Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T04:41:20.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of iodine on nutritional, metabolic and immunological response of goats fed Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2007

A. K. PATTANAIK*
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Studies in Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
S. A. KHAN
Affiliation:
Centre of Advanced Studies in Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
T. K. GOSWAMI
Affiliation:
Immunology Section, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, India
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Email: patnaik@ivri.up.nic.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fifteen indigenous nondescript kids (8·2 kg; 8 months initial age), randomly allotted into three equal groups, were used to study the effects of supplementation of extra iodine on their performance when fed a leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) leaf meal containing diet. Group I (CON) was fed a control concentrate supplement consisting of a conventional protein source whereas the other two groups (LL and LLI) were fed a concentrate containing leucaena leaf meal so as to supply 0·5 of the net crude protein (CP) requirements. Additionally, animals in group LLI were given supplemental iodine (as potassium iodide solution) at 0·25 mg/head/day. Wheat straw was provided ad libitum as the sole source of roughage during the 120 days of the experimental period. A metabolism trial, conducted at the end of the feeding trial, revealed no variation in the dry matter intake (DMI) among the groups. A significant (P<0·01) decline was evident in digestibility of CP in both the leucaena-fed groups (0·463 and 0·482 versus 0·586) whilst that of the other organic components remained unaffected. Animals on the LL diet exhibited lower (P<0·01) nitrogen retention and average daily gain (ADG) in live weight (LW). Blood collected periodically was analysed for the thyroid hormones triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) as well as other biochemical parameters. At the end of the experimental feeding, the cell-mediated immune (CMI) response of the goats was assessed by intra-dermal inoculation of phytohaemagglutinin-P and measuring the change in skin thickness at various post-inoculation hours. The results revealed that the serum concentration of glucose was significantly (P<0·05) higher in the LLI group of animals fed leucaena with iodine. The concentration of cholesterol in serum of LL animals increased significantly (P<0·05) compared to the CON and LLI groups. No variation due to dietary interventions was evident in other indices of metabolic profile. While the concentration of circulating T3 remained unaffected due to dietary intervention, that of T4 reduced significantly (P<0·05) in the LL group. Moreover, the T4 concentration in the LLI group remained similar to that of control indicative of positive impact of iodine supplementation. The immune response revealed that the skin thickness of animals in the LL group was lower (P<0·05) as compared to the control, indicating a compromise of CMI response due to feeding of leucaena leaf meal. Supplementation of iodine appeared to be partially effective in potentiating the response. In conclusion, iodine supplementation could be adopted as a strategic management strategy to ameliorate the negative impacts of feeding leucaena leaf meal in growing kids.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

INTRODUCTION

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) is a protein-rich browse legume having a pan-tropical distribution. It has potential as a supplement in the primarily crop residue-based small ruminants feeding systems common to most of the tropics. Considering its easy accessibility and good forage quality with an average crude protein (CP) content ranging from 140 to 300 g/kg (Akbar & Gupta Reference Akbar and Gupta1985; Gupta & Atreja Reference Gupta and Atreja1998; Pattanaik et al. Reference Pattanaik, Khan, Kumar and Bedi2000), leucaena is very suitable, both on an economic and nutritional basis, as a protein supplement to cereal straw-based feeding regimens by the resource-poor farmers of developing countries. However, the presence of mimosine impedes the effective and optimal exploitation of this protein-rich forage. Mimosine, a non-protein toxic amino acid, is an antimitotic and depilatory agent (Hegarty et al. Reference Hegarty, Schinckel and Court1964; Reis et al. Reference Reis, Tunks and Hegarty1975), and its rumen metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-(1H)-pyridone (DHP) is a potent goitrogen (Hegarty et al. Reference Hegarty, Court, Christie and Lee1976, Reference Hegarty, Lee, Christie, Court and Haydok1979). Hence feeding of leucaena could lead to a hypothyroid condition (Jones & Hegarty Reference Jones and Hegarty1984) with typical signs of alopecia, anorexia, reduced weight gain, enlarged thyroid and low circulating concentrations of thyroid hormones (Jones Reference Jones, Seawright, Hegarty, James and Keeler1985). The expression of toxicity, however, is related to the proportions of leucaena in the diet, mimosine intake, duration of feeding, and diet composition (Jones & Hegarty Reference Jones and Hegarty1984; Elliot et al. Reference Elliot, Norton, Milton and Ford1985). At lower rates of feeding, signs of leucaena toxicity may be absent but live weight (LW) gain may still be depressed (Jones & Winter Reference Jones and Winter1982).

To overcome the negative impacts of leucaena feeding, animal nutritionists have tried a number of approaches including heat treatment (Tangendjaja et al. Reference Tangendjaja, Lowry and Wills1984, Reference Tangendjaja, Rahardjo and Lowry1990), ensiling (Hongo et al. Reference Hongo, Tawata, Watanabe and Shiroma1986), wilting and leaching (Padmavathy & Shobha Reference Padmavathy and Shobha1987), pelleting (Srivastava & Sharma Reference Srivastava and Sharma1998) and feeding of DHP-degrading microbes (Jones & Megarrity Reference Jones and Megarrity1983; Akingbade et al. Reference Akingbade, Nsahlai, Morris and Iji2002) with various degrees of success and applicability. Although inoculation with rumen bacteria capable of degrading DHP constitutes one of the most effective approaches to deal with the problems of leucaena toxicosis, its applicability by the smallholder farmers of developing countries is doubtful for a number of reasons inherent to their livestock production system.

Since thyroid problems constitute major problems associated with leucaena feeding, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that provision of extra iodine would help overcome the toxicity. There have been suggestions that treatment with iodine or thyroxine (T4) may alleviate signs of leucaena toxicity (Hammond Reference Hammond1995). However, early studies by Jones et al. (Reference Jones, Blunt and Nurenberg1978), Holmes (Reference Holmes1980), Jones & Hegarty (Reference Jones and Hegarty1984) and Pratchett et al. (Reference Pratchett, Jones and Syrch1991) have failed to elicit a clear-cut advantage based on treatment and/or supplementation with iodine or T4. However, in most of these studies, the experimental animals had access to very high contents of dietary leucaena extending up to total (sole) leucaena feeding. On the contrary, it is generally believed that leucaena can constitute up to 0·3 of the diet of ruminants without overt signs of toxicity (Hammond Reference Hammond1995), but sub-clinical effects, mainly in terms of reduced weight gain and feed intake, may still be apparent. In previous studies involving adult goats, improved nutrient utilization and nitrogen retention when leucaena-containing diets were fortified with iodine has been observed (Pattanaik et al. Reference Pattanaik, Khan, Kumar and Bedi2000; Rajendran et al. Reference Rajendran, Pattanaik, Khan and Bedi2001a, Reference Rajendran, Pattanaik, Khan and Bedib). The present study, therefore, was undertaken to ascertain the effects of iodine supplementation in growing kids with a moderate content of leucaena leaf meal fed a wheat straw-based diet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals, feeds and feeding

The study was conducted at the Animal Nutrition Research facility of Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar in India. The animal experimentation of the study was ethically approved by the Staff Research Council of the institute. Fifteen indigenous kids (8·2 kg; initial age 8 months) were obtained from the Sheep & Goat Farm of the institute and used for the experiment. The kids were randomly allotted into three equal groups in a completely randomized block design.

Leucaena twigs were collected from the institute farm in a single batch and were allowed to dry under the sun. Following manual separation, the dried leaves were ground and stored in gunny bags, and incorporated into concentrate mixtures as and when required. The mimosine content of the leucaena was determined on this stored leaf meal.

All the kids were reared on a common nutritional regime before the initiation of the experiment. The animals in the first group (control; CON) were fed a concentrate supplement consisting of a conventional protein source whereas those in the other two groups were fed a concentrate containing leucaena leaf meal (LL), the latter replacing 0·50 of the net CP. Additionally, animals in the third group (LLI) were given supplemental iodine (as potassium iodide solution) of 0·25 mg/head/day. The required quantity of iodine was supplied through 5·0 ml of potassium iodide solution, which was added (by thorough mixing) to the concentrate mixture allowance of individual goats. Wheat straw was provided ad libitum as the sole source of roughage for all the three groups during the 120 days of the experimental period.

Management and experimental procedure

The animals were housed in a well-ventilated cement-floored barn having provision for individual feeding and watering. Each goat was housed in an individual pen. The goats were tagged for identification using numbered plastic tags tied to their necks. For exercise, the animals were let loose into an adjacent paddock for one hour daily in the morning. All the kids were dewormed using anthelmintic Albomar (albendazole, 5 mg/kg body weight; Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals Limited, India) and dipped for ectoparasites using 50 ppm Butox® solution (deltamethrin 12·5 mg/ml; Intervet India Pvt Ltd) besides being vaccinated for prevalent common infectious diseases before the onset of the experiment. The animals were weighed at the beginning and thereafter at fortnightly intervals to record the change in LW.

Individual animals were offered a weighed quantity of the respective concentrate supplement at 08.00 h after recording the residues, if any. Following complete consumption of the supplement, wheat straw was offered at 10.00 h so as to ensure ad libitum consumption. The animals were watered twice daily.

A metabolism trial of 7 days' duration involving quantification of intake and excretion was conducted at the end of 120 days of the feeding trial, after allowing for proper adaptation in the metabolism cages. During the collection period, records were kept of daily feed intake, and faecal and urinary outputs during the preceding 24 h. The daily urinary output of individual goats was collected quantitatively in plastic bottles; suitable aliquots were preserved in glass bottles containing dilute (200 ml/l) H2SO4 for nitrogen estimation. An appropriate aliquot of the wet faeces was weighed, mixed well with 5 ml of dilute (200 ml/l) H2SO4 and pooled into previously weighed wide-mouth plastic bottles. At the end of the collection period, the pooled aliquots of the wet faeces for each animal were weighed, mixed well and analysed for nitrogen concentration. Another aliquot of the faecal output was dried in a forced-draft oven for dry matter (DM) estimation. Samples of feeds, refusals and faeces were pooled for each animal over the 7 days of collection and stored in airtight (zipped) polyethylene bags for further processing.

Blood was collected from all the animals by jugular venipuncture at the beginning and thereafter at 40-day intervals, and serum, that was separated by centrifugation, was stored at −20°C until analysis.

Immune response

At the end of the experimental feeding, the cell-mediated immune (CMI) response of the goats was assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction to intra-dermal inoculation of phytohaemagglutinin-P (PHA-P) as described by Sevi et al. (Reference Sevi, Annicchiarico, Albenzio, Taibi, Muscio and Dell'aquila2001). The skin of the area to be tested (both sides of the neck region) was shaved 24 h in advance so as to facilitate subsiding of any inflammation due to abrasion. An area of about 1 cm2 was encircled with a marker pen. The thickness of the skin was measured with the help of a vernier caliper, which was represented as the basal (0 h) value. Subsequently, a calculated volume of the PHA-P solution in phosphate buffer saline was inoculated intradermally to the marked site so as to deliver about 15 μg of PHA-P per site, and the change in thickness of the skin was monitored at 24 h intervals up to 96 h post-inoculation.

Analyses and statistics

Samples of feeds, residues and faeces, after grinding to pass through a 2 mm sieve, were analysed for proximate components as per AOAC (1995). The metabolizable energy (ME) value of the compound diet was evaluated as per MAFF (1984). Mimosine concentration in the leucaena leaf meal was assayed as per Megarrity (Reference Megarrity1978). Analysis of various serum biochemical parameters (glucose, total protein, albumin, globulin, urea and cholesterol) were undertaken as described elsewhere (Pattanaik et al. Reference Pattanaik, Sastry and Katiyar1999). Serum concentration of thyroid hormones triiodothyronine (T3) and T4 was assayed using radioimmuno assay (RIA) kits obtained from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India, with the minimum detectable limits of 0·01 and 0·05 ng/ml, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay variations were 0·12 and 0·08, respectively.

The statistical analysis of the data was undertaken by analysis of variance as described by Snedecor & Cochran (Reference Snedecor and Cochran1989). Means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test. Significance was declared at P<0·05 unless otherwise stated. Data from one animal in the control group were deleted as the animal sustained a fracture of the fore leg not related to diet.

RESULTS

The composition of the feeds and fodder are listed in Table 1. Based on the estimated consumption of leucaena leaf meal, that contained 22·4 g mimosine/kg DM, the mean mimosine intake was calculated to be 0·19±0·015 and 0·20±0·018 g/kg LW for groups LL and LLI, respectively.

Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental feeds

* The compounded mixtures were fortified with a vitamin premix containing 50 000 IU vitamin A and 5000 IU vitamin D3 per gram.

Leucaena leaf meal.

Minimum assay (g/kg): Ca 280; P 120; Fe 0·50; I 0·26; Cu 0·77; Co 0·13.

Nutrient utilization, nitrogen balance and growth

The mean digestibility of dietary components is given in Table 2. The mean digestibility of DM and organic matter (OM) tended (P<0·10) to be lower in LL group animals in comparison to CON or LLI. The CP digestibility, on the other hand, reduced significantly (P<0·01) in both the leucaena-fed groups, irrespective of iodine supplementation. There was no effect of dietary treatment on the digestibility of ether extract and total carbohydrate. The plane of nutrition during the metabolism trial revealed no influence of the treatments on the mean daily intake of DM or CP; however, the ME intake as well as the digestible organic matter in dry matter (DOMD) were significantly (P<0·05) reduced in the LL group compared to the control.

Table 2. Influence of iodine supplementation of leucaena diet on intake and digestibility coefficients

DOM: digestible organic matter; DCP: digestible crude protein; EE: ether extract.

The mean daily nitrogen intake values were similar (P>0·05) across the treatment groups (Table 3). Excretion of nitrogen through faeces was significantly higher (P<0·05) in both the leucaena-fed groups while that through urine varied significantly (P<0·05) among the three groups, being 3·1, 2·4 and 1·8 g/d for the control, LL and LLI groups, respectively. Retention of nitrogen (either as g/day or as proportion of intake) reduced significantly (P<0·01) in LL compared to LLI group. When compared as proportion of absorbed nitrogen, the retention was significantly (P<0·01) improved in LLI compared to the other two groups.

Table 3. Influence of iodine supplementation of leucaena diet on LW change and nitrogen balance

NI: nitrogen intake; NA: nitrogen absorbed.

Animals belonging to all the three groups exhibited positive growth response (Table 3). The average daily gain (ADG), however, was significantly (P<0·01) reduced in LL group as compared to the control as well as LLI groups.

Metabolic profile and immune response

The results of blood biochemical parameters are given in Table 4. Serum concentration of glucose was significantly (P<0·05) higher in LLI animals fed leucaena with iodine compared to LL. No variation due to dietary interventions was evident with respect to serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, globulin, albumin:globulin ratio and urea. The serum concentration of cholesterol, on the other hand, increased significantly (P<0·05) in LL group as compared to control or LLI groups. The periodic alterations in serum T3 and T4 are depicted in Figs 1 and 2, respectively. The concentration of circulating thyroid hormones revealed that, while the concentration of T3 remained unaffected due to dietary intervention, that of T4 reduced significantly in the leucaena-fed group LL.

Fig. 1. Periodic alterations in the serum T3 concentrations in goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.

Fig. 2. Periodic alterations in the serum T4 concentrations in goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.

Table 4. Effects of iodine supplementation to leucaena diet on serum biochemistry and thyroid hormonesFootnote *

* Means of four collections.

The CMI response (Fig. 3), as assessed through DTH reaction to PHA-P, revealed that the skin thickness of animals in the LL group were significantly lower (P<0·05) as compared to control, but that of the animals in the LLI group was comparable to both.

Fig. 3. DTH response to intra-dermal inoculation of phytohaemagglutinin-P by goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.

DISCUSSION

The mimosine content of the leucaena leaf meal was apparently towards the lower end of the reported range of 20–140 g/kg (Akbar & Gupta Reference Akbar and Gupta1985; Garcia et al. Reference Garcia, Ferguson, Neckles and Archibald1996), but it is known to show significant variability attributable to plant strain variation, stage of growth and methods of drying among other factors (Garcia et al. Reference Garcia, Ferguson, Neckles and Archibald1996).

Both the leucaena-fed groups of goats exhibited a reduction in CP digestibility. Richards et al. (Reference Richards, Brown, Ruegseggar and Bates1994a) also reported a reduction in CP digestibility in lactating goats when leucaena was incorporated in the diet replacing part of a concentrate supplement. Furthermore, and similar to the present observations, Srivastava & Sharma (Reference Srivastava and Sharma1998) also observed negative effects of leucaena on the digestibility of the organic components DM and CP when fed at 200 g/kg. This could be attributed to the presence of variable amounts of tannins and other polyphenolics in leucaena. Protein degradability has been known to be negatively correlated with polyphenolics and proanthocyanidins (Rittner & Reed Reference Rittner and Reed1992). In addition, Dzowela et al. (Reference Dzowela, Hove, Topps and Mafongoya1995) have reported depressing effects of the presence of tannins in leguminous forages on DM degradation. Leguminous forages like Accacia, Calliandra and Leucaena contained varied amounts of soluble polyphenolics and fibre-bound proanthocyanidins that had a negative relationship with OM degradability (Norton Reference Norton, Gutteridge and Shelton1994; Maasdorp et al. Reference Maasdorp, Muchenje and Titterton1999).

The mean daily ME (MJ/day) intake was significantly (P<0·05) reduced in the LL animals as compared to the control, which could be attributable to a reduction in energy content of the leucaena diets in comparison to the control diet. The animals in both the leucaena-fed groups, however, showed a reduction in wheat straw consumption by a margin of about 30 and 22%, respectively, for the LL and LLI groups. This observation is in line with the earlier findings of Mtenga & Shoo (Reference Mtenga and Shoo1990) that leucaena supplementation reduced voluntary feed intake of hay in goats. In contrast, Dana et al. (Reference Dana, Tegyene and Shenkoru2000) observed an improvement in total DMI without depressing the intake of the basal feed in sheep fed leucaena leaf hay. However, studies by Tomkins et al. (Reference Tomkins, Macmeniman and Daniel1991) also indicated that supplementation with leucaena dry leaves at about 300 g/kg reduced the intake of pangola grass basal diet by about 8%. The possible explanation for this could be related to a lowering of circulatory thyroid hormones generally associated with leucaena feeding. Earlier studies by Fox et al. (Reference Fox, Preston, Senft and Johnson1974) and Bermudez et al. (Reference Bermudez, Forbes and Injidi1983) found a relationship between voluntary food intake and exogenous administration of thyroid hormones. Forbes (Reference Forbes, Quirke and Schmid1988) in fact suggested that, although there is no evidence of a direct involvement of thyroid hormones in the control of intake in mammals, they could play a role, possibly by inducing greater energy requirement and therefore feed intake, to support the increased metabolic rate. The observed partial improvement in wheat straw intake in LLI group compared to LL animals could possibly therefore be explained on the basis of higher T4 concentration (Table 4).

In spite of a similar (P>0·05) nitrogen intake, the faecal excretion was higher (P<0·05) in both LL and LLI animals as compared to the control, similar to the observations of Richards et al. (Reference Richards, Brown, Ruegseggar and Bates1994a). Moreover, the urinary N excretion also showed significant variation (P<0·01), being lower in both the leucaena-fed groups. This could be attributable to the presence of tanniniferous compounds in the leucaena; tannins and related polyphenols may have shifted the excretion of metabolized nitrogen from urine to faeces as has been suggested by Reed et al. (Reference Reed, Soller and Woodward1990). Although not estimated in the present study, the tannin content of leucaena is known to range from 12 to 44 g/kg (D'Mello & Fraser Reference D'Mello and Fraser1981; Akbar & Gupta Reference Akbar and Gupta1985). The negative effects of tannins and related polyphenolic compounds present in leguminous forages on the intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization are well known (Reed et al. Reference Reed, Soller and Woodward1990). The present findings are similar to the observations of Egan & Ulyatt (Reference Egan and Ulyatt1980) who suggested that condensed tannins (in sainfoin) increased the amount of metabolized nitrogen recycled to the digestive tract, thereby increasing its excretion through faeces with a concomitant decrease in its excretion in the urine. A further reduction (P<0·01) in urinary nitrogen excretion in the LLI group in comparison to LL resulted in better (P<0·01) nitrogen retention in the former, similar to the control. Provision of added iodine, as in the case of LLI, appeared to promote better nitrogen utilization efficiency as could be ascertained from the lower excretion of nitrogen in urine and this was aptly reflected as higher coefficient of retention of absorbed nitrogen in LLI (0·481) in comparison to LL (0·269) and control (0·313). A positive response of iodine supply in terms of protein utilization has been reported earlier (Regius-Mocseny et al. Reference Regius-Mocseny, Szelenyi-Galantal, Dinnyes-Simig and Votisky-Varga1992). A similar trend of better nitrogen utilization was also recorded earlier when diets for goats containing leucaena and mustard cake were supplemented with extra iodine (Pattanaik et al. Reference Pattanaik, Khan, Kumar and Bedi2000, Reference Pattanaik, Khan, Varshney and Bedi2001).

The indigenous goats of the region used for the study are medium-sized animals with various coat colours ranging between brown, black and white, and reared mainly for meat. The mean ADG in the control animals was similar to the range reported for the indigenous kids in earlier studies (Bedi et al. Reference Bedi, Pattanaik, Khan and Kumar2000; Anbarasu et al. Reference Anbarasu, Dutta, Sharma and Rawat2004; Hembade & Patel Reference Hembade and Patel2004). Contrary to the present observations, Yami et al. (Reference Yami, Litherland, Davis, Sahlu, Puchala and Goetsch2000) reported that diets containing moderate to high rates of leucaena, at least up to 450 g/kg, can be fed to goats without significant adverse effects on LW gain. However, the lack of negative effects in their study could be explained on the basis of a lower mimosine concentration of the leucaena leaf meal used. The present results indicate that at the current rate of inclusion (0·25 of DMI), leucaena leaf meal is detrimental to growth performance of kids. This is in confirmation of the findings of Jones & Winter (Reference Jones and Winter1982) that, at lower rates of feeding, signs of leucaena toxicity may be absent, but LW gain may still be depressed. In the present study, with an average intake of 0·2 g mimosine/kg LW, no overt clinical signs of toxicity were recorded during the 120 days of the experiment, although Hegarty et al. (Reference Hegarty, Schinckel and Court1964) have suggested that daily intake of mimosine in the range of c. 0·2–0·3 g/kg LW is sufficient to induce hair shedding. Although it is generally believed that leucaena can constitute up to 300 g/kg diet of ruminants without signs of toxicosis (Hammond Reference Hammond1995), the present results revealed that sub-clinical effects mainly in terms of reduced weight gain are apparent even at 250 g/kg. In experiments where legumes have replaced a concentrate feed, superior animal performance with concentrate supplementation has been attributed to greater energy intake due to a better energy concentration of the concentrate supplement than the legume-based supplement (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Brown, Ruegseggar and Bates1994b). A similar trend was also evident in the present study, with the comparable but greater growth performance of control and LLI animals in comparison to LL correlating well with the variation in ME intake (Table 2). The comparable performance of the LLI animals with those fed the control suggests that iodine supplementation was effective in overcoming the growth-retarding effects of leucaena feeding. Megarrity & Jones (Reference Megarrity and Jones1983) have reported no effects of T4 injections in goats fed only leucaena. Similarly, Pratchett et al. (Reference Pratchett, Jones and Syrch1991) observed no effects of intramuscular iodine injection on LW gain of heifers grazing on leucaena–pangola grass pasture and showing clinical signs of leucaena toxicosis. Jones et al. (Reference Jones, Blunt and Nurenberg1978) also failed to notice an effect of iodine injections on LW gain or a clinical sign of toxicosis in steers given ad libitum access to leucaena. In all these and other related studies, the experimental animals had access to much higher rates of leucaena feeding extending frequently up to sole leucaena feeding and also showing clinical signs of toxicity in some cases. On the other hand, in the present study the rate of inclusion of leucaena was restricted to below 300 g/kg of the total DMI, a level generally believed to be reasonably safe. Thus a lower rate of incorporation resulting, consequently, in a virtual absence of clinical toxicosis other than sub-clinical growth retardation possibly explains the positive response of iodine supplementation obtained in the present study. Furthermore, the present findings are in line with earlier findings of better growth performance in goats following iodine supplementation when fed on conventional as well as goitrogenic diets (Bedi et al. Reference Bedi, Pattanaik, Khan and Kumar2000; Pattanaik et al. Reference Pattanaik, Khan, Varshney and Bedi2001).

The hypoglycaemic effect of leucaena observed in the present study, as was also reported by Kailas (Reference Kailas1991), appeared to have been overcome by iodine supplementation. Similar observations of increased glucose concentration with iodine supplementation have been observed (Rajendran et al. Reference Rajendran, Pattanaik, Khan and Bedi2001b). Contrary to the present observations, Yami et al. (Reference Yami, Litherland, Davis, Sahlu, Puchala and Goetsch2000) observed that plasma urea concentration showed an increase with higher dietary concentrations of leucaena. Serum protein synthesis is known to be influenced by dietary protein (Khattab et al. Reference Khattab, El-Alamy, El-Nor, Salem and Abdou1998) while blood albumin concentration has been used to assess protein intake (Shetaewi & Ross Reference Shetaewi and Ross1991). Hence the comparable values of serum proteins observed in different groups in the present study could be explainable in light of the observed similar dietary protein intake. Concentration of cholesterol in serum of LL group animals increased significantly (P<0·05) compared to the control and LLI, indicating a probable thyroid insufficiency (Kaneko Reference Kaneko1989) due to leucaena feeding that responded positively to iodine supplementation. Serum cholesterol is often used as an index of thyroid function because hypothyroidism is generally associated with an elevation in serum cholesterol.

During early stages of iodine deficiency, there is a tendency for preferential production of the less-iodinated thyroid hormone T3 at the expense of the more-iodinated T4 (Stanbury & Pinchera Reference Stanbury, Pinchera, Hetzel and Pandav1994). The present finding of similar T3 concentrations accompanying a lower T4 in leucaena-alone-fed group (LL) could be attributable to such a physiological compensatory mechanism. The similar concentration of T4 in LLI group compared to that of the control indicated the positive influence of iodine supplementation.

A lower DTH response in the LL group of animals suggests a compromised CMI response compared to the control. In contrast, an improved skin thickness in the LLI group in relation to LL animals indicates that supplementation of iodine appeared to be partially effective in potentiating the CMI response. Although there are apparently no reports where the effects of leucaena feeding on the immune response were studied, Schone et al. (Reference Schone, Steinbach, Kirchner, Henig and Ludke1987) observed a depression of immune response in pigs fed rapeseed meal, another goitrogenic feedstuff, which responded positively to extra iodine feeding, indicative of a role of hypothyroidism in depression of immune responses. They explained the depression in immune response and the concomitant reduction in growth in the hypothyroid animals to impaired protein synthesis or unfavourable synthesis-catabolism. Ramakrishna et al. (Reference Ramakrishna, Prasad, Kumar, Singh and Kumar1991) also reported a non-significant depression of CMI in goats with induced hypothyroidism. Similarly, Williamson et al. (Reference Williamson, Davison and Payne1990) reported in domestic fowl that stress-induced changes in thyroid hormones could modulate CMI responses. In light of these reports it would be reasonable to conclude that feeding of leucaena may result in depressed CMI response mediated possibly through its effects on thyroid hormones. This could be further confirmed by the observations of Marsh (Reference Marsh1995) that growth hormones and thyroid hormones play a role in eliciting the production of factors such as thymulin and interleukin-2, which affect the immune system.

Considering the underlying positive results from the present study, it can be concluded that iodine supplementation could be adopted as a nutritional strategy to ameliorate the negative impacts of low rates of leucaena leaf meal feeding in growing kids. However, this needs to be further confirmed with a long-duration study.

References

REFERENCES

Akbar, M. A. & Gupta, P. C. (1985). Proximate composition and tannin and mineral contents of different cultivars and various parts of subabul (Leucaena leucocephala). Indian Journal of Animal Science 55, 808812.Google Scholar
Akingbade, A. A., Nsahlai, I. V., Morris, C. D. & Iji, P. A. (2002). Field activities and blood profile of pregnant South African indigenous goats after receiving dihydroxy pyridone-degrading rumen bacteria and grazing Leucaena leucocephala-grass or natural pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anbarasu, C., Dutta, N., Sharma, K. & Rawat, M. (2004). Response of goats to partial replacement of dietary protein by leaf meal mixture containing Leucaena leucocephala, Morus alba and Tectona grandis. Small Ruminant Research 51, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bedi, S. P. S., Pattanaik, A. K., Khan, S. A. & Kumar, A. (2000). Effect of graded levels of iodine supplementation on the performance of Barbari goats. Indian Journal of Animal Science 70, 736739.Google Scholar
Bermudez, F. F., Forbes, J. M. & Injidi, M. H. (1983). Involvement of melatonin and thyroid hormones in the control of sleep, food intake and energy metabolism in domestic fowl. Journal of Physiology 337, 1927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Mello, J. P. F. & Fraser, K. W. (1981). The composition of leaf meal from Leucaena leucocephala. Tropical Science 23, 7578.Google Scholar
Dana, N., Tegyene, A. & Shenkoru, T. (2000). Feed intake, sperm output and seminal characteristics of Ethiopian highland sheep supplemented with different levels of leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) leaf hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 239249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzowela, B. H., Hove, L., Topps, J. H. & Mafongoya, P. L. (1995). Nutritional and anti-nutritional characters and rumen degradability of dry matter and nitrogen for some multipurpose tree species with potential for agroforestry in Zimbabwe. Animal Feed Science and Technology 55, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1980). Quantitative digestion of fresh herbage by sheep. VI. Utilization of nitrogen in five herbages. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R., Norton, B. W., Milton, J. T. B. & Ford, C. W. (1985). Effect of molasses on mimosine metabolism in goats fed fresh and dried leucaena with barley straw. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 867875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1988). Endocrine factors important to appetite. In Control and Regulation of Animal Growth (Eds Quirke, J. F. & Schmid, H.), pp. 19. EAAP Publication No. 36. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Fox, D. G., Preston, R. L., Senft, B. & Johnson, R. R. (1974). Plasma growth hormone levels and thyroid secretion rates during compensatory growth in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 38, 437441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, G. W., Ferguson, T. U., Neckles, F. A. & Archibald, K. A. E. (1996). The nutritive value and forage productivity of Leucaena leucocephala. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60, 2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, H. K. & Atreja, P. P. (1998). Influence of gradual adaptation of cattle to Leucaena leucucephala leaf meal on biodegradation of mimosine and 3-hydroxy-4-(1H)-pyridone (3,4 DHP) in rumen, their levels in blood, fate and influence of absorbed DHP on thyroid hormones and liver enzymes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 74, 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, A. C. (1995). Leucaena toxicosis and its control in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 73, 14871492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, M. P., Schinckel, P. G. & Court, R. D. (1964). Reaction of sheep to the consumption of Leucaena leucocephala glauca Benth and to its toxic principle mimosine. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 153167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, M. P., Court, R. D., Christie, G. S. & Lee, C. P. (1976). Mimosine in Leucaena leucocephala is metabolized to a goitrogen in ruminants. Australian Veterinary Journal 52, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, M. P., Lee, C. P., Christie, G. S., Court, R. D. & Haydok, K. P. (1979). The goitrogen 3-hydroxy-4-(1H)-pyridone, a ruminal metabolite from Leucaena leucocephala: effects in mice and rats. Australian Journal of Biological Science 32, 2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hembade, A. S. & Patel, P. M. (2004). Green banana (Musca sps) leaves in the ration of kids. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 21, 57.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. H. (1980). Toxicity of Leucaena leucocephala. II. Reduced fertility of heifers grazing Leucaena leucocephala. Papua New Guinea Agricultural Journal 31, 4750.Google Scholar
Hongo, F., Tawata, S., Watanabe, Y. & Shiroma, S. (1986). Mimosine degradation as affected by ensiling Leucaena leucocephala Lam de wit. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 57, 223230.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. (1985). Leucaena toxicity and ruminal degradation of mimosine. In Plant Toxicology, Proceedings of the Australia–USA Poisonous Plants Symposium (Eds Seawright, A. A., Hegarty, M. P., James, L. F. & Keeler, R. F.), pp. 111119. Yeerongpilly, Queensland, Australia: Queensland Poisonous Plants Committee.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Hegarty, M. P. (1984). The effect of different proportions of Leucaena leucocephala in the diet of cattle on growth, feed intake, thyroid function and urinary excretion of 3-hydroxy-4-(1H)-pyridone. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 317325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Megarrity, R. G. (1983). Comparative toxicity responses of goats fed on Leucaena leucocephala in Australia and Hawaii. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 781790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. & Winter, W. H. (1982). Serum thyroxine levels and live weight gain of steers grazing Leucaena leucocephala pastures. Leucaena Research Report 3, 23.Google Scholar
Jones, R. J., Blunt, C. G. & Nurenberg, B. I. (1978). Toxicity of Leucaena leucocephala. The effect of iodine and mineral supplements on penned steers fed a sole diet of Leucaena. Australian Veterinary Journal 54, 387392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kailas, M. M. (1991). Studies on use of Leucaena leucocephala (subabul) in the feeding of cattle. PhD Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.Google Scholar
Kaneko, J. J. (1989). Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 4th edn. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Khattab, H. M., El-Alamy, H. A., El-Nor, S. A. H. A., Salem, F. A. F. & Abdou, M. M. A. (1998). Effect of protein source on milk yield and composition of lactating buffaloes. Egyptian Journal of Dairy Science 26, 123.Google Scholar
Maasdorp, B. V., Muchenje, V. & Titterton, M. (1999). Palatability and effect on dairy cow milk yield of dried fodder from the forage trees Accacia boliviana, Calliandra calothyrus and Leucaena leucocephala. Animal Feed Science and Technology 77, 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, J. A. (1995). Hormonal mediators of growth and immunity. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 62, 2123.Google Scholar
Megarrity, R. G. (1978). An automated colorimetric method for mimosine in Leucaena leaves. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 182186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Megarrity, R. G. & Jones, R. J. (1983). Toxicity of Leucaena leucocephala in ruminants: the effect of supplemental thyroxine on goats fed on a sole diet of Leucaena. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 791798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) (1984). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants, Reference Book 433. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Mtenga, L. A. & Shoo, R. A. (1990). Growth rate, feed intake and feed utilization of small East African goats supplemented with Leucaena leucocephala. Small Ruminant Research 3, 918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. W. (1994). The nutritive value of tree legumes. In Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture (Eds Gutteridge, R. C. & Shelton, H. M.), pp. 171191. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Padmavathy, P. & Shobha, S. (1987). Effect of processing on protein quality and mimosine content of subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) seeds. Journal of Food Science and Technology – Mysore 24, 180182.Google Scholar
Pattanaik, A. K., Sastry, V. R. B. & Katiyar, R. C. (1999). Effect of different degradable protein and starch sources on the blood metabolites and rumen biochemical profile of early weaned crossbred calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 12, 728734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanaik, A. K., Khan, S. A., Kumar, A. & Bedi, S. P. S. (2000). Influence of iodine supplementation on the performance of goats fed Leucaena leaf meal containing diet. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 12451248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanaik, A. K., Khan, S. A., Varshney, V. P. & Bedi, S. P. S. (2001). Effect of iodine level in mustard (Brassica juncea) cake-based concentrate on nutrient utilization and serum thyroid hormones of goats. Small Ruminant Research 41, 5159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratchett, D., Jones, R. J. & Syrch, F. X. (1991). Use of mimosine degrading rumen bacteria to overcome toxicity in cattle grazing irrigated leucaena pasture. Tropical Grassland 25, 268274.Google Scholar
Rajendran, D., Pattanaik, A. K., Khan, S. A. & Bedi, S. P. S. (2001 a). Iodine supplementation of Leucaena leucocephala diet for goats. 1. Effects on nutrient utilization. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 14, 785790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajendran, D., Pattanaik, A. K., Khan, S. A. & Bedi, S. P. S. (2001 b). Iodine supplementation of Leucaena leucocephala diet for goats. 2. Effects on blood metabolites and thyroid hormones. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 14, 791796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna, C., Prasad, M. C., Kumar, R., Singh, S. K. & Kumar, R. (1991). Effect of induced hypothyroidism on immune status of goats. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology 15, 59.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Soller, H. & Woodward, A. (1990). Fodder tree and straw diets for sheep: Intake, growth, digestibility and the effects of phenolics on nitrogen utilization. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30, 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regius-Mocseny, A., Szelenyi-Galantal, M., Dinnyes-Simig, J. & Votisky-Varga, E. (1992). Correlation between iodine supply and protein utilization. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 41, 271276.Google Scholar
Reis, P. J., Tunks, D. A. & Hegarty, M. P. (1975). Fate of mimosine administered orally to sheep and its effectiveness as a defleecing agent. Australian Journal of Biological Science 28, 495501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, D. E., Brown, W. F., Ruegseggar, G. & Bates, D. B. (1994 a). Replacement value of tree legumes for concentrates in forage based diets. II. Replacement value of Leucaena leucocephala and Gliricidia sepium for lactating goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 46, 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, D. E., Brown, W. F., Ruegseggar, G. & Bates, D. B. (1994 b). Replacement value of tree legumes for concentrates in forage based diets. I. Replacement value of Gliricidia sepium for growing goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 46, 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittner, U. & Reed, J. D. (1992). Phenolics and in vitro degradability of protein and fiber in West African browse. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58, 2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schone, F. G., Steinbach, E., Kirchner, A., Henig, A. & Ludke, H. (1987). Influence of diets with rapeseed meal containing varying amounts of goitrogenic compounds or iodine on performance, immune response and some blood serum parameters in growing pigs. Acta Veterinaria Brno 56, 281296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevi, A., Annicchiarico, G., Albenzio, M., Taibi, L., Muscio, A. & Dell'aquila, S. (2001). Effects of solar radiation and feeding time on behavior, immune response and production of lactating ewes under high ambient temperature. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 629640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shetaewi, M. M. & Ross, T. T. (1991). Effects of concentrate supplementation and lasalocid on serum chemistry and hormone profiles in Rambouillet ewes. Small Ruminant Research 4, 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods, 9th edn. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S. N. L. & Sharma, K. (1998). Response of goats to pelleted diets containing different proportions of sun-dried Leucaena leucoceophala. Small Ruminant Research 28, 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanbury, J. B. & Pinchera, A. (1994). Measurement of iodine deficiency disorders. In S.O.S. for a Billion: The Conquest of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (Eds Hetzel, B. S. and Pandav, C. S.), pp. 7388. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tangendjaja, B., Lowry, J. B. & Wills, R. B. H. (1984). Optimization of conditions for the degradation of mimosine in Leucaena leucocephala leaf. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 613616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangendjaja, B., Rahardjo, Y. C. & Lowry, J. B. (1990). Leucaena leaf meal in the diet of growing rabbits: evaluation and effect of a low mimosine treatment. Animal Feed Science and Technology 29, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, N. W., Macmeniman, N. P. & Daniel, R. C. W. (1991). Voluntary feed intake and digestibility by red deer (Cervus elaphus) and sheep (Ovis ovis) of pangola grass (Digitaria decumbens) with or without a supplement of Leucaena leucocephala. Small Ruminant Research 5, 337345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, R. A., Davison, T. F. & Payne, L. N. (1990). Effects of thyroid hormones on humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Development and Comparative Immunology 14, 305318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yami, A., Litherland, A. J., Davis, J. J., Sahlu, T., Puchala, R. & Goetsch, A. L. (2000). Effect of dietary level of Leucaena leucocephala on performance of Angora and Spanish doelings. Small Ruminant Research 38, 1727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental feeds

Figure 1

Table 2. Influence of iodine supplementation of leucaena diet on intake and digestibility coefficients

Figure 2

Table 3. Influence of iodine supplementation of leucaena diet on LW change and nitrogen balance

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Periodic alterations in the serum T3 concentrations in goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Periodic alterations in the serum T4 concentrations in goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.

Figure 5

Table 4. Effects of iodine supplementation to leucaena diet on serum biochemistry and thyroid hormones*

Figure 6

Fig. 3. DTH response to intra-dermal inoculation of phytohaemagglutinin-P by goats fed control diet (◆) or diets containing leucaena leaf meal with (△) and without (□) iodine.