Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:52:50.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Going further post-RNA-seq: In silico functional analyses revealing candidate genes and regulatory elements related to mastitis in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2021

Hyago Passe Pereira
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Lucas Lima Verardo
Affiliation:
Zootechnics Department, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
Mayara Morena Del Cambre Amaral Weller
Affiliation:
Zootechnics Department, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Alegre, Brazil
Ana Paula Sbardella
Affiliation:
Department of Exact Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Danísio Prado Munari
Affiliation:
Department of Exact Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Raquel Morais de Paiva Daibert
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Wanessa Araújo Carvalho
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Marco Antonio Machado
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Marta Fonseca Martins*
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Marta Fonseca Martins, Email: marta.martins@embrapa.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to obtain a better understanding of the regulatory genes and molecules involved in the development of mastitis. For this purpose, the transcription factors (TF) and MicroRNAs (miRNA) related to differentially expressed genes previously found in extracorporeal udders infected with Streptococcus agalactiae were investigated. The Gene-TF network highlighted LOC515333, SAA3, CD14, NFKBIA, APOC2 and LOC100335608 and genes that encode the most representative transcription factors STAT3, PPARG, EGR1 and NFKB1 for infected udders. In addition, it was possible to highlight, through the analysis of the gene-miRNA network, genes that could be post-transcriptionally regulated by miRNAs, such as the relationship between the CCL5 gene and the miRNA bta-miR-363. Overall, our data demonstrated genes and regulatory elements (TF and miRNA) that can play an important role in mastitis resistance. The results provide new insights into the first functional pathways and the network of genes that orchestrate the innate immune responses to infection by Streptococcus agalactiae. Our results will increase the general knowledge about the gene networks, transcription factors and miRNAs involved in fighting intramammary infection and maintaining tissue during infection and thus enable a better understanding of the pathophysiology of mastitis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Bovine mastitis is an inflammatory response of the mammary gland caused by metabolic and physiological changes, trauma or, more often, environmental or contagious pathogenic microorganisms (Oviedo-Boyso et al., Reference Oviedo-Boyso, Valdez-Alarcón, Cajero-Juárez, Ochoa-Zarzosa, López-Meza, Bravo-Patino and Baizabal-Aguirre2007) that is responsible for significant economic losses in dairy cattle (Contreras and Rodríguez, Reference Contreras and Rodríguez2011). There is a wide range of pathogens that cause mastitis, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, mycoplasmas and algae (Zadoks et al., Reference Zadoks, Middleton, McDougall, Katholm and Schukken2011). Streptococcus agalactiae is an important Gram-positive bacterium that causes contagiously transmitted chronic subclinical infections in cows (Keefe, Reference Keefe1997; Zadoks et al., Reference Zadoks, Middleton, McDougall, Katholm and Schukken2011). The prevalence of this pathogen in dairy herds is quite high, especially in countries with emerging dairy industries (Duarte et al., Reference Duarte, Miranda, Bellei, Brito and Teixeira2004) and current control strategies involve farm management practices and antibiotic administration promoting the possible emergence of resistant pathogens (Guterbock et al., Reference Guterbock, Van Eenennaam, Anderson, Gardner, Cullor and Holmberg1993; Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Gonzalez, Case, Garrison and Groöhn1999). Therefore, it is necessary to develop new methodologies to control S. agalactiae, including breeding more resistant cattle through enhanced genomic selection. Genomics and transcriptomic data have elucidated gene networks and physiological cellular processes important in the response to S. agalactiae (Sbardella et al., Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019; Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019). In our laboratory, bovine extracorporeal udders have proved to be a successful tool for ex situ transcriptomic analysis of the innate response triggered by S. agalactiae in mammary tissue and display metabolic pathways associated with the inflammatory response (Pinto et al., Reference Pinto, Fonseca, Brandao, Gern, Guimarães, Carvalho, Brito, Viccini and Martins2017; Sbardella et al., Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019; Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019). In order to contribute to a better knowledge of the genes involved in mastitis development, this study aimed to investigate transcription factors and MicroRNAs related to differentially expressed genes (DEGs) previously found in these bovine extracorporeal udders infected with S. agalactiae.

Materials and methods

RNA-seq data

RNA-sequence (RNA-seq) data were obtained from previous studies of our group (Sbardella et al., Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019; Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019). Briefly, four perfused udders were inoculated with a strain of S. agalactiae (FSL S3-026). For each udder, two quarters were inoculated (left anterior and posterior) and two were used as control (right anterior and posterior). Samples of alveolar tissue were collected at 0 and 3 h times after inoculation and the RNA sequenced by HiSeq 2000 analyzer (Illumina Inc.). Expression values were calculated by counting for each gene how many aligned reads overlapped its exons using Htseq-count (Anders et al., Reference Anders, Pyl and Huber2014). The significance of gene expression changes contrasts were assessed using edgeR package (Galaxy tool version 0.0.2) (Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, McCarthy and Smyth2010; Sbardella et al., Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019; Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019).

DEG selection for enrichment and metabolic pathway analysis

The ClueGO Cytoscape application was used to correlate the groups of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with biological processes (Bindea et al., Reference Bindea, Mlecnik, Hackl, Charoentong, Tosolini, Kirilovsky, Fridman, Pagès, Trajanoski and Galon2009) and highlight the roles and terms of gene ontology based on hypergeometric test and Bonferroni correction establishing edges between genes and the chosen term (biological process, cellular component or molecular function). As input, we used the most differentially expressed genes (top 5% of each up and down-regulated genes) previously identified by Sbardella et al. (Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019) and Weller et al. (Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019) (online Supplementary Table S1). Thus, we were able to obtain gene networks highlighting biological processes and compare the groups of genes (up and down-regulated) visualizing their functional differences or similarities.

Identification of transcription factors associated with inflammatory response

The search for promoter sequences was carried out using the current assembly of the bovine genome taking positions of 3.000 bp upstream and 300 bp downstream to the position of each 5% DEGs list. The generated data were used as input in the TFM-Explorer software (http://bioinfo.lifl.fr/tfm-explorer/form.php) which uses weight matrices from the JASPAR database (Sandelin et al., Reference Sandelin, Alkema, Engström, Wasserman and Lenhard2004) to detect all potential transcription factor (TF) binding sites from a set of gene sequences by calculating a score function with a threshold (P-value) equal or greater than 10−3 for each position and each sequence, such as described in Touzet and Varré (Reference Touzet and Varré2007).

Construction of the Gene-TF network

The list of TFs generated by TFM-Explorer was used as an input file in Cytoscape (Shannon et al., Reference Shannon, Markiel, Ozier, Baliga, Wang, Ramage, Amin, Schwikowsk and Ideker2003) using the Biological Networks Gene Ontology tool (BiNGO) (Maere et al., Reference Maere, Heymans and Kuiper2005). Thus, it was possible to determine which biological processes were significantly overrepresented assuming Bonferroni correction patterns and hypergeometric statistical test used to estimate the proportion of genes associated to a particular biological process. TF presenting biological processes associated with inflammatory responses were selected, and a literature review was performed to confirm the relationship between TFs and inflammatory response. In this way, we selected key-TF for the inflammatory response. In order to identify which genes were most connected to each key-TF, the NetworkAnalyzer tool was used in Cytoscape. According to the number of TF binding sites present in the promoter regions of the genes, it was possible to determine the gene-TF network highlighting candidate genes/TF for inflammatory response in mammary gland infected with S. agalactiae.

Real-time PCR and data analyses

Among the enriched genes in the gene-TF network, we selected five for validation by real-time PCR because they perform important functions in the immune response (NFKBIA – NFKB Inhibitor Alpha, SAA3 – Serum Amyloid A3, CD14 – Cluster of Differentiation 14, STAT3 – Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 e SCD – Stearoyl-CoA Desaturase). Methodological details are in the Supplementary File, primers are given in online Supplementary Table S2.

Identification of miRNAs and construction of the gene-miRNAs network

To establish the gene-miRNAs network, we first searched for miRNAs differentially expressed in RNA-seq data. After identifying the differentially expressed miRNAs, we did a literature review aiming to select miRNAs related to inflammatory response. From these miRNAs, we used the online miRWalk® software (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/) to identify possible target genes. Only target genes that were also differentially expressed in our database were selected for subsequently analyses. Thus, in order to identify which genes are the most linked to each miRNA, NetworkAnalyzer tool in Cytoscape® were used. In this way, and according to the number of binding sites between genes and miRNAs, it was possible to determine the most enriched genes and miRNAs through the gene-miRNAs network.

Results

Gene−biological processes network

Some of the most enriched biological processes in the gene−biological processes network were cellular response to bacterial lipoprotein and cellular response to the triacyl bacterial lipopeptide. The TLR2 and CD14 genes, both up-regulated, shared these biological processes. The genes CXCL8 and CCL5 were also observed in the network sharing cellular response by interleukin 1 and cellular response to molecules of bacterial origin processes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Network of main biological processes from differentially expressed genes in response to Streptococcus agalactiae. Functional group network, a zoom in the main biological terms (yellow nodes) and genes (white nodes labeled in red). Yellow biological processes are linked to up-regulated genes. White nodes with yellow edges represent the up-regulated genes. The size of the biological processes node corresponds to the enrichment of the ClueGO app.

Gene−TF network

Twenty candidate TF were identified for up-regulated gene group and 22 for the down-regulated group (one Supplementary Table S3). Those TF were used as input to the BiNGO app from Cytoscape software to search for biological processes related to inflammatory response. According to the enriched biological processes and a literature review, it was possible to select four main key-TF related with immune response and/or inflammatory response (Table 1). Based on the key-TF, a gene-transcription factors network was constructed (Fig. 2). This network provided an overview of shared key-TF among candidate genes, as well as highlighting the most connected genes within each group for inflammatory response (LOC515333, SAA3, NFKBIA, IL8, CD14, APOC2, and LOC100335608).

Fig. 2. Gene-transcription factor network. Red colored octagonal nodes represent the key-TFs associated with inflammatory response. Circular nodes represent differentially expressed genes, being up-regulated (yellow) and down-regulated (blue). The node size corresponds to the network analysis of Cytoscape, where nodes with larger sizes have a greater number of transcription factor binding sites. Red nodes with blue borders are TFs that showed binding site only to down-regulated genes. Pink squares represent the biological processes related to TFs.

Table 1. Main transcription factors associated with top 5% up and down-regulated genes in alveolar mammary tissue 3 h post-inoculation with Streptococcus agalactiae from inoculated quarters compared to not inoculated quarters, their biological process and literature evidences to inflammatory response

a Cited references are just a sample of a vast literature.

Validation of differentially expressed genes by real-time PCR

To further investigate the immune response induced by S. agalactiae, we selected five genes to be confirmed by real-time PCR aiming to substantiate the involvement of the identified key biological processes. As defined by RNA-seq analysis, all immune-associated genes tested in real-time PCR confirmed differences in gene expression prior to inoculation of S. agalactiae (0 h) compared to inoculated udders. Furthermore, we observed an increase in CD14 (expression = 5.117), NFKBIA (expression = 2.645), STAT3 (expression = 2.281), SAA3 (expression = 2.618) expression and decreased SCD gene expression (expression = 0.130) at 3 h after inoculation with S. agalactiae between inoculated and uninoculated samples (Table 2).

Table 2. Relative expression of genes enriched in the gene−TF network

Gene−miRNAs network

28 candidate miRNAs (14 up-regulated miRNAs and 14 down-regulated) were analyzed (online Supplementary Table S4). Based on a literature review, it was possible to select the major miRNAs related with immune/inflammatory response (bta-miR-193a, bta-miR-363, bta-miR-148b, bta-miR-205 and bta-let-7e), which were used to assemble the gene-MicroRNA (gene-miRNA) network (Fig. 3). Therefore, the observations in the current study highlight which genes had the highest number of binding sites for the selected miRNAs (e.g. SCD, LPIN1, RPS26 and MPP6), which may play a role in regulate those protein expression.

Fig. 3. Gene-miRNA network. Blue circular nodes are down-regulated miRNAs; yellow circular nodes are up-regulated miRNAs. Blue diamond-shaped nodes are down-regulated genes; yellow diamond-shaped nodes are up-regulated genes. The pink square nodes represent evidence in the literature relating the miRNAs to inflammatory response.

Discussion

The host's first line of defense against infection is the innate immune response, as it has the ability to recognize and respond quickly to the first signs of infection (Bannerman, Reference Bannerman2009). It is known that the innate immunity response occurs after challenge by E. coli (Bannerman et al., Reference Bannerman, Paape, Lee, Zhao, Hope and Rainard2004a; Günther et al., Reference Günther, Koy, Berthold, Schuberth and Seyfert2016), S. aureus (Petzl et al., Reference Petzl, Zerbe, Günther, Yang, Seyfert, Nürnberg and Schuberth2008) and S. uberis (Bannerman et al., Reference Bannerman, Paape, Goff, Kimura, Lippolis and Hope2004b; Swanson et al., Reference Swanson, Stelwagen, Dobson, Henderson, Davis, Farr and Singh2009). Other studies have investigated changes in gene expression in milk samples after intramammary infection with S. agalactiae (Fonseca et al., Reference Fonseca, Cardoso, Higa, Giachetto, Brandão, Brito, Ferreira, Guimarães and Martins2015). Recently, the transcriptional profile of bovine mammary tissue was investigated after challenge with S. agalactiae (Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019; Sbardella et al., Reference Sbardella, Weller, Fonseca, Stafuzza, Bernardes, Silva, da Silva, Martins and Munari2019), however, a better understanding of the regulatory elements of gene expression, such as transcription factors and MicroRNAs, is needed.

In our study, genes related to the innate immune response were enriched in the biological process network, highlighting the main biological roles (such as cellular response to interleukin-1 and cellular response to molecule of bacterial origin) and connections between DEGs such as the Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), Cluster of Differentiation 14 (CD14), CC Motif Ligand 5 (CCL5) and CXC Motif 8 (CXCL8) (Fig. 1). Among its signaling pathways, CD14, as an adapter molecule of the TLR signaling pathway, plays an important role in bacterial infection as a high-affinity lipopolysaccharide receptor, which activates intracellular signaling pathways, leading to the release of cytokines (Shin et al., Reference Shin, Park, Shin, Jung, Im, Park, Cho and Yoo2015). In our study, the CD14 gene was highlighted in the analysis of the gene-biological process network. Like in our study, Thorgersen et al. (Reference Thorgersen, Hellerud, Nielsen, Barratt-Due, Fure, Lindstad, Pharo, Fosse, Tønnessen, Johansen, Castellheim and Mollnes2010) associated CD14 with early inflammatory and hemostatic responses in a Gram-negative sepsis model as an important innate immunity molecule in pigs.

The presence of TLR2 in the network corroborates the results obtained by Fonseca et al. (Reference Fonseca, Cardoso, Higa, Giachetto, Brandão, Brito, Ferreira, Guimarães and Martins2015) who observed increased expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in milk samples after in vivo infection with S. agalactiae. These results suggest that these genes are regulated together at the beginning of the immune response in mammary alveolar tissue. The CCL5 and CXCL8 genes are important mediators of the inflammatory response. Among their functions, they include orchestrating the migration of monocytes and T cells to injured or infected sites (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Rahbar and Fish2016) and recruiting polymorphonuclear neutrophils to the site of infection (Rosales et al., Reference Rosales, Lowell, Schnoor and Uribe-Querol2017). In our results, these genes were enriched with important roles at the time of infection, highlighting the importance of these chemokines in these stages of the innate immune response to intramammary infection by S. agalactiae. As in our findings, Fonseca et al. (Reference Fonseca, Cardoso, Higa, Giachetto, Brandão, Brito, Ferreira, Guimarães and Martins2015) demonstrated that CCL5 is positively regulated in milk samples. Other studies have suggested this gene as a biomarker of Mycobacterium infection in bovine cells, in the sense of presenting a difference in expression against infection of the pathogen (Shin et al., Reference Shin, Park, Shin, Jung, Im, Park, Cho and Yoo2015). In addition, Günther et al. (Reference Günther, Koy, Berthold, Schuberth and Seyfert2016) evaluated the immune response to different pathogens in uterine cell types and observed the differential expression of CXCL8 against E. coli infection.

Considering such evidence besides their over-expression in bovine extracorporeal udders infected with S. agalactiae, it is suggested that TLR2, CD14, CCL5 and CXCL8 might play a role in the inflammatory response under this scenario. In the present study, TLR2 and CD14 were linked to the cellular response to bacterial lipoprotein. The CCL5 was related to the positive regulation of injury response, positive regulation of inflammatory response and positive regulation of lipase activity. Also, in the biological processes network presented in this study, the CXCL8 gene was related to the cellular response by IL1 and cellular response to the molecule of bacterial origin. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest the investigation of these molecules as candidates for biomarkers of inflammatory response under S. agalactiae infection.

Besides these candidate genes highlighted via biological processes, we identified other TF (STAT3, EGR1, NFKB1 and PPARG) that are expected to play a role in S. agalactiae mastitis and built a gene-TF network. This network draws attention to genes also involved in the inflammatory response (LOC515333, SAA3, NFKBIA, IL8, CD14, APOC2 and LOC100335608).

The serum amyloid A3 gene (SAA3) belongs to the up-regulated group and was one of the most enriched genes in the network, according to the number of connections to the major TFs. Similar to our findings, Molenaar et al. (Reference Molenaar, Harris, Rajan, Pearson, Callaghan, Sommer, Farr, Oden, Miles, Petrova, Good, Singh, McLaren, Prosser, Kim, Wieliczko, Dines, Johannessen, Grigor, Davis and Stelwagen2009) showed that the SAA3 gene is highly expressed during bovine mastitis, being differentially expressed between infected and uninfected quarters and with minimal or undetectable expression in healthy quarters (Eckersall et al., Reference Eckersall, Young, McComb, Hogarth, Safi, Fitzpatrick, Nolan, Weber and McDonald2001, Reference Eckersall, Young, Nolan, Knight, McComb, Waterston, Hogarth, Scott and Fitzpatrick2006). Alpha NFKB Inhibitor (NFKBIA) is a member of the gene family encoding proteins that interact with Rel dimers to inhibit the NF-kappa-B/Rel complexes that are involved in inflammatory responses. According to our results, the positive regulation of this gene may be involved with the connection with STAT3 and NF-kappa-B TFs. Lutzow et al. (Reference Lutzow, Donaldson, Gray, Vuocolo, Pearson, Reverter, Byrne, Sheehy, Windon and Tellam2008) reported that NFKBIA was activated in mastitis induced by S. uberis. Also, Moyes et al. (Reference Moyes, Drackley, Morin, Bionaz, Rodriguez-Zas, Everts, Lewin and Loor2009) observed the same behavior when the infection was caused by S. aureus. These findings support our results, whereas this gene was also over-represented in the gene-TF network.

Another two highlighted genes in this study, CD14 and TLR2, have STAT3 binding sites, which mediate cellular responses to interleukins such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) that are identified in the promoters of various acute phase protein genes. IL-6 also acts as a regulator of the inflammatory response by regulating the differentiation of naive CD4 ( + ) T cells into Th17 helper or regulatory T cells (Lee, Reference Lee2018). As in our results, Fonseca et al. (Reference Fonseca, Cardoso, Higa, Giachetto, Brandão, Brito, Ferreira, Guimarães and Martins2015) observed increased expression of TLR2, TLR4 and CD14 in milk samples after experimental in vivo infection with S. agalactiae. In the study of Weller et al. (Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019), the CD14 gene was highly regulated three hours after S. agalactiae inoculation in bovine extracorporeal udder.

Once selected key-TF had been shown to be associated with the inflammatory response, higher up-regulated gene enrichment was expected in the gene-TF network. However, two down-regulated genes were highlighted (APOC2 and LOC100335608). The gene LOC100335608 corresponds to the Rabphilin 3A Like in Homo sapiens, Mus musculus and Rattus norvegicus. In humans, the protein encoded by this gene (rabphilin 3A) plays a direct regulatory role in calcium ion-dependent exocytosis in endocrine and exocrine cells and plays a key role in pancreatic cell secretion of insulin (Matsunaga et al., Reference Matsunaga, Taoka, Isobe and Izumi2017). In addition, this gene is described as a tumor suppressor in humans (Putcha et al., Reference Putcha, Jia, Katkoori, Salih, Shanmugam, Jadhav, Bovell, Behring, Callens, Messiaen, Bae, Grizzle, Singh and Manne2015). In cattle, the gene LOC100335608 encodes the protein type 3A and can be associated with fatty acids in milk of Dutch cattle (Li et al., Reference Li, Sun, Zhang, Wang, Wu, Zhang, Liu, Li and Qiao2014). RNA-seq analysis of bovine extracorporeal mammary gland revealed several genes involved in lipid metabolism, such as down-regulated APOC2, FABP3 and FABP4 (Weller et al., Reference Weller, Fonseca, Sbardella, Pinto, Viccini, Brandão, Gern, Carvalho, Guimarães, Brito, Munari, Silva and Martins2019). In addition, Swanson et al. (Reference Swanson, Stelwagen, Dobson, Henderson, Davis, Farr and Singh2009) studying gene regulation profiles in mammary tissue after S. uberis infection also observed the downregulation of genes related to lipid metabolism, such as LPIN1, FABP3 and APOC2. In this study, the genes APOC2 and LOC100335608 were enriched in the TF gene network with binding to key-TFs PPARG and EGR1. Although PPARG and EGR1 TFs were related to biological processes involved in inflammatory response, they were also associated with lipid metabolism (EGR1) and lipid storage negative regulation (PPARG).

Furthermore, among the key-TFs, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was the most represented. Shin et al. (Reference Shin, Park, Shin, Jung, Im, Park, Cho and Yoo2015) analyzed transcriptional profiles of bovine cells infected by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and observed differences in expression pattern between STAT3 target genes, suggesting that they may be used as biomarkers for Mycobacterium infection. In this study, all enriched genes cited above had binding sites for this TF.

All genes selected from gene-TF network analysis had their expression levels confirmed by real-time PCR (Table 1). As in our results, Lutzow et al. (Reference Lutzow, Donaldson, Gray, Vuocolo, Pearson, Reverter, Byrne, Sheehy, Windon and Tellam2008) observed high expression of NFKBIA and CD14 during intramammary infection with S. aureus. In vivo studies by Swanson et al. (Reference Swanson, Stelwagen, Dobson, Henderson, Davis, Farr and Singh2009) also showed high expression of STAT3 and SAA3 genes in the challenge of infection by S. uberis, a Gram-positive bacterium, as well as S. agalactiae. Our results indicate that these genes play a critical role in the immune response in the S. agalactiae udder during early stage of intramammary infection. Another finding of interest while combining RNA-seq and gene network analysis was that several genes involved with lipid metabolism, such as SCD, LPIN1, APOC2, FABP3, and FABP4, were suppressed in quarters inoculated with S. agalactiae and shared TF involved also with inflammatory response in accordance to Swanson et al. (Reference Swanson, Stelwagen, Dobson, Henderson, Davis, Farr and Singh2009). From the most enriched genes in the gene-TF network, and those that were evidenced in biological processes network (TLR2, CD14 and CXCL8), most of them were not enriched in the gene-miRNAs network, with the exception of SAA3 and CCL5. The SAA3 gene had a binding site for bta-miR-193a, which was down-regulated in mammary alveolar tissue 3 h after inoculation with S. agalactiae. In this case, bta-miR-193a should not be exerting relevant action on the SAA3 gene during this period in the alveolar tissue as it is down-regulated in the RNA-seq data. On the other hand, CCL5 had a binding site for bta-miR-363, which was up-regulated in mammary alveolar tissue 3 h after inoculation with S. agalactiae. Thus, their role in the inflammatory response of mammary gland is uncertain, in terms that miRNAs generally act to inhibit translation, but also, as previously described, may positively act on gene transcription (Portnoy et al., Reference Portnoy, Huang, Place and Li2011). Our results indicate that the CCL5 gene was highly expressed in mammary alveolar tissue infected with S. agalactiae presenting biological processes related to the inflammatory response and enriched in gene-TF network.

In conclusion, our results point to a number of genes that are prominent in biological processes and gene-TF networks, and which have not been linked to up-regulated miRNAs, but which are likely candidate genes for the inflammatory response markers in mammary glands, with possible relation to mastitis resistance trait. The gene-TF network highlighted genes that may act at the time of infection by being up or down-regulated have been discussed. In addition the gene-miRNA network indicated which genes could be negatively or positively regulated by translation inhibition, mRNA degradation or transcription activation by miRNAs. These genes are deserving of more intensive study. In this way, using post-RNA-seq analyses, we can propose the most likely candidate genes (LOC515333 and CD14), transcription factors (STAT3 and NFKB1) and miRNAs (bta-miR-193a and bta-miR-363) with possible roles in the inflammatory response of mammary glands under S. agalactiae infection.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029921000571

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – Embrapa Dairy Cattle (Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil) for providing the data used in this study and the Bioinformatics Multiuser Laboratory (LMB) – Embrapa Agricultural Informatics (Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil) for providing computational structure for data analysis. H. P. Pereira received a Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, Brazil) scholarship. The experiment was financially supported by the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, FAPEMIG, Minas Gerais, Brazil; project number APQ-00095-15) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, Brazil; project number 473414/2011-2).

References

Anders, S, Pyl, PT and Huber, W (2014) HTSeq – A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 14.Google ScholarPubMed
Bindea, G, Mlecnik, B, Hackl, H, Charoentong, P, Tosolini, M, Kirilovsky, A, Fridman, WH, Pagès, F, Trajanoski, Z and Galon, J (2009) ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25, 10911093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannerman, DD (2009) Pathogen-dependent induction of cytokines and other soluble inflammatory mediators during intramammary infection of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannerman, DD, Paape, MJ, Lee, JW, Zhao, X, Hope, JC and Rainard, P (2004a) Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus elicit differential innate immune responses following intramammary infection. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 11, 463472.Google Scholar
Bannerman, DD, Paape, MJ, Goff, JP, Kimura, K, Lippolis, JD, Hope, JC (2004b) Innate immune response to intramammary infection with Serratia marcescens and Streptococcus uberis. Veterinary Research 35, 681700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, GA and Rodríguez, JM (2011) Mastitis: comparative etiology and epidemiology. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 16, 339356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, RS, Miranda, OP, Bellei, BC, Brito, MAV and Teixeira, LM (2004) Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates recovered from milk of dairy cows in Brazil. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 42144222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckersall, PD, Young, FJ, McComb, C, Hogarth, CJ, Safi, S, Fitzpatrick, JL, Nolan, AM, Weber, A and McDonald, T (2001) Acute phase proteins in serum and milk from dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Veterinary Record 148, 3541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckersall, PD, Young, FJ, Nolan, AM, Knight, CH, McComb, C, Waterston, MM, Hogarth, CJ, Scott, EM and Fitzpatrick, JL (2006) Acute phase proteins in bovine milk in an experimental model of Staphylococcus aureus subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 14881501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, I, Cardoso, FF, Higa, RH, Giachetto, PF, Brandão, HDM, Brito, MAVP, Ferreira, MBD, Guimarães, SEF and Martins, MF (2015) Gene expression profile in zebu dairy cows (Bos taurus indicus) with mastitis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae. Livestock Science 180, 4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, D, Rahbar, R and Fish, EM (2016) CCL5 activation of CCR5 regulates cell metabolism to enhance proliferation of breast cancer cells. Open Biology 6, 160122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Günther, J, Koy, M, Berthold, A, Schuberth, HJ and Seyfert, HM (2016) Comparison of the pathogen species-specific immune response in udder derived cell types and their models. Veterinary Research 47, 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guterbock, WM, Van Eenennaam, AL, Anderson, RJ, Gardner, IA, Cullor, JS and Holmberg, CA (1993) Efficacy of intramammary antibiotic therapy for treatment of clinical mastitis caused by environmental pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 34373444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keefe, GP (1997) Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis: a review. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 38, 429.Google ScholarPubMed
Kosciuczuk, EM, Lisowski, P, Jarczak, J, Majewska, A, Rzewuska, M, Zwierzchowski, L and Bagnicka, E (2017) Transcriptome profiling of Staphylococci-infected cow mammary gland parenchyma. BMC Veterinary Research 13, 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, GR (2018) The balance of Th17 vs. Treg cells in autoimmunity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C, Sun, D, Zhang, S, Wang, S, Wu, X, Zhang, Q, Liu, L, Li, Y and Qiao, L (2014) Genome wide association study identifies 20 novel promising genes associated with milk fatty acid traits in Chinese Holstein. PloS One 9, e96186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutzow, YCS, Donaldson, L, Gray, CP, Vuocolo, T, Pearson, RD, Reverter, A, Byrne, KA, Sheehy, PA, Windon, R and Tellam, RL (2008) Identification of immune genes and proteins involved in the response of bovine mammary tissue to Staphylococcus aureus infection. BMC Veterinary Research 4, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maere, S, Heymans, K and Kuiper, M (2005) BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21, 34483449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsunaga, K, Taoka, M, Isobe, T and Izumi, T (2017) Rab2a and Rab27a cooperatively regulate the transition from granule maturation to exocytosis through the dual effector Noc2. Journal of Cell Science 130, 541550.Google ScholarPubMed
Molenaar, AJ, Harris, DP, Rajan, GH, Pearson, ML, Callaghan, MR, Sommer, L, Farr, VC, Oden, KE, Miles, MC, Petrova, RS, Good, LL, Singh, K, McLaren, RD, Prosser, CG, Kim, KS, Wieliczko, RJ, Dines, MH, Johannessen, KM, Grigor, MR, Davis, SR and Stelwagen, K (2009) The acute-phase protein serum amyloid A3 is expressed in the bovine mammary gland and plays a role in host defense. Biomarkers 14, 2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyes, KM, Drackley, JK, Morin, DE, Bionaz, M, Rodriguez-Zas, SL, Everts, RE, Lewin, HA and Loor, JJ (2009) Gene network and pathway analysis of bovine mammary tissue challenged with Streptococcus uberis reveals induction of cell proliferation and inhibition of PPARγ signaling as potential mechanism for the negative relationships between immune response and lipid metabolism. BMC Genomics 10, 542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oviedo-Boyso, J, Valdez-Alarcón, JJ, Cajero-Juárez, M, Ochoa-Zarzosa, A, López-Meza, JE, Bravo-Patino, A and Baizabal-Aguirre, VM (2007) Innate immune response of bovine mammary gland to pathogenic bacteria responsible for mastitis. Journal of Infection 54, 399409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petzl, W, Zerbe, H, Günther, J, Yang, W, Seyfert, HM, Nürnberg, G and Schuberth, HJ (2008) Escherichia coli, but not Staphylococcus aureus triggers an early increased expression of factors contributing to the innate immune defense in the udder of the cow. Veterinary Researc 39, 123.Google Scholar
Pinto, ISB, Fonseca, I, Brandao, HDM, Gern, JC, Guimarães, AS, Carvalho, WA, Brito, MAVP, Viccini, LF and Martins, MF (2017) Short communication: evaluation of perfused bovine udder for gene expression studies in dairy cows. Genetic and Molecular Research 16, gmr16019637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portnoy, V, Huang, V, Place, RF and Li, LC (2011) Small RNA and transcriptional upregulation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA 2, 748760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putcha, BDK, Jia, X, Katkoori, VR, Salih, C, Shanmugam, C, Jadhav, T, Bovell, LC, Behring, MP, Callens, T, Messiaen, L, Bae, S, Grizzle, WE, Singh, KP and Manne, U (2015) Clinical implications of rabphillin-3A-like gene alterations in breast cancer. PloS One 10, e0129216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, MD, McCarthy, DJ and Smyth, GK (2010) edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 139140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosales, C, Lowell, CA, Schnoor, M and Uribe-Querol, E (2017) Neutrophils: their role in innate and adaptive immunity 2017. Journal of Immunology Research 2017, 9748345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandelin, A, Alkema, W, Engström, P, Wasserman, WW and Lenhard, B (2004) JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 9194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sbardella, AP, Weller, MMDCA, Fonseca, I, Stafuzza, NB, Bernardes, PA, Silva, FF, da Silva, MVGB, Martins, MF and Munari, DP (2019) RNA sequencing differential gene expression analysis of isolated perfused bovine udders experimentally inoculated with Streptococcus agalactiae. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 7611767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, P, Markiel, A, Ozier, O, Baliga, NS, Wang, JT, Ramage, D, Amin, N, Schwikowsk, B and Ideker, T (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 13, 24982504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, MK, Park, HT, Shin, SW, Jung, M, Im, YB, Park, HE, Cho, YI and Yoo, HS (2015) Whole-blood gene-expression profiles of cows infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis reveal changes in immune response and lipid metabolism. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2, 255267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, KM, Stelwagen, K, Dobson, J, Henderson, HV, Davis, SR, Farr, VC and Singh, K (2009) Transcriptome profiling of Streptococcus uberis-induced mastitis reveals fundamental differences between immune gene expression in the mammary gland and in a primary cell culture model. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 117129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegowski, M, Fan, C and Baldwin, AS (2018) Thioridazine inhibits self-renewal in breast cancer cells via DRD2-dependent STAT3 inhibition, but induces a G1 arrest independent of DRD2. Journal of Biological Chemistry 41, 1597715990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorgersen, EB, Hellerud, BC, Nielsen, EW, Barratt-Due, A, Fure, H, Lindstad, JK, Pharo, A, Fosse, E, Tønnessen, TI, Johansen, HT, Castellheim, A and Mollnes, TE (2010) CD14 inhibition efficiently attenuates early inflammatory and hemostatic responses in Escherichia coli sepsis in pigs. The FASEB Journal 24, 712722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touzet, H and Varré, JS (2007) Efficient and accurate P-value computation for Position Weight Matrices. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YL, Guo, XY, He, W, Chen, RJ and Zhuang, R (2017) Effects of alliin on LPS-induced acute lung injury by activating PPARγ. Microbial Pathogenesis 110, 375379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, MMDCA, Fonseca, I, Sbardella, AP, Pinto, IS, Viccini, LF, Brandão, HM, Gern, JC, Carvalho, WA, Guimarães, AS, Brito, MAVP, Munari, DP, Silva, MVGB and Martins, MF (2019) Isolated perfused udder model for transcriptome analysis in response to Streptococcus agalactiae. Journal of Dairy Research 86, 307314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, DJ, Gonzalez, RN, Case, KL, Garrison, LL and Groöhn, YT (1999) Comparison of seven antibiotic treatments with no treatment for bacteriological efficacy against bovine mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 16641670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN, Middleton, JR, McDougall, S, Katholm, J and Schukken, YH (2011) Molecular epidemiology of mastitis pathogens of dairy cattle and comparative relevance to humans. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 16, 357372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Network of main biological processes from differentially expressed genes in response to Streptococcus agalactiae. Functional group network, a zoom in the main biological terms (yellow nodes) and genes (white nodes labeled in red). Yellow biological processes are linked to up-regulated genes. White nodes with yellow edges represent the up-regulated genes. The size of the biological processes node corresponds to the enrichment of the ClueGO app.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Gene-transcription factor network. Red colored octagonal nodes represent the key-TFs associated with inflammatory response. Circular nodes represent differentially expressed genes, being up-regulated (yellow) and down-regulated (blue). The node size corresponds to the network analysis of Cytoscape, where nodes with larger sizes have a greater number of transcription factor binding sites. Red nodes with blue borders are TFs that showed binding site only to down-regulated genes. Pink squares represent the biological processes related to TFs.

Figure 2

Table 1. Main transcription factors associated with top 5% up and down-regulated genes in alveolar mammary tissue 3 h post-inoculation with Streptococcus agalactiae from inoculated quarters compared to not inoculated quarters, their biological process and literature evidences to inflammatory response

Figure 3

Table 2. Relative expression of genes enriched in the gene−TF network

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Gene-miRNA network. Blue circular nodes are down-regulated miRNAs; yellow circular nodes are up-regulated miRNAs. Blue diamond-shaped nodes are down-regulated genes; yellow diamond-shaped nodes are up-regulated genes. The pink square nodes represent evidence in the literature relating the miRNAs to inflammatory response.

Supplementary material: PDF

Passe Pereira et al. supplementary material

Passe Pereira et al. supplementary material

Download Passe Pereira et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 237.2 KB