Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T15:35:27.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from mastitis outbreaks in dairy herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

Shlomo Sela
Affiliation:
Microbial Food-Safety Research Unit, Department of Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Orly Hammer-Muntz
Affiliation:
Microbial Food-Safety Research Unit, Department of Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Oleg Krifucks
Affiliation:
National Mastitis Reference Center, Kimron Veterinary Institute, PO Box 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Riki Pinto
Affiliation:
Microbial Food-Safety Research Unit, Department of Food Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, PO Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Limor Weisblit
Affiliation:
National Mastitis Reference Center, Kimron Veterinary Institute, PO Box 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Gabriel Leitner*
Affiliation:
National Mastitis Reference Center, Kimron Veterinary Institute, PO Box 12, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: leitnerg@moag.gov.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During 1998–2002 outbreaks of Pseudomonas sp. mastitis among more than 15 Israeli sheep and goat dairy herds were observed. The animals presented a wide spectrum of clinical signs ranging from subclinical to gangrenous udder. Ninety-five isolates of Pseudomonas sp. were isolated from clinical and subclinical mastitis of 47 sheep, 17 goats and 31 cows from 34 different farms. Biochemical and genetic analyses revealed that the all-causative organism was Ps. aeruginosa. Selections of isolates were further analysed on the bases of colony morphology, biochemical traits and capacity to form biofilm. All the strains displayed a wide heterogeneity in all the tested traits. No association between bacterial isolates, farm of origin and type of animal was found. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and cluster analysis showed no clonality among the tested strains. The present study revealed that a large variety of Ps. aeruginosa strains may cause mastitis outbreaks in sheep, goat and cattle in Israel.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that is frequently responsible for nosocomial infections in humans, particularly in cystic fibrosis (CF) and burn patients (Høiby, Reference Høiby1977). Ps. aeruginosa has also been identified as an opportunistic animal pathogen, occasionally involved in enzootic or epizootic outbreaks of mastitis in small ruminants (Bergonier et al. Reference Bergonier, de Cremoux, Rupp, Lagriffoul and Berthelot2003). The microorganism is considered an environmental pathogen in mastitis occurrence in animals in clinical and subclinical cases. Additionally, it was detected in contaminated wash hoses in milking parlours and in water and spray nozzles (Kirk & Bartlett, Reference Kirk and Bartlett1984). From 1998 to 2002 several outbreaks of mastitis caused by a Gram-negative, non-coliform pathogen were reported in dairy herds in Israel. Preliminary laboratory investigation has identified the causative agent as Ps. aeruginosa (Yeruham et al. Reference Yeruham, Schwimmer, Friedman, Leitner, Zamir, Ilsar-Adiri and Goshen2005). The morbidity of the animals reached 15–20%, including culling of animals with subclinical mastitis. Since such outbreaks impose a substantial economic burden on breeders, and might also contribute to the spread of highly virulent clones into the human population, a selected number of bacteria isolated from various dairy animals and farms were further characterized and subjected to phenotypic and genotypic analyses.

Materials and Methods

Bacteriological techniques

Ninety-five isolates of Ps. aeruginosa were isolated from clinical and subclinical mastitis of 47 sheep, 17 goats and 31 cows on 34 different dairy farms in Israel. In addition, Ps. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as a reference strain. Duplicate quarter foremilk samples were taken aseptically according to the International Dairy Federation (IDF, 1985) procedures and submitted to the laboratory. Bacteriological analysis was performed according to accepted standards (Hogan et al. Reference Hogan, Gonzalez, Harmon, Nickerson, Oliver, Pankey and Smith1999). A 0·01-ml aliquot from each milk sample was cultured in defibrinated sheep blood (5%) agar (Bacto-Agar; Difco Laboratory, France) and incubated in aerobic conditions, at 37°C for 18–42 h. Colonies suspected to be Pseudomonas were streak-isolated on Pseudomonas-isolation-agar (PIA) (Hy Lab. Ltd, Rehovot, Israel) and putative Pseudomonas colonies were identified by means of the ID 20 NE Kit (API; Bio Merieux SA, France) and the BBL Crystal Identification System; Enteric ID Kit (BD BBL CRYSTAL; Becton Dickinson, Baltimore MD, USA). Isolates identified as Pseudomonas genera were submitted to 0·3% agar tube, oxidase (Oxidase Identification Stick; OXOID, Hampshire, UK), carbohydrate fermentation (lactose, glucose and sucrose), indol (Difco), urease, and reduction of NH3 to NH2.

Phenotypic and biochemical data were obtained from all isolates, from which a selected number of isolates were further identified by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis. Genetic relatedness among 10 representative Ps. aeruginosa isolates representing various farms and animals were tested by Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The capacity of these isolates to form biofilm was also studied.

Susceptibility test

The susceptibility test was performed with the disk diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco), according to NCCLS guidelines (NCCLS) (NCCLS, 1999). Commercially available disks (Dispens-O-Disc, Susceptibility Test System, Difco) were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the plates were incubated at 37°C in aerobic conditions. The antimicrobials tested were: gentamycin (10 μg), sulphamethoxazole with trimethoprim (25 μg), polymyxin (300 i.u.), ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and amikacin (30 μg).

Formation of biofilm

The ability of Ps. aeruginosa strains to develop biofilm on polystyrene was tested according to O'Toole et al. (Reference O'Toole, Pratt, Watnick, Newman, Weaver and Kolter1999). The strains were grown overnight at 37°C in Luria broth (LB) (Hy-lab, Rehovot, Israel), brought to an OD600 of 1·0 and diluted 1:100 in fresh LB. Samples (100 μl) were transferred into 96-well polystyrene tissue culture plates (Greiner, Germany) and incubated for 24 h at 26°C or 37°C. The plates were washed, stained with crystal-violet (CV), and the absorbance of the extracted CV was read at 595 nm. Results are presented as the average OD and sd of 3–5 replicates. To visualize the macroscopic nature of the biofilms, bacteria were also grown in borosilicate glass tubes (16×150 mm) with 4 ml of LB in a Lab-line shaker operating at 100 rpm for 24 h at 37°C. Digital images of the tubes at 24 h are presented.

Identification of Ps. aeruginosa by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis

Chromosomal DNA was extracted from each isolate using the Alkali-lysis technique, as described by Hartas et al. (Reference Hartas, Hibble and Sriprakash1998). Eubacteria-domain-targeted PCR primers were used to amplify a conserved region of euobacterial DNA coding for 16S rDNA (1392 bp), as described previously (Amann et al. Reference Amann, Ludwig and Schleifer1995). The following primers, purchased from Sigma Genosys (Israel) were used: 11F (5′-GTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1392R (5′-ACGGGCGGTGTGTAC-3′). PCR was performed in a Biometra/Tgradient thermocycler. Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 40 μl, with 0·5 pmol of each primer and 20 μl of PCR reaction master mix (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada). PCR conditions were: 95°C for 4 min followed by 36 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1·5 min. The final cycle was followed by extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gel and, following a purification step, were sent for sequence determination (Hy Laboratories, Rehovot, Israel). Sequence identity was determined with the BLAST program (Altschul et al. Reference Altschul, Madden, Schaffer, Zhang, Zhang, Miller and Lipman1997).

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

DNA preparation and electrophoresis conditions were essentially as previously described (Grundmann et al. Reference Grundmann, Schneider, Hartung, Daschner and Pitt1995; Kaufmann, Reference Kaufmann, Woodford and Johnson1998) with minor modifications. Bacteria were grown overnight in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks MD, USA). The bacteria were washed twice and the pellet was suspended in SE buffer (75 mm-NaCl, 25 mm-EDTA, pH 7·4) to a final concentration of ~1×109 cfu/ml. The bacterial suspension was mixed with 2% low-melting-point agarose (Agarose III, pulse-field application; Amersco, Solon OH, USA), filled into plug moulds and solidified at room temperature. Bacterial lysis was performed with proteinase K (Sigma, St. Louis MO, USA) in a modified EC lysis buffer (6 mm-Tris–Cl, pH 7·6; 1 m-NaCl; 100 mm-EDTA, pH 8·0; 0·5% Brij-58; 0·2% deoxycholate; 0·5% n-lauroylsarcosine, and 20 μg/ml RNAse) at 56°C, overnight. The DNA plugs were washed four times, each for 30 min, in TE buffer (10 mm-Tris–1 mm-EDTA, pH 7·5) at room temperature. The DNA plugs were then stored in TE buffer at 4°C until use. The DNA plugs were cut up and immersed in 100 μl of restriction enzyme buffer, and digestion was performed with 10 U SpeI (Fermentas, Ontario, Canada) at 37°C for 16 h. The DNA fragments were separated by gel-electrophoresis in 1·2% agarose gel (Amersco) in a modified Tris-borate–EDTA (0·25×TBE) buffer (Amersco) using CHEF-DRII module (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules CA, USA). Electrophoresis was performed at 14°C for 22 h, and the switch interval was ramped from 5 s to 60 s. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide for 1 h and de-stained in distilled water for 2 h. Finally, the gel was photographed under transmitted u.v. illumination, and the pictures were saved as TIFF files. A 48·5–1000-kb lambda DNA ladder (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used as a molecular weight marker.

Phylogenetic analysis

The relatedness among the DNA fragment patterns (fingerprints) of the various isolates was determined with the Molecular Analyst DST, version 1.6 software (Bio-Rad). The size of the DNA fragments was normalized against the Lambda ladder. For comparisons among the DNA profiles a band tolerance of 2·0% was used. Cluster analysis was performed by the unweighted pair-group method, using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), and the calculation of the DNA relatedness was based on the Dice coefficient (Altschul et al. Reference Altschul, Madden, Schaffer, Zhang, Zhang, Miller and Lipman1997).

Results and Discussion

All isolates were found to be Gram-negative rods, motile, oxidase-positive, positive for fermentation of glucose and negative for tryptophan fermentation to indol. Further biochemical identification, by means of the API and Crystal kits, revealed that the strains belonged to Ps. aeruginosa. Phenotypic and biochemical data from a selected number of isolates representing various farms and animals are presented in Table 1. Susceptibility studies revealed that all the isolates were sensitive to gentamicin, polymyxin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin and resistant to sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim. Susceptibility of Ps. aeruginosa strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases, during a 7-year period was recently reported (Erskine et al. Reference Erskine, Walker, Bolin, Bartlett and White2002). In contrast to our results, most strains displayed multiple antibiotic resistance, although all the 53 strains tested were still susceptible to gentamicin. This might reflect difference in antimicrobial usage in the two countries. Based on morpho-physiological characteristics, biochemical traits and the susceptibility test, no association was observed between isolates, farms and animal species (Table 1).

Table 1. Phenotypic and biochemical characterization of Ps. aeruginosa strains according to farm origin and animal species

Genetic identification by 16S rDNA amplification and BLAST analysis

ND, not done

§ Highly mucoid colonies

To verify that the strains identified according to biochemical characteristics belonged to the species Ps. aeruginosa, we employed common prokaryotic primers to amplify a region (~1300 bp) of the 16S rDNA gene in 10 selected strains, which represented isolates from different farms and animals. Sequence analysis with the BLAST program revealed 98–100% identity, in ~700 bp, with Ps. aeruginosa in all the tested strains (Table 1), confirming the identity of the isolates.

The capacity of bacterial pathogens to form biofilm is recognized as an important virulence factor to facilitate colonization and persistence both outside and within the host (Costerton et al. Reference Costerton, Stewart and Greenberg1999; Parsek & Fuqua, Reference Parsek and Fuqua2003; Hall-Stoodley & Stoodley, Reference Hall-Stoodley and Stoodley2005). Comparison among the biofilm masses developed by Ps. aeruginosa strains showed high heterogeneity at each of the temperatures tested, with some strains forming greater biofilm mass at lower and others at higher temperatures (Fig. 1). It is hypothesized that in-vitro biofilm formation, at the air-liquid interface, has environmental relevance to colonization of surface and volume, thus, the ability of Pseudomonas strains from divers ecological niches to form biofilm (pellicle) at the air-liquid interface was recently studied (Ude et al. Reference Ude, Arnold, Moon, Timms-Wilson and Spiers2006). Under static conditions at temperatures of 18–22°C, 76% of the isolates formed pellicles (Ude et al. Reference Ude, Arnold, Moon, Timms-Wilson and Spiers2006). In concurrence with these results, the majority of Ps. aeruginosa strains in our study also generated a clearly visible pellicle (Fig. 2). Notably, most strains displayed a distinct combination of growth pattern and pellicle morphology. Since all strains were grown under identical conditions, these findings support the presence of genetic heterogeneity among the Ps. aeruginosa strains isolated from mastitis cases in Israel. Further studies should be performed to examine possible correlations between biofilm formation and capacity of a strain to cause clinical or subclinical masitits.

Fig. 1. Quantification of Ps. aeruginosa biofilm, assayed by the crystal violet staining method, according to the average OD595 and sd of four replicate wells.

Fig. 2. Image of Ps. aeruginosa growth in borosilicate glass tube. Strains were grown in LB for 24 h at 37°C with gentle agitation. Glass tubes were imaged by digital camera. For strain designations, see legend to Fig. 1.

Genetic relatedness among Ps. aeruginosa strains

Phenotypic characterization of the isolates from the outbreaks suggested the presence of distinct strains in different farms and different animals. PFGE is a commonly employed fingerprinting method that has become the gold standard for typing Ps. aeruginosa strains (Ojeniyi et al. Reference Ojeniyi, Petersen and Høiby1993; Grundmann et al. Reference Grundmann, Schneider, Hartung, Daschner and Pitt1995; Jalal et al. Reference Jalal, Ciofu, Hoiby, Gotoh and Wretlind2000; Spencker et al. Reference Spencker, Haupt, Claros, Walter, Lietz, Schille and Rodloff2000; Bertrand et al. Reference Bertrand, Thouverez, Talon, Boillot, Capellier, Floriot and Helias2001; Douglas et al. Reference Douglas, Mulholland, Denyer and Gottlieb2001; Rementeria et al. Reference Rementeria, Gallego, Quindos and Garaizar2001). To further delineate the relationship between the 10 clones that were genetically identified as Ps. aeruginosa, the strains were subjected to PFGE analysis (Fig. 3a). The variations observed in the PFGE profiles suggest that several different strains, rather than one clone, were involved in the various outbreaks. It is interesting to note that strains GA-13, GA-15, which were derived from the same sheep farm, represent a single clone (similarity coefficient 100%), while strain GA-30, isolated also from the same farm was only distantly related (similarity coefficient 70%). If we use the >90% criterion for closely related strains, then strains BI-40 and KZ-85 seem to form a distinct cluster. Interestingly, the two strains were derived from different animals and farms in distinct geographical regions. Our findings are similar to those reported by Las Heras et al. (Reference Las Heras, Vela, Fernandez, Casamayor, Dominguez and Fernandez-Garayzabal2002), who found 14 different pulsotypes among 32 Ps. aeruginosa strains derived from clinical and subclinical cases of mastitis in 12 sheep flocks. Whether strains associated with outbreaks in animals may also cause human infection in susceptible individuals remains to be studied.

Fig. 3. Genotypic analysis of Ps. aeruginosa strains by pulsed-field gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). (A) DNA fingerprints obtained with PFGE. (B) A dendrogram showing percentages of similarity among the isolates, based on the PFGE fingerprint data. Strains were clustered by the unweighted pair-group method of arithmetic averages. Strain details are presented in Table 1.

In conclusion, our findings support the evidence that mastitis outbreaks of Ps. aeruginosa in sheep, goat and cattle in Israel were caused by different virulent clones and isolates coming from various dairy farms. Ps. aeruginosa is classified as an environmental pathogen in animal mastitis, a relatively rare disease, associated with infections. The occurrence of this microorganisms as a mastitis pathogen in Israeli dairy farms remained unclear. Others studies will be performed in order to evaluate the predisposal factors or epidemiological data that facilitate the occurrence of Ps. aeruginosa infections in mammary glands in sheep, goat and cattle in Israeli dairy animal herds.

References

Altschul, SF, Madden, TL, Schaffer, AA, Zhang, J, Zhang, Z, Miller, W & Lipman, DJ 1997 Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25 33893402CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amann, RI, Ludwig, W & Schleifer, KH 1995 Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Reviews 59 143169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergonier, D, de Cremoux, R, Rupp, R, Lagriffoul, G & Berthelot, X 2003 Mastitis of dairy small ruminants. Veterinary Research 34 689716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, X, Thouverez, M, Talon, D, Boillot, A, Capellier, G, Floriot, C & Helias, JP 2001 Endemicity, molecular diversity and colonisation routes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units. Intensive Care Medicine 27 12631268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costerton, JW, Stewart, PS & Greenberg, EP 1999 Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284 13181322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, MW, Mulholland, K, Denyer, V & Gottlieb, T 2001 Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a burns unit – an infection control study. Burns 27 131135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, RJ, Walker, RD, Bolin, CA, Bartlett, PC & White, DG 2002 Trends in antibacterial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens during a seven-year period. Journal of Dairy Science 85 11111118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grundmann, H, Schneider, C, Hartung, D, Daschner, FD & Pitt, TL 1995 Discriminatory power of three DNA-based typing techniques for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33 528534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall-Stoodley, L & Stoodley, P 2005 Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens. Trends in Microbiology 13 710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartas, J, Hibble, M & Sriprakash, KS 1998 Simplification of a Locus-Specific DNA Typing Method (Vir Typing) for Streptococcus pyogenes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36 14281429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, SJ, Gonzalez, NR, Harmon, JR, Nickerson, CS, Oliver, PS, Pankey, JW & Smith, KL 1999 Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Revised edition. Madison WI, USA: NMC Inc.Google Scholar
Høiby, N 1977 Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section B 28 196Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1985 Laboratory Methods for Use in Mastitis Work. IDF Document 132. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Jalal, S, Ciofu, O, Hoiby, N, Gotoh, N & Wretlind, B 2000 Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44 710712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, ME 1998 Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In Molecular Bacteriology: Protocols and Clinical Applications, pp. 3350 (Eds Woodford, N & Johnson, AP). Totowa NJ, USA: Humana PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, JH & Bartlett, PC 1984 Nonclinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa mastitis in a dairy herd. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 184 671673Google Scholar
Las Heras, A, Vela, AI, Fernandez, E, Casamayor, A, Dominguez, L & Fernandez-Garayzabal, JF 2002 DNA macrorestriction analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from mastitis in dairy sheep. Veterinary Record 151 670672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NCCLS 1999 Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilation susceptibility test for veterinary antimicrobial agents. Approved standard. M31-A. NCCLS, Wayne Pa, USAGoogle Scholar
Ojeniyi, B, Petersen, US & Høiby, N 1993 Comparison of genome fingerprinting with conventional typing methods used on Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologic, et immunologica Scandinavica 101 168175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Toole, GA, Pratt, LA, Watnick, PI, Newman, DK, Weaver, VB & Kolter, R 1999 Genetic approaches to the study of biofilms. Methods in Enzymology 310 91109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsek, MR & Fuqua, C 2003 Biofilms: emerging themes and challenges in studies of surface-associated microbial life. Journal of Bacteriology 186 44274440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rementeria, A, Gallego, L, Quindos, G & Garaizar, J 2001 Comparative evaluation of three commercial software packages for analysis of DNA polymorphism patterns. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 7 331336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencker, FB, Haupt, S, Claros, MC, Walter, S, Lietz, T, Schille, R & Rodloff, AC 2000 Epidemiologic characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 6 600607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ude, S, Arnold, DL, Moon, CD, Timms-Wilson, T & Spiers, AJ 2006 Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates. Environmental Microbiology 8 19972011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeruham, I, Schwimmer, A, Friedman, S, Leitner, G, Zamir, S, Ilsar-Adiri, N & Goshen, T 2005 Investigation and control of mastitis outbreaks caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a sheep flock and a goat herd. Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift 118 220223Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Phenotypic and biochemical characterization of Ps. aeruginosa strains according to farm origin and animal species

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Quantification of Ps. aeruginosa biofilm, assayed by the crystal violet staining method, according to the average OD595 and sd of four replicate wells.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Image of Ps. aeruginosa growth in borosilicate glass tube. Strains were grown in LB for 24 h at 37°C with gentle agitation. Glass tubes were imaged by digital camera. For strain designations, see legend to Fig. 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Genotypic analysis of Ps. aeruginosa strains by pulsed-field gel-electrophoresis (PFGE). (A) DNA fingerprints obtained with PFGE. (B) A dendrogram showing percentages of similarity among the isolates, based on the PFGE fingerprint data. Strains were clustered by the unweighted pair-group method of arithmetic averages. Strain details are presented in Table 1.