Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:28:08.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of bovine intramammary infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci on four farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Ricardo Bexiga*
Affiliation:
CIISA/Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Márcia G. Rato
Affiliation:
Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
Abdelhak Lemsaddek
Affiliation:
CIISA/Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Teresa Semedo-Lemsaddek
Affiliation:
CIISA/Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Carla Carneiro
Affiliation:
CIISA/Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
Helena Pereira
Affiliation:
VetAgro Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, 1 Avenue Bourgelat 69280 Marcy L'Etoile, France
Dominic J Mellor
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Production Animal Health and Food Safety, Large Animal Clinical Sciences and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, Scotland
Kathryn A Ellis
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Production Animal Health and Food Safety, Large Animal Clinical Sciences and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, Scotland
Cristina L Vilela
Affiliation:
CIISA/Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa. Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: ricardobexiga@fmv.ulisboa.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the impact of different coagulase-negative species (CNS) on udder health measured in terms of individual quarter milk somatic cell count (SCC) and duration of intramammary infection, and to get some insight into most likely routes of infection for different CNS species. This longitudinal observational study was performed on four farms that were sampled at 4-week intervals for a total of 12 visits each. Quarters infected with CNS were followed through time with milk samples being submitted for bacteriological culture and SCC determination. PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region and sequencing of the sodA and rpoB genes were used for species allocation. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to assess strain identity. The percentage of quarters affected per farm varied between 6 and 35%, with the most frequently isolated CNS species being Staphylococcus epidermidis, followed by Staph. simulans, Staph. chromogenes and Staph. haemolyticus. It was possible to follow 111 intramammary infections due to CNS through time. Duration of infection had a mean of 188 d and was not significantly different between CNS species. Geometric mean quarter SCC overall was 132 000 cells/ml and was also not significantly different between CNS species. Despite the possibility of a different epidemiology of infection, the impact in terms of udder health seems to be similar for different CNS species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2014 

In recent years there has been a greater focus on the role of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) in bovine mastitis, despite authors having slightly different views of their impact on udder health (Piepers et al. Reference Piepers, Opsomer, Barkema, de Kruif and De Vliegher2010; Supré et al. Reference Supré, Haesebrouck, Zadoks, Vaneechoutte, Piepers and De Vliegher2011). This may be due to the fact that the frequency of isolation of the so called ‘major mastitis pathogens’ is decreasing (Makovec & Ruegg, Reference Makovec and Ruegg2003; Pitkälä et al. Reference Pitkälä, Haveri, Pyörälä, Myllys and Honkanen-Buzalski2004) with the ‘minor pathogens’ getting greater attention from the scientific community. In the past, individual species of CNS were grouped and it was assumed that all individual species presented the same characteristics in terms of pathogenicity. Several authors have studied the impact of different CNS species on mastitis, with evidence of some being more frequently isolated from cases of clinical mastitis (Waage et al. Reference Waage, Mørk, Røros, Aasland, Hunshamar and Ødegaard1999; Taponen et al. Reference Taponen, Simojoki, Haveri, Larsen and Pyörälä2006) and others found to lead to more persistent intramammary infection (IMI) (Taponen et al. Reference Taponen, Koort, Björkroth, Saloniemi and Pyörälä2007; Supré et al. Reference Supré, Haesebrouck, Zadoks, Vaneechoutte, Piepers and De Vliegher2011). It is well established that CNS are present in the environment (Piessens et al. Reference Piessens, Van Coillie, Verbist, Supré, Braem, Van Nuffel, De Vuyst, Heyndrickx and De Vliegher2011). However, the most frequent form of infection might differ for different CNS species. Taponen et al. (Reference Taponen, Björkroth and Pyörälä2008) found Staphylococcus chromogenes pulsotypes that were shared between isolates from mastitic milk samples and extramammary sites, whereas Staph. simulans was very seldom isolated from extramammary sites despite frequently being isolated from mastitic milk samples, indicating a stronger possibility of cow to cow transmission. This suggests scientific attention is needed on how often transmission of individual CNS species occurs in the milking parlour.

The objectives of the present study were to compare IMI due to different CNS species in terms of quarter somatic cell count and duration of infection, and to gain insight into diversity of staphylococcal species.

Materials and methods

Herds

This longitudinal observational study was performed in four Portuguese commercial dairy farms selected on their compliance and geographical location. All animals were Holstein-Friesian, zero-grazed, with year-round calving and housed in cubicles with sand bedding. Farm A milked 3 times daily and was a closed farm, whereas the other farms milked twice daily and would occasionally buy in primiparous animals. Post-milking teat dipping and antimicrobial dry cow therapy were routinely performed on every animal across farms. Mean data for SCC, milk production and number of animals in each farm is displayed in Table 1.

Table 1. Arithmetic mean for the number of lactating animals and milk yield, geometric mean for individual cow somatic cell count (SCC) for the duration of the study; number of cows and quarters sampled (initial sampling), number of cows and quarters with coagulase-negative staphylococcal intramammary infection (CNS IMI) and proportion of quarters affected (initial sampling)

Selection and sampling of animals

Quarter milk samples were taken according to NMC protocols (NMC, 1999) every 4 weeks on each farm for 12 visits, and a total of 48 weeks. In the initial visit, 12 cows were randomly selected from those with individual cow SCC showing an increase from below to above 200 000 cells/ml in the previous 2 milk recordings, to tentatively detect new infections at cow level. On subsequent visits, cows from which CNS had been isolated in at least 1 of the 2 previous visits, were resampled at quarter level; if these animals were not enough to total 12 cows, others were selected according to the criterion used in the first visit, to obtain samples from 12 cows per visit. None of the samples originated from clinical mastitis cases. Records of treatments performed during the study were analysed to exclude animals that received antimicrobial treatment during the study from the analysis or for right censoring of data.

Bacteriology and somatic cell count determination

Samples were refrigerated, transported to the laboratory and processed on the sampling day. From each milk sample, 0·01 ml of milk were plated onto sheep blood agar (Columbia™, bioMérieux, France), incubated at 37 °C and observed after 24 and 48 h of incubation. Samples yielding more than 2 morphologically different bacterial colonies were considered contaminated. A single colony representative of colonies with similar morphology was selected for isolation and identification if there was evidence of growth of ⩾500 cfu/ml. Gram-positive catalase-positive cocci were initially identified to species level by use of a biochemical identification system (ID 32 Staph™, bioMérieux, France). Isolates with an identification probability <90% were excluded from the study. Milk samples in which CNS were found concurrently with a major mastitis pathogen were also excluded from the analysis. Individual quarter milk samples were submitted to flow cytometry (CombiFoss™, Foss, Denmark) for somatic cell count (SCC) determination.

Strain typing

Molecular fingerprinting of staphylococci to strain level was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously (Chung et al. Reference Chung, de Lencastre, Matthews, Tomasz, Adamsson, Aires de Sousa, Camou, Cocuzza, Corso, Couto, Dominguez, Gniadkowski, Goering, Gomes, Kikuchi, Marchese, Mato, Melter, Oliveira, Palacio, Sá-Leão, Santos Sanches, Song, Tassios and Villari2000). Staphylococcal isolates submitted to PFGE (n=467) included all the CNS isolated from each quarter when these were found in 4 or fewer sampling visits in succession, or isolates isolated in alternating visits when these were found in 5 or more sampling visits in succession. Bacterial disks were prepared with SeaPlaque® GTG® agarose (Lonza, Rockland ME, USA). Cell lysis was performed with a solution of ribonuclease A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA), lysostaphin (Ambi Products LLC, Lawrence KS, USA) and lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) for 5 h at 37 °C. Deproteinisation was performed by incubation in a solution with proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) at 50 °C for 17 h. DNA was digested with SmaI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA) overnight at 25 °C. A CHEF-DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules CA, USA) was used for the PFGE, run at 11·3 °C with a voltage of 6 V/cm, an initial pulse time of 5 s and a final pulse time of 35 s, with a total run time of 23 h. A Lambda Ladder PFG marker (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV transillumination. PFGE patterns were analysed with BioNumerics v. 4.61 (Applied Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Levels of similarity between profiles were estimated with the Pearson coefficient and an unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages was used for clustering, to produce band-based dendrograms, with a band position tolerance of and optimisation of 0·5–2·0%. A cut-off value of 80% similarity was used to differentiate clusters of PFGE types.

Genotypic species identification

Genotypic identification was sought using an internal transcribed spacer PCR (ITS-PCR), as described previously (Couto et al. Reference Couto, Pereira, Miragaia, Santos-Sanches and Lencastre2001) with modifications. Briefly, the disks containing DNA used to perform the PFGE were melted at 65 °C for 10 min in 1×TE buffer. A 1·25-μl aliquot of bacterial DNA was combined with 10 μl of reaction buffer, 6 μl of 25 mm-MgCl2, 1 μl of 10 mm-dNTP mix, 0·25 μl of DNA polymerase, 29 μl of nuclease-free water (all reagents from Promega, Madison WI, USA) and 1·25 μl of the G1 (5′-GAAGTCGTAACAAGG) and of the L1 (5′-CAAGGCATCCACCGT) primers (Stabvida, Caparica, Portugal). PCR amplification products, obtained using a MyCycler™ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules CA, USA), were resolved in a 3% Sea Plaque agarose (Lonza, Rockland ME, USA) for 6 h at 80 volts. A 100 bp DNA step ladder was used as a molecular weight marker (Promega, Madison WI, USA). All the isolates with characteristic PFGE profiles were submitted to the ITS-PCR, with at least 2 representatives of each profile being selected whenever available. The ITS-PCR profiles of 94 isolates were compared with 19 type strains (Table 1) and with a Staph. pseudintermedius isolate previously identified and characterised genotypically (Couto et al. Reference Couto, Pomba, Moodley and Guardabassi2011). The 19 type strains were selected based on phenotypic identification results. The profile analysis was performed visually with the aid of the BioNumerics software v. 4.61 (Applied Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Whenever ITS-PCR results did not allow for a clear differentiation between species or did not match type strain profiles, isolates (n=27) were submitted to PCR amplification of both sodA and rpoB housekeeping genes, as described previously by Poyart et al. (Reference Poyart, Quesne, Boumala and Trieu-Cuot2001) and Drancourt & Raoult (Reference Drancourt and Raoult2002), respectively. PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea), and sequence data proofread using Bioedit v. 7.0.5 (Hall, Reference Hall1999), and compared with publicly available sequence data using nucleotide-nucleotide BLAST (See: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/).

Data analysis

Unless otherwise stated, only results based on genotypic identification were used in the data analysis. An IMI with a CNS was defined by isolation of CNS from at least 1 quarter milk sample. Spontaneous cure was defined as not detecting a specific strain in the same quarter in 2 subsequent visits in succession. Duration of CNS IMI was defined by the period of time a CNS with the same PFGE profile, was found in successive or alternate months and analysed by way of a Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a log-rank survival test. A general linear model was used with log10 transformation of individual quarter SCC as the outcome variable. Explanatory variables included CNS species, sampling number, quarter, cow and herd level:

$$\eqalign{{\rm Log(SCC) =} & {\rm \alpha + \beta '1}_{ijkn} {\rm X1}_{ijkn} {\rm + \beta '2}_{\,jkn} {\rm X2}_{\,jkn} {\rm + \beta '3}_{kn} \cr & {\rm + X3}_{kn} {\rm + \beta '4}_n {\rm X4}_n {\rm + \beta '5X5 +} e} $$

where the subscripts i, j, k and n denote the ith CNS species, the jth quarter, the kth cow and the nth farm respectively.

Data were analysed using SPSS version 15.0 (survival analysis) and in Minitab 16.0 (general linear model). A significant difference was defined as a probability value of P<0·05.

Results

To detect infections by CNS, a total of 2302 quarter milk samples from 264 cows were collected. These represented 1021 functional quarters, of which 147 (14·4%) had a CNS IMI, according to phenotypic identification. The proportion of quarters with CNS IMI among sampled quarters for the first time, ranged from 6·4% in farm B to 347% in farm A (Table 1). Out of the 147 IMI, 36 were not followed for at least 3 successive samplings. From the remaining 111 CNS IMI (representing 51 cows), 63 were right-censored in order to be further studied. Both exclusion of IMIs and right censoring occurred because: (a) antimicrobial treatments were performed during the study; (b) it was not possible to follow the animals through time (some died, were culled or were missed by the operator during sampling visits); (c) some animals included in the final visits did not stay long enough in the study to allow for cure or maintenance of infection to be effectively evaluated.

Genotypic identification of the 111 CNS revealed the presence of 38 Staph. epidermidis, 36 Staph. simulans, 16 Staph. chromogenes, 7 Staph. haemolyticus and 2 Staph. hyicus. It was not possible to identify genotypically 12 isolates. The ITS-PCR method did not allow for confident identification of several isolates, namely it was difficult to distinguish between Staph. epidermidis and Staph. chromogenes, and some isolates that had been identified phenotypically as Staph. intermedius had profiles that did not match any of the type strains used. Some of these were clarified through sequencing of housekeeping genes and revealed to be Staph. simulans (n=2) and Staph. haemolyticus (n=1). Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic identification is summarised in Table 2.

Table 2. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) by the ID32 Staph® compared with the phenotypic identification (ITS-PCR and sequencing of rpoB or sodA)

The Staphylococcus sp. used for comparison with ITS-PCR isolate profiles and respective DSM numbers included Staph. lugdunensi (4804), Staph. sciuri subsp. carnaticus (15 613), Staph. sciuri subsp. rodentium (16 827), Staph. epidermidis (20 044), Staph. saprophyticus subsp. Saprophyticus (20 229), Staph. aureus subsp. aureus (20 231), Staph. haemolyticus (20 263), Staph. xylosus (20 266), Staph. warneri (20 316), Staph. simulans (20 322), Staph. capitis subsp. capitis (20 326), Staph. hominis subsp. hominis (20 328), Staph. intermedius (20 373), Staph. chromogenes (20 454), Staph. hyicus (20 459), Staph. auricularis (20 609), Staph. gallinarum (20 610), Staph. caprae (20 698), Staph. pseudintemedius

When comparing only the 4 most frequently isolated species, duration of infection (Table 3) was not significantly different (P=0·179) when the species were compared altogether. When performing a 2-way comparison in duration of infection between the species with the shortest and longest duration, the difference approached statistical significance (P=0·071). Quarter SCC was also not significantly different between CNS species. The relationship of log10 SCC with sampling occasion and with cow affected were dependent on CNS species considered (P=0·014 and P=0·015, respectively).

Table 3. Number of isolates (Isol), cows affected and pulsotypes (Puls) per farm, for different coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CNS) species. Different pulsotypes were defined based on less than 80% similarity. Number of infections followed per farm, geometric mean somatic cell count (SCC) and presence in successive months of CNS identified genotypically

Geometric mean

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

Dendrograms showed that clusters within Staph. epidermidis and Staph. simulans isolates were generally grouped per farm (Fig. 1), whereas for Staph. chromogenes and Staph. haemolyticus this separation was not noticeable. The number of pulsotypes per species and per farm is displayed in Table 3. Cows with 2 or more quarters affected by CNS IMI (n=29) had the same species in multiple quarters (n=10), different species between quarters (n=9) or both (n=10). In cases where the same species was isolated in more than 1 quarter per cow (n=20), shared pulsotypes between quarters of the same cow were found in 17 animals.

Fig. 1. Dendrograms with PFGE profiles for Staph. epidermidis (above) and Staph. chromogenes (below), showing the 80% similarity line.

Discussion

CNS were the most frequently isolated bacteria from milk samples in several studies worldwide (Makovec & Ruegg, Reference Makovec and Ruegg2003; Pitkälä et al. Reference Pitkälä, Haveri, Pyörälä, Myllys and Honkanen-Buzalski2004). Considering only the first time a cow was sampled, 147 out of 1021 sampled quarters (14·4%) had a CNS IMI according to the ID 32 Staph™ identification system. Some CNS species were only found in 2 herds, notably Staph. epidermidis and Staph. simulans, the most frequently isolated, were found in farms A and D, whereas Staph. chromogenes and Staph. haemolyticus, which had the third and fourth greatest number of CNS isolates respectively, were isolated from milk samples on all 4 farms. Most studies on prevalence and persistence of CNS infection have focused on single farms or on a small number of farms, not allowing for clustering effect evaluation of CNS species per farm. Recently, Piessens et al. (Reference Piessens, Van Coillie, Verbist, Supré, Braem, Van Nuffel, De Vuyst, Heyndrickx and De Vliegher2011) found herd-to-herd differences in the distribution of individual CNS species isolated from milk and from the environment of 6 dairy herds. Despite the low number of farms in the current study, the predominance of 2 species in 2 of the farms also suggests a clustering effect for individual CNS species. As stated above, Staph. epidermidis and Staph. simulans were the most frequently isolated CNS species, followed by Staph. chromogenes and Staph. haemolyticus. Other studies resorting to genotypic identification methods have found Staph. simulans (Taponen et al. Reference Taponen, Simojoki, Haveri, Larsen and Pyörälä2006) or Staph. chromogenes (Piessens et al. Reference Piessens, Van Coillie, Verbist, Supré, Braem, Van Nuffel, De Vuyst, Heyndrickx and De Vliegher2011) to be the most frequently isolated CNS.

Mean duration of infection for all CNS was 188 d, corresponding to 6·7 successive monthly visits. There were no significant differences in mean duration of infection between CNS species when these were compared altogether. When the species with the shortest mean duration (Staph. haemolyticus with 123 d) was compared with the species with the longest duration (Staph. simulans with 213 d) there was still no statistically significant difference. Despite having the shortest duration of infection Staph. haemolyticus still led to persistent infections, which is in agreement with what was observed by Piessens et al. (Reference Piessens, Van Coillie, Verbist, Supré, Braem, Van Nuffel, De Vuyst, Heyndrickx and De Vliegher2011) and Mørk et al. (2012). Persistence of CNS IMI has been reported by several authors, with 46% (Taponen et al. Reference Taponen, Koort, Björkroth, Saloniemi and Pyörälä2007), 66% (Seymour et al. Reference Seymour, Jones and McGilliard1989), 75·6% (Rainard et al. Reference Rainard, Ducelliez and Poutrel1990), 84·5% (Chaffer et al. Reference Chaffer, Leitner, Winkler, Glickman, Krukucks, Ezra and Saran1999) and 85% (Timms & Schultz, Reference Timms and Schultz1987) of infections persisting until dry-off or until the cows left the herd. Todhunter et al. (Reference Todhunter, Cantwell, Smith, Hoblet and Hogan1993) mentioned an average length of CNS IMI of 222 d and Rainard et al. (Reference Rainard, Ducelliez and Poutrel1990) of 236 d, despite neither of these authors resorting to molecular biology techniques for confirmation of IMI with the same strain. Supré et al. (Reference Supré, Haesebrouck, Zadoks, Vaneechoutte, Piepers and De Vliegher2011) recorded an average duration of infection of 148 d for Staph. chromogenes and of 176 d for Staph. simulans. It is impossible to establish more accurately the exact duration of the IMI followed in our study because there is no exact knowledge of when the infections were acquired or cleared.

Geometric mean SCC for CNS IMI followed through time was 132 000 cells/ml, with no significant differences observed between CNS species. Staph. chromogenes was associated with the highest mean SCC, with a geometric mean of 202 000 cells/ml and Staph. epidermidis with the lowest mean, with a SCC of 95 000 cells/ml. The geometric mean obtained in this study is similar to the 138 000 cells/ml reported by Djabri et al. (Reference Djabri, Bareille, Beaudeau and Seegers2002) in a meta-analysis for quarter milk samples infected with staphylococci other than Staph. aureus. Similarly to what was observed in the current study, both Nickerson et al. (Reference Nickerson, Owens and Boddie1995) and Supré et al. (Reference Supré, Haesebrouck, Zadoks, Vaneechoutte, Piepers and De Vliegher2011) observed that Staph. chromogenes led to the highest quarter SCC and Hogan et al. (Reference Hogan, White and Pankey1987) did not find significant differences in quarter SCC between CNS species. In the current study, the impact of sampling number and of cow on log10 SCC were both species-dependent. The reduced number of observations and the fact that not every species had the same average duration of IMI, render the sampling occasion relationship of questionable significance. The significant relationship for cow would be expected since individual animal have been shown to respond differently to infections with CNS (Simojoki et al. Reference Simojoki, Orro, Taponen and Pyörälä2009) or with other udder pathogens (Burvenich et al. Reference Burvenich, Van Merris, Mehrzad, Diez-Fraile and Duchateau2003).

Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic identification showed 61·6% correct species identification with phenotypic methods, which is higher than the 41·3% found by Sampimon et al. (Reference Sampimon, Zadoks, De Vliegher, Supré, Haesebrouck, Barkema, Sol and Lam2009) using the same phenotypic identification system and sequencing of the rpoB gene. This difference may be partly explained by the fact that only isolates with a phenotypic identification probability ⩾90% were included in the present study.

In the current study, PFGE was used to evaluate duration of infection and strain diversity, which has also been used by other authors (Taponen et al. Reference Taponen, Björkroth and Pyörälä2008; Mørk et al. Reference Mørk, Jørgensen, Sunde, Kvitle, Sviland, Waage and Tollersrud2012). Choice of a cut-off value to differentiate between different PFGE pulsotypes is not unanimous, with some authors resorting to the lowest reproducibility value to define the cut-off (Silva et al. Reference Silva, Gaivão, Leitão, Jost, Carneiro, Vilela, Lopes da Costa and Mateus2008) and others defining similarity coefficients after reviewing epidemiological data associated with each cluster of isolates (McDougal et al. Reference McDougal, Steward, Killgore, Chaitram, McAllister and Tenover2003). The criteria for PFGE profile interpretation that seem to gather more agreement were defined by Tenover et al. (Reference Tenover, Arbeit, Goering, Mickelsen, Murray, Persing and Swaminathan1995). In the current study, the 80% cut-off value was used according to a publication by the same research group, analysing the same genus and using the same restriction enzyme (McDougal et al. Reference McDougal, Steward, Killgore, Chaitram, McAllister and Tenover2003). However, a lower cut-off value could be viewed as more appropriate because not all the criteria defined by Tenover et al. (Reference Tenover, Arbeit, Goering, Mickelsen, Murray, Persing and Swaminathan1995) were fulfilled in the current study; namely the analysed strains were obtained from different geographical areas and over a time span close to a year in which natural variation would likely add to the observed DNA fingerprint differences. Different criteria could be considered to evaluate within-herd and between-herd diversity (Zadoks et al. Reference Zadoks, van Leewen, Kreft, Fox, Barkema, Schukken and van Belkum2002). Dendrograms showed clustering of Staph. epidermidis and Staph. simulans per farm, whereas Staph. chromogenes and Staph. haemolyticus showed less clonality within each farm. This suggests that cow to cow transmission in the milking parlour is more likely to occur with Staph. epidermidis and Staph. simulans. Taponen et al. (Reference Taponen, Björkroth and Pyörälä2008) found the same pulsotypes of Staph. chromogenes isolated from milk samples and extramammary sites suggesting an environmental source of infection. They also found that Staph. simulans was very commonly isolated from milk samples but seldom found in environmental samples, indicating that this species was likely to be a specific mastitis pathogen. On the contrary, Piessens et al. (Reference Piessens, Van Coillie, Verbist, Supré, Braem, Van Nuffel, De Vuyst, Heyndrickx and De Vliegher2011) found that Staph. chromogenes and Staph. epidermidis were rarely found in the environment, whereas Staph. simulans and Staph. haemolyticus were commonly isolated from environmental samples. The low number of isolates per farm in the present study did not allow for a more extensive inter-species comparison within each farm. The use of such methodologies across different farms raises the question whether the differences observed in diversity between species are a feature of the species, a feature of the farm (including host and farm management factors) or a combination of both.

Based on the genetic heterogeneity observed in each CNS species, the predominant mode of infection seems to vary between species. Irrespective of that, the impact of different species on udder health seems to be similar, as there were no statistically significant differences between individual CNS species in terms of duration of IMI and mean quarter SCC.

R. Bexiga was financed by grant number SFRH/BD/36759/2007 from the Foundation for Science and Technology. The financial support of the Interdisciplinary Centre of Research in Animal Health (CIISA) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors acknowledge the access given to farms by farmers and practitioners, the technical assistance of staff at the Scottish MRSA Reference Laboratory, Dr Suvi Taponen for kindly providing staphylococcal type strains and Natacha Couto for providing the S. pseudintermedius isolate.

References

Burvenich, C, Van Merris, V, Mehrzad, J, Diez-Fraile, A & Duchateau, L 2003 Severity of E. coli mastitis is mainly determined by cow factors. Veterinary Research 34 521564Google Scholar
Chaffer, M, Leitner, G, Winkler, MM, Glickman, A, Krukucks, O, Ezra, E & Saran, A 1999 Coagulase-negative staphylococci and mammary gland infection in cows. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B 46 707712Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, M, de Lencastre, H, Matthews, P, Tomasz, A, Adamsson, I, Aires de Sousa, M, Camou, T, Cocuzza, C, Corso, A, Couto, I, Dominguez, A, Gniadkowski, M, Goering, R, Gomes, A, Kikuchi, K, Marchese, A, Mato, R, Melter, O, Oliveira, D, Palacio, R, Sá-Leão, R, Santos Sanches, I, Song, JH, Tassios, PT & Villari, P 2000 Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: comparison of results obtained in a multilaboratory effort using identical protocols and MRSA strains. Microbial Drug Resistance 6 189–98Google Scholar
Couto, I, Pereira, S, Miragaia, M, Santos-Sanches, I & Lencastre, H 2001 Identification of clinical staphylococcal isolates from humans by internal transcribed spacer PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39 30993103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couto, N, Pomba, C, Moodley, A & Guardabassi, L 2011 Prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci among dogs and cats at a veterinary teaching hospital in Portugal. Veterinary Record 169 72Google Scholar
Djabri, B, Bareille, N, Beaudeau, F & Seegers, H 2002 Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Veterinary Research 33 335357Google Scholar
Drancourt, M & Raoult, D 2002 rpoB gene sequence-based identification of Staphylococcus species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40 13331338Google Scholar
Hall, TA 1999 BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41 9598Google Scholar
Hogan, JS, White, DG & Pankey, JW 1987 Effects of teat dipping on intramammary infections by staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Dairy Science 70 873879Google Scholar
Makovec, JA, Ruegg, PL 2003 Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. Journal of Dairy Science 86 34663472Google Scholar
McDougal, LK, Steward, CD, Killgore, GE, Chaitram, JM, McAllister, SK & Tenover, FC 2003 Pulsed-field electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41 51135120Google Scholar
Mørk, T, Jørgensen, HJ, Sunde, M, Kvitle, B, Sviland, S, Waage, S, Tollersrud, T 2012 Persistence of staphylococcal species and genotypes in the bovine udder. Veterinary Microbiology 159 171180Google Scholar
Nickerson, SC, Owens, WE & Boddie, RL 1995 Mastitis in dairy heifers: initial studies on prevalence and control. Journal of Dairy Science 78 16071618Google Scholar
NMC 1999 Sample collection and handling. Laboratory Handbook of Bovine Mastitis. Madison: National Mastitis CouncilGoogle Scholar
Piepers, S, Opsomer, G, Barkema, HW, de Kruif, A & De Vliegher, S 2010 Heifers infected with coagulase-negative staphylococci in early lactation have fewer cases of clinical mastitis and higher milk production in their first lactation than noninfected heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 93 20142024Google Scholar
Piessens, V, Van Coillie, E, Verbist, B, Supré, K, Braem, G, Van Nuffel, A, De Vuyst, L, Heyndrickx, M & De Vliegher, S 2011 Distribution of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species from milk and environment of dairy cows differs between herds. Journal of Dairy Science 94 29332944Google Scholar
Pitkälä, A, Haveri, M, Pyörälä, S, Myllys, V & Honkanen-Buzalski, T 2004 Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001 – Prevalence, distribution of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. Journal of Dairy Science 87 24332441Google Scholar
Poyart, C, Quesne, G, Boumala, C & Trieu-Cuot, P 2001 Rapid and accurate species-level identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by using the sodA gene as a target. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39 42964301Google Scholar
Rainard, P, Ducelliez, M & Poutrel, B 1990 The contribution of mammary infections by coagulase-negative staphylococci to the herd bulk milk somatic cell count. Veterinary Research Communications 14 193198Google Scholar
Sampimon, OC, Zadoks, RN, De Vliegher, S, Supré, K, Haesebrouck, F, Barkema, HW, Sol, J & Lam, TJGM 2009 Performance of API Staph ID 32 and Staph-Zym for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine milk samples. Veterinary Microbiology 136 300305Google Scholar
Seymour, EH, Jones, GM & McGilliard, MK 1989 Effectiveness of intramammary antibiotic therapy based on somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 72 10571062Google Scholar
Silva, E, Gaivão, M, Leitão, S, Jost, BH, Carneiro, C, Vilela, CL, Lopes da Costa, L & Mateus, L 2008 Genomic characterization of Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolates recovered from the uterus of dairy cows with normal puerperium or clinical metritis. Veterinary Microbiology 132 111118Google Scholar
Simojoki, H, Orro, T, Taponen, S & Pyörälä, S 2009 Host response in bovine mastitis induced with Staphylococcus chromogenes. Veterinary Microbiology 134 9599Google Scholar
Supré, K, Haesebrouck, F, Zadoks, RN, Vaneechoutte, M, Piepers, S & De Vliegher, S 2011 Some coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species affect udder health more than others. Journal of Dairy Science 94 23292340Google Scholar
Taponen, S, Simojoki, H, Haveri, M, Larsen, HD & Pyörälä, S 2006 Clinical characteristics and persistence of bovine mastitis caused by different species of coagulase-negative staphylococci identified with API or AFLP. Veterinary Microbiology 115 199207Google Scholar
Taponen, S, Koort, J, Björkroth, J, Saloniemi, H & Pyörälä, S 2007 Bovine intramammary infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci may persist throughout lactation according to amplified length restriction polymorphism-based analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 90 33013307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taponen, S, Björkroth, J & Pyörälä, S 2008 Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine extramammary sites and intramammary infections in a single herd. Journal of Dairy Research 75 422429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, Mickelsen, PA, Murray, BE, Persing, DH & Swaminathan, B 1995 Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33 2233–39Google Scholar
Timms, LL & Schultz, LH 1987 Dynamics and significance of coagulase-negative staphylococcal intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science 70 26482657Google Scholar
Thorberg, B-M, Kühn, I, Aarestrup, FM, Brändström, B, Jonsson, P & Danielsson-Tham, M-L 2006 Pheno- and genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from bovine milk and human skin. Veterinary Microbiology 115 163172Google Scholar
Todhunter, DA, Cantwell, LL, Smith, KL, Hoblet, KH & Hogan, JS 1993 Characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine intramammary infections. Veterinary Microbiology 34 373380Google Scholar
Waage, S, Mørk, T, Røros, A, Aasland, D, Hunshamar, A & Ødegaard, SA 1999 Bacteria associated with clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 82 712719Google Scholar
Zadoks, RN, van Leewen, WB, Kreft, D, Fox, LK, Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH & van Belkum, A 2002 Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine and human skin, milking equipment and bovine milk by phage typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and binary typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40 38943902Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Arithmetic mean for the number of lactating animals and milk yield, geometric mean for individual cow somatic cell count (SCC) for the duration of the study; number of cows and quarters sampled (initial sampling), number of cows and quarters with coagulase-negative staphylococcal intramammary infection (CNS IMI) and proportion of quarters affected (initial sampling)

Figure 1

Table 2. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) by the ID32 Staph® compared with the phenotypic identification (ITS-PCR and sequencing of rpoB or sodA)†

Figure 2

Table 3. Number of isolates (Isol), cows affected and pulsotypes (Puls) per farm, for different coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CNS) species. Different pulsotypes were defined based on less than 80% similarity. Number of infections followed per farm, geometric mean somatic cell count (SCC) and presence in successive months of CNS identified genotypically

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Dendrograms with PFGE profiles for Staph. epidermidis (above) and Staph. chromogenes (below), showing the 80% similarity line.