Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:25:35.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The neutrophil function and lymphocyte profile of milk from bovine mammary glands infected with Streptococcus dysgalactiae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2015

Maiara G Blagitz*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof Dr Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Fernando N Souza
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-010, Brazil
Camila F Batista
Affiliation:
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof Dr Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Luis Fernando F Azevedo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof Dr Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Nilson Roberti Benites
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Priscilla Anne Melville
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Soraia A Diniz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-010, Brazil
Marcos X Silva
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-010, Brazil
João Paulo A Haddad
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-010, Brazil
Marcos Bryan Heinnemann
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
Mônica M O P Cerqueira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Tecnologia e Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-010, Brazil
Alice M M P Della Libera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof Dr Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: magblagitz@uol.com.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Streptococcus dysgalactiae is a bacterium that accounts for a notable proportion of both clinical and subclinical intramammary infections (IMIs). Thus, the present study explores the function of milk neutrophils and the lymphocyte profile in mammary glands naturally infected with Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Here, we used 32 culture-negative control quarters from eight clinically healthy dairy cows with low somatic cell counts and 13 S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters from six dairy cows. Using flow cytometry, we evaluated the percentage of milk monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils, expression of CD62L, CD11b and CD44 by milk neutrophils, the levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by milk neutrophils, and neutrophil viability. Furthermore, the percentages of B cell (CD21+) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+/CD4+/CD8; CD3+/CD8+/CD4; and CD3+/CD8/CD4), and the expression of CD25 by T milk lymphocytes (CD3+) and T CD4+ milk cells were also assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies. The present study showed a higher SCC and percentage of milk neutrophils, and a decrease in the percentage of milk monocytes/macrophages from S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters when compared to uninfected ones. We also observed a higher expression of CD11b by milk neutrophils and a tendency toward a decrease in neutrophil apoptosis rate in S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters. In addition, the S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters had higher percentages of milk T cells (CD3+) and their subset CD3+CD8+CD4 cells. Overall, the present study provided new insights into S. dysgalactiae IMIs, including distinct lymphocyte profiles, and a tendency toward an inhibition of apoptosis in milk neutrophils.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2015 

Mastitis is a disease of major economic importance, causing reduced milk production and quality and increasing the use of veterinary drugs worldwide. Several bacterial genera and species are capable of causing mastitis, and one of the most common groups of bacteria isolated from intramammary infections (IMIs) is Streptococcus spp., which includes Streptococcus dysgalactiae (Osteras et al. Reference Osteras, Solverod and Reksen2006; Whist et al. Reference Whist, Osteras and Solverod2007; Souza et al. Reference Souza, Brito, Moreira, Brito and Silva2009; Zadoks & Fitzpatrick, Reference Zadoks and Fitzpatrick2009; Botrel et al. Reference Botrel, Haeni, Morignat, Sulpice, Madec and Calavas2010; Schwarz et al. Reference Schwarz, Diesterbeck, Failing, König, Brügemann, Zschöck, Wolter and Czerny2010; Beecher et al. Reference Beecher, Daly, Ross, Flynn, McCarthy and Giblin2012; Abrahmsén et al. Reference Abrahmsén, Persson, Kanyima and Bage2014; Leelahapongsathon et al. Reference Leelahapongsathon, Schukken and Suriyasathaporn2014). For instance, Botrel et al. (Reference Botrel, Haeni, Morignat, Sulpice, Madec and Calavas2010) described that S. dysgalactiae was isolated in 8·8 and 9·4% of the milk samples from clinical and subclinical cases of mastitis, respectively.

Mastitis organisms are categorised as contagious or environmental pathogens based on their distinct characteristics of distribution and interaction with the teat and teat duct. Environmental pathogens are those whose primary reservoir is the environment rather than infected mammary glands. The most frequently isolated environmental pathogens are coliform bacteria and streptococci other than S. agalactiae. Among the environmental streptococci, S. uberis and S. dysgalactiae are the most prevalent (Calvinho et al. Reference Calvinho, Almeida and Oliver1998; Osteras et al. Reference Osteras, Solverod and Reksen2006; Whist et al. Reference Whist, Osteras and Solverod2007; Zadoks & Fitzpatrick, Reference Zadoks and Fitzpatrick2009; Schwarz et al. Reference Schwarz, Diesterbeck, Failing, König, Brügemann, Zschöck, Wolter and Czerny2010; Leelahapongsathon et al. Reference Leelahapongsathon, Schukken and Suriyasathaporn2014), although these bacteria have been found to be contagious in some dairy herds (Whist et al. Reference Whist, Osteras and Solverod2007).

In the last few decades, with the improvement of mastitis control programs leading to herds with lower somatic cell counts (SCCs), environmental mastitis has become a major problem in many well-managed dairy herds that have successfully controlled contagious pathogens (Schukken et al. Reference Schukken, Grommers, Van Der Geer and Brand1989; Calvinho et al. Reference Calvinho, Almeida and Oliver1998; Green et al. Reference Green, Green, Schukken, Bradley, Peeler, Barkema, de Hass, Collis and Medley2004). In these herds, S. dysgalactiae accounts for a significant number of subclinical and clinical cases of IMIs (Calvinho et al. Reference Calvinho, Almeida and Oliver1998; Zadoks & Fitzpatrick, Reference Zadoks and Fitzpatrick2009). Furthermore, mastitis control programs have had minimal effects on reducing the incidence of IMIs caused by S. dysgalactiae (Bolton et al. Reference Bolton, Song, Wilson, Fontaine, Potter and Perez-Casal2004; Lundberg et al. Reference Lundberg, Nyman, Unnerstad and Waller2014). Despite improvements in management practices, S. dysgalactiae mastitis has remained a problem in many dairy herds. However, few studies have investigated the immune response against S. dysgalactiae (Calvinho et al. Reference Calvinho, Almeida and Oliver1998; Song et al. Reference Song, Perez-Casal, Bolton and Potter2001; Wyder et al. Reference Wyder, Boss, Naskova, Kaufmann, Steiner and Graber2010; Beecher et al. Reference Beecher, Daly, Ross, Flynn, McCarthy and Giblin2012) and its effects on udder health.

Striving for a complete elimination of antimicrobial use in dairy cattle is unrealistic, although a reduction in antimicrobial use is recommended and feasible. From that point of view, one of the most practical means for dealing with mastitis may be to enhance the natural ability of animals to resist infection. The greatest obstacle in establishing this type of strategy is a lack of understanding of many aspects of the host immune response. Currently, the roles of various immune system components in the defence of the mammary gland against infection by several pathogens are not well understood. Altogether, it is clear that a more comprehensive understanding of the immune response is essential to the development of effective prevention strategies of mastitis (Soltys & Quinn, Reference Soltys and Quinn1999).

The present study aimed to investigate the function of milk neutrophils and the milk lymphocyte profile in S. dysgalactiae-infected mammary glands.

Materials and methods

Animals and experimental design

The present study utilised milk samples from 45 quarter  of14 Holstein dairy cows, which were collected at various stages of lactation from a commercial herd. From these samples, 32 culture-negative quarters from eight dairy cows exhibiting no abnormal secretions in the strip cup test and a milk somatic cell count (MSCC) lower than 2 × 105 cells/ml, which is the MSCC threshold proposed by Schepers et al. (Reference Schepers, Lam, Schukken, Wilmink and Hanekamp1997) and Schukken et al. (Reference Schukken, Wilson, Welcome, Garrison-Tikofsky and Gonzales2003) for uninfected quarters, were defined as the control group. Additionally, 13 S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters from six dairy cows were included. The parity and days in milk of all animals were also recorded.

Regarding the criteria used here, Dohoo et al. (Reference Dohoo, Smith, Andersen, Kelton and Godden2011) assessed the sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of a single milk quarter sample and described that milk samples with SCC ⩾ 200 000 cells/ml and with at least two pure colonies of S. dysgalactiae or S. uberis have a SE and SP of 66·4 and 100%, respectively. In addition, these authors reported that 89% of all Streptococcus spp. isolates in the weekly data had more than 1000 colony forming per unit/ml in culture, suggesting that these infections shed a large number of microorganisms.

Sample collection

First, the strip cup test was performed to identify the presence of clots, flakes or otherwise obviously abnormal secretions. Then, the pre-dipping was performed, and one towel was used for each teat. After discarding the first three milk streams, teat ends were scrubbed with cotton containing 70% ethanol, and single milk samples from individual mammary quarters were aseptically collected into sterile vials for bacteriological analysis (approximately 3 ml). Finally, milk samples for the SCC (approximately 40 ml) and evaluation of neutrophilic function and milk lymphocyte profile (approximately 1 litres) were collected. Samples were kept at 4 °C for about 3 h until arriving at the laboratory. Milk samples for bacteriological analysis were cooled at –20 °C until the analysis.

Bacteriological analysis

The bacteriological analysis was performed by culturing 0·01 ml of each single milk-quarter sample on 5% bovine blood agar plates (Bio Express, São Paulo, Brazil). The plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C, and S. dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae was identified as Gram-positive cocci, alpha-hemolytic, catalase negative, esculin negative and negative reaction in Christie-Atkins-Munch-Petersen (CAMP) (Raemy et al. Reference Raemy, Meylan, Casati, Gaia, Berchtold, Boss, Wyder and Graber2013). A milk sample was considered culture-positive when the growth of ⩾10 (103 colony forming per unit) pure S. dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae colonies was detected. Samples yielding no bacterial growth were regarded as culture-negative.

Determination of the SCC

Milk samples for SCC were collected in 40 ml vials containing microtablets of bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropane-1,3-diol) as a preserving agent. Subsequently, SCC measurements were performed using an automated, fluorescent, microscopic somatic cell counter (Somacount 300 – Bentley Instruments®, Chaska, USA).

Separation of milk cells

The separation of the milk cells was performed as described by Koess & Hamann (Reference Koess and Hamann2008). Briefly, 1 L of milk was diluted with 1 litre of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7·4; 1·06 mM Na2HPO4, 155·17 mM NaCl and 2·97 mM Na2HPO4·7H2O). After centrifugation at 1000 g for 15 min, the cream layer and supernatant were discarded. The cell pellet was then washed once using 30 ml of PBS and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. The cells were resuspended in 1 ml of RPMI-1640 nutritional medium (cat. n. R7638, Sigma Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cultilab, Campinas, Brazil) and counted using a Neubauer chamber. Cell viability was evaluated using trypan blue exclusion (Jain & Jasper, Reference Jain and Jasper1967). The milk cells were then diluted with nutritional medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum to a concentration of 2 × 106 viable cells/ml.

Enumeration of lymphocyte subpopulations

The cells were washed with PBS and incubated with the primary monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for 30 min on ice to detect CD21, and the combination of CD3, CD4 and CD8. The identification of lymphocyte subsets was based on their cytoplasmic granularities and mean fluorescence intensities following a two-step fluorescence immunolabeling protocol using primary anti-bovine mAbs and secondary mAbs coupled to long-wavelength fluorescent probes (Table 1). Next, 1 ml of PBS was added to the cell suspension and centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min. Finally, the labelled secondary mAb was added to the cell suspension, and the cells were incubated for 30 min on ice with the secondary mAbs. The cells were then washed with PBS and immediately analysed using flow cytometry. A total of 20 000 milk cells, excluding the cellular debris, were examined per sample. FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data. The results were corrected for autofluorescence, which was defined as the fluorescence that was associated with non-labelled freshly isolated milk cells from the same cow (Della Libera et al. Reference Della Libera, Souza, Batista, Santos, Azevedo, Sanchez, Diniz, Silva, Haddad and Blagitz2015).

Table 1. Monoclonal antibodies used for immunophenotyping bovine milk leucocytes by flow cytometry

PE:R-Phycoerythrin; APC: Allophycocyanin; FITC: fluorescein isothiocyanate; PE-Cy5: Phycoerythrin cyanine 5

VMRD Pullman Inc. Corp®, Pullman, WA, USA

Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA

§ AbD Serotec, Oxford, England

Expression of CD25

A crucial event in the initiation of an immune response is the activation of T cells, which requires IL-2 binding to its high-affinity IL-2 receptor for optimal signalling. The IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25) is needed for the high affinity binding of IL-2 to effector cells and is potently induced after T cell activation (Waters et al. Reference Waters, Rahner, Palmer, Cheng, Nonnecke and Whipple2003; Maslanka et al. Reference Maslanka, Spodniewska, Barski, Jasiecka, Zuska-Prot, Ziólkowski, Markiewicz and Jaroszewski2014). Thus, here we evaluated the expression of CD25 in bovine T cells (CD3+) and T CD4+ lymphocytes by flow cytometry using the mAbs listed in Table 1. Firstly, unlabelled primary mAbs that were directed against CD3, CD4 and CD25 were added to the cell suspension and incubated for 30 min on ice. The isolated milk cell suspension was centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min, and the labelled secondary mAbs were added. Finally, the isolated milk cells were incubated for 30 min on ice in the dark to allow the visualisation of cells expressing CD3, CD4 and CD25. Expression of CD25 was determined for gated T cells (CD3+) and T CD4+ lymphocytes (CD3+ CD4+) populations. Data are presented as median fluorescence intensity (MFI). For this assay, 10 000 gated T cells were examined per sample. FlowJo Tree Star Software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data.

Identification of neutrophils

Milk neutrophils were differentiated from other cells by indirect fluorescence labelling. The cells were incubated with an unlabelled primary anti-bovine granulocyte mAbs (Table 1) for 30 min on ice. Next, 1 ml of PBS was added to the cell suspension, which was centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min. Finally, a labelled secondary mAb (Table 1) was added, and the sample was incubated for 30 min on ice in the dark to visualise the bound of CH138A. The neutrophils were identified using flow cytometry based on the cells’ cytoplasmic granularities and CH138A positivity as previously described by Piepers et al. (Reference Piepers, De Vliegher, Demeyere, Lamrecht, Kruif, Meyer and Opsomer2009) and Blagitz et al. (Reference Blagitz, Souza, Santos, Batista, Parra, Azevedo and Della Libera2013) (Fig. 1). A total of 20 000 milk cells, excluding cellular debris, were examined per sample. FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data. The results were corrected for autofluorescence, which was defined as the fluorescence that was associated with non-labelled freshly isolated milk cells from the same cow.

Fig. 1. Flow cytometric identification of the milk polymorphonuclear leucocytes (neutrophils) isolated from a representative uninfected (A) and S. dysgalactiae-infected (B) quarters. Recordings of scatter (SSC-H) and fluorescent properties (FL2-H; CH138A-Phycoerythrin) were performed on 20 000 events gated in a standard population excluding most of cell debris.

Identification of macrophages/monocytes

CD14 has long be used to identify macrophages/monocytes, however, milk neutrophils can also express CD14 (Paape et al. Reference Paape, Liluis, Wiitanen, Kontio and Miller1996; Sladek et al. Reference Sladek, Rysanek and Faldyna2002). Thus, the macrophages/monocytes were identified using flow cytometry based on CD14 positivity and CH138 negativity (CD14+/CH138). The cells were washed with PBS and incubated with an unlabelled primary anti-bovine CH138A and CD14 mAbs (Table 1) for 30 min on ice. Next, 1 ml of PBS was added to the cell suspension, which was centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min. Finally, a labelled secondary mAbs (Table 1) was added, and the sample was incubated for 30 min on ice in the dark to visualise the bound of CD14 and CH138A. A total of 20 000 milk cells, excluding cellular debris, were examined per sample. FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data. The results were corrected for autofluorescence, which was defined as the fluorescence that was associated with non-labelled freshly isolated milk cells from the same cow.

Detection of apoptosis using flow cytometry

The death of neutrophils (CH138+) was assessed using dual-labelling with an annexin V antibody and propidium iodide (PI) using a commercial kit (cat. n. K2350, APOPTEST-FITC™, Dako Cytomation, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands). Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described (Piepers et al. Reference Piepers, De Vliegher, Demeyere, Lamrecht, Kruif, Meyer and Opsomer2009; Blagitz et al. Reference Blagitz, Souza, Santos, Batista, Parra, Azevedo and Della Libera2013). Briefly, 2 × 105 viable milk cells were suspended in 100 µl of binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2 and 1·8 mM CaCl2) containing an anti-annexin V-FITC antibody and incubated on ice for 20 min in the dark. Immediately before flow cytometric analysis, 5 µl of a 250 µg/ml PI solution was added (final concentration 2·5 µg/ml). Next, the neutrophils were labelled using mAbs as described above.

To analyse the data, scatterplots were generated for the gated neutrophils. The living, non-apoptotic cells were negative for both FITC-labelled anti-annexin V and PI. The cells that were positive for FITC-labelled anti-annexin V but negative for PI were classified as apoptotic cells. The necrotic and late apoptotic cells were positive for both FITC-labelled anti-annexin V and PI (Piepers et al. Reference Piepers, De Vliegher, Demeyere, Lamrecht, Kruif, Meyer and Opsomer2009; Blagitz et al. Reference Blagitz, Souza, Santos, Batista, Parra, Azevedo and Della Libera2013). A total of 20 000 milk cells, excluding cellular debris, was examined per sample. FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data.

Intracellular reactive oxygen species production

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was assessed with flow cytometry using 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) as a probe (Hasui et al. Reference Hasui, Hirabayashi and Kobayashi1989). Briefly, 2 × 105 viable milk cells from each quarter, which were previously assessed using trypan blue exclusion, were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with 0·3 µM DCFH-DA (D6883, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).

The intracellular 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) fluorescence of the neutrophils (CH138+) was determined with flow cytometry using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm. DCFH-DA, which is a cell-permeable, nonfluorescent probe, is converted to DCF by ROS in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in fluorescence emission. The green fluorescence of DCF was detected at 500–530 nm.

The percentage of neutrophils producing ROS was calculated as the number of fluorescent neutrophils divided by the total neutrophil count and multiplied by 100. The MFI of ROS production was estimated from the median of DCF fluorescence (Blagitz et al. Reference Blagitz, Souza, Batista, Diniz, Azevedo, Silva, Haddad, Heinemann, Cerqueira and Della Libera2015; Della Libera et al. Reference Della Libera, Souza, Batista, Santos, Azevedo, Sanchez, Diniz, Silva, Haddad and Blagitz2015). For this assay, 10 000 gated neutrophils were examined per sample. FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, USA) was used to analyse the data. The results were corrected for autofluorescence, which was defined as the fluorescence that was associated with non-labelled freshly isolated milk cells from the same cow.

Preparation of PI-labelled bacteria

PI-labelled Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was prepared as described by Hasui et al. (Reference Hasui, Hirabayashi and Kobayashi1989) with some modifications for the detection of phagocytosis of S. aureus by milk neutrophils. Briefly, S. aureus was cultured for 18 h at 37 °C on brain-heart infusion agar. Subsequently, the bacteria were heat-killed using incubation at 60 °C for 30 min, after which they were washed three times using a sterile saline solution (0·9% NaCl). The bacterial density was adjusted to an absorbance of 2·50 at 620 nm, yielding approximately 2·4 × 109 bacteria/ml, as previously described (Hasui et al. Reference Hasui, Hirabayashi and Kobayashi1989). The bacteria were then labelled using a 5% PI (P4170, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution for 30 min on ice. The fluorescent bacteria were washed three times and suspended in PBS containing 5 mM glucose and 0·1% gelatin, and aliquots were stored at −80 °C. Thereafter, the PI-labelling of the bacteria was confirmed using flow cytometry.

Phagocytosis assay

The phagocytosis assay was performed using flow cytometry of PI-labelled S. aureus. Briefly, 2 × 105 viable milk cells were incubated with 100 µl of heat-killed, PI-labelled S. aureus and 900 µl of PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, 2 ml of 3 mM EDTA was added, and after centrifugation at 400 g for 10 min, the leucocytes were resuspended in 300 µl of PBS and analysed using flow cytometry.

The percentage of neutrophils (CH138+) that phagocytised the PI-labelled bacteria was equal to the number of fluorescent neutrophils divided by the total neutrophil count and multiplied by 100. The MFI of S. aureus phagocytosis was estimated from the median value of PI fluorescence (Blagitz et al. Reference Blagitz, Souza, Santos, Batista, Parra, Azevedo and Della Libera2013, Reference Blagitz, Souza, Batista, Diniz, Azevedo, Silva, Haddad, Heinemann, Cerqueira and Della Libera2015; Della Libera et al. Reference Della Libera, Souza, Batista, Santos, Azevedo, Sanchez, Diniz, Silva, Haddad and Blagitz2015). At least 20 000 cells were examined per sample. FlowJo Tree Star Software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data.

Expression of L-selectin, β 2-integrin and CD44

The identification of neutrophils expressing L-selectin (CD62L), the β-chain of β2-integrin (CD11b) and one of the three endothelial-selectin ligands (CD44) was performed with flow cytometry using the mAbs listed in Table 1. Unlabelled primary mAbs that were directed against CH138A, CD11b and CD44 were added to the cell suspension and incubated for 30 min on ice. The isolated milk cell suspension was centrifuged at 400 g for 8 min, and a CD62L mAb and secondary mAbs for the detection of the anti-CH138A, anti-CD11b and -CD44 mAbs were added. Finally, the isolated milk cells were incubated for 30 min on ice in the dark to allow the visualisation of cells expressing CD62L, CD11b and CD44. Expression of CD11b, CD44 and CD62L was determined for gated neutrophils (CH138A+). We chose the relative MFI for analysis of adhesion molecules because this parameter was much more discriminating compared with the percentage of positive cells. The MFI provides an accurate measurement of the brightness of the stained cells and is thus an indicator of the number of receptors per cell (Diez-Fraile et al. Reference Diez-Fraile, Meyer, Paape and Burvenich2003). For this assay, 10 000 gated neutrophils were examined per sample. FlowJo Tree Star Software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to analyse the data.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean ± se) were initially calculated for all variables. To account for the nested nature of the data (quarters and cows nested within the cows), multilevel analyses were conducted using the Generalised Linear Latent and Mixed Models (GLLAMM) procedure. Multilevel models are the most appropriate technique for analysing nested data that are not independent of each other (Rabe-Hesketh & Skrondal, Reference Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal2008). The potential moderating effect of number of days in milk and parity on observed associations was estimated in the model by including appropriate interactions terms. A two-tailed probability level of 0·05 was adopted. The statistical analyses were performed using STATA statistical software version 12 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

The logarithmic SCC and the proportion of neutrophils (CH138+, Fig. 1) were higher in the quarters that were infected with S. dysgalactiae compared with the mammary glands that were free from infection (Table 2). On the other hand, the macrophages/monocytes were the major cell type in milk from healthy quarters (Table 3). From the 13 S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters that were included in the present study, only two quarters were from clinical cases of mastitis (presence of abnormal secretion in the strip cup test). Furthermore, S. dysgalactiae-infected cows have a higher number of days in milk (222·77 ± 25·32) and parity (3·77 ± 0·48) than uninfected ones (133·38 ± 22·84, P = 0·007; 2·50 ± 0·31, P = 0·001).

Table 2. SCC and function of milk neutrophils from uninfected and Streptococcus dysgalactiae infected quarters

Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significant differences (P ⩽ 0·05) between the values The results are shown as the mean ± se

SCC: somatic cell count; PI: propidium iodide; S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus; ROS: reactive oxygen species; MFI: median fluorescence intensity

Table 3. Percentage of milk macrophages/monocytes and lymphocyte subsets from uninfected and Streptococcus dysgalactiae infected quarters

Different superscripted letters within a row indicate significant differences (P ⩽ 0·05) between the values. The results are shown as the mean ± se

The results of this study revealed a tendency toward a lower percentage of annexin-V+/PI neutrophils (apoptotic neutrophils) from S. dysgalactiae-infected mammary glands compared with the uninfected glands (Table 2). No significant difference was observed in the viable (annexin-V/PI) milk neutrophils, necrotic or late apoptotic (annexin-V+/PI+) milk neutrophils, the percentage of milk neutrophils that produced intracellular ROS or phagocytised S. aureus, the MFI of intracellular ROS production, the MFI phagocytosis of S. aureus, and the expression of CD44 and CD62L by the milk neutrophils (Table 2). By contrast, the expression of CD11b by milk neutrophils in the S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters was higher than uninfected quarters (Fig. 2; Table 2).

Fig. 2. Histogram overlays demonstrating CD11b expression on milk neutrophils. Histogram represents the log fluorescence (CD11b-Phycoerythrin-Cy5) of milk neutrophils (CH138+).

In addition, the S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters had higher percentages of milk T cells (CD3+) (Fig. 3; Table 3) and their subset CD3+CD8+CD4. The expression of CD25 by T cells (CD3+) and CD4+ T cells did not differ between groups. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of milk B cells (Table 3).

Fig. 3. Flow cytometric identification of the T lymphocytes (CD3+) isolated from a representative uninfected (A) and S. dysgalactiae-infected (B) quarters. The recordings of scatter (SSC-H) and fluorescent properties (FL3-H; CD3-Phycoerythrin-Cy5) were performed on 20 000 events gated in a standard population excluding most of debris.

Regarding the statistical model used here, it was possible to determine an effect of the number of days in the following variables: percentage of annexin V+/PI+ milk neutrophils (P = 0·038), percentage of milk neutrophils that produced ROS (P = 0·048), MFI of ROS production by milk neutrophils (P = 0·028), percentage of milk neutrophils that phagocytised S. aureus (P = 0·063), MFI of phagocytosis of S. aureus by milk neutrophils (P = 0·046), expression of CD11b by milk neutrophils (P = 0·015), percentage of milk monocytes/macrophages (P = 0·059), and expression of CD25 by T (P = 0·007) and T CD4+ milk cells (P = 0·014). Furthermore, an effect of parity on the following variables was observed: somatic cell count (P = 0·066), percentage of milk neutrophils (P = 0·038), percentage of annexin V+/PI+ milk neutrophils (P = 0·0001), percentage of milk monocytes/macrophages (P = 0·013), and percentage of T CD4+ milk cells (P = 0·007).

Discussion

The mammary glands naturally infected with S. dysgalactiae had higher SCCs and neutrophil proportions in the present study, as previously described (Leitner et al. Reference Leitner, Shoshani, Krifucks, Chaffer and Saran2000; Djabri et al. Reference Djabri, Bareille, Beaudeau and Seegers2002; Whist et al. Reference Whist, Osteras and Solverod2007). This augmentation of milk SCC, mainly due to the increase of neutrophils might be at least partially due to the evocation of an eicosanoid response (prostaglandin (PG)E2, PGF, and thromboxane B2) that leads to the recruitment of neutrophils in naturally infected mammary glands (Bannerman, Reference Bannerman2009).

During mastitis, inflammatory chemoattractants guide neutrophils toward the foci of infection. The influx of neutrophils from the blood to the milk in the mammary gland is important for the defence of the mammary gland against bacterial infection (Paape et al. Reference Paape, Bannerman, Zhao and Lee2003; Rainard & Riollet, Reference Rainard and Riollet2006). Several receptors on neutrophils participate in the migration into milk, including L-selectin, E-selectin and β2-integrins. L-selectin plays a role in the first step of egress from the blood flow, allowing the initial, migratory rolling on the endothelium, which is a prerequisite for endothelial-dependent neutrophil arrest. Therefore, the expression of L-selectin on bovine neutrophils that migrate into tissues diminishes after activation and diapedesis (Diez-Fraille et al. Reference Diez-Fraille, Mehrzad, Meyer, Duchateau and Burvenich2004). Since these cells already down-regulated L-selectin during migration into the udder, little or no further down-regulation or shedding of L-selectin was observed in milk leucocytes isolated from cows with mastitis (Soltys & Quinn, Reference Soltys and Quinn1999), as found here.

The β2-integrins consist of three non-covalently linked heterodimers (CD11a,b,c/CD18), which are important cell surface adhesion molecules that are involved in neutrophil migration; the dominant β2-integrin heterodimer that is expressed on bovine neutrophils is CD11b/CD18 (Smits et al. Reference Smits, Burvenich, Guidry and Massart-Leën2000; Paape et al. Reference Paape, Bannerman, Zhao and Lee2003; Rainard & Riollet, Reference Rainard and Riollet2006). CD44 was identified as one of the three endothelial selectin (E-selectin) ligands on neutrophils responsible for slowing down and activating the rolling process. CD44 and two other E-selectin ligands (ESL-1 and PSGL-1) are required, but not essential, for neutrophil extravasation during inflammation (Gonen et al. Reference Gonen, Nedvtzki, Naor and Shpigel2008).

Here, the expression of CD62L and CD44 by milk neutrophils was not statistically significant. In that regard, Beecher et al. (Reference Beecher, Daly, Ross, Flynn, McCarthy and Giblin2012) have demonstrated that the levels of IL-8 mRNA in S. dysgalactiae IMI, whose gene product enables leucocyte migration to the sites of infection, are not significantly different in milk somatic cells from uninfected control quarters v. infected quarters. Otherwise, a decreased transcription level of the β2-integrin gene cd18 was observed in milk somatic cells from experimental S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters at 7 h after challenge, and no difference was observed in the levels of cd18 gene expression over the course of the infection. On the other hand, Soltys & Quinn (Reference Soltys and Quinn1999) reported that lymphocytes and neutrophils obtained from the milk of cows with mastitis exhibited significant up-regulation of β2-integrins (CD18), consistent with an activated state due to the presence of bacterial pathogens, in agreement with our findings regarding the β2-integrins (CD11b). Nagahata et al. (Reference Nagahata, Kawai, Higuchi, Kawai, Yayou and Chang2011) found that the expression of L-selectin and CD18 molecules on neutrophils is higher in the milk from cows with S. aureus mastitis, although the expression of L-selectin in the milk was decreased compared to that in the blood. The reasons for these differences in phenotypic features between studies is unclear, though it may be associated with the difference in the virulence factors of these bacteria or the severity, extent and stage of the IMIs (Schukken et al. Reference Schukken, Günther, Fitzpatrick, Fontaine, Goetze, Holst, Leigh, Petzl, Schuberth, Sipka, Smith, Quesnell, Watts, Yancey, Zerbe, Gurjar, Zadoks and Seyfert2011).

The persistent accumulation of inflammatory cells at the inflammatory site requires both a continuous neutrophil influx and the increased survival of extravasated neutrophils (Boutet et al. Reference Boutet, Boulanger, Gillet, Vanderplasschen, Closset, Bureau and Lekeux2004). The present study revealed a tendency toward a lower percentage of apoptotic neutrophils in the S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters; this finding confirms the results of Boutet et al. (Reference Boutet, Boulanger, Gillet, Vanderplasschen, Closset, Bureau and Lekeux2004), who described delayed neutrophil apoptosis in subclinical bovine mastitis.

It is noteworthy that neutrophils are the first line of defence against infection and that the active stage of immune defence requires viable, immune-competent cells (Baumert et al. Reference Baumert, Bruckmaier and Wellnitz2009). In the present study, no significant difference in the viability rates was observed between the S. dysgalactiae-infected and uninfected quarters; moreover, there was no change in the percentage of neutrophils that produced intracellular ROS and phagocytised S. aureus.

Tassi et al. (Reference Tassi, McNeiley, Fitzpatrick, Fontaie, Reddick, Ramage, Lutton, Schukken and Zadoks2013), in an experimental infection by S. uberis, found that the proportion of CD3+ lymphocytes was significantly elevated from 96 h post-challenge onwards, reaching its highest level at 312 h post-challenge. Regarding T cells subsets, these authors found that the proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets increased 96 h post-challenge, with higher proportions of CD4+ lymphocytes compared with CD8+ lymphocytes present in the initial stages of infection. The proportion of CD4+ cells stabilised after the initial increase, whereas the proportion of CD8+ lymphocytes increased from 144 to 312 h post-challenge (the last sample collection). These data are in agreement with our findings, considering the higher proportion of milk T cells (CD3+) and CD8+ T lymphocytes in S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters found here. Furthermore, it appears that there is a selective recruitment of T-cell subsets to the udder during mastitis that depends on the pathogen (Soltys & Quinn, Reference Soltys and Quinn1999).

The higher proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes found here may have implications in the mammary gland. For instance, Park et al. (Reference Park, Fox, Hamiton and Davis1993) demonstrated that experimentally infected cows with S. aureus have higher number of activated CD8+ T cells which are responsible for suppressing the proliferative response of milk CD4+ T cells. Besides this, the preferential trafficking of CD8+ suppressor lymphocytes into mammary gland tissues and secretion may be responsible for the lower responsiveness of local leucocytes compared with those from peripheral blood (Sordillo et al. Reference Sordillo, Shafer-Weaver and DeRosa1997). Altogether, these data indicated that activation of CD8+ T-cells during certain bacterial IMIs can suppress important host immune responses and predispose to the chronic pattern of the IMIs (Alnakip et al. Reference Alnakip, Quintela-Baluja, Böhme, Fernandez-No, Caamaño-Antelo, Calo-Mata and Barros-Velázquez2014).

In milk from healthy mammary glands, the results of the percentage of each cell population are widely variable using flow cytometry, and consequently no consensus exists. Dosogne et al. (Reference Dosogne, Vangroenweghe, Mehrzad, Massart-Leën and Burvenich2003) and Schwarz et al. (Reference Schwarz, Diesterbeck, König, Brügemann, Schlez, Zschöck, Wolter and Czerny2011) regarded lymphocytes as the predominant cell population in healthy mammary glands. In contrast, Leitner et al. (Reference Leitner, Shoshani, Krifucks, Chaffer and Saran2000) and Leitner et al. (Reference Leitner, Eligulashvily, Krifucks, Perl and Saran2003) showed that epithelial cells are the main cell type in milk from uninfected mammary glands. On the other hand, macrophages were also pointed out as the major cell type in milk from healthy mammary glands using flow cytometry (Koess & Hamann, Reference Koess and Hamann2008) or microscopy (Lee et al. Reference Lee, Wooding and Kemp1980; Miller et al. Reference Miller, Paape and Fulton1991; Sarikaya et al. Reference Sarikaya, Prgomet, Pfaffl and Bruckmaier2004, Reference Sarikaya, Werner-Misof, Atzkern and Bruckmaier2005; Merle et al. Reference Merle, Schröder and Hamann2007), as found here.

Furthermore, the S. dysgalactiae-infected quarters used here came from cows with higher parity and days in milk than the uninfected cows, as previously described by Osteras et al. (Reference Osteras, Solverod and Reksen2006).

Overall, the present study provided new insights into S. dysgalactiae IMIs, including distinct lymphocyte profiles, and a tendency toward an inhibition of apoptosis in milk neutrophils.

The authors express appreciation for financial support from the São Paulo State Research Foundation (Project no 2009/50672-0). MGB and FNS should be considered co-first authors.

References

Abrahmsén, M, Persson, Y, Kanyima, BM & Bage, 2014 Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy farms in urban and peri-urban areas of Kamala, Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46 99105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alnakip, ME, Quintela-Baluja, M, Böhme, K, Fernandez-No, I, Caamaño-Antelo, S, Calo-Mata, P & Barros-Velázquez, 2014 The immunology of mammary gland of dairy ruminants between healthy and inflammatory conditions. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2014 659801Google Scholar
Bannerman, DD 2009 Pathogen-dependent induction of cytokines and other soluble inflammatory mediators during intramammary infections in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 87 1025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumert, A, Bruckmaier, RM & Wellnitz, O 2009 Cell population, viability, and some key immunomodulatory molecules in different milk somatic cell samples in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 76 356364CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecher, C, Daly, M, Ross, RP, Flynn, J, McCarthy, TV & Giblin, L 2012 Characterization of the bovine innate immune response in milk somatic cells following intramammary infection with Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies dysgalactiae. Journal of Dairy Science 95 57205729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blagitz, MG, Souza, FN, Santos, BP, Batista, CF, Parra, AC, Azevedo, LFF & Della Libera, AMMP 2013 Function of milk polymorphonuclear neutrophil in bovine mammary glands infected Corynebacterium bovis. Journal of Dairy Science 96 37503757CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blagitz, MG, Souza, FN, Batista, F, Diniz, SA, Azevedo, LFF, Silva, MX, Haddad, JPA, Heinemann, MB, Cerqueira, MMOP & Della Libera, AMMP 2015 Flow cytometric analysis: interdependence of healthy and infected udders. Journal of Dairy Science 98 24012408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, A, Song, X-M, Wilson, P, Fontaine, MC, Potter, AA & Perez-Casal, J 2004 Use of surface proteins GapC and Mig of Streptococcus dysgalactiae as potential protective antigens against bovine mastitis. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 50 423432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botrel, M-A, Haeni, M, Morignat, E, Sulpice, P, Madec, J-Y & Calavas, D 2010 Distribution and antimicrobial resistance of clinical and subclinical mastitis pathogens in dairy cows in Rhône-Alpes, France. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 7 479487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutet, P, Boulanger, D, Gillet, L, Vanderplasschen, A, Closset, R, Bureau, F & Lekeux, P 2004 Delayed neutrophil apoptosis in bovine subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 87 41044114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calvinho, LF, Almeida, RA & Oliver, SP 1998 Potential virulence factors of Streptococcus dysgalactiae associated with bovine mastitis. Veterinary Microbiology 61 93110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diez-Fraile, A, Meyer, E, Paape, MJ & Burvenich, C 2003 Analysis of the selective mobilization of L-selectin and Mac-1 reservoirs in bovine neutrophils and eosinophils. Veterinary Research 34 5770CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diez-Fraille, A, Mehrzad, J, Meyer, E, Duchateau, L & Burvenich, C 2004 Comparison of L-selectin and Mac-1 expression on blood and milk neutrophils during experimental Escherichia coli-induced mastitis in cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65 11641171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Della Libera, AMMP, Souza, FN, Batista, CF, Santos, BP, Azevedo, LFF, Sanchez, EMR, Diniz, SA, Silva, MX, Haddad, JP & Blagitz, MG 2015 Effect of bovine leukemia virus infection on milk neutrophil function and the milk lymphocyte profile. Veterinary Research 46 2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djabri, B, Bareille, N, Beaudeau, F & Seegers, F 2002 Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected cows: a meta analysis. Veterinary Research 33 335357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohoo, I, Smith, J, Andersen, S, Kelton, DF & Godden, S 2011 Diagnosing intramammary infections: evaluation of definitions based on a  single milk sample. Journal of Dairy Science 94 250261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dosogne, H, Vangroenweghe, F, Mehrzad, J, Massart-Leën, AM & Burvenich, C 2003 Differential leukocyte count method for bovine low somatic cell count milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86 828834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, MJ, Green, LE, Schukken, YH, Bradley, AJ, Peeler, EJ, Barkema, HW, de Hass, Y, Collis, VJ & Medley, GF 2004 Somatic cell count distributions during lactation predict clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 87 12561264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonen, E, Nedvtzki, S, Naor, D & Shpigel, NY 2008 CD44 is highly expressed on milk neutrophils in bovine mastitis and plays a role in their adhesion to matrix and mammary epithelium. Veterinary Research 39 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasui, M, Hirabayashi, Y & Kobayashi, Y 1989 Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of phagocytosis and hydrogen peroxide production of neutrophils in while blood. Journal of Immunology Methods 117 5358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koess, C & Hamann, J 2008 Detection of mastitis in the bovine mammary gland by flow cytometry at early stages. Journal of Dairy Research 75 225232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CS, Wooding, FB & Kemp, P 1980 Identification, properties, and differential counts of cell populations using eletron microscopy of dry cows secretion, colostrum and milk from normal cows. Journal of Dairy Research 47 3950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leelahapongsathon, K, Schukken, YH & Suriyasathaporn, K 2014 Quarter, cow, and farm risk factors for intramammary infections with major pathogens relative to minor pathogens in Thai dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46 10671078CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Shoshani, E, Krifucks, O, Chaffer, M & Saran, A 2000 Milk leucocyte population patterns in bovine udder infection of different aetiology. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B: Infectious Disase and Veterinary Public Health 47 581589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitner, G, Eligulashvily, R, Krifucks, O, Perl, S & Saran, A 2003 Immune cell differentiation in mammary gland tissues and milk of cows chronically infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B: Infectious Disase and Veterinary Public Health 50 4552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, NC & Jasper, DE 1967 Viable cells in bovine milk. British Veterinary Journal 123 5763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, Ä, Nyman, A, Unnerstad, HE & Waller, P 2014 Prevalence of bacterial genotypes and outcome of bovine clinical mastitis due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Streptococcus uberis. ACTA Veterinaria Scandinavica 56 80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslanka, T, Spodniewska, A, Barski, D, Jasiecka, A, Zuska-Prot, M, Ziólkowski, H, Markiewicz, W & Jaroszewski, JJ 2014 Prostaglandin E2 down-regulates the expression of CD25 on bovine T cells, and this effect is mediated through the EP4 receptor. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 160 192200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merle, R, Schröder, A & Hamann, J 2007 Cell function in bovine mammary gland: a preliminary study on the interdependence of healthy and infected udder quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74 174179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RH, Paape, MJ & Fulton, LA 1991 Variation in milk somatic cells of heifers at first calving. Journal of Dairy Science 74 37823790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagahata, H, Kawai, H, Higuchi, H, Kawai, K, Yayou, K & Chang, CJ 2011 Altered leukocyte responsiveness in dairy cows with naturally occurring chronic Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 73 885894CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osteras, O, Solverod, L & Reksen, O 2006 Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey – Effect of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. Journal of Dairy Science 89 10101023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paape, MJ, Liluis, E-M, Wiitanen, PA, Kontio, RH & Miller, RH 1996 Intramamary defense against infections induced by Escherichia coli in cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57 477482Google Scholar
Paape, MJ, Bannerman, DD, Zhao, X & Lee, JW 2003 The bovine neutrophil: structure and function in blood and milk. Veterinary Research 34 597627Google ScholarPubMed
Park, YH, Fox, LK, Hamiton, MJ & Davis, WC 1993 Suppression of proliferative response of BoCD4+ T lymphocytes by actived BoCD8+ T lymphocytes in the mammary gland of cows with Staphylococcus mastitis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 36 137151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepers, S, De Vliegher, S, Demeyere, K, Lamrecht, BN, Kruif, A, Meyer, E & Opsomer, G 2009 Technical note: flow cytometric identification of bovine milk neutrophils and simultaneous quantification of their viability. Journal of Dairy Science 92 626631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabe-Hesketh, S & Skrondal, A 2008 Multilevel and Longitudinal Modelling using Stata. 3rd ed. p. 562. Texas: StataCorp LPGoogle Scholar
Raemy, A, Meylan, M, Casati, S, Gaia, V, Berchtold, B, Boss, R, Wyder, A & Graber, HU 2013 Phenotypic and genotypic identification of streptococci and related bacteria isolated from bovine intramammary infections. ACTA Veterinaria Scandinavica 55 53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rainard, P & Riollet, C 2006 Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Veterinary Research 37 369400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarikaya, H, Prgomet, C, Pfaffl, MW & Bruckmaier, RM 2004 Differetiation of leukocytes in bovine milk. Milchwissenschaft 59 586589Google Scholar
Sarikaya, H, Werner-Misof, C, Atzkern, M & Bruckmaier, RM 2005 Distribution of leukocyte popuations, and milk composition, in milk fractions of healthy quarters in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 72 486492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepers, AJ, Lam, TJGM, Schukken, YH, Wilmink, JBM & Hanekamp, WJA 1997 Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine threshold for uninfected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science 80 18331840CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Grommers, FJ, Van Der Geer, D & Brand, A 1989 Incidence of clinical mastitis on farms with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Veterinary Record 125 6063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Wilson, DJ, Welcome, F, Garrison-Tikofsky, L & Gonzales, RN 2003 Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Veterinary Research 34 579596CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Günther, J, Fitzpatrick, J, Fontaine, MC, Goetze, L, Holst, O, Leigh, J, Petzl, W, Schuberth, H-J, Sipka, A, Smith, DGE, Quesnell, R, Watts, J, Yancey, R, Zerbe, H, Gurjar, A, Zadoks, RN & Seyfert, H-M 2011 Host-response patterns of intramammary infections in dairy cows. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 144 270289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, D, Diesterbeck, US, Failing, K, König, S, Brügemann, K, Zschöck, M, Wolter, W & Czerny, CP 2010 Somatic cell counts and bacteriological status in quarter foremilk samples of cows in Hesse, Germany – A longitudinal study. Journal of Dairy Science 93 57165728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, D, Diesterbeck, US, König, S, Brügemann, K, Schlez, K, Zschöck, M, Wolter, W & Czerny, C-P 2011 Flow cytometric differential cell counts in milk for the evaluation of inflammatory reactions in clinically healthy and subclinically infected bovine mammary glands. Journal of Dairy Science 94 50335044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sladek, Z, Rysanek, D & Faldyna, M 2002 Activation of phagocytes during initiation and resolution of mammary gland injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in heifers. Veterinary Research 33 191204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smits, E, Burvenich, C, Guidry, AJ & Massart-Leën, A 2000 Adhesion receptor CD11b/CD18 contributes to neutrophil diapedesis across the bovine blood-milk barrier. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 73 255265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltys, J & Quinn, MT 1999 Selective recruitment of T-cell subsets to the udder during staphylococcal and streptococcal mastitis: analysis of lymphocyte subsets and adhesion molecule expression. Infection and Immunity 67 62936302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, X-M, Perez-Casal, J, Bolton, A & Potter, AA 2001 Surface-expressed Mig protein protects Streptococcus dysgalactiae against phagocytosis by bovine neutrophils. Infection and Immunity 69 60306037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sordillo, LM, Shafer-Weaver, H & DeRosa, D 1997 Immunobiology of the mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science 80 18511865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souza, GN, Brito, JRF, Moreira, EC, Brito, MAVP & Silva, MVGB 2009 Variação da contagem de células somáticas em vacas leiteiras de acordo com patógenos da mastite. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 61 10151020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassi, R, McNeiley, TN, Fitzpatrick, JL, Fontaie, MC, Reddick, D, Ramage, C, Lutton, M, Schukken, YH & Zadoks, RN 2013 Strain-specific pathogenecity of putative host-adapted and nonadapted strains of Streptococcus uberis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 96 51295145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, WR, Rahner, TE, Palmer, MV, Cheng, D, Nonnecke, BJ & Whipple, DL 2003 Expression of L-selectin (CD62L), CD44, and CD25 on activated bovine T cells. Infection and Immunity 71 317326CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whist, AC, Osteras, O & Solverod, L 2007 Streptococcus dysgalactiae isolates at calving and lactation performance within the same lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90 766778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyder, AB, Boss, R, Naskova, J, Kaufmann, T, Steiner, A & Graber, HU 2010 Streptococcus spp. and related bacteria: their identification and their pathogenic potential for chronic mastitis – a molecular approach. Research in Veterinary Science 91 349357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN & Fitzpatrick, JL 2009 Changing trends in mastitis. Irish Veterinary Journal 62 5970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Monoclonal antibodies used for immunophenotyping bovine milk leucocytes by flow cytometry

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Flow cytometric identification of the milk polymorphonuclear leucocytes (neutrophils) isolated from a representative uninfected (A) and S. dysgalactiae-infected (B) quarters. Recordings of scatter (SSC-H) and fluorescent properties (FL2-H; CH138A-Phycoerythrin) were performed on 20 000 events gated in a standard population excluding most of cell debris.

Figure 2

Table 2. SCC and function of milk neutrophils from uninfected and Streptococcus dysgalactiae infected quarters

Figure 3

Table 3. Percentage of milk macrophages/monocytes and lymphocyte subsets from uninfected and Streptococcus dysgalactiae infected quarters

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Histogram overlays demonstrating CD11b expression on milk neutrophils. Histogram represents the log fluorescence (CD11b-Phycoerythrin-Cy5) of milk neutrophils (CH138+).

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Flow cytometric identification of the T lymphocytes (CD3+) isolated from a representative uninfected (A) and S. dysgalactiae-infected (B) quarters. The recordings of scatter (SSC-H) and fluorescent properties (FL3-H; CD3-Phycoerythrin-Cy5) were performed on 20 000 events gated in a standard population excluding most of debris.