Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T09:32:06.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparisons for carrier-borne epidemics in heterogeneous and homogeneous populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Claude Lefevre  and
Marie-Pierre Malice
Claude Lefevre*
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Marie-Pierre Malice*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
*
∗Postal address: Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut de Statistique, Campus Plaine, C.P. 210, Boulevard du Triomphe, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
∗∗Postal address: University of Kentucky, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Lexington, KY 40506–0027, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two specific models for the spread of a carrier-borne epidemic are considered which allow for individual variability. The implications of differences in the infection or removal rates are investigated by comparing the propagation of the disease for heterogeneous and homogeneous populations. This is achieved by means of the stochastically larger and more variable order relations for random variables. The results obtained extend earlier ones and are illustrated with some numerical examples.

Keywords

STOCHASTICALLY LARGER ORDERINGSTOCHASTICALLY MORE VARIABLE ORDERING
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Applied Probability , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 663 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by a grant of the Belgian F.N.R.S. The work was carried out while the author was visiting the Statistics and Applied Probability Program, University of California, Santa Barbara.

This paper was prepared with the partial support of the Office of Naval Research under Contract N00014–86-K-0019.

References

Ball, F. G. (1985) Deterministic and stochastic epidemics with several kinds of susceptibles. Adv. Appl. Prob. 17, 1–22.Google Scholar
Becker, N. G. (1973) Carrier-borne epidemics in a community consisting of different groups. J. Appl. Prob. 10, 491–501.Google Scholar
Gani, J. and Jerwood, D. (1972) The cost of a general stochastic epidemic. J. Appl. Prob. 9, 257–269.Google Scholar
Henderson, W. (1979) A solution of the carrier-borne epidemic. J. Appl. Prob. 16, 641–645.Google Scholar
Kryscio, R. J. and Saunders, R. (1976) A note on the cost of carrier-borne, right-shift epidemic models. J. Appl. Prob. 13, 652–661.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (1979) Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ross, S. M. (1983) Stochastic Processes. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Warren, P., Foster, J. and Bleistein, N. (1976) A stochastic model of a nonhomogeneous carrier-borne epidemic. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 31, 569–578.Google Scholar
Watson, R. K. (1980) A useful random time-scale transformation for the standard epidemic model. J. Appl. Prob. 17, 324–332.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. H. (1965) On the spread of epidemics by carriers. Biometrics 21, 481–491.Google Scholar