Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-dkgms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T13:50:49.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atypical social cognitive processing in premotor Huntington’s disease: a single case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2015

T. Burke*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
D. Healy
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
P. Casey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
O. Hardiman
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Department of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
N. Pender
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland Academic Unit of Neurology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: T. Burke, Department of Psychology, Lower Ground Floor, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland. (Email: burket2@tcd.ie)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

We report the case of a 52-year-old male with pre-motor Huntington’s disease (HD) who has undergone detailed clinical and neuropsychological examination. This patient’s negative symptomatology and behavioural change are having a detrimental impact on his social, occupational and interpersonal life, in the absence of motor symptoms.

Methods

The patient has undergone repeat neuropsychological testing (T1 aged 50; T2 aged 52) with particular focus on executive function and social cognition on repeat testing.

Results

This case details a specific manifestation of HD relating to behavioural, psychiatric and social affective deficits.

Conclusions

This case illustrates how social cognitive changes can occur in HD, months and even years prior to the onset of motor features and how such unrecognized deficits can have a deleterious impact on an individual’s functional ability and lifestyle, before the disease is traditionally considered to have become manifest.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2015 

Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant, progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by chorea, cognitive decline and psychiatric illness, with associated behavioural difficulties (Walker Reference Abu-Akel and Shamay-Tsoory2007). HD is reported to have an incidence of 6.4/100 000 in Northern Ireland (Morrison et al. Reference Bowers, Blonder and Heilman1995), although prevalence is unknown in the Republic of Ireland. HD is caused by a trinucleotide repeat expansion (CAG) in the huntingtin gene located on chromosome 4p16.3 (Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group Reference Calder, Keane, Young, Lawrence, Mason and Barker1993). Subtle cognitive decline has been reported before the onset of motor features in patients with genetically confirmed HD (Henley et al. Reference Delis, Kramer, Kaplan and Holdnack2012; Paulsen et al. Reference Damasio and Maurer2013), although the focus herein is on social-affect deficits, specifically as social cognition can deteriorate over the course of the disease (Sprengelmeyer et al. Reference Dubois, Slachevsky, Litvan and Pillon2006; for a review of global cognitive decline in prodromal HD, see Paulsen et al. Reference Damasio and Maurer2013).

Social cognition refers to the cognitive processes associated with social interaction, which encompass the ability to recognize, process, and express emotions (Ekman Reference Duff, Beglinger, Therlault, Allison and Paulsen1992; Ekman Reference Ekman1993). These have been shown to be problematic in neurodegenerative diseases (Müller & Bekkelund Reference Ekman2013), including HD (Johnson et al. Reference Grace and Malloy2007). Some studies maintain that poor performance on tasks that examine the recognition of emotional stimuli, by patients with HD, may be due to task difficulty rather than specific social affective dysfunction associated with emotional processing (Midlers et al. Reference Hart, Dumas, Giltay, Middelkoop and Roos2003). However, impairment has been noted in the recognition of certain emotions in patients with HD, such as sadness and disgust, using a range of stimuli in different modalities (Snowden et al. Reference Henley, Marianne, Frost, King, Tabrizi and Warren2008). Modalities such as facial recognition of emotion (Calder et al. 2010) and prosodic tone in an individual’s voice (Snowden et al. Reference Johnson, Stout, Solomon, Langbehn, Aylward, Cruce, Ross, Nance, Kayson, Julian-Baros, Hayden, Kieburtz, Guttman, Oakes, Shoulson, Beglinger, Duff, Penziner and Paulsen2003) have evidenced deficits in emotive processing in patients with manifest HD (Henley et al. Reference Delis, Kramer, Kaplan and Holdnack2012).

Social cognition is theorized to be a sub-element of the executive system (Damasio & Maurer Reference Kenny, Coen, Frewen, Donoghue, Cronin and Savva1978); however, there is an increasing body of evidence suggesting that social cognition is characterized by its own subcomponents referred to as ‘Theory of Mind’ (ToM; Sprengelmeyer et al. Reference Dubois, Slachevsky, Litvan and Pillon2006). ToM is further categorized into ‘cognitive’ and ‘affective’ subtypes. Cognitive ToM governs the recognition that others may have knowledge and beliefs, which are different to one’s own (Abu-Akel & Shamay-Tsoory Reference Midlers, Crawford, Lamb and Simpson2011), whereas affective ToM is the ability to infer another’s emotional state and modulate socially appropriate behaviour accordingly (Shamay-Tsoory & Aharon-Peretz Reference Morey2007).

Social breakdown and interpersonal difficulties are common features of HD, and these may be mediated by cognitive dysfunction. Within the literature, it is unclear as to whether a common underlying executive deficit mediates impairment on tasks of social cognition. A limitation of many studies in HD is the use of single modality testing and sampling of manifest HD who exhibit co-morbid executive function.

A minority of individuals with HD have cognitive decline before the onset of motor features (Paulsen & Long Reference Morrison, Johnston and Nevin2014). Recent findings demonstrate how cognitive deterioration can be seen in persons with HD with no overt motor signs or symptoms, suggesting that subtle cognitive onset may precede motor features (Paulsen & Long Reference Morrison, Johnston and Nevin2014).

Behavioural/social-cognitive decline may occur before the onset of motor features, due to neurodegeneration in basal ganglia circuitry. The fronto-striatal system has been noted, in imaging studies of prodromal HD, to show local and global atrophy in the fronto-striatal tracts over a decade before symptom onset (Rees et al. Reference Müller and Bekkelund2013; Paulsen & Long Reference Morrison, Johnston and Nevin2014).

Detailed neuropsychological assessment is required with patients in order to delineate differential deficits in the expression, identification and recognition of emotion, as patients may present with heterogeneous neuropsychological deficits over time (Novak & Tabrizi Reference Nasreddine, Philips, Bédirian, Charbonneau, Whitehead, Collin, Cummins and Chertkow2010; Hart et al. Reference Novak and Tabrizi2013). We describe the case of genetically confirmed pre-manifest HD patient with specific social-affective deficits before the onset of motor features.

Case presentation

The patient was a 50-year old, right-handed Caucasian Irish male with 12 years of education and genetically confirmed HD (expansion of 41±1 CAG repeat). The patient had initially been assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al. Reference Paulsen and Long2005) and scored 27 of 30, within the average range for an Irish cohort (Kenny et al. Reference Paulsen, Smith and Long2013), when he initially presented in early 2011.

The patient, ‘Mr. A’ reported feeling ‘flat’, reported no disturbance of sleep, appetite or subjective low mood. He displayed insight into his lack of motivation for social activities, family and home life. Before presenting at his local services in early 2011, according to his wife, he had become more intolerant, he was difficult to interact and live with, and he could suddenly present as ‘acutely irate’ over small things, and then return to a ‘flat’ state. She referred to her husband as ‘lacking emotion’, stating that his symptoms were new, and that ‘he was not the man she married 20 years ago’, indicating a huge change from his premorbid personality. Together they have two children, although both report that he has become much more distant from them in recent times.

Mr. A was not formally employed at the time of his initial examination. He continued to earn an income by managing property, although he commonly reported interpersonal difficulties with his clients. Collateral interview, with his wife of over 20 years confirms this, and she further reported that these hostile interactions as new onset. Mr. A’s wife reports that his behaviour antagonizes clients, instigates interpersonal difficulties and there is often little resolution.

Mr. A’s father and paternal uncle were genetically diagnosed with HD. On examination, by an expert movement disorder specialist in 2012, our patient was described as physically unremarkable, and prodromal by traditional clinical characterization. Clinically, a major concern was effective treatment options for our patient, based on whether his new onset presentation was a reactive depression, or a premotor pathological decline in his HD.

Our patient had been attending a consultant psychiatrist, with a working diagnosis of idiopathic depression. After a multidisciplinary team and family meeting in late 2012, his anti-depressive medications were ceased and psychotherapeutic intervention commenced, as the patient was not experiencing any relief from medication. At that time, the evidence supported a severe apathetic profile, although our patient was not endorsing depressive or anxiety symptoms on empirical assessment.

The patient was referred for further psychotherapeutic, neuropsychological and neurological review in early 2013. At this time, he completed an initial neuropsychological screening assessment (see Table 1). The patient was initially tested using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (Randolph Reference Randolph1998), which is reported to be reliable in the clinical assessment of cognition in HD (Duff et al. Reference Rees, Scahill and Hobbs2010). The patient continued, and continues, psychotherapeutic intervention. He reported that his symptoms have not been alleviated dramatically, and endorsed feeling flat, severely lacking empathy, and low tolerance for family, friends or social engagement.

Table 1 Results from clinic-based neuropsychological assessment (percentile scores) RCI, Reliable Change Index

After ∼1 year, in early 2014, the team re-assessed the patient and his clinical presentation remained unchanged. During his annual follow-up assessment, the patient was assessed on an alternate form of the screening tool outlined below. Published normative age-matched data were used to compile standardized scores represented in Table 1.

One should interpret the differences in percentile scores with caution, and consider the accompanied Reliable Change Indices (RCIs). The patient appears to have dropped from the 74th to the 32nd percentile; however, this is reflective of a drop of one raw score on repeat assessment. Due to the fluctuations in the scoring pattern, RCIs were calculated for each of the measures, with none reaching significance. At the time of this assessment, he was further assessed on measures investigating executive processes and social cognitive processes in detail.

Neuropsychological assessment

Mr A’s estimated premorbid Full Scale IQ, using the Test of Premorbid Function (TOPF-UK), was estimated to be within the average range, standard score 107, functioning at the 68th percentile. On the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale, our patient scored at maximum level, at both time points, indicating no functional disability (100/100). Mr A had not been evaluated on this measure before cognitive testing, as he did not present clinically with motor symptoms. On the Frontal Assessment Battery (Dubois et al. Reference Shamay-Tsoory and Aharon-Peretz2000), he scored 17 of 18, with a reduced fluency score, congruent with the MoCA completed in 2011.

Scores were within the subclinical range for alexithymia, depression, anxiety and dissociative disorders on self-report questionnaires. On the Personality Assessment Inventory (Morey Reference Snowden, Austin, Sembi, Thompson, Craufurd and Neary1991), the patient scored within the clinical range for depression with elevation on the ‘Non-Support’ scale. A t-score >65t is considered in the clinically significant range.

The Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale (Grace & Malloy Reference Snowden, Gibbon, Blackshaw, Doubleday, Thompson, Craufurd, Foster, Happé and Neary2001), a self- and proxy-report, measured apathy, executive function and disinhibition differences prior and subsequent to onset of illness (Fig 1).

Fig. 1 Self- and Proxy-Frontal System Behavioural Scale (FrSBe).

Executive functions were assessed using the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS; Delis et al. Reference Sprengelmeyer, Schroeder, Young and Epplen2004). Our patient performed within the expected range for tests of executive function, based on premorbid estimations. Scores were evidenced within the borderline impaired range on measures of phonemic fluency (see Table 2), although no set-loss or repetition errors were evident.

Table 2 Supplementary investigations at T2: social affect and executive function scores (percentiles)

D-KEFS, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System.

On the Social Faux Pas Recognition Test (Stone et al. Reference Stone, Baron-Cohen and Knight1998), a measure of cognitive ToM, our patient scored accurately on the experimental and control subtests. The Florida Affect Battery (Bowers et al. 1999) was used to assess this man’s ability on identity discrimination, emotional discrimination and emotional processing through facial, prosodic, and cross-modal tasks.

Our patient scored within the average range on a measure of facial affect processing. Subsequent to this, he was asked to verbally label emotive facial expressions in this task and his score was within the average range. Mr A was then asked to identify the picture of the face that corresponds to the emotion named by the examiner (i.e. ‘point to the angry face’). His score was reflected within the impaired range. Our patient was asked to match a target expression from presented choices, and his score was reflected within the impaired range

In the emotional prosody discrimination task, the patient was presented pairs of semantically neutral sentences that are spoken in the same or different emotional tone of voice. He achieved a score within the impaired range. On an emotional prosody identification task, assessing the ability to verbally label affective prosody, he achieved a score within the impaired range.

The patient further listened to emotionally intoned sentences whose semantic content may differ (i.e. conflict) or be parallel the prosodic message. On the incongruent task, our patient achieved a score in the impaired range. Interestingly, on the congruent task our patient scored within the high average range achieving a score at the 84th percentile, as seen in Table 2.

Lastly, the patient was shown a picture of an emotional face, and at the same time, he listened to sentences spoken in a different emotional tone. When the patient was asked to indicate which of three facial stimuli best represented an emotional tone, he performed within the impaired range.

Discussion

This case report describes a patient with genetically confirmed HD who is clinically in the pre-manifest stage. Comparing clinic-based assessments, our patient showed subtle cognitive and behavioural change over an annual period, consistent with HD, although not to a clinically or statistically relevant degree. He presents with severe apathy, and evidenced specific deficits relating to social affective processing, which was recorded using both visual, auditory and cross-modal measurements, in the absence of any motor symptoms.

Mr A had an elevated ‘Non-support’ scale score, whereby a score above 70t may represent combative family relationships, where friends are also unavailable or unhelpful. This is unsurprising considering the aforementioned social context this man is operating within.

On assessment, the patient showed a discrepancy between elements of social-affective processes, with impairments noted at the 1st percentile, compared with social-cognitive and executive tasks within the average range. Social-affect deficits were found on facial, prosodic and cross-modal measures of emotional processing. Lower scores were noted on the more executively loaded subtests of the D-KEFS, which may be indicative of a progressive disease trajectory typically seen in HD, however, Mr A has consistently scored poorly on measures of phonemic fluency, reporting ‘he was never good with words’.

This profile is suggestive of a specific social-affective cognitive deficit, likely to be secondary to prodromal Huntington’s disease, based on this man’s confirmed genetic diagnosis and new cognitive symptomatology. It may also be plausible that this patient’s disease is becoming more manifest, amplifying specific deficits, which were subclinical until recently. It is for this reason, auxiliary cognitive processes, such as executive functions, may appear relatively intact at this time. This case highlights a behaviourally interesting and scarcely reported domain-specific cognitive impairment within a pre-motor HD case, consequently creating dramatic behavioural implications in his life. Although limitations exist when reporting any single case, it is felt that this case delineates aspects of the behavioural and neuropsychological profile of genetically confirmed prodromal HD.

A limitation of this case report is that the patient had no extensive assessment before his more detailed neurocognitive evaluation in 2013, with a focus on executive function and/or social cognitive functioning. This may have been beneficial in categorizing the trajectory and rate of overall cognitive decline and behavioural features of this case; however, such an assessment was not initially indicated given his lack of overt symptoms at that point.

In future, it may be of clinical benefit to investigate social-affective deficits in prodromal HD, and other clinical presentations, where an idiopathic/organic depressive syndrome is possible, yet the presentation is unclear. Future clinic-based screening assessments should aim to delineate premorbid characteristics, functional decline and to empirically quantify the difficulties experienced by patients with genetically confirmed HD in the pre-manifest stage. Lastly, the emerging deficits in social cognition may explain the considerable interpersonal difficulties noted in early HD patients, which may in turn contribute to the behavioural profile, as these may often be masked by ancillary difficulties as the disease progresses. To this end, clinic-based assessment should routinely include measures of social cognitive processes, and clinicians should refer patients with neurodegenerative conditions for full neuropsychological assessment. Further references relative to assessments are available upon request from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the patient and his family for allowing them to report on this case. The research leading to these results has received funding from the Irish Institute of Clinical Neuroscience (IICN; 12549. 201616).

Authors’ Contributions

Authors of this work were directly involved in the assessment and clinical care of this patient. Furthermore, all authors contributed to the design, review and overall development of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

References

Abu-Akel, A, Shamay-Tsoory, S (2011). Neuroanatomical and neurochemical bases of theory of mind. Neuropsychologia 49, 29712984.Google Scholar
Bowers, D, Blonder, XM, Heilman, KM (1999). The Florida Affect Battery Revised: Introduction to the Florida Affect Battery. neurology.ufl.edu/files/2011/12/florida-affect-battery-manual.pdf. Last accessed 7 August 2014.Google Scholar
Calder, AJ, Keane, J, Young, AW, Lawrence, AD, Mason, S, Barker, RA (2010). The relation between anger and different forms of disgust: implications for emotional recognition impairments in Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia 48, 27192729.Google Scholar
Damasio, AR, Maurer, RG (1978). A neurological model for childhood autism. Archives of Neurology 35, 777786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, DC, Kramer, JH, Kaplan, E, Holdnack, J (2004). Reliability and validity of the Delis-Kaplan executive function system: an update. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 10, 301303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B, Slachevsky, A, Litvan, I, Pillon, B (2000). The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 55, 16211626.Google Scholar
Duff, K, Beglinger, LJ, Therlault, D, Allison, J, Paulsen, JS (2010). Cognitive deficits in Huntington’s disease on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 32, 231238.Google Scholar
Ekman, P (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion 6, 169200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48, 384392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grace, J, Malloy, PF (2001). Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.: Lutz, Florida.Google Scholar
Hart, EP, Dumas, EM, Giltay, EJ, Middelkoop, HAM, Roos, RAC (2013). Cognition in Huntington’s disease in manifest, pre-manifest and converting gene carriers over ten years. Journal of Huntington’s Disease 2, 137147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henley, SMD, Marianne, NJU, Frost, C, King, J, Tabrizi, SJ, Warren, JD (2012). Emotional recognition in Huntington’s disease: a systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 36, 237253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group (1993). A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable in Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 72, 971983.Google Scholar
Johnson, SA, Stout, JC, Solomon, AC, Langbehn, DR, Aylward, EH, Cruce, CB, Ross, CA, Nance, M, Kayson, E, Julian-Baros, E, Hayden, MR, Kieburtz, K, Guttman, M, Oakes, D, Shoulson, I, Beglinger, L, Duff, K, Penziner, E, Paulsen, JS; Predict-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group (2007). Beyond disgust: impaired recognition of negative emotions prior to diagnosis in Huntington’s disease. Brain 130, 17321744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenny, RA, Coen, RF, Frewen, J, Donoghue, OA, Cronin, H, Savva, GM (2013). Normative values of cognitive and physical function in older adults: findings from the Irish longitudinal study on aging. The American Geriatrics Society 61, 52795290.Google Scholar
Midlers, M, Crawford, JR, Lamb, A, Simpson, SA (2003). Differential deficits in expression recognition in gene-carriers and patients with Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia 41, 14841492.Google Scholar
Morey, LC (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, Florida.Google Scholar
Morrison, PJ, Johnston, WP, Nevin, NC (1995). The epidemiology of Huntington’s disease in Northern Ireland. Journal of Medical Genetics 32, 524530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, KI, Bekkelund, SI (2013). Visual impairment and posterior cortical atrophy preceding rapid progressive dementia. BMJ Case Reports 2, 17571790.Google Scholar
Nasreddine, ZS, Philips, NA, Bédirian, V, Charbonneau, S, Whitehead, V, Collin, I, Cummins, JL, Chertkow, H (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 695699.Google Scholar
Novak, MJ, Tabrizi, SJ (2010). Huntington’s disease. British Medical Journal 340, 3440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulsen, JS, Long, JD (2014). Onset of Huntington’s disease: can it be purely cognitive? Movement Disorders 29, 13421360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulsen, JS, Smith, MM, Long, JD, The PREDICT HD Investigators and Coordinators of the Huntington’s Study Group (2013). Cognitive decline in prodromal Huntington’s disease: implications for clinical trials. Cognitive Neurology 84, 12331239.Google ScholarPubMed
Randolph, C (1998). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Manual. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio.Google Scholar
Rees, EM, Scahill, RI, Hobbs, NZ (2013). Longitudinal neuroimaging biomarkers in Huntington’s disease. Journal of Huntington’s Disease 2, 2139.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, SG, Aharon-Peretz, J (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: a lesion study. Neuropsychologia 45, 30543067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowden, JS, Austin, NA, Sembi, S, Thompson, JC, Craufurd, D, Neary, D (2008). Emotional recognition in Huntington’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 46, 26382649.Google Scholar
Snowden, JS, Gibbon, ZC, Blackshaw, A, Doubleday, E, Thompson, J, Craufurd, D, Foster, J, Happé, F, Neary, D (2003). Social cognition in frontotemporal dementia and Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia 41, 688701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprengelmeyer, R, Schroeder, U, Young, AW, Epplen, JT (2006). Disgust in pre-clinical Huntington’s disease: a longitudinal study. Neuropsychologia 44, 518533.Google Scholar
Stone, VE, Baron-Cohen, S, Knight, RT (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10, 640656.Google Scholar
Walker, FO (2007). Huntington’s disease. Lancet 369, 218228.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Results from clinic-based neuropsychological assessment (percentile scores) RCI, Reliable Change Index

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Self- and Proxy-Frontal System Behavioural Scale (FrSBe).

Figure 2

Table 2 Supplementary investigations at T2: social affect and executive function scores (percentiles)