Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T01:39:44.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large constituent families help children parse compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2005

ANDREA KROTT  and
ELENA NICOLADIS
ANDREA KROTT
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK
ELENA NICOLADIS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The family size of the constituents of compound words, or the number of compounds sharing the constituents, has been shown to affect adults' access to compound words in the mental lexicon. The present study was designed to see if family size would affect children's segmentation of compounds. Twenty-five English-speaking children between 3;7 and 5;9 were asked to explain the meaning of existing compounds with constituents of varying family size to an alien puppet. The results showed that children were more likely to mention the modifier of compounds if they came from large constituent families than if they came from small constituent families. Other variables were also shown to have some, but smaller effects on children's parsing, including the frequency of the constituent words and the compounds, whether the compounds were already known, and age. These results suggest that children's segmentation of compounds might be facilitated by analogy with other compounds already in their vocabularies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 139 - 158
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

This research was supported by a NSERC Research Grant to the second author. An earlier version has been presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the German Linguistics Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft) in Munich, February 26–28, 2003. We thank Trinity Wilson for collecting and coding the data for this study and Christina Gagné for helpful feedback.