Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-15T11:14:55.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative strategies for activation of the natural lactoperoxidase system in cows' milk: trials in Tanzania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2007

Leonard WT Fweja
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, The University of Reading, P O Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
Michael J Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, The University of Reading, P O Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
Alistair S Grandison*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, The University of Reading, P O Box 226, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: a.s.grandison@reading.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thiocyanate content and lactoperoxidase activity of individual cow's milk of different breeds were determined, and the effects of different lactoperoxidase system (LP-s) activation strategies were compared. Lactoperoxidase activity varied significantly between Friesian and both Ayrshire and Tanzania Short Horn Zebu (TSHZ), but differences between Ayrshire and TSHZ were not significant. There was no significant variation in SCN content between breeds. The LP-s was activated using three strategies based on SCN: namely; equal concentrations of SCN and H2O2 (7:7, 10:10, 15:15 mg/l), excess SCN concentrations (15:10, 20:10, 25:10 mg SCN:H2O2/l), and excess H2O2 concentrations (10:15, 10:20, 10:25 mg SCN:H2O2/l), plus a fourth strategy based on I (15:15 mg I:H2O2/l). The keeping quality (KQ) was assessed using pH, titratable acidity, clot on boiling and alcohol stability tests. All activation strategies enhanced the shelf life of milk (typically increasing KQ from around 10 to around 20 h), but it was clear that the effectiveness of the LP-s depends on the type and concentrations of the activators of the system. The LP-s activated using I as an electron donor was more effective than the LP-s activated using SCN as an electron donor, increasing the KQ by a further 6–8 h compared with SCN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2007

Lactoperoxidase (LP) is a natural enzyme with the ability to oxidize molecules at the expense of H2O2 and thus to generate antimicrobial compounds. Its antimicrobial effects also require the presence of thiocyanate (SCN) or a halogen as a second substrate (de Wit & van Hooydonk, Reference De Wit and van Hooydonk1996), to form the lactoperoxidase system (LP-s). Iodide (I) is the most readily oxidisable of all the halides whereas Cl requires a more powerful oxidant for its oxidation (de Wit & van Hooydonk, Reference De Wit and van Hooydonk1996). In the LP-s, the enzyme catalyses the oxidation of SCN to yield OSCN and HOSCN (Shin et al. Reference Shin, Hayasawa and Lönnerdal2001) and the oxidation of I to yield OI and HOI (Bosch et al. Reference Bosch, Van Doorne and De Vries2000). These compounds react with microbial sulphydryl groups to inhibit various cellular functions (Björck, Reference Björck1985; Wolfson & Summer, Reference Wolfson and Sumner1993; Shin et al. Reference Shin, Hayasawa and Lönnerdal2001).

The concentration of enzyme necessary for the system to be active is only 1–2 mg/l, much less than normally present in bovine milk (approximately 30 mg/l; Björck et al. Reference Björck, Claesson and Schulthess1979; Siva et al. Reference Siva, Upadhyay and Sannabhadti1991). In the presence of non-limiting activity of LP, the antimicrobial effect is dependent on concentrations of SCN and H2O2 (Björck, Reference Björck1981) which occur naturally but in sub-optimal levels (Reiter & Harnulv, Reference Reiter and Harnulv1984). FAO/WHO (1991) recommends the activation of the LP-s using 10:10 mg SCN:H2O2/l. However, literature data show inconsistency in concentrations of SCN and H2O2 used to activate the LP-s, but all reports demonstrated extension of shelf life (Ridley & Shalo, Reference Ridley and Shalo1990). For example, the keeping quality (KQ) results obtained using different activation strategies in earlier studies show considerable variation. Siva et al. (Reference Siva, Upadhyay and Sannabhadti1991) reported an extended KQ of 9·9, 12·2, and 13·6 h for raw milk treated with equal concentrations of 10:10, 20:20, and 30:30 mg/l SCN:H2O2 respectively at 30°C. With excess concentrations of H2O2, Ewais et al. (Reference Ewais, Sh Hefnawy and Abd El-Salam1985) reported the KQ of buffalo and cow milk preserved at 20–22°C treated with 10:25 and 10:30 mg SCN:H2O2/l to be 48 h, while the use of 10:70–80 mg SCN:H2O2/l kept the acidity unchanged for 24 h at 35°C. Barraquio et al. (Reference Barraquio, Resubal, Bantoc and Almazan1994) observed a 7 h extended shelf life of raw milk treated with 14:30 mg SCN:H2O2/l at 27–32°C. Using excess concentration of SCN, 15:10 mg SCN:H2O2/l (Chakraborty et al. Reference Chakraborty, Chaudry, Alex, Jacob and Soni1986) recorded a 3 h extension in shelf life of buffalo milk at 37°C and Björck et al. (Reference Björck, Claesson and Schulthess1979) reported total lag phases of 7–8 h (30°C), 11–12 h (25°C), 15–16 h (20°C), and 24–26 h (15°C) using 10:8·5 mg SCN:H2O2/l. Increased fungicidal and bactericidal effects have also been demonstrated in LP-s enriched with iodide (Bosch et al. Reference Bosch, Van Doorne and De Vries2000), however little information is available about the LP/I:H2O2 system.

The aim of this study was to establish the most effective substrate (SCN:H2O2) combination for extension of shelf-life in the Tanzanian environment. Three strategies were adopted – i.e. equal concentrations, excess SCN and excess H2O2. A second aim was to compare the effect of different electron donors (SCN and I) on the performance of the LP-s.

Materials and Methods

Selection of cows

The study was carried out between September and December in Morogoro Municipal in Tanzania which is located between longitude 37–39°E and latitude 6–5°S. The area experiences a sub-humid climate with a bimodal rainfall pattern characterised by two rainfall seasons in a year with a dry season separating the short rains (October to December) and long rains (March to May/June). Three commercial farms and four traditional individual farmers from Kimbarai village in the outskirt of Morogoro Municipal were identified for the study. Lactating cows from different breeds, Ayrshire, Friesian and Tanzania Short Horn Zebu (TSHZ) were sampled based on the number of lactations and the last calving date. To eliminate the possibility of variation due to lactation number or stage, all cows selected for the study (50 in total) were in their second lactation and in mid-lactation stage (4–5 months). With the exception of one farm, all lactating cows from other farms and individual farmers, were hand milked. Cows owned by individual farmers were grazed on natural pastures while the farm managed cows were grazed on natural pastures and also supplemented with maize bran, hay, and/or cotton seed cakes.

Milk sampling

Milk from individual cows was used for determining SCN content and LP activity, while pooled milk was used for KQ assessment. Individual cows milk samples (250 ml) were collected and transported without cooling, within 1 h of milking, to the Laboratory of the Department of Food Science and Technology at Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania for analysis. Bulk milk was obtained by pooling together 50 ml from each of 50 cows and thorough mixing. The cans used for pooling milk and other containers were sanitised using hot water and sodium hypochlorite solution (4%).

Thiocyanate determination

Thiocyanate content (mg/l) was determined spectrophotometrically in duplicate as Fe(SCN)3 as described previously (FAO/WHO, 1991; Fonteh et al. Reference Fonteh, Grandison and Lewis2002). Milk samples were first deproteinised by mixing 4 ml milk with 2 ml 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The filtrate (1·5 ml) was mixed with 1·5 ml ferric nitrate reagent (prepared by dissolving 16 g Fe(NO3)3⋅9H2O in 50 ml 2 m-HNO3) and the A460nm was measured immediately. Thiocyanate content was determined from a standard curve prepared using 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg thiocyanate/l. The experiment was repeated with fresh milk samples one week later.

Lactoperoxidase activity

Lactoperoxidase activity was determined in four replicates per sample according to the method described by Fonteh et al. (Reference Fonteh, Grandison and Lewis2002). The milk sample (0·1 ml) was mixed with 2 ml 1 mm-2, 2′ azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Germany) in phosphate buffer (0·1 m, pH 6·7) in a cuvette. Reaction was initiated by adding 1 ml 0·3 mm-H2O2 to the mixture. The reaction was monitored for 1 min and the absorbance recorded at 412 nm. Results are expressed in μmole product/min. The experiment was repeated on fresh milk samples one week later.

Activation of the LP-s in raw milk

Activation of the LP-s was achieved by addition of sodium thiocyanate (BDH chemicals, Ltd., Poole, UK) or potassium iodide (Fisher Scientific, Leicestershire, UK), followed by sodium carbonate peroxhydrate (Peroxide – Chemie, GmbH, Munich). The concentrations of activators quoted refer to the calculated concentrations of SCN, I or H2O2 added to the milk.

Three treatment strategies based on SCN were used with varying concentrations of the activators. The treatments involved were (i) equal concentrations of SCN:H2O2 i.e. 7:7, 10:10 and 15:15 mg/l, (ii) excess concentrations of SCN in the SCN:H2O2 combination i.e. 15:10, 20:10, and 25:10 mg/l and (iii) excess concentrations of H2O2 in the SCN:H2O2 combination i.e. 10:15, 10:20 and 10:25 mg/l.

To compare the performances of LP/SCN:H2O2 system and LP: I:H2O2 system, 15:15 mg/l of SCN:H2O2 and I:H2O2 were used to activate the two systems.

The treated and control milk samples were dispensed in 20 ml glass bottles (sterilised by oven drying at 100°C) and stored overnight (for approximately 10 h) at room temperature which varied from 28–30°C. The final design of the experiment was determined from preliminary trials (results not shown) which showed that fresh raw milk could keep for up to 10 h. Sample assay was carried out at 0 h and 10 h and then after every 2 h to an end point as determined by the quality prediction methods.

Keeping quality determination

Keeping quality of raw milk at 28–30°C was measured using pH, titratable acidity, clot on boiling test and alcohol stability test as described below. For all KQ measurements, duplicate readings were taken and reported values are means. Keeping quality is reported as the time (h) between milking and the first observation of spoilage criteria noted for each test.

Titratable acidity (TA)

To 10 ml milk was added 1 ml phenolphthalein solution (0·5% w/w). The mixture was titrated against 0·11 m-NaOH (VWR International Ltd, Poole, UK) to an end point marked by a pink colour persistent for at least 5 s. The milk was judged to be spoiled when TA had increased by 0·02% (Chakraborty et al. Reference Chakraborty, Chaudry, Alex, Jacob and Soni1986).

Clot on boiling (COB)

The test was performed by boiling 2 ml milk sample in a test tube for 5 min, after which it was examined for curdling by tilting the tube gently. The sample was judged to be spoiled when clotting was observed.

Alcohol stability test (AST)

Equal volumes of milk and 70% ethanol prepared from 99% ethanol (VWR International Ltd) were mixed together in a test tube. The tube was inverted several times and then examined for coagulation. Coagulation of milk indicated spoilage.

pH

Spoilage was judged to have occurred by a fall in pH of 0·4 units.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the means compared using a multiple comparison test of Least Significant Difference (lsd) at (P⩽0·05).

Results

LP activity and thiocyanate concentration in different breeds

Large variations, both between and within breeds, were recorded in all breeds in both LP activity and SCN concentration (Table 1). The greatest variability in both parameters was observed in the Ayrshire breed. The variation was lowest in TSHZ in terms of LP activity, and in Friesian in terms of SCN concentration. The highest individual and mean LP activities were found for Friesians while the lowest individual activity was for the Ayrshires and the lowest mean activity was found for the TSHZ. In some cases, large differences in both LP activity and SCN concentration in individual cows were recorded over the weekly sampling interval. An extreme case of this variation for an individual cow was LP activities of 254 and 2951 μm product/min, and SCN concentrations of 6·1 and 35·2 mg/l.

Table 1 Lactoperoxidase activity and thiocyanate concentration in milk from various cow breeds. Values are means±standard deviations (sd) for n=Number of selected cows

a,b Mean values in a column with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0·05)

TSHZ – Tanzania Short Horn Zebu

Statistically significant variations (P<0·05) in LP activity between both Friesian and Ayrshire, and Friesian and TSHZ were noted, but the differences between Ayrshire and TSHZ were not significant. The thiocyanate concentration varied quite widely between the different individuals, but there was no significant difference between the three breeds.

Keeping quality of LP-s activated raw milk

The KQ results for the different activation strategies of LP-s activated raw milk stored at 28–30°C are summarised in Table 2. There was good agreement between the four methods of estimating KQ in terms of the ranking of the different treatments. Higher KQ estimates were generally observed with COB and pH measurements, while TA and AST gave similar results. These results are consistent with previous findings (Barrett et al. Reference Barret, Grandison and Lewis1999).

Table 2 Keeping quality of LP-s activated raw milk with varying concentrations of SCN:H2O2, stored at 28–30°C. TA=Titratable acidity, AST=Alcohol stability test and COB=Clot on boiling test

Values are means of two experiments

All activation strategies resulted in improved KQ, however, quite different increases in KQ were apparent when levels of either one or both substrates were increased. The use of equal substrate concentrations (Table 2a) showed a consistent increase in KQ in all four tests, and KQ increased as the concentrations of the system initiators were increased, such that KQ was more than doubled at the highest concentrations of initiators.

Although, the treatment of raw milk with excess concentrations of SCN similarly extended the KQ at all activation levels and for all four methods of assessment, there was little difference in KQ between the different activation levels (Table 2b).

With excess concentration of H2O2, all three treatments again gave considerable increases in KQ above the control, but there was little difference between the three activation treatments (Table 2c).

Comparison of activation with LP/SCN:H2O2 and LP/I:H2O2

Activation using the LP/I:H2O2 system gave much greater increases in KQ compared with LP/SCN:H2O2, according to all four criteria (Table 3).

Table 3 Keeping quality of LP-s activated raw milk treated with equal concentrations of I:H2O2 and SCN:H2O2 at 28–30°C. TA=Titratable acidity, AST=Alcohol stability test and COB=Clot on boiling test

Values are means of two experiments

Discussion

The wide variations in LP activity in individual cows of the same or different breeds, and variations between samples from individual cows over a weekly sampling interval, are consistent with the variable pattern of the enzyme activity described in earlier studies (Fonteh et al. Reference Fonteh, Grandison and Lewis2002). The significantly greater activity in the Friesian milk compared with the other breeds is an interesting observation, although care should be taken in ascribing too much importance to this in view of the wide variation and unpredictability of LP activity seen in this and earlier studies.

The mean SCN content reported in the present study is consistent with literature data, 1–15 mg/l (Reiter & Harnulv, Reference Reiter and Harnulv1984; Wolfson & Sumner, Reference Wolfson and Sumner1993; de Wit & van Hooydonk, Reference De Wit and van Hooydonk1996) and 4–59 mg/l (Korhonen, Reference Korhonen1973). Although variations in SCN concentration were observed between and within individual cows during sampling, the overall mean did not show any significant variations between breeds. The results also demonstrated a lack of correlation between milk LP activity and SCN content (R2=0·052) as reported previously in cows' and goats' milk (Fonteh et al. Reference Fonteh, Grandison and Lewis2002). In milk of healthy cows, the SCN level is highly dependent on the feeding regime of the cow, as many plants, particularly Cruciferaceae, contain SCN precursors (Korhonen, Reference Korhonen2004). Lactoperoxidase activity, on the other hand, is not primarily affected by diet.

The use of equal concentrations of SCN:H2O2 resulted in a consistent increase in KQ with increased substrate concentration. The enhancement of the effects of the LP-s with increasing concentration of SCN:H2O2 has been demonstrated in previous studies (Björck, Reference Björck1978; Siva et al. Reference Siva, Upadhyay and Sannabhadti1991). Chakraborty et al. (Reference Chakraborty, Chaudry, Alex, Jacob and Soni1986) described the increasing effectiveness of the system with increasing substrate concentration as resulting from generation of large amounts of intermediate compounds OSCN and O2SCN for a long duration.

There was clearly no advantage in providing excess concentrations of SCN relative to H2O2. This observation suggests that the effects of SCN on the antimicrobial properties of LP-s, depend on the relative amount of available H2O2. H2O2 is considered to be the most limiting factor to the LP-s as only traces of H2O2 have been detected in freshly secreted milk (Korhonen, Reference Korhonen2004). Siva et al. (Reference Siva, Upadhyay and Sannabhadti1991) recorded a residual level of 61·4 mg SCN/l in LP-s activated milk treated with 70:30 mg/l SCN:H2O2 at the end of their experiment. Similar observations were reported by Ridley & Shalo (Reference Ridley and Shalo1990) using 21·5 mg SCN/l and 7·3–14·4 mg H2O2/l; they recorded an average residue of 11·5 mg SCN/l in treated milk after 24 h. Thakar & Dave (Reference Thaka and Dave1986) demonstrated that the residual SCN concentration in milk treated using equimolar concentration of SCN:H2O2 is equivalent to the concentration of SCN occurring naturally in milk. The residual SCN may also partly result from regeneration through interaction of oxidation products with SH-groups of proteins (Siva et al. Reference Siva, Upadhyay and Sannabhadti1991). It should also be noted that fresh milk contains a significant and variable concentration of SCN, as discussed above, so the optimum activation level could vary between milk samples. Overall these results suggest that there is no advantage in providing excess SCN above 10 mg/l, in agreement with Ewais et al. (Reference Ewais, Sh Hefnawy and Abd El-Salam1985), who demonstrated that SCN levels >10 mg/l have no advantage in KQ improvement, and Rossi & de Oliveira (Reference Rossi and de Oliveira1993) who showed an increased efficacy of the LP-s with increasing SCN concentration in the range of 3·5 to 12 mg/l, but no further increase at higher concentrations. Similarly, excess concentrations of H2O2 >10 mg/l did not have a significant impact on the overall KQ of milk. Rossi et al. (Reference Rossi, Oliveira and Faria1995) reported a decrease in the effectiveness of LP-s at H2O2 >20 mg/l and linked the antimicrobial effect at this concentration to the direct action of H2O2 rather than the LP-s. Excess H2O2 is associated with irreversible inactivation of LP (Seif et al. Reference Seif, Buys and Donkin2005), however this occurs when the H2O2 concentration exceeds 300 mg/l (FAO/WHO, 1991). It can be concluded that equal concentrations of the two activators are effective in increasing the KQ, and there is no particular advantage in providing excess concentrations of either component.

The greater effectiveness of the LP/I:H2O2 system over the LP/SCN:H2O2 system may be due to the formation of more stable compounds between I and sulphydryl compounds from bacterial enzymes, thus offering a much longer inhibition effect or greater bacteriocidal effect compared with SCN (De Wit & van Hooydonk, Reference De Wit and van Hooydonk1996). Barraquio et al. (Reference Barraquio, Resubal, Bantoc and Almazan1994) reported the strong dependence of the effect of the antimicrobial products (OI and OSCN) on their special ability to bind to free SH-groups in various proteins. Enhanced antimicrobial effectiveness of the LP-s against Candida albicans, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by addition of iodide has also been demonstrated previously (Bosch et al. Reference Bosch, Van Doorne and De Vries2000). Studies are currently in progress to compare the bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic effects of the two systems against a range of spoilage bacteria in milk.

The authors are unaware of any current practical applications of I addition to milk. However, the Codex Alimentarius standard permits addition of potassium iodide to food grade salt at levels of 30–200 mg ml−1 (FAO, 1996), which suggests that application of the LP/I:H2O2 system in milk should be acceptable. It is felt that the possibility of application of this system should be further explored.

The authors would like to thank the Association of Commonwealth Universities for providing a scholarship for Mr Fweja.

References

Barraquio, VL, Resubal, LE, Bantoc, IBM & Almazan, EN 1994 Preservation of raw milk with lactoperoxidase/hydrogen peroxide/thiocyanate system, hydrogen system and by refrigeration. Asia Life Sciences 3 110Google Scholar
Barret, NE, Grandison, AS & Lewis, MJ 1999 Contribution of the lactoperoxidase system to the keeping quality of pasteurised milk. Journal of Dairy Research 66 7380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björck, L 1978 Antibacterial effect of lactoperoxidase system on psychrotrophic bacteria in milk. Journal of Dairy Research 45 109118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björck, L, Claesson, O & Schulthess, W 1979 The lactoperoxidase/thiocyanate/hydrogen peroxide system as a temporary preservative for raw milk in developing countries. Milchwissenschaft 34 726729Google Scholar
Björck, L 1981 Activation of lactoperoxidase system as a mean of preventing bacterial deterioration of raw milk – Invited paper IDF symposium on Bacteriological Quality of raw milkGoogle Scholar
Björck, L 1985 The Lactoperoxidase System. In Antimicrobial Systems in Milk. Proceedings of the International Dairy Federation Symposium on Natural Antimicrobial Systems. Bath University Press UKGoogle Scholar
Bosch, EH, Van Doorne, H & De Vries, S 2000 The lactoperoxidase system: the influence of iodide and the chemical and antimicrobial stability over the period of about 18 months. Journal of applied Microbiology 89 215224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, BK, Chaudry, SS, Alex, KA, Jacob, G & Soni, GJ 1986 Application of lactoperoxidase system for preserving buffalo milk produced in Indian villages. Milchwissenschaft 41 1619Google Scholar
De Wit, JN & van Hooydonk, ACM 1996 Structure, functions, and application of lactoperoxidase in natural antimicrobial systems. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 50 227244Google Scholar
Ewais, SM, Sh Hefnawy, A & Abd El-Salam, MH 1985 Utilisation of lactoperoxidase system in preservation of raw milk under local conditions. Egyptian Journal of Dairy Science 13 17Google Scholar
FAO 1996 Food fortification: technology and quality control. FAO food and nutrition paper number 60 FAO RomeGoogle Scholar
FAO/WHO 1991 Guidelines for the preservation of raw milk by use of the lactoperoxidase system CAC/GL 13-1991Google Scholar
Fonteh, FA, Grandison, AS & Lewis, MJ 2002 Variation of lactoperoxidase activity and thiocyanate content in cows' and goats' milk throughout lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 69 401409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korhonen, H 1973 Untersuchungen zur bakterizidie der milch und immunisierung der bovinen milchdrüse Meijeritieteellinen Aikakauskirja (Finnish Journal of Dairy Science) 32 (3) 115Google Scholar
Korhonen, H 2004 The lactoperoxidase system in mastitic milk. FAO LP Expert Meeting 29 February–1 March 2004, Cape Town South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Reiter, B & Harnulv, BG 1984 Lactoperoxidase antibacterial system: Natural occurrence, biological functions and practical applications. Journal of Food Protection 47 724732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, SC & Shalo, PL 1990 Farm Application of Lactoperoxidase Treatment and Evaporative Cooling for the intermediate Preservation of Unprocessed Milk in Kenya. Journal of Food Protection 53 592597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossi, EA & de Oliveira, JS 1993/94 Effect of thiocyanate concentration on the effectiveness of the lactoperoxidase system activated in raw milk. Alimentos-e-Nutriecao 5 4956Google Scholar
Rossi, EA, Oliveira, JS & Faria, JB 1995 Effect of hydrogen peroxide levels on the effectiveness of the lactoperoxidase system in raw milk. Ciencie-e-Technologia-de-Alimentos 14 178188Google Scholar
Seif, E, Buys, EM & Donkin, EF 2005 Significance of lactoperoxidase system in the dairy industry and its potential application: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 16 137154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, K, Hayasawa, H & Lönnerdal, B 2001 Inhbition of Escherichia Coli respiratory enzymes by the lactoperoxidase – hydrogen peroxide-thiocyanate antimicrobial system. Journal of applied Microbiology 90 489493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siva, CV, Upadhyay, KG & Sannabhadti, SS 1991 Lactoperoxidase/thiocyanate/hydrogen peroxide system, its use and implication in manufacture of dairy products. Indian dairyman 43 240246Google Scholar
Thaka, RP & Dave, JM 1986 Application of the activated lactoperoxidase-thiocyanate-hdrogen peroxide system in enhancing the keeping quality of buffalo milk at higher temperatures. Milchwissenschaft 41 2022Google Scholar
Wolfson, LM and Sumner, SS 1993 Antibacterial activity of the Lactoperoxidase system: a Review. Journal of Food Protection 56 887892CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Lactoperoxidase activity and thiocyanate concentration in milk from various cow breeds. Values are means±standard deviations (sd) for n=Number of selected cows

Figure 1

Table 2 Keeping quality of LP-s activated raw milk with varying concentrations of SCN:H2O2, stored at 28–30°C. TA=Titratable acidity, AST=Alcohol stability test and COB=Clot on boiling testValues are means of two experiments

Figure 2

Table 3 Keeping quality of LP-s activated raw milk treated with equal concentrations of I:H2O2 and SCN:H2O2 at 28–30°C. TA=Titratable acidity, AST=Alcohol stability test and COB=Clot on boiling testValues are means of two experiments