Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T16:19:42.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early ovarian follicular development in prepubertal Wistar rats acutely exposed to androgens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

L. Paixão
Affiliation:
Gynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
L. M. Velez
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Fisio-patología Ovárica, Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
B. R. Santos
Affiliation:
Gynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
C. Tusset
Affiliation:
Gynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
S. B. Lecke
Affiliation:
Gynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil Department of Diagnostic Methods, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
A. B. Motta
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Fisio-patología Ovárica, Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
P. M. Spritzer*
Affiliation:
Gynecological Endocrinology Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
*Address for correspondence: P. M. Spritzer, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 90035 003, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. (Email spritzer@ufrgs.br)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Androgens may directly modulate early ovarian follicular development in preantral stages and androgen excess before puberty may disrupt this physiological process. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the dynamics of follicular morphology and circulating androgen and estradiol levels in prepubertal Wistar rats acutely exposed to androgens. Prepubertal female Wistar rats were distributed into three groups: control, equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) intervention and eCG plus dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) intervention (eCG+DHEA). Serum DHEA, testosterone and estradiol levels were determined, and ovarian morphology and morphometry were assessed. The eCG+DHEA group presented increased serum estradiol and testosterone levels as compared with the control group (P<0.01), and higher serum DHEA concentration v. the eCG-only and control groups (P<0.01). In addition, the eCG+DHEA group had a higher number of, and larger-sized, primary and secondary follicles as compared with the control group (P<0.05). The eCG group presented intermediate values for number and size of primary and secondary follicles, without significant differences as compared with the other two groups. The number of antral follicles was higher in the eCG+DHEA and eCG groups v. controls (P<0.05). The number of primordial, atretic and cystic follicles were similar in all groups. In conclusion, the present experimental model using an acute eCG+DHEA intervention was useful to investigate events involved in initial follicular development under hyperandrogenic conditions, and could provide a reliable tool to study defective follicular development with possible deleterious reproductive consequences later in life.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2016 

Introduction

Ovarian follicular development is crucial to female reproductive healthiness and this event depends on several factors such as growth factor and hormone signals. At the beginning, the transition of primordial follicles to secondary stages is controlled by some growth factor as bone morphogenic protein 15 (BMP15), kit ligand, BMP4 and hormones as insulin and growth hormone. All of them are important to maintain oocytes and granulosa cells (GCs) survival through initial follicular development.Reference Palma, Argañaraz and Barrera 1 Physiological levels of androgens have also been linked to a role on modulating the expression and activity of genes related to growth and development of ovarian follicles in mammals.Reference Prizant, Gleicher and Sen 2 , Reference Sen, Prizant and Light 3

In turn, androgen excess may disturb physiological mechanisms of follicular development leading to chronic anovulation, as observed in human clinical diseases. One example is the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a prevalent condition in which impaired follicular growth and high circulating androgen levels lead to menstrual disturbances and anovulatory infertility.Reference Spritzer 4 Evidence indicates that prenatal or prepubertal androgen excess may be involved with the pathophysiology of PCOS.Reference Franks, McCarthy and Hardy 5 Reference Sir-Petermann, Codner and Pérez 7 In addition, some animal models of PCOS have been developed by using experimental exposure of high androgen levels.Reference Abbott, Dumesic and Franks 8 Reference Franks 12 In this sense, the study of ovarian dysfunction promoted by animal models of androgen interventions may provide interesting insights into the initial pathogenic mechanisms of PCOS. Indeed, the pathological ovarian features of PCOS include arrest of follicular development with accumulation of early and mid-antral stage follicles.Reference Franks, Stark and Hardy 10 Abnormalities in cellular investments of the ovarian follicle, such as theca cell (TC), GC and oocyte layers during early follicular development may be a primary cause of ovarian dysfunction leading to reduced responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone stimulation.Reference Orisaka, Tajima, Tsang and Kotsuji 13 Nevertheless, it is not clear whether reproductive hormone abnormalities are a primary or secondary reflex of follicular disruption, or whether and to what degree androgen overproduction may modulate GCs activity.Reference Gervásio, Bernuci, Silva-de-Sá and Rosa-E-Silva 14

Because of these many uncertainties, animal models are still crucial for the study of PCOS. In fact, the observation that dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels are increased in women with PCOSReference Loughlin, Cunningham and Moore 15 led to the development of a PCOS animal model using postnatal treatment with DHEA, the first androgen to rise in the early female pubertal period.Reference Apter, Bützow, Laughlin and Yen 16 This postnatal DHEA treatment produced different degrees of ovarian morphological changes, such as cystic ovaries with thin GC layer and consistent with anovulation,Reference Lee, Anderson and Lee 17 Reference Sander, Luchetti and Solano 20 increased ovarian stroma and increased number of atretic follicles. Animals also exhibit altered steroidogenesis with high serum estrogen and androgen levels.Reference Henmi, Endo and Nagasawa 21 However, these animal models are limited by the need for long experimental periods, precluding the observation of direct androgen effect on early follicular growth and development. Thus, animal models using short periods of follicular stimulation would be useful to investigate this aspect.

A rodent model of acute gonadotropin hyperstimulation and hyperandrogenism has been recently developed.Reference Faut, Elia and Parborell 22 Reference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 In that experimental model, a two-hormone treatment was administered to immature female animals aged 22–25 days: equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), an efficient interspecies inductor of follicular recruitment,Reference Parborell, Pecci, Gonzalez, Vitale and Tesone 25 and DHEA, in order to promote a hyperandrogenic condition.Reference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 However, that study did not focus on the prepubertal stage, and therefore missed the opportunity to promote a folliculogenesis spurt after the onset of physiological follicular development in the ovaries. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the dynamics of follicular morphology and ovarian function in prepubertal Wistar rats, aged 25–28 days, acutely treated with the same previously validated concentrations of eCG and DHEA.

Materials and methods

All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with local regulations (National Council on Research Animal Care, CONCEA, Brazil). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (Brazil).

Experimental animal and procedures

In total, 20 prepubertal (25–28 days old) female Wistar rats were divided into three groups, that received one single dose of the following treatments, between 8 and 10 am: intraperitoneal injection of 25 IU of eCG alone (Novormon, Buenos Aires, Argentina) in 0.1 ml of saline solution (eCG group, n=7); 26 subcutaneous injection of 60 mg/kg of DHEA (Sigma–Aldrich, MO, USA) in 0.1 ml of sunflower oil together with 25 IU of eCG (eCG+DHEA group, n=7);Reference Faut, Elia and Parborell 22 and a group with no hormones and subcutaneous injection of vehicle (sunflower oil) (control group, n=6).

Rats were housed under controlled temperature (21°C) and lighting (12 h light/12 h dark cycle; lights from 7 am until 7 pm), with free access to chow (Nuvilab CR-1, PR, Brazil) and water until the experimental day.

Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and killed by decapitation 8 h after the treatments. Trunk blood was collected and serum was separated by centrifugation at 2500 g for 10 min and stored at −80°C until DHEA, testosterone and estradiol measurements. The left ovarian tissue from each rat was dissected and immediately fixed in 10% buffered formalin for morphological and morphometric studies.

Hormonal assays

Radioimmunoassays (RIA; Immunotech SAS, Marseille, France and Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, TX, USA) were used to measure serum DHEA, testosterone and estradiol, with sensitivity of 0.06 ng/ml, 0.02 ng/ml and 2.20 pg/ml, respectively. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were ⩽10%. RIAs were performed according to manufacturer instructions, using control serum samples.

Morphological and morphometric analysis of follicles and oocytes

Formalin-fixed ovaries were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Serial 5-μm thick sections were prepared on microscope slides and stained with hematoxylin–eosin (Laborclin, PR, Brazil; Vetec, RJ, Brazil).

The identification of follicles was based on strict criteria.Reference Pedersen and Peters 27 Five-μm step sections were mounted at 50 μm intervals onto microscope slides. This interval was chosen to prevent counting the same structure twice. Two trained investigators, who were blinded to treatment group, carried out the morphological analyses (Olympus BX41, Tokyo, Japan).

Follicles were classified as primordial, primary, secondary, antral, atretic and cystic.Reference Cruz, Barra, González, Sotomayor-Zárate and Lara 28 Primordial follicles were those with one oocyte surrounded by flattened GCs. Primary follicles presented a single layer of cuboidal GCs, whereas secondary follicles had two or more GC layers. Antral follicles were recognized by the presence of both visible one single vacuole and oocyte nuclei. Atretic follicles were defined as follicles with >5% of the GCs having pyknotic nuclei. Cystic follicles were characterized as those with a large antral cavity, thickened theca interna layer and attenuated GC layer.

For morphometric evaluation, 15 structures of each follicle stage were chosen in each group for analysis. Follicular diameters were determined as the average of two measurements at a right angle across the midpoints. In both primordial and primary follicles, the diameter was measured from the outer layer of GCs. For secondary and antral stages, the diameter was measured from the outer wall of the thecal layer. All diameters were measured using the Image-Pro Plus 4.5 Software (Media Cybernetics, MD, USA), after calibration with a stage micrometer (Media Cybernetics, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPAD PRISM 5 Software (San Diego, CA, USA). Data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test and described as median and interquartile range (25–75%). Non-parametric analysis was carried out with Kruskal–Wallis test for comparing the control, eCG and eCG+DHEA groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used as the adjustment procedure for multiple comparisons. Data were considered statistically significant at P<0.05. The P for trend was estimated for the comparisons among the groups.

Results

Effect of treatments on DHEA, testosterone and estradiol levels

Animals treated with eCG+DHEA presented higher serum estradiol [61 (38–596) pg/ml] and testosterone [4.2 (2.3–17.0) ng/ml] levels in comparison with the control group [8.0 (5.6–10.0) pg/ml and 0.09 (0.09–0.11) ng/ml]. Animals under eCG stimulation showed intermediate levels of these steroid hormones [10.0 (8.5–15.0) pg/ml and 0.23 (0.18–0.25) ng/ml] (Fig. 1a and 1b). Serum DHEA levels were elevated in eCG+DHEA [23.00 (21.00–23.00) ng/ml] in relation to the other two groups [0.69 (0.40–2.40) and 0.60 (0.56–0.72) ng/ml, respectively, for control and eCG groups) (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1 Serum estradiol (a), testosterone (b) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) (c) levels from control (n=6), equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (n=7) and eCG+DHEA (n=7) groups. Values are expressed as median and 25–75% interquartile range (lower and upper limit of the box); maximum and minimum values are shown by the limits of vertical lines. P<0.01 by Kruskal–Wallis test. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Morphological analysis of ovarian follicles

Table 1 shows the number of follicles according to follicular stage and treatment. The total number of primary and secondary follicles was higher in the eCG+DHEA group than in the control group (Table 1; Fig. 2). The eCG group did not differ from either the control or the eCG+DHEA group regarding the number of primary and secondary follicles. The total number of antral follicles was also higher in the eCG and eCG+DHEA groups compared with controls. Primordial, atretic and cystic follicles were similar in all groups (Table 1).

Fig. 2 Representative ovarian micrographs from control (a), equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (b) and eCG+dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) (c) groups. PF, primary follicle; SF, secondary follicle. Scale bar is 100 μm.

Table 1 Number of follicles according to follicular stage and treatment

eCG, equine chorionic gonadotropin; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone.

Values are expressed as median and interquartile range (25–75%) and percentage of total number of follicles for each follicle stage and per group (Kruskal–Wallis test).

a,bDifferent superscript letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Morphometric analysis of ovarian follicles

Primordial follicle diameter was larger in the eCG and eCG+DHEA groups compared with controls (Table 2). The size of primary and secondary follicles was greater in eCG+DHEA animals compared with controls, whereas the diameter of primary follicles was similar in the eCG group in comparison with both controls and eCG+DHEA animals (Table 2; Fig. 2). Antral follicular diameter was similar in all groups.

Table 2 Follicular diameter in μm according to follicular stage and treatment

eCG, equine chorionic gonadotropin; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone.

Values are expressed as median and interquartile range (25–75%) of follicular diameter for each follicle stage and per group (Kruskal–Wallis test).

a,bDifferent superscript letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Discussion

In the present study, acute administration of eCG plus androgen affected initial follicular recruitment, causing an increase in the number of primary, secondary and antral follicles in ovaries of prepubertal rats. A similar animal model has been previously described in immature Sprague Dawley rats (22–25 days of age), showing early apoptosis of antral follicles.Reference Faut, Elia and Parborell 22 The present study is the first to employ both morphological and morphometric analysis in order to measure follicular growth in different stages of follicular development after acute stimulation with eCG plus DHEA in Wistar rats. The decision to use this rat strain is warranted by the fact that this is the experimental strain for which the largest amount of reproductive physiology data are available.

Moreover, our study was carried out specifically with prepubertal animals (25–28 days of age). In prepubertal 25–30-day-old animals, the hypothalamus–pituitary–ovary axis is undergoing maturation; follicular development has initiated, and both antral and atretic follicles are already present. Therefore, eCG stimulation may be very useful to promote follicular development in terms of speed and quantity.Reference Gal and Orly 23 Actually, the study of Gal et al.,Reference Gal and Orly 23 using eCG stimulation followed by human chorionic gonadotropin administration, resulted in a growth spurt of peri-ovulatory follicles. Interestingly, in the present study, stimulation with eCG only produced a slightly and non-significant increase in the proportion of small follicles. This probably occurred because of the short-term duration of the experimental model, with no sufficient time to allow growing follicles could secrete androgens. Nevertheless, eCG stimulation served as priming for the stimulation with DHEA,Reference Elia, Sander and Luchetti 29 , Reference Misugi, Ozaki and El Beltagy 30 generating an androgen excess state and promoting greater ovarian morphological changes. In turn, although we did not tested the effect of isolated DHEA treatment, it is important to point out that prepubertal animals present only an early slight follicular growth. Based on evidence from previous studies using the same treatments,Reference Faut, Elia and Parborell 22 Reference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 we hypothesize that a priming effect of eCG would be needed to detect a DHEA effect on ovarian changes. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Previous in vitro studies suggest that high doses of androgens could impair early follicular development.Reference Okutsu, Itoh, Takahashi and Ishizuka 31 Reference Walters, Allan and Handelsman 33 Indeed, experimental animal models using prenatal exposure to androgens have resulted in reproductive disorders with increased preantral follicles and elevated estradiol and testosterone levels in adult age, resembling PCOS.Reference Walters, Allan and Handelsman 33 , Reference Wu, Li and Wu 34 Taken together, these studies and our present results support the hypothesis that prenatal exposure to androgens serves to ‘program’ both ovaries and adrenals of prepubertal animals to secrete high levels of androgens that interfere with ovarian function.Reference Abbott, Dumesic and Franks 8 , Reference Franks 12

We found significant increases in estradiol, testosterone and DHEA levels in animals treated with eCG plus DHEA in comparison with controls, indicating the consistency of our experimental model. These results are in agreement with those of a previous studyReference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 with a different female rat strain. Moreover, these findings suggest that follicles remain healthy, with functional cells, following acute exposure to eCG. This was confirmed by our morphological findings and visualization of healthy follicles. Indeed, it is known that biosynthesis of estradiol-like hormones is a basic function of GCs,Reference Palma, Argañaraz and Barrera 1 initiated early in primary follicles. In turn, androgens could be derived from TC secretion from small follicles and adrenal gland. In fact, a recent studyReference Zhou, Kang, Chen, Han and Ma 35 has demonstrated significantly increased expression of aromatase in rat ovaries and increased 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), 17β-HSD and aromatase messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in adrenal gland. Therefore, DHEA could also be stimulating adrenal cells to synthetize androgens to act as substrate to aromatase enzymes in follicular GCs.

Interestingly, we found an increased proportion of primary, secondary and antral follicles following acute hormonal stimulus with eCG and DHEA. Our results differ slightly from those of a previous study,Reference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 which reported greater proportion of small follicles. Although Velez et al.Reference Velez, Heber and Ferreira 24 studied Sprague Dawley rats in the late postnatal age (22–25 days old), in our study Wistar rats were studied at the late prepubertal age (25–28 days old), and presented both small and antral follicles. The presence of higher numbers of primary, secondary and antral follicles in our animals underscores the role of DHEA added to eCG in initial follicular recruitment, despite the acute nature of the intervention. DHEA possibly interacts with androgen receptors expressed in GCs of primary and early antral follicles. Similarly, a previous studyReference Lenie and Smitz 36 observed higher expression of androgen receptors in small follicles. Indeed, acute DHEA treatment seems to enhance intracellular factors to ensure primary to secondary follicular transition.Reference Collado-Fernandez, Picton and Dumollard 37 In addition, several studies have shown that androgens mediate local amplification of both insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and FSH actions, inducing an increase in IGF-1, IGF-1 receptor and FSH receptor mRNA in the ovaries of experimental animals.Reference Vendola, Zhou, Wang and Bondy 38 Reference Weil, Vendola, Zhou and Bondy 40 These findings show that androgens play an important role in modulating growth factors responsible for early folliculogenesis.

An increased diameter of primordial, primary and secondary follicles was also found in our study. We hypothesize that exogenous DHEA amplifies the responsiveness of IGF-1 and perhaps other growth factors by acting on androgen receptors,Reference Lebbe and Woodruff 41 and that it stimulates the activity and proliferation of GCs in these small follicles. Amplified proliferation of GCs would be maintained through follicular transitions from primary to secondary follicles.

Limitations of the present study are the absence of molecular analyses such as gene and protein expression in ovarian tissue, which could have provided further mechanistic insight. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess morphological aspects of early follicular development in late prepubertal female Wistar rats acutely stimulated with eCG plus DHEA. The histological analyses were able to demonstrate an initial change that may potentially impair normal follicular development during the ulterior reproductive cycles. Therefore, further studies with this experimental model and longer periods of observation are needed in order to detect whether the observed increased growth of small and early antral follicles is associated with later arrest of preantral follicles throughout the reproductive life course.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present experimental model using an acute intervention with eCG plus DHEA triggered an increase in the growth and number of small and early antral follicles and could be a reliable tool to study the mechanisms of detrimental follicular development with possible reproductive consequences later in life.

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial Support

This work was supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq INCT 573747/2008-3), Research Incentive Fund of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (FIPE-HCPA 11-0607), Brazil, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 71/2010, PICT 577/2012, PICT 689/2013) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PIP 185, Argentina.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Ethical Standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guides on the care and use of laboratory animals (Wistar rats) and have been approved by the institutional committee [Ethics Committee of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil (GPPG 14-0125)].

References

1. Palma, GA, Argañaraz, ME, Barrera, AD, et al. Biology and biotechnology of follicle development. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012; 2012, 938138.Google Scholar
2. Prizant, H, Gleicher, N, Sen, A. Androgen actions in the ovary: balance is key. J Endocrinol. 2014; 222, R141R151.Google Scholar
3. Sen, A, Prizant, H, Light, A, et al. Androgens regulate ovarian follicular development by increasing follicle stimulating hormone receptor and microRNA-125b expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111, 30083013.Google Scholar
4. Spritzer, PM. Polycystic ovary syndrome: reviewing diagnosis and management of metabolic disturbances. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2014; 58, 182187.Google Scholar
5. Franks, S, McCarthy, MI, Hardy, K. Development of polycystic ovary syndrome: involvement of genetic and environmental factors. Int J Androl. 2006; 29, 278284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Sir-Petermann, T, Codner, E, Maliqueo, M, et al. Increased anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentrations in prepubertal daughters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91, 31053109.Google Scholar
7. Sir-Petermann, T, Codner, E, Pérez, V, et al. Metabolic and reproductive features before and during puberty in daughters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 941, 19231930.Google Scholar
8. Abbott, DH, Dumesic, DA, Franks, S. Developmental origin of polycystic ovary syndrome – a hypothesis. J Endocrinol. 2002; 174, 15.Google Scholar
9. Dumesic, DA, Padmanabhan, V, Abbott, DH. Polycystic ovary syndrome and oocyte developmental competence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008; 63, 3948.Google Scholar
10. Franks, S, Stark, J, Hardy, K. Follicle dynamics and anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008; 14, 367378.Google Scholar
11. Pasquali, R, Stener-Victorin, E, Yildiz, BO, et al. PCOS Forum: research in polycystic ovary syndrome today and tomorrow. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011; 74, 424433.Google Scholar
12. Franks, S. Animal models and the developmental origins of polycystic ovary syndrome: increasing evidence for the role of androgens in programming reproductive and metabolic dysfunction. Endocrinology. 2012; 153, 25362538.Google Scholar
13. Orisaka, M, Tajima, K, Tsang, BK, Kotsuji, F. Oocyte-granulosa-theca cell interactions during preantral follicular development. J Ovarian Res. 2009; 2, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Gervásio, CG, Bernuci, MP, Silva-de-Sá, MF, Rosa-E-Silva, AC. The role of androgen hormones in early follicular development. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 2014, 818010.Google Scholar
15. Loughlin, T, Cunningham, S, Moore, A, et al. Adrenal abnormalities in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986; 62, 142147.Google Scholar
16. Apter, D, Bützow, T, Laughlin, GA, Yen, SS. Accelerated 24-hour luteinizing hormone pulsatile activity in adolescent girls with ovarian hyperandrogenism: relevance to the developmental phase of polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994; 79, 119125.Google Scholar
17. Lee, MT, Anderson, E, Lee, GY. Changes in ovarian morphology and serum hormones in the rat after treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone. Anat Rec. 1991; 231, 185192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Anderson, E, Lee, MT, Lee, GY. Cystogenesis of the ovarian antral follicle of the rat: ultrastructural changes and hormonal profile following the administration of dehydroepiandrosterone. Anat Rec. 1992; 234, 359382.Google Scholar
19. Sander, V, Solano, ME, Elia, E, et al. The influence of dehydroepiandrosterone on early pregnancy in mice. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2005; 12, 285292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Sander, V, Luchetti, CG, Solano, ME, et al. Role of the N, N’-dimethylbiguanide metformin in the treatment of female prepuberal BALB/c mice hyperandrogenized with dehydroepiandrosterone. Reproduction. 2006; 131, 591602.Google Scholar
21. Henmi, H, Endo, T, Nagasawa, K, et al. Lysyl oxidase and MMP-2 expression in dehydroepiandrosterone-induced polycystic ovary in rats. Biol Reprod. 2001; 64, 157162.Google Scholar
22. Faut, M, Elia, EM, Parborell, F, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and early folliculogenesis during an acute hyperandrogenism condition. 2011; 95, 333337.Google Scholar
23. Gal, M, Orly, J. Ketoconazole inhibits ovulation as a result of arrest of follicular steroidogenesis in the rat ovary. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2014; 8, 3744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Velez, LM, Heber, MF, Ferreira, SR, et al. Effect of hyperandrogenism on ovarian function. Reproduction. 2015; 149, 577585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Parborell, F, Pecci, A, Gonzalez, O, Vitale, A, Tesone, M. Effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on rat ovarian follicle apoptosis: regulation by epidermal growth factor and the expression of Bcl-2-related genes. Biol Reprod. 2002; 67, 4814866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Gonadotropin preparations: past, present, and future perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90, S13S20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Pedersen, T, Peters, H. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1968; 17, 555557.Google Scholar
28. Cruz, G, Barra, R, González, D, Sotomayor-Zárate, R, Lara, HE. Temporal window in which exposure to estradiol permanently modifies ovarian function causing polycystic ovary morphology in rats. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98, 12831290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Elia, E, Sander, V, Luchetti, CG, et al. The mechanisms involved in the action of metformin in regulating ovarian function in hyperandrogenized mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006; 12, 475481.Google Scholar
30. Misugi, T, Ozaki, K, El Beltagy, K, et al. Insulin-lowering agents inhibit synthesis of testosterone in ovaries of DHEA-induced PCOS rats. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006; 61, 208215.Google Scholar
31. Okutsu, Y, Itoh, MT, Takahashi, N, Ishizuka, B. Exogenous androstenedione induces formation of follicular cysts and premature luteinization of granulosa cells in the ovary. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93, 927935.Google Scholar
32. Tarumi, W, Tsukamoto, S, Okutsu, Y, et al. Androstenedione induces abnormalities in morphology and function of developing oocytes, which impairs oocyte meiotic competence. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97, 469476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Walters, KA, Allan, CM, Handelsman, DJ. Rodent models for human polycystic ovary syndrome. Biol Reprod. 2012; 86, 149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Wu, XY, Li, ZL, Wu, CY, et al. Endocrine traits of polycystic ovary syndrome in prenatally androgenized female Sprague-Dawley rats. Endocr J. 2010; 57, 201209.Google Scholar
35. Zhou, Y, Kang, J, Chen, D, Han, N, Ma, H. Ample evidence: dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) conversion into activated steroid hormones occurs in adrenal and ovary in female rat. PLoS One. 2015; 10, e0124511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Lenie, S, Smitz, J. Functional AR signaling is evident in an in vitro mouse follicle culture bioassay that encompasses most stages of folliculogenesis. Biol Reprod. 2009; 80, 685695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Collado-Fernandez, E, Picton, HM, Dumollard, R. Metabolism throughout follicle and oocyte development in mammals. Int J Dev Biol. 2012; 56, 799808.Google Scholar
38. Vendola, K, Zhou, J, Wang, J, Bondy, CA. Androgens promote insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene expression in the primate ovary. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14, 23282332.Google Scholar
39. Vendola, K, Zhou, J, Wang, J, et al. Androgens promote oocyte insulin-like growth factor I expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod. 1999; 61, 353357.Google Scholar
40. Weil, S, Vendola, K, Zhou, J, Bondy, CA. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84, 29512956.Google Scholar
41. Lebbe, M, Woodruff, TK. Involvement of androgens in ovarian health and disease. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013; 19, 828837.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Serum estradiol (a), testosterone (b) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) (c) levels from control (n=6), equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (n=7) and eCG+DHEA (n=7) groups. Values are expressed as median and 25–75% interquartile range (lower and upper limit of the box); maximum and minimum values are shown by the limits of vertical lines. P<0.01 by Kruskal–Wallis test. Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Representative ovarian micrographs from control (a), equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (b) and eCG+dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) (c) groups. PF, primary follicle; SF, secondary follicle. Scale bar is 100 μm.

Figure 2

Table 1 Number of follicles according to follicular stage and treatment

Figure 3

Table 2 Follicular diameter in μm according to follicular stage and treatment