Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T14:43:04.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WHO'S BETTER NOT BEST: APPROPRIATE PROBABILISTIC UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2003

Douglas Coyle
Affiliation:
Ottawa Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of probabilistic analysis as a means for analyzing uncertainty within economic analysis has grown in popularity in recent years as it has been recognized as the most complete method for propagating uncertainty with respect to input parameters in terms of uncertainty about outcomes of interest. The World Health Organization (WHO) in a series of recent reports and publications have recognized the role of probabilistic analysis in what they term generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. However, there are fundamental problems with the analysis and the interpretation of such analysis as proposed by WHO. This study highlights three specific points for concern and offers constructive criticism by recommending more appropriate approaches.

Type
RESEARCH NOTES
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press