Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:41:36.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Confusion of Mind”: Colonial and Post-Colonial Discourses about Frontier Encounters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

DOLORES E. JANIEWSKI
Affiliation:
Department of History, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An interpretation of frontier texts must respond to the demand by Gesa Mackenthun and other scholars that “empire be added to the study of American culture.” As written by authors like Frederick Jackson Turner, who placed themselves on the colonizing side of the frontier, these texts described the frontier as “the meeting point between savagery and civilization” where European immigrants became “Americanized, liberated, and fused into a mixed race.” Here was forged a “composite nationality for the American people.” Such texts with their understanding of the “Indian frontier ” as a “consolidating agent in our history” which developed “the stalwart and rugged qualities of the frontiersman,” helped to construct the American identity as the “imperial self” with its implicitly patriarchal, Eurocentric, and colonial assumptions. Describing the frontier as a “military training school, keeping alive the power of resistance to aggression,” such texts failed to acknowledge the aggressive acts that seized the land from its original inhabitants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press