No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Professor Schafer Would Say …
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2011
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static-cambridge-org.ezproxyberklee.flo.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0021911800139713/resource/name/firstPage-S0021911800139713a.jpg)
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1978
References
1 Mr. Chaves's alternative proposal (but enough of a conceivable infinity of alternatives!) requires the direct modification of a bisyllabic noun by a monosyllabic attribute which is normally an intran sitive verb—a solecism in any form of “Classical Chinese.”