancy, neonatal outcomes and later health. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2005; 17, 341348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Godfrey, KM, Barker, DJ, Robinson, S, Osmond, C. Maternal birthweight and diet in pregnancy in relation to the infant’s thinness at birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104, 663667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Gardner, DS, Pearce, S, Dandrea, J, et al. Peri-implantation undernutrition programs blunted angiotensin II evoked baroreflex responses in young adult sheep. Hypertension. 2004; 43, 12901296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Gardner, DS, Van Bon, BW, Dandrea, J, et al. Effect of periconceptional undernutrition and gender on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in young adult sheep. J Endocrinol. 2006; 190, 203212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Cleal, JK, Poore, KR, Boullin, JP, et al. Mismatched pre- and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104, 95299533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Beedle, AS. Early life events and their consequences for later disease: a life history and evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol. 2007; 19, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Watkins, AJ, Ursell, E, Panton, R, et al. Adaptive responses by mouse early embryos to maternal diet protect fetal growth but predispose to adult onset disease. Biol Reprod. 2008; 78, 299306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Kwong, WY, Wild, AE, Roberts, P, Willis, AC, Fleming, TP. Maternal undernutrition during the preimplantation period of rat development causes blastocyst abnormalities and programming of postnatal hypertension. Development. 2000; 127, 41954202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Waddington, CH. The epigenotype. Endeavour. 1942, 1820.Google Scholar
19.Kim, JK, Samaranayake, M, Pradhan, S. Epigenetic mechanisms in mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009; 66, 596612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Santos, F, Dean, W. Epigenetic reprogramming during early development in mammals. Reproduction. 2004; 127, 643651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Thurston, A, Lucas, ES, Allegrucci, C, Steele, W, Young, LE. Region-specific DNA methylation in the preimplantation embryo as a target for genomic plasticity. Theriogenology. 2007; 68(Suppl 1), S98S106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Kwong, WY, Miller, DJ, Ursell, E, et al. Imprinted gene expression in the rat embryo-fetal axis is altered in response to periconceptional maternal low protein diet. Reproduction. 2006; 132, 265277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Young, LE, Fernandes, K, McEvoy, TG, et al. Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture. Nat Genet. 2001; 27, 153154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Martin, B, Pearson, M, Brenneman, R, et al. Gonadal transcriptome alterations in response to dietary energy intake: sensing the reproductive environment. PLoS One. 2009; 4, e4146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Watson, AJ, De, SP, Caveney, A, et al. Impact of bovine oocyte maturation media on oocyte transcript levels, blastocyst development, cell number, and apoptosis. Biol Reprod. 2000; 62, 355364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Russell, DF, Baqir, S, Bordignon, J, Betts, DH. The impact of oocyte maturation media on early bovine embryonic development. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006; 73, 12551270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Wakefield, SL, Lane, M, Schulz, SJ, et al. Maternal supply of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids alter mechanisms involved in oocyte and early embryo development in the mouse. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 294, E425E434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Howie, GJ, Sloboda, DM, Kamal, T, Vickers, MH. Maternal nutritional history predicts obesity in adult offspring independent of postnatal diet. J Physiol. 2009; 587, 905915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Sinclair, KD, Allegrucci, C, Singh, R, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104, 1935119356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Watkins, AJ, Wilkins, A, Cunningham, C, et al. Low protein diet fed exclusively during mouse oocyte maturation leads to behavioural and cardiovascular abnormalities in offspring. J Physiol. 2008; 586, 22312244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Armstrong, DG, McEvoy, TG, Baxter, G, et al. Effect of dietary energy and protein on bovine follicular dynamics and embryo production in vitro: associations with the ovarian insulin-like growth factor system. Biol Reprod. 2001; 64, 16241632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Boland, MP, Lonergan, P, O’Callaghan, D. Effect of nutrition on endocrine parameters, ovarian physiology, and oocyte and embryo development. Theriogenology. 2001; 55, 13231340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.O’Callaghan, D, Yaakub, H, Hyttel, P, Spicer, LJ, Boland, MP. Effect of nutrition and superovulation on oocyte morphology, follicular fluid composition and systemic hormone concentrations in ewes. J Reprod Fertil. 2000; 118, 303313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.McEvoy, TG, Robinson, JJ, Aitken, RP, Findlay, PA, Robertson, IS. Dietary excesses of urea influence the viability and metabolism of preimplantation sheep embryos and may affect fetal growth among survivors. Anim Reprod Sci. 1997; 47, 7190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Sinclair, KD, Kuran, M, Gebbie, FE, Webb, R, McEvoy, TG. Nitrogen metabolism and fertility in cattle: II. Development of oocytes recovered from heifers offered diets differing in their rate of nitrogen release in the rumen. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78, 26702680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Mitchell, M, Schulz, SL, Armstrong, DT, Lane, M. Metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunction in early mouse embryos following maternal dietary protein intervention. Biol Reprod. 2009; 80, 622630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Edwards, LJ, McMillen, IC. Impact of maternal undernutrition during the periconceptional period, fetal number, and fetal sex on the development of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis in sheep during late gestation. Biol Reprod. 2002; 66, 15621569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Edwards, LJ, McMillen, IC. Periconceptional nutrition programs development of the cardiovascular system in the fetal sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 283, R669R679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Edwards, LJ, McFarlane, JR, Kauter, KG, McMillen, IC. Impact of periconceptional nutrition on maternal and fetal leptin and fetal adiposity in singleton and twin pregnancies. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 288, R39R45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.McMillen, IC, MacLaughlin, SM, Muhlhausler, BS, Gentili, S, Duffield, JL, Morrison, JL. Developmental origins of adult health and disease: the role of periconceptional and foetal nutrition. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008; 102, 8289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Shi, W, Haaf, T. Aberrant methylation patterns at the two-cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failure. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002; 63, 329334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Fortier, AL, Lopes, FL, Darricarrere, N, Martel, J, Trasler, JM. Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17, 16531665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Stouder, C, Deutsch, S, Paoloni-Giacobino, A. Superovulation in mice alters the methylation pattern of imprinted genes in the sperm of the offspring. Reprod Toxicol. 2009; 28, 536–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Allegrucci, C, Thurston, A, Lucas, E, Young, L. Epigenetics and the germline. Reproduction. 2005; 129, 137149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Song, Z, Min, L, Pan, Q, Shi, Q, Shen, W. Maternal imprinting during mouse oocyte growth in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 387, 800805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Boyano, MD, Andollo, N, Zalduendo, MM, Arechaga, J. Imprinting of mammalian male gametes is gene specific and does not occur at a single stage of differentiation. Int J Dev Biol. 2008; 52, 11051111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Barnes, FL, Kausche, A, Tiglias, J, Wood, C, Wilton, L, Trounson, A. Production of embryos from in vitro-matured primary human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65, 11511156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Bertolini, M, Mason, JB, Beam, SW, et al. Morphology and morphometry of in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine concepti from early pregnancy to term and association with high birth weights. Theriogenology. 2002; 58, 973994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Eppig, JJ, Schroeder, AC. Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1989; 41, 268276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50.Mikkelsen, AL, Smith, SD, Lindenberg, S. In-vitro maturation of human oocytes from regularly menstruating women may be successful without follicle stimulating hormone priming. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14, 18471851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Polyzos, A, Schmid, TE, Pina-Guzman, B, Quintanilla-Vega, B, Marchetti, F. Differential sensitivity of male germ cells to mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke in the mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009; 237, 298305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Si, W, Men, H, Benson, JD, Critser, JK. Osmotic characteristics and fertility of murine spermatozoa collected in different solutions. Reproduction. 2009; 137, 215223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53.Polyzos, A, Schmid, TE, Pina-Guzman, B, Quintanilla-Vega, B, Marchetti, F. Differential sensitivity of male germ cells to mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke in the mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009; 237, 298305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54.Anway, MD, Rekow, SS, Skinner, MK. Transgenerational epigenetic programming of the embryonic testis transcriptome. Genomics. 2008; 91, 3040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55.Lucas, ES, Fleming, TP. Developmental programming and epigenetics: DNA methylation makes its mark. Cell & Tissue Biology Research. 2009; 1, 1523.Google Scholar
56.Watanabe, T, Ebara, S, Kimura, S, et al. Maternal vitamin B12 deficiency affects spermatogenesis at the embryonic and immature stages in rats. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2007; 47, 915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Delbes, G, Duquenne, C, Szenker, J, Taccoen, J, Habert, R, Levacher, C. Developmental changes in testicular sensitivity to estrogens throughout fetal and neonatal life. Toxicol Sci. 2007; 99, 234243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58.Lonergan, P, Khatir, H, Piumi, F, Rieger, D, Humblot, P, Boland, MP. Effect of time interval from insemination to first cleavage on the developmental characteristics, sex ratio and pregnancy rate after transfer of bovine embryos. J Reprod Fertil. 1999; 117, 159167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59.Thurston, A, Lucas, ES, Allegrucci, C, Steele, W, Young, LE. Region-specific DNA methylation in the preimplantation embryo as a target for genomic plasticity. Theriogenology. 2007; 68(Suppl 1), S98S106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60.Torres-Padilla, ME. Cell identity in the preimplantation mammalian embryo: an epigenetic perspective from the mouse. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23, 12461252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61.Ng, RK, Dean, W, Dawson, C, et al. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10, 12801290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62.Li, E, Bestor, TH, Jaenisch, R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell. 1992; 69, 915926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63.Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Stevens, J, Schoolcraft, WB. Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76, 11751180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64.Lane, M, Gardner, DK. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil. 1997; 109, 153164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65.Martin, KL, Leese, HJ. Role of developmental factors in the switch from pyruvate to glucose as the major exogenous energy substrate in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1999; 11, 425433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66.Casslen, BG. Free amino acids in human uterine fluid. Possible role of high taurine concentration. J Reprod Med. 1987; 32, 181184.Google ScholarPubMed
67.Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Calderon, I, Leeton, J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65, 349353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68.Corcoran, D, Fair, T, Park, S, et al. Suppressed expression of genes involved in transcription and translation in in vitro compared with in vivo cultured bovine embryos. Reproduction. 2006; 131, 651660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69.Lloyd, RE, Romar, R, Matas, C, et al. Effects of oviductal fluid on the development, quality, and gene expression of porcine blastocysts produced in vitro. Reproduction. 2009; 137, 679687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70.Fernandez-Gonzalez, R, Moreira, P, Bilbao, A, et al. Long-term effect of in vitro culture of mouse embryos with serum on mRNA expression of imprinting genes, development, and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101, 58805885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71.Khosla, S, Dean, W, Brown, D, Reik, W, Feil, R. Culture of preimplantation mouse embryos affects fetal development and the expression of imprinted genes. Biol Reprod. 2001; 64, 918926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72.Watkins, AJ, Platt, D, Papenbrock, T, et al. Mouse embryo culture induces changes in postnatal phenotype including raised systolic blood pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104, 54495454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73.Lonergan, P, Rizos, D, Kanka, J, et al. Temporal sensitivity of bovine embryos to culture environment after fertilization and the implications for blastocyst quality. Reproduction. 2003; 126, 337346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74.Dandekar, PV, Glass, RH. Development of mouse embryos in vitro is affected by strain and culture medium. Gamete Res. 1987; 17, 279285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75.Harvey, MB, Kaye, PL. Insulin increases the cell number of the inner cell mass and stimulates morphological development of mouse blastocysts in vitro. Development. 1990; 110, 963967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76.Kaye, PL, Gardner, HG. Preimplantation access to maternal insulin and albumin increases fetal growth rate in mice. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14, 30523059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77.Mihalik, J, Rehak, P, Koppel, J. The influence of insulin on the in vitro development of mouse and bovine embryos. Physiol Res. 2000; 49, 347354.Google ScholarPubMed
78.Karagenc, L, Lane, M, Gardner, DK. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates mouse blastocyst inner cell mass development only when media lack human serum albumin. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 10, 511518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
79.Sjoblom, C, Roberts, CT, Wikland, M, Robertson, SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alleviates adverse consequences of embryo culture on fetal growth trajectory and placental morphogenesis. Endocrinology. 2005; 146, 21422153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80.Rizos, D, Gutierrez-Adan, A, Perez-Garnelo, S, de la, FJ, Boland, MP, Lonergan, P. Bovine embryo culture in the presence or absence of serum: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and messenger RNA expression. Biol Reprod. 2003; 68, 236243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81.Wrenzycki, C, Herrmann, D, Carnwath, JW, Niemann, H. Alterations in the relative abundance of gene transcripts in preimplantation bovine embryos cultured in medium supplemented with either serum or PVA. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999; 53, 818.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82.Lonergan, P, Rizos, D, Gutierrez-Adan, A, et al. Temporal divergence in the pattern of messenger RNA expression in bovine embryos cultured from the zygote to blastocyst stage in vitro or in vivo. Biol Reprod. 2003; 69, 14241431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
83.Mansouri-Attia, N, Sandra, O, Aubert, J, et al. Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106, 56875692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
84.Steele, W, Allegrucci, C, Singh, R, et al. Human embryonic stem cell methyl cycle enzyme expression: modelling epigenetic programming in assisted reproduction? Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 10, 755766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
85.Sinclair, KD, McEvoy, TG, Maxfield, EK, et al. Aberrant fetal growth and development after in vitro culture of sheep zygotes. J Reprod Fertil. 1999; 116, 177186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86.Young, LE, Sinclair, KD, Wilmut, I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod. 1998; 3, 155163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87.Yang, X, Smith, SL, Tian, XC, Lewin, HA, Renard, JP, Wakayama, T. Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nat Genet. 2007; 39, 295302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
88.Thompson, JG, Gardner, DK, Pugh, PA, McMillan, WH, Tervit, HR. Lamb birth weight is affected by culture system utilized during in vitro pre-elongation development of ovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 1995; 53, 13851391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
89.Wells, DN, Misica, PM, Tervit, HR. Production of cloned calves following nuclear transfer with cultured adult mural granulosa cells. Biol Reprod. 1999; 60, 9961005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90.Ecker, DJ, Stein, P, Xu, Z, et al. Long-term effects of culture of preimplantation mouse embryos on behaviour. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101, 15951600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91.Mahsoudi, B, Li, A, O’Neill, C. Assessment of the long-term and transgenerational consequences of perturbing preimplantation embryo development in mice. Biol Reprod. 2007; 77, 889896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92.Manipalviratn, S, DeCherney, A, Segars, J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91, 305315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93.Fauser, BC, Devroey, P, Macklon, NS. Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment. Lancet. 2005; 365, 18071816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94.Steel, AJ, Sutcliffe, A. Long-term health implications for children conceived by IVF/ICSI. Hum Fertil. 2009; 12, 2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
95.Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DA, Donker, D, Keirse, MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. Br Med J. 2004; 328, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96.Belva, F, Henriet, S, Liebaers, I, Van, SA, Celestin-Westreich, S, Bonduelle, M. Medical outcome of 8-year-old singleton ICSI children (born >or=32 weeks’ gestation) and a spontaneously conceived comparison group. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22, 506515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97.Leunens, L, Celestin-Westreich, S, Bonduelle, M, Liebaers, I, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. Follow-up of cognitive and motor development of 10-year-old singleton children born after ICSI compared with spontaneously conceived children. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98.Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I, Bonduelle, M, Barnes, J, et al. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments. Pediatrics. 2005; 115, e283e289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
99.Hvidtjorn, D, Schieve, L, Schendel, D, et al. Cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay in children born after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163, 7283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100.Stromberg, B, Dahlquist, G, Ericson, A, Finnstrom, O, Koster, M, Stjernqvist, K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002; 359, 461465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
101.Ceelen, M, van Weissenbruch, MM, Vermeiden, JP, van Leeuwen, FE, Delemarre-van de Waal, HA. Cardiometabolic differences in children born after in vitro fertilization: follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93, 16821688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102.Gomes, MV, Huber, J, Ferriani, RA, maral Neto, AM, Ramos, ES. Abnormal methylation at the KvDMR1 imprinting control region in clinically normal children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009; 15, 471477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
103.Thurston, A, Lucas, ES, Allegrucci, C, Steele, W, Young, LE. Region-specific DNA methylation in the preimplantation embryo as a target for genomic plasticity. Theriogenology. 2007; 68(Suppl 1), S98S106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104.Morgan, HD, Jin, XL, Li, A, Whitelaw, E, O’Neill, C. The culture of zygotes to the blastocyst stage changes the postnatal expression of an epigentically labile allele, agouti viable yellow, in mice. Biol Reprod. 2008; 79, 618623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105.Waterland, RA, Jirtle, RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 23, 52935300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106.Watkins, AJ, Papenbrock, T, Fleming, TP. The preimplantation embryo: handle with care. Semin Reprod Med. 2008; 26, 175185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
107.Watkins, AJ, Fleming, TP. Blastocyst environment and its influence on offspring cardiovascular health: the heart of the matter. J Anat. 2009; 215, 5259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
108.Kwong, WY, Wild, AE, Roberts, P, Willis, AC, Fleming, TP. Maternal undernutrition during the preimplantation period of rat development causes blastocyst abnormalities and programming of postnatal hypertension. Development. 2000; 127, 41954202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109.Kwong, WY, Miller, DJ, Wilkins, AP, et al. Maternal low protein diet restricted to the preimplantation period induces a gender-specific change on hepatic gene expression in rat fetuses. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007; 74, 4856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (Colour online) A summary diagram detailing the impact of environmental conditions on gametogenesis and development, and the short- and long term consequences which may be observed.