Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:45:05.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antioxidant and cholesterol assimilation activities of selected lactobacilli and lactococci cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Shalini Jain
Affiliation:
Animal Biochemistry Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
Hariom Yadav*
Affiliation:
Animal Biochemistry Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
Pushpalata Ravindra Sinha
Affiliation:
Animal Biochemistry Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: yadavhariom@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In present study, three strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) viz. Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactococcus lactis and milk fermented with these strains have been studied for antioxidant and cholesterol assimilation activities in-vitro and in-vivo, in addition to the effect on total lactobacilli, lactococci and coliform counts into the gut of mice fed with diets supplemented by fermented milk. All three selected strains exhibited potent 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, malonaldialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging abilities as well as inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation activity. These activities were highest in Lb. casei as followed by Lb. acidophilus and Lc. lactis. In addition, these bacterial cultures also exhibited good in-vitro cholesterol assimilation potential. Oral administration to mice of milk fermented with selected LAB strains, slightly decreased blood cholesterol, increased colonization of total lactobacilli and lactococci, and decreased coliforms in the intestinal tissues as well as faecal samples. These results indicate that, selected LAB strains have good antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic and coliform removal activities. It may suggest that, a novel functional food can be obtained by supplementation of selected LAB in milk, which may have various health beneficial properties such as antioxidant and hypocholesterolemic activities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009

The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes, cancer and bowel inflammatory syndrome are rapidly increasing, due to lack of successful curative or preventing strategies available in the market (DeCoster, Reference DeCoster2008; Maramaldi et al. Reference Maramaldi, Dungan and Poorvu2008; Willcox et al. Reference Willcox, Curb and Rodriguez2008; Zisman & Rubin, Reference Zisman and Rubin2008). Hence, development of new strategies to inhibit the increasing prevalence of these diseases is urgently warranted. The consumption of fermented milk products containing health beneficial probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) may turn out to be a successful solution to prevent such diseases by eliminating various risk factors. Oxidative stress and hypercholesterolemia are hallmark risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and closely related to various diseases such as diabetes, cancer and bowel inflammatory syndrome (Sinclair et al. Reference Sinclair, Barnett and Lunec1991; Roessner et al. Reference Roessner, Kuester, Malfertheiner and Schneider-Stock2008). Numerous strains of LAB and their fermented milk products have been studied for various health beneficial effects including anti-oxidant and hypocholesterolemic effects (Gorbach, Reference Gorbach1990; Grajek et al. Reference Grajek, Olejnik and Sip2005; Pham et al. Reference Pham, Lemberg and Day2008). These biofunctional properties of LAB are strictly strain dependent (Fujiwara et al. Reference Fujiwara, Inoue, Wakabayashi and Fujii2004; Sonnenburg et al. Reference Sonnenburg, Chen and Gordon2006). Therefore, search for new biologically functional strains of LAB with anti-oxidant and hypocholesterolemic potential and development of fermented milk products with similar functions are current interests of dairy scientific community and industries. Present study was an attempt to examine the antioxidant and cholesterol removal potential of three selected strains of LAB i.e. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis in-vitro. Further milk was fermented with these LAB strains and tested for in-vivo anti-oxidant and hypocholesterolemic effects in mice. It is always a considerable issue for probiotic products that the oral consumption of functional bacteria as dietary adjunct must survive the extremely harsh conditions of the gut before colonizing the intestine and providing health beneficial effects (Klaenhammer, Reference Klaenhammer1982). Therefore, in the present study we also determined the success of transmission and colonization of these microorganisms into mice gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and effects on commensal bacteria such as coliforms in GIT of mice.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

All cultures used in this study were obtained from the National Collection of Dairy Cultures (NCDC), of the National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, India. The lactobacilli and lactococci were grown in MRS-broth (Hi-Media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Bombay, India) and M17 broth (Terzaghi & Sandine, Reference Terzaghi and Sandine1975) by incubating for 18–20 h at 37 and 30°C, respectively. The cultures were maintained by sub-culturing weekly with 1% inoculum in 10 ml portions of sterile respective media and stored at 4°C. For all the estimations ~108–109 colony forming units per millilitre (CFU/ml) bacterial counts were used.

Antioxidant activity measurements

The free radical scavenging activity of cultures was measured according to the method described by Shibata et al. (Reference Shibata, Natori, Nishihara, Tomisaka, Matsumoto, Sansawa and Nguyen2003). The hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity of cultures was determined by the method described by Lin & Yen, (Reference Lin and Yen1999). Thiobarbituric acid method was used for measurement of linoleic acid (which was chosen as the source of unsaturated fatty acid) peroxidation (Halliwell & Chirico, Reference Halliwell and Chirico1993) and iron-ascorbate system was used for the catalysis of oxidation (Decker & Faraji, Reference Decker and Faraji1990). t-Butylhydroperoxide (TBH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were chosen as representative of the primary and secondary product of lipid peroxidation, respectively for determining the scavenging activity of the selected LAB cultures. For determination of TBH scavenging activity, the method described by Wolfe (Reference Wolfe1962) was adopted and for determination of MDA scavenging activity the method reported by Lin & Yen (Reference Lin and Yen1999) was used.

Cholesterol assimilation activity

The cholesterol removal activity of bacterial strains was performed according to the procedure described by Gilliland et al. (Reference Gilliland, Nelson and Maxwell1985). Freshly prepared MRS thio-broth (MRS broth with 0·2% sodium thioglycollate) was supplemented with 0·3% oxgall and an amount of pleuropneuminia-like organism (PPLO) serum to give a concentration of 0·24% cholesterol. The broth was inoculated with 1% of each culture for 24 h at 37°C and cholesterol content in the growth medium was determined using the method described by Rudel & Morris (Reference Rudel and Moris1973).

Preparation of fermented milk

Bacterial cultures were revitalized three times in reconstituted and autoclaved skim milk prior to use for preparation of fermented milk samples. Skim milk was obtained from the Institute experimental dairy and heated at 90°C for 15 min. After cooling, the milk samples were inoculated (1%) with the corresponding stock cultures of selected LAB and incubated at respective temperature for 14–15 h and subsequently stored at 4°C until use. The pH of fermented milk product was measured directly by digital pH meter (LabIndia Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India). The final bacterial counts in fermented milk product was determined by the method described elsewhere (Terzaghi & Sandine, Reference Terzaghi and Sandine1975; Dave & Shah, Reference Dave and Shah1996; Ravula & Shah, Reference Ravula and Shah1998) and were found to be approximately 108−109 CFU/ml.

Animal study

Animals:

Male Swiss albino mice (30–40 g body weight) were obtained from small animal house of the NDRI. The animals were housed (3 animals/cage) in plastic polypropylene cages. They were divided into 5 groups (n=6) i.e. 1). Control; fed with synthetic diet (Table 1), 2). Skim milk fed; fed with skim milk supplemented diet, 3). Lc. lactis fed; fed with diet supplemented with Lc. lactis fermented milk, 4). Lb. casei fed; fed with diet supplemented with Lb. casei fermented milk and 5). Lb. acidophilus fed; fed with diet supplemented with Lb. acidophilus fermented milk. Animals were allowed access free intake of diet and water and consumed approximately 5–6 g/d per mice of diet for 8 consecutive days.

Table 1. Composition of different diets of treatment

# Vitamin and mineral mixture were prepared and mixed according to AOAC (1995)

Blood collection and plasma cholesterol estimation:

On the last day of experiment blood was collected from the orbital venous plexus of 12 h fasted mice and drawn in a vial containing heparin solution (2 U/μl). The blood samples were centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min and plasma was separated out. Plasma total cholesterol was estimated using enzymatic kits procured from Bayer Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd, Baroda, India and thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) were measured by the method of Ohkawa et al. Reference Ohkawa, Ohishi and Yagi1979.

Determination of microbial counts:

For the assay of faecal lactobacilli and coliforms, fresh samples of faeces were collected before and after 2, 5 and 8 d of feeding by gently squeezing rectal part of mice. Faecal materials were put into sterile tightly caped tubes. Animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and, small and large intestinal tissues collected aseptically. One gram of faecal sample or intestinal tissue was gently homogenized to a final volume of 5 ml in 0·1% peptone water. The cell suspensions were serially diluted in peptone water and aliquot plated (in triplicate) on M17 agar for enumeration of total lactococci, on lactobacilli MRS agar for total lactobacilli and on violet red bile agar (Hi-Media Laboratories Pvt Ltd., Mumbai, India) for coliforms, and plates were incubated at 30, 37 and 37°C for 72, 48 and 24 h, respectively. Numbers of colonies (in CFU) were counted.

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard error of means (sem). Significant differences were tested by employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for individual parameters and groups; student t-test was performed by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 10.0) for computation of data.

Results and Discussion

Antioxidant property

Antioxidant potential of all three strains was screened using DPPH, which is a free radical and shows a characteristic purple colour, but when it encounters any proton radical scavengers then the colour fades. In the present study all three LAB strains had shown potent dose dependent free radical scavenging activity in terms of DPPH scavenging potential (Fig. 1A, B). Furthermore, results for antioxidant potential in terms of Trolox equivalents (μM; Fig. 1C) clearly shown that, Lb. casei exhibited highest Trolox equivalents (48·7 μM) followed by Lb. acidophilus (46·3 μM) and Lc. lactis (23·4 μM). Our findings are in line with many other studies (Kaizu et al. Reference Kaizu, Sasaki, Nakajima and Suzuki1993; Zommara et al. Reference Zommara, Takagi, Sakono, Suzuki and Imaizami1994; Lin & Yen, Reference Lin and Yen1999). Lin & Chang (Reference Lin and Chang2000) also reported that both intact and intracellular cell free extracts of intestinal LAB i.e. Bifidobacterium longum (ATCC 15708) and Lb. acidophilus (ATCC 4356) of 109 cells exhibited a potent anti-oxidant activity by inhibiting linoleic acid peroxidation. Therefore we also measured antioxidant activity using this approach (Table 2) and found that inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation followed similar trend as observed in DPPH and Trolox equivalent method i.e. Lb. casei showed highest inhibitory activity (67%) followed by Lb. acidophilus (52%) and Lc. lactis (27%). Results of present study clearly indicate that 108−109 cells of Lb. casei, Lb. acidophilus and Lc. lactis have potent antioxidant activity.

Fig. 1. Curves of dose dependent DPPH scavenging activity (A) and antioxidant activities as Trolox equivalents (B) of Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei. Values are means of triplicate tests. The results were obtained ED50 values from 2A.

Table 2. Antioxidant activity cholesterol assimilation activities of Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei Footnote 1

1 The values are means ± SEM of three trails in triplicates

a,b,c Values with different superscripts in a column are significantly different at the level of p<0·05

TBH, MDA and hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity

Oxidative stress is the result of excess formation and/or insufficient removal of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased production of ROS oxidizes unsaturated fatty acids of cell membranes and produces lipid hydroperoxides by initiating a chain reaction (Halliwell & Chirico, Reference Halliwell and Chirico1993), this leads to changes in cell membrane and genotoxicity which result in tissue damage (Baker & He, Reference Baker and He1991). Interestingly, all three strains exhibited potent scavenging ability of cellular toxic substances i.e. lipid peroxidation end products (MDA) as well as H2O2 radicals (Table 2), indicating detoxification effects by ROS removal potential of these strains.

In present study, TBH was used as a primary product of lipid peroxidation and the selected bacterial strains were unable to scavenge this lipid hydroperoxide. The results of present study were in line with Lin & Yen (Reference Lin and Yen1999) study, in which they reported that the cell free extract of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus were unable to scavenge TBH. Indeed, MDA is a secondary end product of lipid peroxidation and a highly reactive substance which has ability to deteriorate structural and functional characteristics of cellular proteins and nucleic acids (Aubourg, Reference Aubourg1993). In the present study, the whole cells of the selected strains had ability to scavenge low concentration (μM) of MDA also. However, the milk fermented with these three strains i.e. Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei did not cause significant differences in plasma TBARS levels in mice fed with different diets for 8 days (data not shown), while dahi (Indian yogurt) prepared with these selected strains had shown a potent antioxidant activity in-vivo in diabetic rats fed for 56 days (Yadav et al. Reference Yadav, Jain and Sinha2008). This indicates that, short term feeding of fermented milk in the present study may not be able to show potential anti-oxidant activity in normal mice.

Cholesterol lowering activity

All three strains grew well in the presence of cholesterol and decreased cholesterol concentration in the culture broth (Table 2). However, the cholesterol assimilation ability was different from antioxidant activity among cultures i.e. Lb. acidophilus had shown highest (79%) cholesterol removal activity followed by Lb. casei (67%) and Lc. lactis (29%). During the feeding trial, feeding milk fermented with Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei exhibited decreased plasma total cholesterol levels (~47 and ~49 mg/dl, respectively) after 8 days compared with those of control group (~63 mg/dl). However, no significant changes were observed in plasma total cholesterol levels by non-fermented skim milk- and Lc. lactis fermented milk-fed animals (~63 and ~62 mg/dl, respectively) relative to control. Indeed mean values did not differ significantly among all the groups of animals (P>0·05). Similarly, several workers also reported that LAB and their fermented milk products have an ability to reduce media as well as blood cholesterol (Kimoto et al. Reference Kimoto, Ohmomo and Okamoto2002; Taranto et al. Reference Taranto, Fernandez, Murga and deValdez2003; Liong & Shah, Reference Liong and Shah2005). This might be due to the binding of dietary cholesterol with the bacterial cell wall in the food and/or intestinal tract before cholesterol can be absorbed into the body (Gilliland et al. Reference Gilliland, Nelson and Maxwell1985; Gilliland & Walker, Reference Gilliland and Walker1990). Hosono & Tono-oka (Reference Hosono and Tono-oka1995) demonstrated that binding of dietary cholesterol by LAB cells in different fermented milk products varied among strains and species. They also suggested that differences in binding abilities might be due to chemical and structural properties of peptidoglycan layer of bacterial cell wall. In the present study, cholesterol removal ability also differed in different cultures such as Lb. acidophilus had shown highest cholesterol assimilation ability followed by Lb. casei and Lc. lactis. In addition dahi prepared with these bacterial species had shown a potent antidiabetic as well as anti-hypercholesterolemic effect in high fructose diet-fed rats (Yadav et al. Reference Yadav, Jain and Sinha2006, Reference Yadav, Jain and Sinha2007).

Successful transmission and colonization of LAB into the gut

In order to act as a successful probiotic dietary adjunct, a bacterial strain must survive and transmit successfully to GIT. We confirmed the successful transmission of live bacteria in GIT by analysing faecal samples of mice fed with different fermented milk supplemented diets and found that total lactobacilli and lactococci counts were significantly increased in faeces of lactobacilli and lactococci fermented milk fed animals, respectively (Fig. 2E, F) The ability of micro-organisms to adhere to intestinal epithelium is often considered one of the main selection criteria for potential probiotics (Ouwehand et al. Reference Ouwehand, Kirjavainien, Shortt and Salminen1999). Adhesion to the intestinal mucosa is thought to be an important property for colonization by preventing wash-out (Wadstrom, Reference Wadstrom1998), especially in the small intestine where flow rates are relatively high (Sanford, Reference Sanford1992). The counts of total lactobacilli were significantly increased on intestinal mucosa by feeding Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei fermented milks (Fig. 2A–D), which demonstrates that the selected lactobacilli strains are able to adhere to the intestinal epithelium after crossing from the harsh conditions of GIT.

Fig. 2. The total counts of lactococci (A, C, E) and lactobacilli (B, D, F) in small (A, B) and large intestinal mucosa (C, D) as well as faecal samples (E, F) of mice fed with control, skim milk and milk fermented with Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei supplemented diets analysed on 0, 2, 5 and 8 d of experiments.

Removal of coliforms from intestinal tract

Several studies have also suggested that adhesive probiotic bacteria could prevent the attachment of pathogens, such as coliform bacteria and Clostridia, and stimulate their removal from the infected intestinal tract (Lidbeck et al. Reference Lidbeck, Gustafasson and Nord1987; Saxelin et al. Reference Saxelin, Pessi and Salminen1995). A significant decline in the counts of intestinal and faecal coliforms in mice fed with milk fermented by Lb. casei, Lb. acidophilus and Lc. lactis supplemented diets was observed, whereas no changes were observed in control and skim milk supplemented diet fed animals (Fig. 3). However, the maximum reduction of coliform counts was observed in animals fed with Lb. casei fermented milk supplemented diet (39%), followed by Lb. acidophilus and Lc. lactis, which have shown 32 and 25%, reduction, respectively (Fig. 3). These results clearly indicate that feeding of milk fermented with selected LAB significantly reduced the burden of commensal bacteria i.e. coliforms in the intestinal tract of mice.

Fig. 3. The total coliform counts in small (A) and large intestinal mucosa (B) as well as faecal samples (C) in mice fed with control, skim milk and milk fermented with Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei supplemented diets analysed on 0, 2, 5 and 8 d of the experiment.

In conclusion, selected LAB strains exhibited potent antioxidant activity by inhibiting linoleic acid peroxidation, scavenging hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, in addition to cholesterol assimilation activities and ability to successfully transmit into GIT of consumer animals. On the basis of these results it can be suggested that, these selected LAB stains may be used for the preparation of biotherapeutic fermented milk products with potential health beneficial properties. The consumption of a food with these properties may play a vital role in the prevention of highly prevalent diseases like CVD, diabetes, colon cancinogenesis and inflammatory bowel diseases.

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995 In: Official methods of analysis, (16th ed.). Garthersburg: AOAC InternatonalGoogle Scholar
Aubourg, SP 1993 Review: interaction of malondialdehyde with biological molecules—new trend about reactivity and significance. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 28 323335Google Scholar
Baker, MA & He, SQ 1991 Elaboration of cellular DNA breaks by hydroperoxides. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 11 563572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dave, RI & Shah, NP 1996 Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 79 15291536Google Scholar
Decker, E & Faraji, H 1990 Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by carnosine. Journal of AOCS 67 650652Google Scholar
DeCoster, VA 2008 Diabetes treatments. Journal of Gerontology and Social Work 50 105129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujiwara, D, Inoue, S, Wakabayashi, H & Fujii, T 2004 The anti-allergic effects of lactic acid bacteria are strain dependent and mediated by effects on both Th1/Th2 cytokine expression and balance. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 135 205215Google Scholar
Gilliland, SE & Walker, DK 1990 Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans. Journal of Dairy Science 73 905911Google Scholar
Gilliland, SE, Nelson, CR & Maxwell, C 1985 Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49 377381Google Scholar
Gorbach, SL 1990 Lactic acid bacteria and human health. Annals of Medicine 22 3741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grajek, W, Olejnik, A & Sip, A 2005 Probiotics, prebiotics and antioxidants as functional foods. Acta Biochemica Polonica 52 665671Google Scholar
Halliwell, B & Chirico, S 1993 Lipid peroxidation, its mechanism, measurement and significance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 57 715S725SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosono, A & Tono-oka, T 1995 Binding of cholesterol with lactic acid bacteria cells. Milchwissenschaft 50 556560Google Scholar
Kaizu, H, Sasaki, M, Nakajima, H & Suzuki, Y 1993 Effect of antioxidative lactic acid bacteria on rats fed a diet deficient in vitamin E. Journal of Dairy Science 76 24932499Google Scholar
Kimoto, H, Ohmomo, S & Okamoto, T 2002 Cholesterol removal from media by lactococci. Journal of Dairy Science 85 31823188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaenhammer, TR 1982 Microbiological considerations in selection and preparation of Lactobacillus strains for use as dietary adjuncts. Journal of Dairy Science 65 13391341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidbeck, A, Gustafasson, JA & Nord, C 1987 Impact of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplements on the human oropharyngeal and intestinal micro-flora. Scavandian Journal of Infectious Diseases 19 531537Google Scholar
Lin, MY & Chang, FJ 2000 Antioxidative effect of intestinal bacteria Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15708 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Digestive Diseases Science 45 16171622Google Scholar
Lin, MY & Yen, CL 1999 Reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation product-scavenging ability of yogurt organisms. Journal of Dairy Science 82 16291634Google Scholar
Liong, MT & Shah, NP 2005 Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. Journal of Dairy Science 88 5566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maramaldi, P, Dungan, S & Poorvu, NL 2008 Cancer treatments. Journal of Gerontology and Social Work 50 4577Google Scholar
Ohkawa, H, Ohishi, N & Yagi, K 1979 Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Analytical Biochemistry 95 351358Google Scholar
Ouwehand, AC, Kirjavainien, PV, Shortt, C & Salminen, S 1999 Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. International Dairy Journal 9 4352Google Scholar
Pham, M, Lemberg, DA & Day, AS 2008 Probiotics: sorting the evidence from the myths. The Medical Journal of Australia 188 304308Google Scholar
Ravula, RR & Shah, NP 1998 Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus casei from yogurt and fermented milk drinks. Biotechnology Techniques 12 819822Google Scholar
Roessner, A, Kuester, D, Malfertheiner, P & Schneider-Stock, R 2008 Oxidative stress in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Pathology Research and Practice 204 511524Google Scholar
Rudel, LL & Moris, MD 1973 Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde. Journal of Lipid Research 14 354366Google Scholar
Sanford, PA 1992 Digestive system physiology. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Saxelin, M, Pessi, T & Salminen, S 1995 Faecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatine capsules to healthy volunteers. International Journal of Food Microbiology 25 199203Google Scholar
Shibata, S, Natori, Y, Nishihara, T, Tomisaka, K, Matsumoto, K, Sansawa, H & Nguyen, C 2003 Antioxidant and anticataract effect of Chlorella on rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 49 334339Google Scholar
Sinclair, AJ, Barnett, AH & Lunec, J 1991 Free radicals and antioxidant systems in health and disease. Journal of Applied Medicine 21 409417Google Scholar
Sonnenburg, JL, Chen, CT & Gordon, JI 2006 Genomic and metabolic studies of the impact of probiotics on a model gut symbiont and host. PLoS Biology 4 e413Google Scholar
Taranto, MP, Fernandez, ML, Murga, LG & deValdez, GF 2003 Bile salts and cholesterol induce changes in the lipid cell membrane of Lactobacillus reuteri. Journal of Applied and Microbiology 95 8691Google Scholar
Terzaghi, BE & Sandine, W 1975 Improved medium for lactic acid streptococci and their bacteriophages. Applied Microbiology 29 807813Google Scholar
Terzaghi, BE & Sandine, W 1975 Improved medium for lactic acid streptococci and their bacteriophages. Applied Microbiology 29 807813Google Scholar
Wadstrom, T 1998 Adherence traits and mechanisms of microbial adhesion in the gut. Boiller's Clinical and Tropical Medical Common Disease 3 417433Google Scholar
Willcox, BJ, Curb, JD & Rodriguez, BL 2008 Antioxidants in cardiovascular health and disease: key lessons from epidemiologic studies. American Journal of Cardiology 101 75D86DCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, WC 1962 Spectrophotometric determination of hydroperoxide in diethyl ether. Analytical Chemistry 34 13281330Google Scholar
Yadav, H, Jain, S & Sinha, PR 2006 Effect of skim milk and dahi (yogurt) on blood glucose, insulin and lipid profile in rats fed with high fructose diet. Journal of Medicinal Food 9 328335Google Scholar
Yadav, H, Jain, S & Sinha, PR 2007 Antidiabetic effect of probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis bacteria in high fructose diet fed rats. Nutrition 72 6268Google Scholar
Yadav, H, Jain, S & Sinha, PR 2008 Oral administration of dahi containing probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei ameliorated the Streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress and dyslipidemia in rats. Journal of Dairy Research 75 189195Google Scholar
Zisman, TL & Rubin, DT 2008 Colorectal cancer and dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology 14 26622669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zommara, M, Takagi, H, Sakono, M, Suzuki, Y & Imaizami, K 1994 Effect of milk whey and its fermentation products by lactic acid bacteria on mitochondrial lipid peroxide and hepatic injury in bile duct-ligated rats. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 58 12131217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zommara, M, Toubo, H, Sakono, M & Imaizumi, K 1998 Prevention of peroxidative stress in rats fed on a low vitamin E containing diet by supplementing with fermented bovine milk whey preparation: Effect of lactic acid bacteria and β-lactoglobulin on antiperoxidative action. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 62 710717Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition of different diets of treatment

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Curves of dose dependent DPPH scavenging activity (A) and antioxidant activities as Trolox equivalents (B) of Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei. Values are means of triplicate tests. The results were obtained ED50 values from 2A.

Figure 2

Table 2. Antioxidant activity cholesterol assimilation activities of Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei1

Figure 3

Fig. 2. The total counts of lactococci (A, C, E) and lactobacilli (B, D, F) in small (A, B) and large intestinal mucosa (C, D) as well as faecal samples (E, F) of mice fed with control, skim milk and milk fermented with Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei supplemented diets analysed on 0, 2, 5 and 8 d of experiments.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. The total coliform counts in small (A) and large intestinal mucosa (B) as well as faecal samples (C) in mice fed with control, skim milk and milk fermented with Lc. lactis, Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei supplemented diets analysed on 0, 2, 5 and 8 d of the experiment.