Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T00:41:17.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect on milk lipolysis of restricted feeding with and without supplementation with protected rape seed oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Harald N. Astrup ,
Lars Bævre ,
Lars Vik-Mo  and
Asmund Ekern
Harald N. Astrup
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 ÅS-NLH, Norway
Lars Bævre
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 ÅS-NLH, Norway
Lars Vik-Mo
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 ÅS-NLH, Norway
Asmund Ekern
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 ÅS-NLH, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Feeding lactating cows at a reduced level for a 6-d-period caused blood serum and milk free fatty acids (FFA) to rise. Milk lipolysis developed more slowly and lasted longer than elevation of the level of FFA in blood. In a second experiment protected rape seed oil was given to underfed animals and inhibited the development of rancidity in the milk. Since unsaturated fat reduced lipoprotein lipase activity in the underfed cow, this supplement appears to reduce the effect of underfeeding if it is accepted that a normal response to underfeeding is to improve the efficiency of fat metabolism through increased lipoprotein lipase activity.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1980 , pp. 287 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ǻkesson, B., Sundler, R. & Nilsson, Ǻ. (1976). European Journal of Biochemistry 63, 65–70.Google Scholar
Astrup, H. N., Langholz, B., Kristoffersen, U. M. & Borgen, R. (1970). Meieriposten 59, 1087–1097.Google Scholar
Astrup, H. N., Vik-Mo, L., Lindstad, P. & Ekern, A. (1979). Mikhwissenschaft 34, 290–291.Google Scholar
Astrup, H. N., Vik-Mo, L., Skrøvseth, O. & Ekern, A. (1980). MilchwisseTischaft 35, 1–4.Google Scholar
Castbero, H. B., Egelrud, T., Solberg, P. & Olivecrona, T. (1975). Journal of Dairy Research 42, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilliard, Y., Sauvant, D., Hbrvieu, J., Dorleans, M. & Morand-Fehr, P. (1977). Annates de Biologie animate, Biochimie, Biophysique 17, 1021–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilliard, Y., Sauvant, D. & Morand-Fehr, P. (1979). Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 10, 401–403.Google Scholar
Deeth, H. C. & Fitz-Gerald, C. H. (1976). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 31, 53–64.Google Scholar
Dole, V. P. & Meinertz, H. (1960). Journal of Biological Chemistry 235, 2595–2599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellema, A. (1975). Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 29, 145–152.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, R. D., Chandler, P. T., Griel, L. C. Jr & Porter, G. A. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science 51, 392–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivecrona, T., Egelrud, T., Hernell, O., Castberg, H. & Solberg, P. (1975). Annual Bulletin, International Dairy Federation (Document 86), 61–72.Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H., Deeth, H. C. & Fitz-Gerald, C. H. (1973). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 28, 170–172.Google Scholar
Super, D. M., Palmquist, D. L. & Schanbacher, F. L. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 1409–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallenius, R. W. & Whitchurch, R. E. (1976). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 85–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, H. G., Dunn, G. D. & Heimberg, M. (1975). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 398, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamdagni, S. & Schultz, L. H. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar