Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:15:27.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susan Nance, How the Arabian Nights Inspired the American Dream, 1790–1935 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2009, $49.95). Pp. 344. isbn978 0 8078 3274 5.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2011

MALINI JOHAR SCHUELLER
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Susan Nance's How the Arabian Nights Inspired the American Dream is a well-researched and engaging study of a wide variety of people – dancers, magicians, acrobats, lecturers – both native and foreign, who “played Eastern” for over a century before the Great Depression. Nance argues that playing Eastern had little to do with questions of empire and race but rather with capitalism, because the East promised an abundance and leisure similar to that of consumer capitalism. The book begins by examining the popularity of The Thousand and One Nights and American Oriental tales inspired by it, the fascination with Eastern architecture and indulgent Eastern repose which found material expression in features like the lady's Oriental corner in American parlors in the 1870s. It then considers the careers of Hatchik Oscanyan and Bayard Taylor, who used the ex oriente lux method of exposing common misconceptions of the East and flattering the audience as enlightened consumers, inviting them both to enjoy Oriental calm and to view the East as a terrain for rugged, manly travel. Chapter 3 reviews the careers of Freemasons Rob Morris and Albert Rawson, who used the persona of the wise man of the East, and the Shriners, who critiqued the commercialization of the East while simultaneously engaging in it by mimicking Muslim rituals for their initiation rites.

Moving to popular entertainment, chapters 4 and 5 survey a variety of foreign and native performers in tent shows and vaudevilles, ranging from those playing roles like the Bedouin horseman to circus performers managed by people like Hassan Ben Ali and his troupe of Arabian acrobats. They also examine the Eastern displays at the 1893 Columbian exposition, including the Ottoman Empire's efforts to represent itself as imperial caretaker. Next, in the most interesting chapter, Nance examines the interest in the Oriental dancer who emerged in public consciousness after the Columbian Exposition. Nance argues that the belly dance, which had a wide female following, allowed middle-class white women to imagine a powerful, sexually aware femininity which these women eventually transformed into a burlesque act known as the “hootchy-kootchy” which lampooned male desire. Nance demonstrates the agency of Eastern women by tracing the career of Algerian dancer Zelika Zimman, who challenged the court when tried for indecency, and that of white women like Ruth St. Denis, who performed Oriental dances. Turning to a different personification, chapter 7 explores the popularity of the Eastern swami at the turn of the century as the swami provided an antimaterialist critique of the US and appealed to Anglo-American women as a rebuke of male power. The final chapter explains how the African-American Members of the Moorish Science Temple and the Nation of Islam used Eastern personae and spirituality to claim the consumption and opportunity promised in the tale of Alladin's lamp.

The strength of the book is its dense archival research, which unearths the careers of little-known performers such as Jovedah de Rajah, aka Joe Downing, an African American mystic adviser, or the Lebanese acrobat George Hamid, whose life exemplified the rags-to-riches story. Refusing to deny the agency of both performers and audiences, Nance rejects any ideological analysis that would link playing Eastern to a discursive system such as Edward Said's Orientalism or to questions of Anglo-American racial hierarchy. Indeed, Nance argues that playing Eastern was most ubiquitous before the East became “practically or politically relevant to the bulk of the population or the U.S. government” (5) and that to understand the attraction of playing Eastern, one needs to stay clear of such presentist orientations and actually “listen to those who played Eastern” (7). Yet this intention is often undermined by the author's attempt to force a reading of Eastern performance as a sign of consumer individuation in capitalism. For instance, the author's contention that audience interest in the exotic performances of Arab entertainers was a way to enact the promise of consumer capitalism is not borne out by the subsequent analysis of the Eastern horseman, which concludes that the horseman could be a despised foreigner, a warrior, or trickster. Likewise, it is not clear how the attraction of the spiritual swami and his antimaterialist critique once again illustrates how audiences could attain the American Dream through the consumption of Eastern spirituality.

The author's summary dismissal of all scholarship which considers empire in relation to US engagement with the East is also hasty. Two examples will suffice: Douglas Little's American Orientalism (2004), an analysis of diplomatic relations between the US and the Middle East as affected by images of the latter, while based on eclectic sources such as political writings as well as articles in National Geographic, is dismissed as lazy reduction; analogously, Hilton Obenzinger's American Palestine (1999), which reads Melville and Twain's works as counternarratives to popular views of millenialist restorations of the Holy Lands to Christianity, is seen as exemplifying a tradition of tracing a stereotypical and monolithic Orientalism.

While Nance's argument about the allure of the East as a sign of capitalist plenty is provocative, the author's insistence on severing this allure from any relationship with imperialism is problematic and unnecessary. Few would agree with the author's claim that Eastern nations were not politically relevant to the US government or the population before the 1930s. An informal empire was operant in China and Japan, and the Philippines was routinely seen as “Oriental.” In recent years there have been a number of works that have analyzed the complexity and multiplicity of American discourses about the “Orient” despite an acknowledgment of US empire and investments in racialization: Yoshihara Mari's Embracing the East (2003), Scott Trafton's Egypt Land (2004), Brian T. Edwards's Morocco Bound (2005), and Tim Marr's The Cultural Roots of American Islamicism (2006). Nance's contribution to American engagement with the “East” is its unearthing of a variety of Eastern performances that were ubiquitous for over a century, thus making the Middle East as well as West and South Asia central to American identity.