Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:18:12.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HEALTH CARE RESOURCE USE AND STROKE OUTCOME

Multinational Comparisons within the GAIN International trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2003

Kjell Asplund
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
Sharron Ashburner
Affiliation:
Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Greenford, UK
Kathy Cargill
Affiliation:
Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Greenford, UK
Margaret Hux
Affiliation:
Innovus Research, Burlington, Canada
Ken Lees
Affiliation:
University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
Michael Drummond for the GAIN International Investigators
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background and Purpose: Outcome in patients hospitalized for acute stroke varies considerably between populations. Within the framework of the GAIN International trial, a large multicenter trial of a neuroprotective agent (gavestinel, glycine antagonist), stroke outcome in relation to health care resource use has been compared in a large number of countries, allowing for differences in case mix.

Methods: This substudy includes 1,422 patients in 19 countries grouped into 10 regions. Data on prognostic variables on admission to hospital, resource use, and outcome were analyzed by regression models.

Results: All results were adjusted for differences in prognostic factors on admission (NIH Stroke Scale, age, comorbidity). There were threefold variations in the average number of days in hospital/institutional care (from 20 to 60 days). The proportion of patients who met with professional rehabilitation staff also varied greatly. Three-month case fatality ranged from 11% to 28%, and mean Barthel ADL score at three months varied between 64 and 73. There was no relationship between health care resource use and outcome in terms of survival and ADL function at three months. The proportion of patients living at home at three months did not show any relationship to ADL function across countries.

Conclusions: There are wide variations in health care resource use between countries, unexplained by differences in case mix. Across countries, there is no obvious relationship between resource use and clinical outcome after stroke. Differences in health care traditions (treatment pathways) and social context seem to be major determinants of resource use. In making comparisons between countries, great care should be exercised in using outcome variables as indicators of quality of stroke care.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press