Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-g9frx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T07:15:37.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age- and ability-related differences in young readers' use of conjunctions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2005

KATE CAIN ,
NIKOLE PATSON  and
LEANNE ANDREWS
KATE CAIN
Affiliation:
University of Essex
NIKOLE PATSON
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
LEANNE ANDREWS
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two studies investigating young readers' use of conjunctions are reported. In Study One, 145 eight- to ten-year-olds completed one of two narrative cloze tasks in which different types of conjunction were deleted. Performance for additive conjunctions was not affected by age in this study, but older children were more likely to select the target conjunction than were younger children for temporal, causal, and adversative terms. Performance was superior in the cloze task in which they were given a restricted choice of responses (three vs. seven). In Study Two, 35 eight- and nine-year-old good and poor comprehenders completed the three-choice cloze task. The poor comprehenders were less likely to select the target terms in general. Sentence-level comprehension skills did not account for their poor performance. The results indicate that understanding of the semantic relations expressed by conjunctions is still developing long after these terms are used correctly in children's speech. The findings are discussed in relation to the role of conjunctions in text comprehension.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 877 - 892
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Footnotes

Study One was supported by British Academy grant no. SG-34207 awarded to the first author. Study Two was supported by a University of Michigan-Flint Honors Scholar Program Study Abroad Grant, a UM-F Office of Research Undergraduate Research Grant, and a UM-F Office of Development Grant awarded to the second author. We would like to record our thanks to the staff and pupils at the following schools in Essex for their co-operation: John Bunyan Junior, John Ray Junior, Millfield Primary, North Primary, to Simon Bignell and Sharon O'Donnell for acting as blind scorers for the error analysis, and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.