Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T19:48:36.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision tree analysis to evaluate dry cow strategies under UK conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2004

Elizabeth A Berry
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury RG14 7NN, UK
Henk Hogeveen
Affiliation:
Farm Management Group, URL Wageningen, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen KN 6706, The Netherlands
J Eric Hillerton
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury RG14 7NN, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Economic decisions on animal health strategies address the cost-benefit aspect along with animal welfare and public health concerns. Decision tree analysis at an individual cow level highlighted that there is little economic difference between the use of either dry cow antibiotic or an internal teat sealant in preventing a new intramammary infection in a cow free of infection in all quarters of the mammary gland at drying off. However, a potential net loss of over £20 per cow might occur if the uninfected cow was left untreated. The only economically viable option, for a cow with one or more quarters infected at drying off, is antibiotic treatment, although a loss might still be incurred depending on the pathogen concerned and the cure rates achievable. There was a net loss for cows with quarters infected with Corynebacterium spp. at drying off, for both the teat sealant and untreated groups (£22 and £48, respectively) with only antibiotic-treated cows showing a gain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2004